PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 13, 2002
No More Terror in New York Act of 2002 - Urges the: (1) Secretary of State to designate the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), appropriate PLO constituent groups, and appropriate arms of the Palestinian Authority as a foreign terrorist organization; (2) President to direct the U.S. Representative to the United Nations (UN) to ensure termination of the PLO's permanent observer status; and (3) United Nations General Assembly to revoke such status and any status under which the PLO is able to maintain an office in New York City.Restricts the travel of any alien admitted to the United States with diplomatic status as a representative of the PLO to within a 25-mile radius of the UN Headquarters Building. Requires prior approval of a written request for any other travel in the United States.Requires biannual reports from the Secretary of State to specified congressional committees on the PLO's involvement with acts of terror and terrorist groups, as well as on PLO representatives' travel outside the restricted areas.
People & committees
Rep. Engel, Eliot L. [D-NY-17] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3743 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3743 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3743 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3743 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.