PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3764 / 115th Congress

Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians Restoration Act of 2018

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 574.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Sep 12, 2018

Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians Restoration Act of 2018

(Sec. 3) This bill extends federal recognition to the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana.

(Sec. 4) The bill makes the tribe and its members eligible for services and benefits provided by the United States to federally recognized tribes and their members, without regard to the existence of a reservation or the location of the residence of any member.

The service area of the tribe is considered to be the area comprised of Blaine, Cascade, Glacier, and Hill Counties in Montana.

(Sec. 6) The tribe, as a condition of receiving recognition, services, and benefits, must submit to the Department of the Interior, and maintain, a membership roll.

(Sec. 7) Interior must take into trust for the benefit of the tribe 200 acres of land within the tribe's service area to be used for a tribal land base.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gianforte, Greg [R-MT-At Large] · R–MT

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 574.

    2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8128)

    4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8128)

    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3764.

    6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8128-8129)

    7. Mr. Gianforte moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 721.

    9. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-928.

    10. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-928.

    11. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

    12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    13. Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Discharged.

    14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs.

    15. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    16. Introduced in House

    17. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Dec 10, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3764 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3764 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3764 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3764 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources