PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.4119 / 114th Congress

Gulf Islands National Seashore Land Exchange Act of 2016

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 611.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Sep 6, 2016

Gulf Islands National Seashore Land Exchange Act of 2016

(Sec. 2) This bill authorizes the Department of the Interior, through the National Park Service, to convey to the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 5699 approximately 1.542 acres of real property located within the Gulf Islands National Seashore in Jackson County, Mississippi, in exchange for a parcel of 2.161 acres.

The values of the parcels of real property to be exchanged shall be equal, as determined by an appraisal conducted:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

by a qualified and independent appraiser, and

in accordance with nationally recognized appraisal standards.

If the values of such parcels of real property are not equal, their values shall be equalized through:

a cash payment, or

adjustments to their acreage.

Interior shall require the Post to cover Interior's costs to carry out the land exchange or to reimburse Interior for them. If Interior collects amounts from the Post in advance of incurring the actual costs, it shall refund to the Post any amount in excess of those costs.

The bill subjects the exchange to valid existing rights.

Land and interests acquired by the United States by this bill shall be administered as part of the Gulf Islands National Seashore.

Interior shall modify the boundaries of the Gulf Islands National Seashore to reflect such land exchange upon its completion.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Palazzo, Steven M. [R-MS-4] · R–MS

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 611.

    2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 114-340.

    3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 114-340.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

    5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Senate Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 114-502.

    6. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1523)

    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H1523)

    10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4119.

    11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1523-1524)

    12. Mr. McClintock moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    13. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 337.

    14. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 114-441.

    15. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 114-441.

    16. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    17. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    18. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged.

    19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    20. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

    21. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    22. Introduced in House

    23. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.4119 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.4119 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.4119 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.4119 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources