PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 2, 1994
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Department of Housing and Urban Development Emergency Food and Shelter Program Title II: Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Formula Grant Program Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance and Prevention Formula Grant Amendments Act of 1994 - Title I: Department of Housing and Urban Development Emergency Food and Shelter Program - Amends the Stewart B. Mckinney Homeless Assistance Act to transfer responsibilities for the emergency food and shelter program (program) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Makes safe haven facilities eligible for emergency food and shelter grants. Extends program authorization of appropriations. Title II: Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Formula Grants Program - Amends the Act to revise the existing emergency shelter grants and supportive housing programs into a homeless housing assistance and prevention formula grant program. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Rep. Roukema, Marge [R-NJ-5] · R–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development.
Referred to the House Committee on Banking, Finance + Urban Affrs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E69-70)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3768 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3768 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3768 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3768 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.