PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 22, 2015
Broadband Conduit Deployment Act of 2015
This bill directs the Department of Transportation (DOT) to require states to evaluate the need for broadband conduit (fiber optic cables that support broadband or wireless facilities for broadband service) as part of any covered highway construction project (a project to construct a new highway or an additional lane or paved shoulder for an existing highway that receives funding under federal-aid highway provisions), in consultation with telecommunications providers. If the evaluation reveals a need in the next 15 years for broadband conduit beneath hard surfaces to be constructed by the project, the conduit shall be installed.
DOT shall establish standards to carry out installation requirements that consider:
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
the ability to accommodate broadband installation without impacting the safety, operations, and maintenance of the highway facility, its users, or others;
population density in the area;
the type of highway involved; and
existing broadband access in the area.
DOT shall ensure that:
an appropriate number of broadband conduits are installed along such highway to accommodate multiple broadband providers,
the size of conduit is consistent with industry best practices and sufficient to accommodate potential demand,
hand holes and manholes for fiber access and pulling such conduit are placed at intervals consistent with industry best practices,
installed conduit includes a pull tape and is capable of supporting fiber optic cable placement techniques consistent with industry best practices,
installed conduit is placed at a depth consistent with industry best practices and cable separation requirements of electrical codes, and
any requesting broadband provider has access to each broadband conduit installed on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis for a charge not to exceed a cost-based rate.
DOT may waive the requirements of this Act upon determining that the waiver is appropriate based upon:
a showing of undue burden,
a determination that the installation of conduit beneath hard surfaces is not necessary based on the availability of existing broadband infrastructure, or
a cost-benefit analysis.
People & committees
Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 12, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3805 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3805 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3805 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3805 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.