PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4204 / 109th Congress

American River Pump Station Project Transfer Act of 2006

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · May 9, 2006

American River Pump Station Project Transfer Act of 2006 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to transfer ownership of the American River Pump Station Project located at Auburn, California, to the Placer County Water Agency.

Makes federal costs associated with construction of the Project nonreimbursable. Authorizes the Secretary to grant title to the Agency to provide a water supply to that Agency. Requires the Secretary, before conveying such land and facilities, to comply with requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and any other applicable law.

Provides that upon the transfer, the United States shall not be liable for damages relating to the land or facilities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Doolittle, John T. [R-CA-4] · R–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.

    2. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    4. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2188)

    5. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2188)

    6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4204.

    7. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2188-2189)

    8. Mr. Radanovich moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 238.

    10. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 109-430.

    11. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 109-430.

    12. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    13. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    14. Subcommittee on Water and Power Discharged.

    15. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    16. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water and Power.

    17. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    18. Introduced in House

    19. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4204 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4204 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4204 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4204 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources