To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal limitations on the eligibility of dependents of civilian employees of the Federal Government residing in a territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States to enroll in Department of Defense domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 9, 2002
Allows a dependent of a Federal employee who is enrolled in an educational program provided by the Secretary of Defense in a U.S. territory, commonwealth, or possession and who is not residing on a military installation to continue such enrollment until the dependent's graduation (currently limited to five consecutive school years).Repeals the requirement that the Secretary be reimbursed by the appropriate agency head for education so provided to a dependent of an employee of a Federal agency outside the Department of Defense.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.4093 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.4093 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.4093 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.4093 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.