PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3734 / 110th Congress

Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area Act

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 714.

Official summary

Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Apr 22, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area Act - Renames the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in Idaho as the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an international authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in the establishment of this National Conservation Area.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Simpson, Michael K. [R-ID-2] · R–ID

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 714.

    2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2500)

    4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2500)

    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3734.

    6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2500-2501)

    7. Mr. Rahall moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    8. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 207.

    9. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 110-593.

    10. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 110-593.

    11. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    13. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Discharged.

    14. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    15. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

    16. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    17. Introduced in House

    18. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3734 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3734 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3734 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3734 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources