PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Fiscal Affairs and Health.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 12, 1994
Federal Payment Formula Reauthorization Act of 1994 - Amends the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act to provide that the authorization of appropriations for the annual Federal payment to the District of Columbia for FY 1996 through 1998 shall be an amount equal to 24 percent of the adjusted District General Fund revenues for the second fiscal year preceding such fiscal year, as such revenues are reported in the audited financial report of the District of Columbia and as reviewed by the Comptroller General. Amends the District of Columbia Code to include, in the annual independent audit of the District's financial operations, a report of the adjusted District General Fund revenues for the fiscal year. Requires the Comptroller General to submit to specified congressional committees an annual review of such report.
People & committees
Rep. Bliley, Tom [R-VA-7] · R–VA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fiscal Affairs and Health.
Referred to the House Committee on District of Columbia.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4166 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4166 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4166 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4166 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.