PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3967 / 111th Congress

To amend the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 to authorize appropriations through fiscal year 2015.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Jul 13, 2010

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Amends the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 to extend, through FY2015, the authorization of appropriations for grants to the Great Blacks in Wax Museum, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland, to carry out programs related to civil rights and juvenile justice through the National Great Blacks in Wax Museum and Justice Learning Center.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Cummings, Elijah E. [D-MD-7] · D–MD

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5507)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5507)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3967.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5507-5508)

  7. Ms. Bordallo moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 299.

  9. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  10. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  11. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 111-526, Part I.

  12. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 111-526, Part I.

  13. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  15. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Discharged.

  16. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

  18. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

  19. Referred to House Judiciary

  20. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  21. Referred to House Natural Resources

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3967 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3967 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3967 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3967 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources