Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 13, 2025
Territorial Tax Parity and Fairness Act
This bill excepts individuals who are bona fide residents of the Virgin Islands from including in gross income for U.S. federal tax purposes subpart F income received from certain corporations if such income may be sourced to the Virgin Islands.
Under current law, a U.S. shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation generally is required to include in gross income their pro rata share of dividends, interest, rent, royalties, and certain other types of income of the controlled foreign corporation (collectively known as subpart F income). A U.S. shareholder is a U.S. person (citizen, resident, domestic partnership or corporation, trust, or estate) that owns a certain percentage of stock in the controlled foreign corporation.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
However, under current law, the definition of a U.S. person does not include individuals who are bona fide residents of the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, America Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands who receive subpart F income from controlled foreign corporations that meets certain requirements for being sourced to the territory or being connected to or derived from a trade or business in the territory.
This bill expands the exceptions from the definition of a U.S. person for purposes of the subpart F income tax rules, to include individuals who are bona fide residents of the Virgin Islands and receive subpart F income from a controlled foreign corporation organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands if the subpart F income may be sourced to the Virgin Islands.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.368 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.368 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.368 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.368 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.