To prohibit foreign assistance to Russia unless certain requirements relating to Russian intelligence activities, relations between Russia and certain neighboring countries, and the reform of the Russian economy are met.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 9, 1994
Prohibits providing Russia with foreign assistance for any fiscal year after FY 1995 unless the President certifies to the Congress for such fiscal year that: (1) the U.S. Government has received satisfactory assurances from the Government of Russia that Russia's intelligence activities in the United States are confined to routine, non-adversarial information gathering; (2) the Russian Government has concluded written agreements with the Governments of Latvia, Estonia, and Moldova on the unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from those nations and is making progress toward fulfilling the agreements, is not pursuing policies in the former Yugoslavia that are contrary to U.S. and allied interests, and is committed to (and taking concrete steps toward) reforming the Russian economy along free-market lines; (3) Russian troops in the Kaliningrad region of Russia are respecting the sovereign territory of Lithuania and neighboring countries and are not offensively postured against any other countries; and (4) the activities of the Russian Government in the independent states of the former Soviet Union do not represent an attempt by Russia to diminish the sovereignty and independence of such States. Prohibits, with respect to FY 1995, providing foreign assistance to Russia unless the President certifies to the Congress for that fiscal year that the Russian Government has provided the U.S. Government with a full and accurate accounting of the espionage activities related to the Aldrich Ames case. Requires the President to report to the Congress for each fiscal year: (1) the amount, purpose, and effectiveness of foreign assistance provided to Russia for the preceding fiscal year; (2) a detailed accounting of the amount of foreign assistance appropriated which has not been expended and its status; and (3) an estimate of the total amount of capital exported from Russia during the previous fiscal year. Expresses the sense of the Congress that the U.S. Government should oppose all lending to Russia by the international financial institutions to which the United States is a member unless the Russian Government is in compliance with the conditions for assistance set forth by this Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3992 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3992 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3992 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3992 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.