PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3929 / 107th Congress

Energy Pipeline Research, Development, and Demonstration Act

House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 22, 2002.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 12, 2002

Energy Pipeline Research, Development, and Demonstration Act - Directs the heads of the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (participating agencies) to develop and implement a cooperative Federal research, development, demonstration, and standardization program to ensure the integrity of pipeline facilities.Establishes a Pipeline Integrity Technical Advisory Committee to advise participating agencies on the development and implementation of a five-year program plan to guide research, development, demonstration, and standardization activities under this Act. Requires participating agencies to enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) detailing their respective responsibilities under this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hall, Ralph M. [D-TX-4] · D–TX

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
12 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 22, 2002.

  2. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 18, 2002.

  3. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 11, 2002.

  4. Committee on Transportation discharged.

  5. Committee on Transportation discharged.

  6. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 4, 2002.

  7. House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 4, 2002.

  8. House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 6, 2002.

  9. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 6, 2002.

  10. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than July 1, 2002.

  11. House Committee on Transportation Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than July 1, 2002.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 107-475, Part I.

  13. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 107-475, Part I.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.

  15. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  16. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

  18. Referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  19. Referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  20. Referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  21. Referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3929 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3929 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3929 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3929 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources