Temporary Access to Skilled Workers and H-1B Nonimmigrant Program Improvement Act of 1998
Received in the Senate.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 28, 1998
Workforce Improvement and Protection Act of 1998 - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to temporarily increase the annual number of skilled foreign worker H-1B visas. Obligates (from such allocation) specified visas for nonphysician health care workers. (Sec. 3) Requires a prospective employer to include in the H-1B admission application: (1) specified protections against U.S. worker displacement; and (2) demonstration of a good faith effort to recruit U.S. workers. (Sec. 4) States that with regard to an "H-1B-dependent employer" (as defined by this Act) only the Secretary of Labor may file a complaint for application violations (no private right of action). (Sec. 5) Revises specified enforcement and penalty provisions.
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 3736.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 288 - 133 (Roll No. 460).
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 1 hour of debate on the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order by the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3736 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 3 shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 2 shall be in order without intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the question, shall be considered read, and debatable for 1 hour equally divided and controlled.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 513. (consideration: CR H8578-8602)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Rule H. Res. 513 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 513 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3736 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 3 shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 2 shall be in order without intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the question, shall be considered read, and debatable for 1 hour equally divided and controlled.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 368.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-657.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-657.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 4.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3736 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3736 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3736 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3736 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.