PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4203 / 106th Congress

Over-the-Counter Derivatives Systemic Risk Reduction Act of 2000

Referred to the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 6, 2000

Over-the-Counter Derivatives Systemic Risk Reduction Act of 2000 - States that the operation of a multilateral clearing organization for over-the-counter derivative instruments is limited to: (1) banks; and (2) certain corporations chartered under the Federal Reserve Act.Sets forth rules of construction to emphasize that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission retain their inherent jurisdiction over the trading and clearing activities within their respective purviews.States that a multilateral clearing organization under the jurisdiction of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) or the Comptroller of the Currency does not fall within the jurisdiction of any other Federal entity as a result of clearing any over-the-counter derivative instrument.States that no over-the-counter instrument to which a financial institution is a party shall be subject to rescission or held unenforceable based solely on the regulatory status or jurisdiction over such instrument under Federal or State law.Provides that an over-the-counter instrument does not fall within the purview of the Commodity Exchange Act as a consequence of being the subject of an electronic trade or communication.Authorizes the Board to appoint a conservator or receiver to take possession and control of a State bank which operates, or operates as, a multilateral clearing organization in the same manner as the Comptroller of the Currency may do so.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Leach, James A. [R-IA-1] · R–IA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
  • Financial Services Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials.

  2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Risk Management, Research and Specialty Crops.

  4. Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, Agriculture, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, Agriculture, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  6. Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, Agriculture, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  7. Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, Agriculture, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  8. Referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, Agriculture, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  9. Introduced in House

  10. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4203 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4203 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4203 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4203 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources