Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 23, 1998

Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act - Declares that the granting of additional slots for air service at LaGuardia Airport in New York shall be considered a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and requiring an environmental impact statement for purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Declares invalid the Secretary of Transportation's orders 97-10-17 and 98-4-22 granting slot exemptions at LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy airports.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Manton, Thomas J. [D-NY-7] · D–NY

Committees

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Natural Resources Committee

3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jul 6, 1998
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Jun 23, 1998
Referred to House Resources
Jun 23, 1998
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jun 23, 1998
Referred to House Transportation and Infrastructure
Jun 23, 1998
Introduced in House
Jun 23, 1998
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jun 23, 1998 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 3179 · Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.4117 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4117, 105th Congress: Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4117

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1998-06-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr4117/BILLS-105hr4117ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.4117 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.4117 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4117, 105th Congress: Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4117

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1998-06-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr4117/BILLS-105hr4117ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4117 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.4117 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4117, 105th Congress: Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4117

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1998-06-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr4117/BILLS-105hr4117ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4117 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.4117 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.4117, 105th Congress: Airport Environmental and Community Fairness Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4117

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1998-06-23.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr4117/BILLS-105hr4117ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:28Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.4117 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.