PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3776 / 110th Congress

Energy Storage Technology Advancement Act of 2007

Hearing Held by Subcommittee by Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction and Referral (October 3, 2007).

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Oct 22, 2007

Energy Storage Technology Advancement Act of 2007 - (Sec. 3) Directs the Secretary of Energy to: (1) conduct programs of basic and applied research to support the development of energy storage systems for electric drive vehicles, stationary applications, and electricity transmission and distribution; and (2) award funds to, and coordinate activities with, stakeholders in the public, private, and academic sectors.

Authorizes appropriations for FY2009-FY2014.

(Sec. 5) Directs the Secretary to implement a program of new regionally diversified demonstrations of advanced energy storage systems to expand upon the existing technology demonstration program of the Department of Energy (DOE).

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Urges such demonstrations to include the participation of a range of stakeholders, such as rural electric cooperatives, investor owned utilities, municipally owned electric utilities, energy storage systems manufacturers, electric drive vehicle manufacturers, the renewable energy production industry, state or local energy offices, the fuel cell industry, and universities.

Authorizes appropriations for FY2009-FY2014.

(Sec. 6) Directs the Secretary to implement a demonstration program of electric drive vehicle energy storage technology, including integration of such systems on a prototype vehicular platform with drivetrain systems for passenger, commercial, and nonroad electric drive vehicles.

Requires such demonstrations to be conducted through consortia, which may include the same range of stakeholders suggested for the advanced energy storage systems demonstration program.

Authorizes appropriations for FY2009-FY2014.

(Sec. 7) Instructs the Secretary to carry out a program of research, development, and demonstration of: (1) secondary applications of energy storage devices following service in electric drive vehicles; and (2) technologies and processes for final recycling and disposal of these devices.

Authorizes appropriations for FY2009-FY2014.

(Sec. 8) Requires the Secretary to carry out the programs under this Act in compliance with the requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) for cost sharing and impartial review of the scientific and technical merit of award proposals.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gordon, Bart [D-TN-6] · D–TN

Committees

  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Hearing Held by Subcommittee by Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction and Referral (October 3, 2007).

    2. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    3. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

    4. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    5. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H11814-11815)

    6. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H11814-11815)

    7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3776.

    8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11814-11816)

    9. Mr. Gordon moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 256.

    11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science and Technology. H. Rept. 110-402.

    12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science and Technology. H. Rept. 110-402.

    13. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

    14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    15. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote .

    16. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.

    18. Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.

    19. Introduced in House

    20. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3776 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3776 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3776 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3776 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources