PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 31, 2017
Give Assistance and Help to Americans impacted by Natural Disasters Act or the Give A HAND Act
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow various tax credits, deductions, and modifications to existing rules in areas impacted by disasters.
With respect to areas in which a federally declared disaster occurred, the bill allows:
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
expensing of disaster expenses,
increased charitable contribution limits and mileage rates,
modifications to rules regarding deductions for losses,
waivers of certain mortgage revenue bond requirements,
increased expensing and bonus depreciation,
an increased new markets tax credit allocation,
penalty-free distributions from retirement plans,
an additional exemption for providing housing to displaced individuals,
an exclusion for cancellations of indebtedness,
the use of the previous year's income for calculating the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit,
an increased rehabilitation credit for buildings,
additional advance refundings of certain tax-exempt bonds,
disaster area recovery bonds,
additional low-income housing credit allocations,
an exclusion for disaster mitigation payments received from state and local governments,
a deduction for payments to a tax-exempt natural disaster fund,
a credit for a portion of the wages paid to employees,
an exclusion for employer-provided housing,
an enhanced deduction for medical expenses, and
extensions for tax and Medicare filing deadlines.
The bill also modifies several deductions, credits, and other tax provisions that affect Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
People & committees
Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D-MA-1] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 11, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4172 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4172 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4172 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4172 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.