PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3861 / 103rd Congress

To amend the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act to permit the District of Columbia to subject the income of the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Student Loan Marketing Association to taxation by the District of Columbia, to require the Federal National Mortgage Association to maintain its principal office in the District of Columbia, and to require the Mayor of the District of Columbia to submit a report to Congress on the economic impact of such entities on the District of Columbia.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Fiscal Affairs and Health.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 1994

Amends the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act to: (1) include within the legislative power of the District of Columbia the power to subject the income of the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA) to taxation for any taxable year, beginning with 1994; and (2) require FNMA to maintain its principal office in the District. Directs the Mayor to study and report to specified congressional committees on the economic impact on the District of the activities of the FNMA, FHLMC, and SLMA, including an analysis of the potential effects on District revenues of permitting the District to subject such enterprises to taxation.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13] · D–CA

Committees

  • District of Columbia Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fiscal Affairs and Health.

    2. Referred to the House Committee on District of Columbia.

    3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E170-171)

    4. Introduced in House

    5. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 2, 2021. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3861 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3861 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3861 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3861 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources