To subject the income of the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Student Loan Marketing Association to taxation by State and local governments, and to require the Mayor of the District of Columbia to submit a report to Congress on the economic impact of such entities on the District of Columbia.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education and Training.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 22, 1993
Amends the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act, and the Higher Education Act of 1965 to subject the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Student Loan Marketing Association, and the Federal National Mortgage Association (including their franchises, capital, reserves, surplus, mortgages or other security holdings, income, and real property) to all taxation imposed by any State, territory, possession, Commonwealth, or dependency of the United States, the District of Columbia, or by any county, municipality, or local taxation authority. Requires the Mayor of the District of Columbia to study and report to specified congressional committees on the economic impact on the District of the Associations' and Corporation's activities, including an analysis of the potential effects on the revenues of the District resulting from the amendments made by this Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3696 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3696 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3696 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3696 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.