PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3756 / 106th Congress

To establish a standard time zone for Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 106-564.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 29, 2000

Amends the Calder Act to increase from eight to nine the number of standard time zones in the territory of the United States. Defines the ninth zone (embracing Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands), which shall be known as Chamorro standard time.Amends the Uniform Time Act of 1966 to require Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands to observe daylight savings time.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Del. Underwood, Robert A. [D-GU-At Large] · D–GU

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 106-564.

    2. Became Public Law No: 106-564.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11940)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11940)

    10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9539)

    13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9539)

    14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3756.

    15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9539-9540)

    16. Mr. Oxley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials.

    18. Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.

    19. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H514-515)

    20. Introduced in House

    21. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3756 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3756 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3756 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3756 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources