PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3672 / 112th Congress

Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2012

Became Public Law No: 112-77.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 23, 2011

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House passed version is repeated here.)

Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2012 - Title I: Disaster Relief - Makes supplemental appropriations for FY2012 to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the Disaster Relief Fund.

Makes appropriations for disaster relief to the Department of Defense (DOD), Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers--Civil, for: (1) the Mississippi River and Tributaries for necessary expenses for the repair of damages to federal projects resulting from a major disaster; (2) Operation and Maintenance for necessary expenses to dredge navigation channels in response to, and repair damage to Corps projects resulting from, a major disaster; and (3) Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies for necessary expenses to prepare for flood, hurricane, and other natural disasters and support emergency operations, repair, and other activities authorized by law in response to a major disaster.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Title II: Combating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse - Makes appropriations for FY2012 to the Social Security Adminstration for continuing disability reviews under title II (Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) and title XVI (Supplemental Security Income) of the Social Security Act and for the cost associated with conducting redeterminations of eligibility under title XVI.

Title III: General Provision - Provides that each amount appropriated or made available in this Act is in addition to amounts otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year involved.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5] · R–KY

Committees

  • Budget Committee
  • Appropriations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 112-77.

    2. Became Public Law No: 112-77.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Received in the Senate.

    9. Passed Senate, under the order of 12/16/2011, having received 60 votes in the affirmative, without amendment by Yea-Nay. 72 - 27. Record Vote Number: 233.

      Senate roll call 233 · Individual votes
    10. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate, under the order of 12/16/2011, having received 60 votes in the affirmative, without amendment by Yea-Nay. 72 - 27. Record Vote Number: 233.

      Senate roll call 233 · Individual votes
    11. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8759)

    12. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    13. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 351 - 67 (Roll no. 943). (text: CR H9903)

      House roll call 943 · Individual votes
    14. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 351 - 67 (Roll no. 943).(text: CR H9903)

      House roll call 943 · Individual votes
    15. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9907)

    16. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause X of Rule 20, the yeas and nays were ordered. Pursuant to clause VIII of Rule 20, further proceedings on H.R. 3672 were postponed.

    17. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H9905)

    18. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3672.

    19. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 500. (consideration: CR H9903-9905)

    20. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    21. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    22. Introduced in House

    23. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3672 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3672 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3672 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3672 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources