Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993

Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from USDA.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 5, 1993

Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993 - Amends the Small Business Act to change the loan eligibility requirements for certain small businesses. Defines "meatpacker or meat marketer engaged in commerce." Imposes limits on the slaughter, sale, purchase, and forward delivery of certain livestock by meatpackers or meat marketers engaged in commerce. Establishes fines for violations of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Smith, Neal Edward [D-IA-4] · D–IA

Committees

Small Business Committee
Agriculture Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jun 12, 1994
Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from USDA.
Jun 8, 1994
Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from SBA.
Jun 16, 1993
Executive Comment Received from SBA.
Feb 12, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from USDA, SBA.
Feb 1, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on SBA Legislation and the General Economy.
Jan 15, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock.
Jan 5, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Jan 5, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Jan 5, 1993
Introduced in House
Jan 5, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jan 5, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.364 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.364, 103rd Congress: Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/364

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-01-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr364/BILLS-103hr364ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:18Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.364 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.364 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.364, 103rd Congress: Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/364

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-01-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr364/BILLS-103hr364ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:18Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.364 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.364 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.364, 103rd Congress: Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/364

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-01-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr364/BILLS-103hr364ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:18Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.364 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.364 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.364, 103rd Congress: Small Business Meat Producer and Marketer Protection Act of 1993

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/364

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-01-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr364/BILLS-103hr364ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:51:18Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.364 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.