PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.421 / 104th Congress

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to provide for the purchase of common stock of Cook Inlet Region, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 104-10.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Feb 21, 1995

Amends the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to authorize the Cook Inlet Regional Corporation (Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated) to purchase its shareholder-held common stock. States that neither Cook Inlet Regional Corporation nor a member of the board of directors or officers of Cook Inlet Regional Corporation shall be liable for damages resulting from a good faith stock purchase offer.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large] · R–AK

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 104-10.

    2. Became Public Law No: 104-10.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    9. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S5681-5682)

    10. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S5681-5682)

    11. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 43.

    12. Received in the Senate.

    13. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    14. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    15. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    17. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3098-3099)

    18. Mr. Young (AK) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    19. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 20.

    20. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-40.

    21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 104-40.

    22. Executive Comment Received from Interior.

    23. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    24. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    25. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    26. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    27. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2-3)

    28. Introduced in House

    29. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.421 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.421 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.421 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.421 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources