PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3908 / 107th Congress

North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization Act

Became Public Law No: 107-308.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Oct 8, 2002

North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization Act - Amends the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to revise the findings and purposes of the Act.Revises the definition of "wetlands conservation project" to specify that: (1) water rights obtained as part of a real property interest must be those of a wetland ecosystem and associated habitat; and (2) habitat restored, managed, or enhanced must be associated with wetland ecosystems.Authorizes appropriations for FY 2003 through 2007 to carry out the purposes of the Act.Decreases the percentages of amounts available to carry out approved projects in Canada and Mexico.Revises cost-sharing requirements to state that, except for projects located on Federal lands and waters, as a condition for provision of assistance, the portion of project costs paid with amounts from non-Federal U.S. sources shall be equal to at least the amount allocated by the Secretary of the Interior under the Act.Makes technical corrections.Amends the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to extend the authorization through FY 2008.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hansen, James V. [R-UT-1] · R–UT

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 107-308.

    2. Became Public Law No: 107-308.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR 11/14/2002 H9018; text as House agreed to Senate amendments: CR 11/14/2002 H9018)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR 11/14/2002 H9018; text as House agreed to Senate amendments: CR 11/14/2002 H9018)

    10. Mr. Armey asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendments.

    11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    12. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11154-11155; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S11154-11155)

    13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11154-11155; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S11154-11155)

    14. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 692.

    15. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords with amendments. With written report No. 107-304.

    16. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords with amendments. With written report No. 107-304.

    17. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    18. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    19. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    20. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2123-2124)

    21. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2123-2124)

    22. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3908.

    23. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2123-2124)

    24. Mr. Simpson moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    25. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 251.

    26. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-421.

    27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-421.

    28. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    29. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    30. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    31. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    32. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    33. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans.

    34. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    35. Introduced in House

    36. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3908 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3908 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3908 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3908 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources