PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 28, 2003
Do-Not-Call Implementation Act - Authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to promulgate regulations establishing fees to implement and enforce provisions relating to the "do-not-call" registry of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (provisions which prohibit a telemarketer from calling an individual listed on a do-not-call registry), as promulgated under the Telephone Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act. Allows such fees to be collected for FY 2003 through 2007.Directs the Federal Communications Commission to issue a final rule pursuant to a rulemaking proceeding begun under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act concerning its promulgation of do-not-call regulations.
People & committees
Rep. Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [R-LA-3] · R–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 108-10.
Became Public Law No: 108-10.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2500)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S2500)
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 7 (Roll no. 26). (text as passed House: CR H407)
House roll call 26 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 7 (Roll no. 26).(text as passed House: CR H407)
House roll call 26 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H416)
POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - The Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered and the Chair announced that further proceedings would be postponed until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 395.
Considered by previous order. (consideration: CR H407-413)
Consideration initiated by previous order.
Mr. Diaz-Balart, L. asked unanimous consent That it be in order at any time without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House H.R. 395, that the bill be considered as read for amendment; that it be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the Chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 108-8.
Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 108-8.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.395 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.395 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.395 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.395 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.