PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3678 / 103rd Congress

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to negotiate agreements for the use of Outer Continental Shelf sand, gravel, and shell resources.

Became Public Law No: 103-426.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Oct 3, 1994

Amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to negotiate an agreement (such agreement) for use of Outer Continental Shelf sand, gravel, and shell resources in: (1) a program of, or project for, shore protection, beach restoration, or coastal wetlands restoration undertaken by a Federal, State, or local government agency; or (2) a construction project that is funded in whole or in part by or authorized by the Federal Government. Authorizes the Secretary: (1) to assess a fee based on the value of the resources and the public interest served by promoting development of the resources (but prohibits assessing any fee against a Federal agency); and (2) to seek to facilitate projects in the coastal zone that promote the policy set forth in the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Requires: (1) any Federal agency which proposes to make use of sand, gravel, and shell resources subject to the provisions of this Act to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Secretary concerning the potential use of those resources; and (2) the Secretary to notify specified congressional committees on any proposed project for the use of those resources prior to such use. Directs the Secretary to conduct a study of any area or region included in any lease sale in order to establish information needed for assessment and management of environmental impacts on the human, marine, and coastal environments of the Outer Continental Shelf and the coastal areas which may be affected by mineral development in such area or region. Directs that, in the case of such agreement, each study pertaining to the agreement under this Act be commenced not later than six months prior to commencing negotiations for such agreement or entering into the Memorandum of Agreement.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Ortiz, Solomon P. [D-TX-27] · D–TX

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-426.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-426.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14407)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14407)

  10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10592-10593)

  16. Mr. Studds moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-817, Part I.

  18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-817, Part I.

  19. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  21. Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged.

  22. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  24. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  25. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  26. Joint Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Oceanography, Gulf of Mexico, and the Outer Continental Shelf and by the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

  27. Joint Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources and by the Subcommittee on Oceanography, Gulf of Mexico, and the Outer Continental Shelf.

  28. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E416)

  29. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  30. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

  31. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Oceanography, Gulf of Mexico, and the Outer Continental Shelf.

  33. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E3070)

  34. Referred to the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.

  35. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  36. Introduced in House

  37. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3678 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3678 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3678 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3678 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources