PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.371 / 106th Congress

Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000

Became Public Law No: 106-207.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Apr 6, 2000

Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 - Waives the English language requirement and provides special consideration for the civics requirement with respect to the naturalization of an alien who: (1) was admitted into the United States as a refugee from Laos, and who served with a Laotian-based special guerilla or irregular unit in support of U.S. forces at any time from February 28, 1961, through September 18, 1978; or (2) was similarly admitted as a refugee and was the spouse of such an alien at the time of (such alien's) application for refugee admission.(Sec. 4) Requires documentation of qualifying service in the form of: (1) original documents; (2) an affidavit by the person's superior officer; (3) two affidavits by individuals who served with such units and personally knew of the person's service; or (4) other appropriate proof.(Sec. 5) States that the Attorney General, in determining eligibility for exemption or special consideration: (1) shall review documentation, and request a military service advisory opinion from the Secretary of Defense; and (2) may consider certification prepared by the Lao Veterans of America, Inc., or other similar organization maintaining records of Hmong veterans or their families.(Sec. 6) Requires applications for naturalization benefits under this Act to be filed with appropriate fees no later than 18 months after enactment of such Act.(Sec. 7) Limits to 45,000 the total number of aliens who may be granted such naturalization benefits.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Vento, Bruce F. [D-MN-4] · D–MN

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
108 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-207.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-207.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H3576-3578; text: CR H3576)

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H3576-3578; text: CR H3576)

  10. Mr. Smith (TX) asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.

  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4211-4213; text: CR S4211)

  13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4211-4213; text: CR S4211)

  14. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 562.

  15. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment. Without written report.

  16. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported to Senate by Senator Hatch with an amendment. Without written report.

  17. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  18. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  19. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  20. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  21. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2359)

  22. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2359)

  23. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 371.

  24. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2359-2362)

  25. Mr. Hyde moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  26. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 307.

  27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-563.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-563.

  29. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  30. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  31. Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims Discharged.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims.

  33. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.371 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.371 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.371 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.371 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources