PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Dec 6, 2017

Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017

TITLE I--CONCEALED CARRY RECIPROCITY ACT OF 2017

(Sec. 101) This bill amends the federal criminal code to allow a qualified individual to carry a concealed handgun into or possess a concealed handgun in another state that allows individuals to carry concealed firearms.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by any state or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in his or her state of residence.

Additionally, the bill specifies that a qualified individual who lawfully carries or possesses a concealed handgun in another state: (1) is not subject to the federal prohibition on possessing a firearm in a school zone, and (2) may carry or possess the concealed handgun in federally owned lands that are open to the public.

(Sec. 102) This bill does not prohibit a law enforcement officer with reasonable suspicion of a violation of any law from conducting a brief investigative stop in accordance with the U.S. Constitution.

(Sec. 103) It specifies that certain retired and off-duty law enforcement officers who are authorized to carry concealed firearms are not subject to the federal prohibitions on possessing or discharging a firearm in a school zone.

(Sec. 104) It permits a federal judge to carry a concealed firearm in any state if the judge is not prohibited from receiving a firearm under federal law.

TITLE II--FIX NICS ACT

Fix NICS Act of 2017

(Sec. 202) This bill amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to require each federal agency and department, including a federal court, to:

certify whether it has provided to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) disqualifying records of persons prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm, and

establish and substantially comply with an implementation plan to maximize record submissions and verify their accuracy.

(Sec. 203) The bill amends the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 to modify the NICS Act Record Improvement Program (NARIP). Specifically, it:

establishes a domestic abuse and violence prevention initiative as a priority area for NARIP grant funding, and

creates a funding preference for states that establish an implementation plan and use grant funds to upload felony conviction and domestic violence records.

(Sec. 204) It amends the Crime Identification Technology Act of 1998 to modify the National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP). Specifically, it:

specifies that facilitating full participation in the NICS, as an allowable use of NCHIP grant funds, includes increasing efforts to pre-validate felony conviction and domestic violence records to expedite eligibility determinations; and

permits the federal share of a grant to exceed 90% of program costs if a state complies with its implementation plan.

(Sec. 205) This section amends the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 to:

direct the Department of Justice (DOJ), in coordination with each state or tribal government, to establish an implementation plan, including benchmarks, to maximize the automation and submission of mental health and criminal history records to the NICS;

require DOJ to conduct, and publish the results of, compliance determinations for state and tribal governments;

give preference to certain discretionary grant applicants that substantially comply with an implementation plan; and

require the NICS to notify law enforcement agencies when a firearm is transferred to a person who is subsequently determined to be prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm.

(Sec. 206) DOJ's Bureau of Justice Assistance must report to Congress on the use of bump stocks in the commission of crimes, including the number of instances and the types of firearms.

(Sec. 207) The bill authorizes appropriations for FY2018-FY2022 to carry out activities under this title.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-8] · R–NC

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
213 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 231 - 198 (Roll no. 663). (text: CR H9685-9688)

    House roll call 663 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 231 - 198 (Roll no. 663).(text: CR H9685-9688)

    House roll call 663 · Individual votes
  5. On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 190 - 236 (Roll no. 662).

    House roll call 662 · Individual votes
  6. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Thompson (CA) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the bill back to the House with an amendment to prohibit an individual who has been convicted of a violent crime within the preceding three years from possessing or carrying a concealed handgun in a State that by law prohibits a person from doing so on the basis of a conviction for such offense. The amendment also outlines what is considered a violent crime, and a conviction.

  8. Mr. Thompson (CA) moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H9701)

  9. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 38.

  11. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 38 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.

  12. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 645. (consideration: CR H9685-9703)

  13. Rule H. Res. 645 passed House.

  14. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 645 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 38 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.

  15. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 320.

  16. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-433.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-433.

  18. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 11.

  19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  20. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.

  21. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.38 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.38 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.38 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.38 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources