Joint Hearings Held by the Committee on Resources and by the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 30, 1998
Tribal Trust Fund Settlement Act of 1998 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to adjust the balances of tribal trust fund accounts to compensate for known errors in management and accounting. Describes procedures for netting such errors in determining the amount of adjustments. Includes interest from the date of the error to the date of adjustment in such adjustments. Makes a tribe's acceptance of compensation without prejudice to any claims the tribe may elect to settle or raise under this Act. (Sec. 6) Requires the Secretary to provide each tribe with two proposals for the comprehensive settlement of the tribe's covered claims. Defines "covered claims" as claims against the United States for losses resulting from deficiencies in the management and accounting of trust funds from July 1, 1972, through September 30, 1992, or the date of settlement, as selected by each tribe. Requires settlement proposals to reflect the likelihood that a tribe's account balance is understated as a result of such deficiencies and other factors appropriate in providing incentives to tribes to accept such proposals. (Sec. 7) Sets forth tribe options for responding to settlement proposals and a deadline for acceptance. (Sec. 8) Authorizes tribes that reject, or fail to respond to, settlement proposals to request the Secretary to enter into government-to-government negotiations to settle covered claims. Makes such negotiations nonbinding and requires facilitation by a mediator selected by the tribe from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Sets forth negotiation procedures and limitations. Provides for adjustment of account balances pursuant to accepted settlements. Declares that an accepted settlement constitutes a final resolution of covered claims and full discharge and release of the United States from liability. (Sec. 9) Grants the U.S. Court of Federal Claims: (1) exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate covered claims not otherwise settled for the period July 1, 1972, through September 30, 1992; and (2) jurisdiction with respect to claims filed after November 12, 1997, only upon a showing that a tribe participated in government-to-government negotiations and has not reached a settlement. Bars tribes that fail to make showings from bringing any covered claims under this Act or in any other forum. Prescribes claim filing deadlines. Directs the Secretary to file a reconciliation record of accounts for covered claims with the court. Requires simple interest to be paid at a rate of four percent of any amounts determined to be owing, payable from the date of loss. (Sec. 11) Caps attorney's fees for services rendered in connection with a claim. (Sec. 14) Authorizes appropriations. (Sec. 15) Permits the Secretary to pay a limited amount into the individual Indian money account pool necessary to replenish any deficiencies in the pool resulting from overdrafts made prior to this Act's enactment. Appropriates funds for such purpose. Authorizes the Secretary to eliminate accounting discrepancies occurring prior to this Act's enactment if the cost of further research to determine the cause of such discrepancies is likely to exceed the cost of clearing them. (Sec. 16) Permits the Secretary to make limited routine administrative adjustments to tribal trust fund and individual Indian money accounts attributable to transactions occurring after this Act's enactment.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3782 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3782 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3782 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3782 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.