PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 11, 1994
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Advisory Opinion Act of 1994 - Amends title XI of the Social Security Act (SSA) to give the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to issue binding advisory opinions addressing certain matters, such as what constitutes prohibited remuneration or an inducement to reduce or limit Medicare or Medicaid services, and whether an arrangement or activity, actual or proposed, violates any other SSA provisions. Amends SSA title XVIII (Medicare) to give the Secretary the authority to issue binding advisory opinions on whether an arrangement or proposed arrangement will result in a prohibited physician referral. Requires the Secretary to issue regulations establishing systems for the issuance of the advisory opinions above.
People & committees
Rep. Hoagland, Peter [D-NE-2] · D–NE
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4028 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4028 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4028 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4028 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.