PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 21, 1998.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 9, 1998
Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to Kern County, California, three parcels of land under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service in Kern County known as Camp Owen, Wofford Heights Park, and the French Gulch maintenance yard in exchange for Greenhorn Mountain Park in Kern County for inclusion in Sequoia National Forest.
People & committees
Rep. Thomas, William M. [R-CA-21] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 21, 1998.
Committee on Commerce discharged.
Committee on Commerce discharged.
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 20, 1998.
House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 20, 1998.
House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 16, 1998.
House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 16, 1998.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-815, Part I.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-815, Part I.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health Discharged.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Executive Comment Requested from USDA.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.
Referred to House Transportation and Infrastructure
Referred to House Commerce
Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to House Resources
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.4023 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.4023 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.4023 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.4023 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.