PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 24, 1994
NAFTA Pork Repeal Act of 1994 - Amends the North American Free Trade Implementation Act to repeal the authorization for (and thus eliminate): (1) the Center for the Study of Western Hemisphere Trade; (2) the North American Development Bank; (3) the snap-back tariff for orange juice; (4) the monitoring of tomato and pepper imports; and (5) data collection on fresh fruits, vegetables, and cut flowers. Prohibits the obligation or expenditure of any FY 1994 or 1995 appropriations for: (1) more than four C-17 military cargo aircraft; (2) construction of a highway connecting the Golden Gate and Antelope Valley highways north of the Santa Clarita Valley in California; or (3) construction or operation of a new agricultural research facility in Ft. Pierce, Florida, a new plutonium research laboratory in the Pantex Facility in Texas, or a new manufacturing technology facility in Henry County, Virginia. Limits to FY 1993 levels the amount of FY 1994 or 1995 appropriations that may be expended for U.S. Customs Service enforcement of textile and apparel rules.
People & committees
Rep. Zimmer, Dick [R-NJ-12] · R–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Acquisition.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3916 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3916 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3916 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3916 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.