PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3633 / 119th Congress

CLARITY Act

Common name House Financial Services Committee

Official title
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act

Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 234) entered in Senate.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 29, 2025

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 or the CLARITY Act of 2025

This bill establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, defined by the bill as digital assets that rely upon a blockchain for their value.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission must generally regulate digital commodities transactions, including digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers. To qualify for trade on an exchange (1) a digital commodity’s blockchain must be mature, or on a blockchain system that has achieved decentralized control as defined by the bill; or (2) the issuer of the digital commodity must file certain reports. The bill establishes requirements for trade monitoring, recordkeeping, and the commingling of customer assets.  

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill exempts digital commodities on mature blockchains (and digital commodities on blockchains expected to mature within certain timeframes) from Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration requirements if annual sales fall under a certain amount and other requirements are met. The bill provides the SEC with jurisdiction over digital commodity activities and transactions engaged in by certain brokers and dealers on alternative trading systems and by national securities exchanges. 

Digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering and related purposes.

The bill also sets forth requirements for alternative trading systems, previously issued digital commodities, and provisional registration until the bill is implemented.  

For more information on this bill, see CRS Insight IN12583, Crypto Legislation: An Overview of H.R. 3633, the CLARITY Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2] · R–AR

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
  • Financial Services Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
21 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 234) entered in Senate.

  2. Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 234. (CR S4706)

    Senate roll call 234 · Individual votes
  3. Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S4557)

  4. Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S4557)

  5. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 423.

  6. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Scott SC, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  7. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Scott SC, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  8. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  9. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

  10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  11. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 199). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3373-3397)

    House roll call 199 · Individual votes
  12. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 199).

    House roll call 199 · Individual votes
  13. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3449)

  14. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3633, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Craig demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  15. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3633.

  17. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4016, H.R. 3633, H.R. 1919 and S. 1582. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4016 and H.R. 3633 under a structured rule, and H.R. 1919 and S. 1582 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each bill. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 4016, H.R. 3633, and H.R. 1919, and a motion to commit on S. 1582.

  18. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 580. (consideration: CR H3373)

  19. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 580 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4016, H.R. 3633, H.R. 1919 and S. 1582. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4016 and H.R. 3633 under a structured rule, and H.R. 1919 and S. 1582 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each bill. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 4016, H.R. 3633, and H.R. 1919, and a motion to commit on S. 1582.

  20. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 134.

  21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-168, Part II.

  22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-168, Part II.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 119-168, Part I.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 119-168, Part I.

  25. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 19.

  26. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  27. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 6.

  28. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  29. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  30. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  31. Introduced in House

  32. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 17, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3633 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3633 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3633 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3633 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 11, 2026

Based on the full Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This proposal would change the rules for creating, selling and holding digital tokens. Qualifying tokens would generally fall outside specified securities rules—the rules governing investments such as stocks. However, investment arrangements used to offer or distribute the tokens could still be regulated as securities transactions. Some people or businesses initially offering or distributing tokens would have to disclose financial and technical information. Trading businesses would face financial-crime controls, and customers would receive additional risk information. Token creators, investors, financial institutions and software developers would be affected.

Check the sources
a network token shall be treated as a non-security, to the extent materially consistent with the requirements and conditions of this section
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
establish and maintain an anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism program
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
require digital asset intermediaries to provide clear and accessible educational materials to the public
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) Secondary market treatment (A) In general Except as provided in this section (including the limitation under subparagraph (B)), and to the extent materially consistent with the requirements and conditions of this section, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (i) section 2(a)(1); (ii) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.); (iii) the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); (iv) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–1 et seq.); (v) the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.); and (vi) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in clauses (i) through (v), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (I) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (II) inconsistent with this section. (B) Limitation Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the applicable network token is offered, sold, or distributed pursuant to the offer, sale, or distribution of a security by an ancillary asset originator or underwriter.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
An ancillary asset originator shall be subject to the initial and periodic disclosure requirements under subsection (d)
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The proposal also addresses banks' digital-asset services, customer assets when firms fail, software development and individuals' control of their own assets. It creates supervised financial-technology testing programs. A separate housing provision would redistribute some community development grants according to housing growth.

Check the sources
providing custodial, fiduciary, or safekeeping services for digital assets
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
treat ancillary assets and digital commodities held for customers as customer property governed by title 11, United States Code
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
establish a CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox to enable eligible firms to test innovative activities within the United States
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the Secretary shall adjust the allocation based on the housing growth improvement rate of the eligible recipient
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
604. Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Developer or provider The term developer or provider means any person or business that creates or publishes software to facilitate the creation of, or provide maintenance to, a distributed ledger, or a service associated with a distributed ledger. (2) Distributed ledger service The term distributed ledger service means any information, transaction, or computing service or system that provides or enables access to a distributed ledger system by multiple users, including a service or system that enables users to send, receive, exchange, or store digital assets described by distributed ledger systems. (3) Non-controlling developer or provider The term non-controlling developer or provider means a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service that, in the regular course of operations, does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets to which users are entitled, without the approval, consent, or direction of any third party. (c) Treatment Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a non-controlling developer or provider— (1) shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business, as defined in section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, and the regulations promulgated under that section; or (B) engaged in money transmitting, as defined in section 1960 of title 18, United States Code; and (2) on or after the date of enactment of this Act, shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar to a requirement (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) that applies to an entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), solely on the basis of— (A) creating or publishing software to facilitate the creation of, or providing maintenance services to, a distributed ledger or a service associated with a distributed ledger; (B) providing hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody or safekeeping of the digital assets of the customer; or (C) providing infrastructure support to maintain a distributed ledger service. (d) Clarification of treatment Subsection (c) shall not modify the application of section 1960(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States Code, to any person (referred to in this subsection as the initial person) that acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity. (e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (3) to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property; (4) to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section; or (5) to create a cause of action or impose liability under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
605. Keep Your Coins Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Keep Your Coins Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered user The term covered user means a United States individual who obtains digital assets to purchase goods or services on behalf of that individual, without regard to the method in which that individual obtained those digital assets. (2) Self-hosted wallet The term self-hosted wallet means a digital interface— (A) that is used to secure and transfer digital assets; and (B) under which the owner of digital assets secured and transferred under subparagraph (A) retains independent control over those digital assets. (c) Self-Custody A Federal agency may not prohibit, restrict, or otherwise impair the ability of a covered user to self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted wallet or other means to conduct transactions for any lawful purpose. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the National Credit Union Administration to carry out any enforcement action or special measure authorized under applicable law, including— (1) the Bank Secrecy Act, section 9714 of the Combating Russian Money Laundering Act (31 U.S.C. 5318A note), and section 7213A of the Fentanyl Sanctions Act (21 U.S.C. 2313a); or (2) any other law relating to illicit finance, money laundering, terrorism financing, or United States sanctions.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each financial regulatory agency shall establish, or identify an office, division, or department of the agency that shall serve as, an AI Innovation Lab to enable regulated entities to experiment with AI test projects without unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation or expectation of enforcement actions, pursuant to the approval of an application under subparagraph (B).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

This is an explanation of the supplied proposed Senate text, not a determination of which tokens or businesses legally qualify. The text refers to a digital-commodity definition it says the Act would add, but does not supply that definition, and it references a separate Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act framework not included here. Those gaps leave the precise reach of token, intermediary, banking and insolvency provisions unresolved. Descriptions below explain the stated rules and conditions without filling in those missing definitions or assuming that the referenced framework has been enacted.

Check the sources
The term digital commodity has the meaning given the term in section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a), as added by this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
certification and supporting materials submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under section 203(d) of the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

How it would work

Title I distinguishes a token from the investment arrangement used to sell it. A qualifying network token derives value from a shared digital ledger's use; an ancillary asset is such a token dependent on its originator's or a related person's business or management efforts. Specified securities and investment contracts or profit-sharing interests conveying listed financial rights are excluded, along with specified interests in investment companies or other asset-holding entities. Originator distributions generally remain investment-contract transactions, while qualifying secondary trades receive non-security treatment. Merely recording a conventional security on a ledger does not remove securities regulation. Section 105(a) would require SEC rules protecting network-token status for certain network-related economic and governance rights where value primarily derives, or is reasonably expected to derive, from the ledger system or its adoption and use. The listed cases include ancillary assets whose value changes with an originator’s or related person’s efforts; those efforts alone therefore do not settle whether a financial right disqualifies a token.

Check the sources
The term ancillary asset means a network token, the value of which is dependent upon the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of an ancillary asset originator or a related person
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A debt or equity interest, or an option on a debt or equity interest, in a person.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be considered to be an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, except with respect to a gratuitous distribution.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the applicable network token is offered, sold, or distributed pursuant to the offer, sale, or distribution of a security by an ancillary asset originator or underwriter.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any asset that is a security under the securities laws shall not cease to be a security solely because the asset is issued, recorded, represented, or transferred using distributed ledger technology or comparable technology.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(7) Network token (A) In general The term network token means a digital commodity that is intrinsically linked to a distributed ledger system and that derives, or is reasonably expected to derive, its value from the use of such distributed ledger system, and, pursuant to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act and the amendments made by the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, is treated as a non-security solely for purposes of the securities laws.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) Secondary market treatment (A) In general Except as provided in this section (including the limitation under subparagraph (B)), and to the extent materially consistent with the requirements and conditions of this section, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (i) section 2(a)(1); (ii) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.); (iii) the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); (iv) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–1 et seq.); (v) the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.); and (vi) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in clauses (i) through (v), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (I) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (II) inconsistent with this section. (B) Limitation Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the applicable network token is offered, sold, or distributed pursuant to the offer, sale, or distribution of a security by an ancillary asset originator or underwriter.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) Disqualifying financial rights The term network token does not include any of the following: (i) Any security, consistent with the categories of disqualifying financial rights described in clause (ii). (ii) An investment contract or a certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement that represents, gives the holder, or is substantially economically or functionally equivalent to, any of the following, as the Commission shall establish by rule: (I) A debt or equity interest, or an option on a debt or equity interest, in a person. (II) Liquidation rights with respect to a person. (III) An entitlement to, or a reasonable expectation of, an interest, dividend, or other payment, or direct or indirect transfer of value, from a person (other than a decentralized governance system). (IV) An express or implied financial interest in (including a limited partnership interest or interest in intellectual property of), or provided by, a person (other than a decentralized governance system). (iii) Any interest that is, represents, or is functionally equivalent to an interest in an investment company or a company (as defined in section 2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2)) that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a)) but for the exclusions provided from that definition by section 3(c) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)). (iv) Any interest that is, represents, or is functionally equivalent to an interest in any entity or person that is not an investment company but holds or will hold assets other than securities.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall adopt rules that provide that— (1) a network token shall not be considered as providing a disqualifying financial right under section 4B(a)(7)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if the market value of the network token is primarily derived, or is reasonably expected to be primarily derived, from a distributed ledger system or from the broader adoption and use of such a system, including where— (A) the mechanisms of the distributed ledger system collect, receive, accrue, or distribute consideration from the functioning of the distributed ledger system; (B) the network token provides governance capabilities with respect to a distributed ledger system or a decentralized governance system; (C) the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the use of, or in response to the efforts, operations, or financial performance of, the distributed ledger system to which the network token relates or its decentralized governance system; or (D) for a network token that meets the definition of an ancillary asset, the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the efforts of the ancillary asset originator or related person; and (2) participants in offers or sales of network tokens providing financial interests described in paragraph (1) shall not be precluded from relying on the exemption from registration under section 4B(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Covered originators would disclose material corporate, financial, technical and risk information before triggering offerings and every six months afterward. Separate inflation-adjusted $5 million tests for initial proceeds or average daily public U.S. trading provide exclusions. Certain intermediaries could report instead, but specified new U.S. originators must report themselves. Earlier originators generally receive a one-year transition after effectiveness. Ending disclosure requires certification of limited managerial efforts, public information and a separately certified absence of coordinated control; renewed disqualifying efforts restart reporting.

Check the sources
semiannually thereafter.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
were $5,000,000 or less (adjusted for inflation) during the 12-month period immediately following the date of the first such offer, sale, or distribution
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the average daily aggregate value of trading in the applicable ancillary asset in all spot markets open to the public in the United States for which trading volume is generally available is $5,000,000 or less (adjusted for inflation)
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
beginning on the date that is 1 year after that effective date.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a certification is effective under section 104(d) of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The furnishing of disclosures pursuant to subclause (II) shall restart the schedule for periodic disclosures under paragraph (1).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(4) Digital asset intermediaries (A) In general Other than as provided under subparagraph (B), with respect to an ancillary asset that is listed for trading on a digital asset intermediary, that digital asset intermediary may, in lieu of the applicable ancillary asset originator, satisfy the requirements of subsection (d) in accordance with such rules as the Commission shall jointly adopt with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (B) Allocation of disclosure responsibility (i) Originator filings A digital asset intermediary may not satisfy the requirements of subsection (d) in lieu of the applicable ancillary asset originator, if— (I) the ancillary asset originator is incorporated, organized, or otherwise registered under the laws of the United States or of any State; and (II) the applicable ancillary asset is— (aa) offered, sold, or distributed after the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act pursuant to— (AA) an investment contract that is offered, sold, or distributed pursuant to Regulation Crypto, as adopted pursuant to section 103 of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026; (BB) the filing of an effective registration statement under this Act (other than a registration statement on the form described in section 239.31 or 239.33 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or the successor to either such form); (CC) the filing of an offering statement described in section 3(b)(2); or (DD) an offering conducted pursuant to section 4(a)(6); or (bb) first offered or sold after the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in a transaction described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii). (ii) Commission determination (I) In general If, after notice, comment, and the opportunity for a hearing, the Commission determines that it is in the public interest or necessary for the protection of investors, including with respect to an ancillary asset originator incorporated or organized in a foreign jurisdiction, the Commission may require an ancillary asset originator, after a transition period, to file the disclosures required under subsection (d). (II) Extraterritorial effect Subclause (I) shall apply extraterritorially.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) Termination of requirements (A) Termination The obligation of an ancillary asset originator to provide disclosures under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date that a certification becomes effective under subparagraph (B), including through an approval or deemed approval. (B) Certification (i) In general A certification covered party may submit to the Commission a certification, based on the knowledge of the certification covered party after due inquiry and supported by reasonable evidence, that states— (I) that— (aa) during the 180-day period preceding the date on which the certification covered party submits the certification, and as of the date of submission, no certification covered party has engaged in more than a nominal level of entrepreneurial or managerial efforts (as defined by the Commission by rule), which shall not, for the purposes of this clause, include providing administrative services alone; (bb) any efforts described in item (aa) were not a primary factor in determining the value of the related ancillary asset (which may include that any essential promises made by the certification covered party have been fulfilled); and (cc) a certification is effective under section 104(d) of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026; (II) in good faith that the certification covered party does not reasonably expect there to be any efforts that would render the certification covered party unable to provide a new certification following the date of the certification; and (III) that substantially all material information that is reasonably expected to contribute to the value of the ancillary assets offered, sold, or distributed to the public by the ancillary asset originator is, and is reasonably expected to remain, available to the public.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Regulation Crypto would exempt eligible ancillary-asset investment offerings from registration, with advance disclosures and continuing reporting. The offering ceiling is the greater of $50 million annually for at most four years or 10% of outstanding token value, subject to a separate $200 million total cap per originator and later adjustments. Eligibility excludes foreign-organized companies and specified disqualified issuers. Qualifying broad, nominal-value distributions, including specified administrative staking arrangements, separately receive a presumption against securities-offering treatment.

Check the sources
$50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
An ancillary asset originator may not raise more than $200,000,000 in total gross proceeds in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a company that is not organized under, and subject to, the laws of a State or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A gratuitous distribution, by itself, shall be presumed to not constitute an offer, sale, or distribution of a security
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Exemption for certain transactions involving ancillary assets (1) Exemption (A) In general Rules adopted by the Commission under this section shall provide that the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) shall not apply to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, if the offer, sale, or distribution does not exceed the greater of— (i) $50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding, as of the date of that offer, sale, or distribution. (B) Continued application of certain provisions Sections 12(a)(2) and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77l(a)(2), 77q) shall apply with respect to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset that is described in subparagraph (A). (2) Limitation An ancillary asset originator may not raise more than $200,000,000 in total gross proceeds in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a). (3) Review and adjustment for inflation (A) In general Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Commission shall— (i) review the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2); (ii) adjust the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) to account for inflation; and (iii) increase the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) as the Commission determines appropriate, if that action would be in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors. (B) Report If the Commission, after conducting a review under subparagraph (A), determines not to increase the amount described in paragraph (1)(A)(i) or (2) (other than to adjust that amount for inflation, as required under subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph), the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report detailing the reasons that the Commission did not increase that amount. (c) Conditions for exemption The following conditions shall apply to the exemption provided under subsection (b): (1) Initial disclosures Not later than 30 days before the date on which the applicable ancillary asset originator, any affiliate of the ancillary asset originator, or any underwriter of an investment contract, offers, sells, or distributes an ancillary asset in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a), the ancillary asset originator shall furnish to the Commission the disclosures required under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, subject to the periodic semiannual disclosure requirements of that section. (2) Coordinated control If the applicable ancillary asset is reliant on a distributed ledger system that, together with that ancillary asset, is subject to coordinated control, including by related persons, the restrictions on disposition under section 104 shall apply. (3) Criteria The applicable ancillary asset originator may not be— (A) a company that is not organized under, and subject to, the laws of a State or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia; (B) a development-stage company that either— (i) has no specific business plan or purpose; or (ii) has indicated that the business plan of the company is to merge with or acquire an unidentified company; (C) an investment company (as defined in section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a))) or a company (as defined in section 2 of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–2)) that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a)) but for the exclusions provided from that definition by section 3(c) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)), provided that, solely for the purposes of evaluating eligibility to rely on the exemption provided under subsection (b), an ancillary asset originator shall not be deemed to be an investment company solely by virtue of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading ancillary assets, including ancillary assets offered for sale by the ancillary asset originator; (D) a person issuing fractional undivided interests in other commodities; (E) a person that is or has been subject to any order of the Commission entered pursuant to section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(j)) after the date of enactment of this Act and during the 5-year period preceding the offer and sale; (F) a person that is or has been disqualified pursuant to section 230.506(d) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation, unless waived by order of the Commission; (G) a person that is or has been disqualified pursuant to section 230.251 through 230.263 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly referred to as Regulation A), or any successor regulations, unless waived by order of the Commission; or (H) a person convicted of a felony offense involving insider trading, embezzlement, cybercrime, money laundering, financing of terrorism, or financial fraud, within the last 10 years. (4) Furnishing notice of reliance The applicable ancillary asset originator shall electronically furnish to the Commission a notice of reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a) not fewer than 30 days before the date on which the ancillary asset originator first offers, sells, or distributes an ancillary asset in reliance on those rules, which shall contain the following information: (A) The name of the ancillary asset originator. (B) A statement by a person duly authorized by the ancillary asset originator that the conditions of those rules are satisfied. (C) The website where the summary documents of the ancillary asset originator, if any, may be found and made available for public consumption. (D) An email address at which the ancillary asset originator may be contacted. (5) Public availability The Commission shall require that the disclosures furnished to the Commission under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, be made publicly available in a manner that provides timely and continuing access. (6) Form and manner The disclosures furnished to the Commission under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, shall be prepared, furnished, and made public in the form and manner prescribed by the Commission, including through the use of electronic furnishing, web posting, machine-readable formats, and plain-English legends, as the Commission determines necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(5) Gratuitous distribution (A) In general The term gratuitous distribution— (i) means a distribution of a network token, including a distribution effected by an agent or other service provider engaged solely in an administrative or ministerial capacity, in exchange for not more than a nominal value of cash, property, services, or other assets in a broad, equitable, and non-discretionary manner; and (ii) includes, without limitation, the mechanisms and methods of distribution described in subparagraph (B). (B) Mechanisms and methods of distribution The mechanisms and methods of distribution described in this subparagraph are the following: (i) Self staking The distribution of a unit of a network token, as a programmatic result of validating or staking activity for a distributed ledger system’s consensus mechanism, including the staking of a network token, and the operation of a node, validator, or substantially similar software for such activity where the owner of the staked network token and the operator of the node, validator, or substantially similar software are the same person or entity. (ii) Self-custodial staking with a third party The distribution of a unit of a network token, as a programmatic result of validating or staking activity for a distributed ledger system’s consensus mechanism, including the staking of a network token, and the operation of a node, validator, or substantially similar software for such activity in which— (I) the owner of the staked network token, and operator of the node, validator, or substantially similar software for such activity are different persons or entities; and (II) the operator of the node, validator, or substantially similar software does not maintain custody or control of the staked network token. (iii) Liquid staking The distribution of network tokens, as the issuance, transfer, or redemption of liquid staking tokens representing a pro rata interest in staked network tokens, and their associated rewards, provided that such tokens are issued as administrative or ministerial receipts and are not providing discretionary management authority. (iv) Custodial and ancillary staking services (I) In general Subject to the rules issued pursuant to subclause (II), the provision of custodial or ancillary staking services enabling the owner of a network token to participate in validating or staking activity for a distributed ledger system’s consensus mechanism that results in the programmatic distribution of a unit of a network token, provided that such custodial or ancillary services are exclusively administrative or ministerial in nature. (II) Rulemaking to define the custodial and ancillary staking services The Commission shall issue rules defining the custodial and ancillary staking services described in subclause (I) that are exclusively administrative or ministerial in nature, consistent with what is necessary or appropriate for the public interest or for the protection of investors. (v) Programmatic and automated distributions The automated, programmatic, protocol-defined, or rules-based distribution of network tokens achieved through the transparent functioning of a distributed ledger system, a distributed ledger, or distributed ledger applications, in which— (I) distributions occur pursuant to public, transparent, rules-based parameters that are publicly available and are accessible on a permissionless basis, without individualized or real-time negotiation with recipients; (II) recipients receive network tokens as a direct, programmatic result of objective, verifiable network participation, consumption, or contribution, including consensus participation, data availability, bandwidth, governance, or use and interaction with the protocol or application; (III) the number of network tokens received is proportionate to the verifiable service, usage, or contribution; (IV) any expected utility or value of the network tokens arises primarily from decentralized network participation and market forces, rather than the discretionary actions of any single person or affiliated group; and (V) no person or group has unilateral authority to alter, restrict, or direct the issuance parameters or distribution mechanisms of the distributed ledger system, and any modification occurs only through a decentralized governance system. (vi) Technology-neutral clause The distribution employing a mechanism, protocol, or technology not specifically described in clauses (i) through (v), without regard to whether such mechanism, protocol, or technology is in existence at the time of enactment of this section, and without regard to terminology or underlying technical framework, provided such distribution meets the requirements described in subparagraph (A)(i).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Specified insiders and large holders would face disclosure and resale restrictions. For covered tokens acquired after effectiveness, the general holding period would be 12 months before certification that the network lacks coordinated control and six months afterward, with different annual sale limits. Rules would provide hardship, market-liquidity, agency and fund exemptions. Token holders could recover profits from prohibited sales. Control certification and termination of reporting are separate tests; decentralized governance alone is not common control.

Check the sources
the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any profit realized by a related person from the sale of an ancillary asset in violation of the restrictions under subsection (c) shall inure to, and be recoverable by, the holders of the ancillary asset
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the existence or termination of coordinated control shall be determined independently of whether entrepreneurial or managerial efforts
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a decentralized governance system shall not be deemed to be a person or a group of persons acting under common control.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(c) Special restrictions on disposition The Commission shall adopt rules that provide that, with respect to transactions involving an ancillary asset for which disclosures are required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, when a sale of that ancillary asset is made by a related person, the following restrictions on that sale shall apply: (1) Sales prior to certification If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system, the covered token may be sold by a related person before that distributed ledger system is certified as not subject to coordinated control, pursuant to subsection (d), if— (A) with respect to that distributed ledger system, the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; (B) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months; and (C) the amount of covered tokens sold in any 12-month period by the related person is— (i) not greater than an amount to be determined by the Commission pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, which rulemaking shall consider what is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, including, among other things, the protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation, and how to foster the development of distributed ledger systems that are not subject to coordinated control; and (ii) in no case equal to or greater than the amount determined by the Commission pursuant to the rulemaking described in paragraph (2)(C). (2) Sales after certification If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system that is certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d), the covered token may be sold by a related person, if— (A) with respect to that distributed ledger system, the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; (B) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months; and (C) the amount of covered tokens sold in any 12-month period by the related person is not greater than an amount to be determined by the Commission pursuant to rulemaking that shall not be less than 10 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of such ancillary assets. (3) Sales of pre-existing covered tokens If the covered token was acquired before the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system, the covered token may be sold by a related person if— (A) in the case that the distributed ledger system has not been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d)— (i) the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; and (ii) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months; and (B) in the case that the distributed ledger system has been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d), the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months. (4) Limitations on transactions by distributed ledger control persons If the holder of an ancillary asset that principally relies on a distributed ledger system that has been certified as not subject to coordinated control is a distributed ledger control person with respect to that distributed ledger system, that control person may resell that ancillary asset if— (A) that control person furnishes notice to the Commission, in a form and manner determined by the Commission, that the person has or intends to obtain an authority described in subparagraph (B) with respect to the distributed ledger system; (B) that distributed ledger control person furnishes disclosures to the Commission, in a form and manner determined by the Commission, describing the material activities, as determined by the Commission, of the control person; (C) with respect to that distributed ledger system, disclosures have been furnished pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act; and (D) that control person has satisfied such other requirements applicable to that control person that may be established by the Commission to prevent manipulation or distortion of the value of the ancillary asset, including resale restrictions consistent with those applied to related persons that are not control persons.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(f) Exemption from disposition restrictions The Commission shall adopt rules that provide for the following exemptions from, or waivers to, disposition restrictions described in subsection (c): (1) Material hardship exemption (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (B), the Commission shall adopt rules and procedures to exempt parties from related person restrictions with respect to an ancillary asset where those restrictions conflict with an obligation or requirement arising from one of the following material hardships on a related person with respect to the ancillary asset or the ancillary asset originator: (i) The death of the related person. (ii) The bankruptcy or insolvency of the related person. (iii) The dissolution, merger, or acquisition of a corporate person. (iv) Tax liability relating to the receipt of the applicable ancillary asset. (v) Such other material hardships as may be designated by the Commission. (B) Requirements The rules and procedures adopted under subparagraph (A) shall be designed to mitigate the risk that parties may seek to structure holdings to evade resale restrictions and exempt or waive the application of resale restrictions only to the extent necessary to address the identified material hardship. (2) Liquidity provision exemption The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions parties buying or selling an ancillary asset through regular two-sided bidding and offering for the purposes of providing market liquidity, provided that such activities are not undertaken for the purpose of evading the requirements of this section. (3) Agency exemption The Commission shall adopt rules that exempt a party acting as a custodian, trading platform, broker, dealer or other agent from being treated as the owner of customer or client assets or from being restricted in facilitating sales on behalf of a customer or client if the agent is otherwise determined to be a related person. (4) Exchange-traded product and passive fund exemption The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions, as appropriate— (A) exchange-traded products, the shares of which are created and redeemed by authorized participants and registered with the Commission; and (B) passive pooled investment vehicles, whether or not the shares of which are registered with the Commission.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title I would require updated securities rules and ledger-compatible recordkeeping, and override specified state securities requirements. Fraud, manipulation, consumer-protection and fiduciary safeguards generally remain, subject to the bill's express classifications and exceptions. Its insider-trading section does not extend securities law to secondary token transactions that are not otherwise securities transactions. Narrow grandfathering and liability protections are described in targetedBenefits below.

Check the sources
including to facilitate the utilization of distributed ledger records.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A network token, as defined in section 4B(a), shall be treated as a covered security.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
contrary to an express classification or treatment provided by this Act or an amendment made by this Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section may be construed to apply the securities laws, or any regulation issued under the securities laws (including any rule adopted under subsection (c)), to any secondary market transaction in an ancillary asset that is not otherwise a transaction in a security, security-based swap, or security-based swap agreement.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
108. Modernization of securities regulations for digital asset activities (a) Tailoring of existing requirements The Commission shall— (1) amend, rescind, replace, or supplement by rule, order, guidance, exemptive relief, or any other appropriate action (provided such action is consistent with chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, and other applicable law) each regulation, form, interpretive statement, or other requirement within the jurisdiction of the Commission that is not otherwise amended by this Act (or required to be amended because of a provision of this Act or an amendment made by this Act), to the extent that such provision applies to any digital asset activity, including any activity involving a security that is issued, recorded, or transferred using distributed ledger technology, to the extent that the provision is outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome in light of the unique technological characteristics of digital assets or substantially similar technology, which may include regulatory provisions governing— (A) customer protection, including custody of digital assets or substantially similar technology; (B) transfer agent rules; (C) books and records, or recordkeeping requirements; (D) clearance and settlement rules; (E) broker-dealer, alternative trading system, and exchange rules; (F) issuer disclosure and ongoing reporting requirements tailored to digital asset securities or substantially similar technology involving securities; and (G) the use of vaults, digital asset receipts, or receipts involving substantially similar technology, vault tokens, or liquidity provider tokens; and (2) in imposing future obligations as those obligations relate to digital assets or substantially similar technology, do so in a manner consistent with the requirements described in paragraph (1). (b) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission to pursue fraud, manipulation, or deceptive practices involving digital assets or substantially similar technology. (c) Use of existing authority When considering, proposing, adopting, or engaging in any rule or program or developing new rules or programs, including those mandated or authorized under this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, the activities of the Commission (which may include the solicitation of data and other input from investors, regulated entities, and market participants or the representatives of any of those persons) shall be considered actions taken under subsection (e) of section 19 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77s) and shall be subject to subsection (f) of that section. (d) Continued applicability of State consumer protection laws Except as expressly provided by this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, nothing in this Act (or in any such amendment) shall preempt any State consumer protection law, including common law, or a remedy available under any such law. (e) Preemption for exemptions and digital asset activities under the securities act Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (3)— (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting in qualified transactions or after sales; (ii) in the first sentence, by inserting in a qualified transaction or after the security; and (iii) in the second sentence— (I) by striking term qualified purchaser and inserting terms qualified transaction and qualified purchaser; (II) by inserting and categories of transactions, including secondary transactions, after securities; and (III) by inserting and with due regard to the facilitation of capital formation and the promotion of innovation before the period at the end; and (B) in paragraph (4)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting or, if the issuer is not required to file such reports, where the Commission otherwise determines, consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors and with due regard to the facilitation of capital formation and the promotion of innovation before the semicolon at the end; (ii) in subparagraph (D)(ii), by inserting in a qualified transaction or after offered or sold; (iii) in subparagraph (F), by striking or at the end; (iv) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or; and (v) by adding at the end the following: (H) Commission rules or regulations issued under section 28, except that this subparagraph does not apply to rules or regulations adopted before the date of enactment of this subparagraph. . (f) Exempting network tokens from State securities laws (1) In general Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (5) Exemption in connection with network tokens A network token, as defined in section 4B(a), shall be treated as a covered security. . (2) Rule of construction Nothing in this section, section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933 (as added by this Act), or the amendments made by this section may be construed to limit the authority (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) described in section 18(c)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(c)(1)) of a securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions) of any State with respect to a covered security or any security. (g) Preemption for ancillary asset activities under the Securities Act of 1933 Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(b)), as amended by subsection (f) is amended by adding at the end the following: (6) Limitations on state law regarding ancillary assets (A) Definitions In this paragraph, the term ancillary asset has the meaning given the term in section 4B(a). (B) Exemption in connection with ancillary assets An ancillary asset offered, sold, or distributed in reliance on Regulation Crypto, as adopted under section 103 of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026, shall be treated as a covered security. . (h) Preservation of Regulation Best Interest (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), nothing in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any rule issued under this Act or pursuant to any such amendment may be construed to limit, preempt, or otherwise affect the obligations of a broker or dealer registered with the Commission under section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o) or section 240.15l–1 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly known as Regulation Best Interest), or any successor regulation. (2) Application Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any person registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (i) Preservation of investment adviser fiduciary duties Nothing in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any rule issued under this Act or pursuant to any such amendment may be construed to limit, preempt, or otherwise affect the fiduciary duty that an investment adviser (as defined in section 202 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2)) owes to a client under section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–6) or any other provision of Federal or State law, including in connection with investment advice regarding a digital commodity.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
111. Investor and consumer protection enforcement (a) Preservation of certain rights, authorities, laws, and obligations Subject to subsection (b), nothing in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any rule, requirement, or regulation promulgated pursuant to this Act may be construed to prohibit, limit, impair, or otherwise affect— (1) any person from bringing a civil action to enforce any private right of action for fraud, deceit, manipulation, or deceptive practices, to the extent that such private right of action is expressly provided for in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or is otherwise available under Federal law, including with respect to conduct involving an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or any transaction, disclosure, certification, notice, report, statement, communication, or other document involving any such asset; (2) except as expressly provided in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, any Federal or State regulator, acting within the scope of authority otherwise provided by law, from bringing an administrative or civil enforcement action under— (A) the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), including the provisions of that Act that are added by this Act and relate to digital commodities and the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; (B) the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), as amended by this Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), as amended by this Act, or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–1 et seq.); (C) State commodities laws, subject to the provisions of this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, relating to the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; or (D) section 18(c)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(c)(1)), or any functionally equivalent anti-fraud or anti-manipulation provision of State securities law (including any State securities law with respect to a security or a transaction in a security to the extent enforcement of that anti-fraud or anti-manipulation provision of State securities law is not preempted by section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r)), with respect to an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, or other transaction involving any such asset, for which this Act or an amendment made by this Act expressly preserves or provides for the application of anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authority; (3) except as expressly provided in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, any generally applicable State law, including a law relating to fraud, deceit, unfair or deceptive acts or practices, consumer protection, banking, payments, property, contracts, criminal law, or unlawful conduct or practices, or the remedies available under any such law, with respect to conduct involving a digital asset, ancillary asset, network token, or digital commodity, or any transaction, activity, person, or service involving any such asset, provided that such law does not impose any licensing, registration, qualification, or other requirement that is expressly preempted, or otherwise expressly limited, by this Act or an amendment made by this Act; (4) the fiduciary obligations of an investment adviser, as defined in section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)), under section 206 of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80b–6), any rule or regulation issued under such section 206, or any other provision of Federal or State law, including in connection with investment advice regarding a digital asset, ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or substantially similar technology; or (5) any right or remedy under Federal consumer financial law, including under section 1011 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5491) or the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.), or authority under Federal consumer financial law with respect to any person, subject to the limitations under section 1027 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5517), including subsections (i) and (j) of such section 1027. (b) Limitations and rules of construction Nothing in subsection (a) may be construed to— (1) preserve, create, or authorize any Federal or State registration, licensing, qualification, or merit-review requirement under State law with respect to an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, transaction, person, or activity, to the extent that such requirement is preempted or otherwise limited by this Act or an amendment made by this Act; (2) create, preserve, or authorize any private right of action under Federal or State law with respect to an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or transaction involving any such asset; (3) permit any claim, action, proceeding, requirement, liability, obligation, or remedy to be brought, maintained, imposed, or enforced under Federal or State securities or commodities law to the extent that such claim, action, proceeding, requirement, liability, obligation, or remedy depends upon, is predicated on, or would require a determination that an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or any transaction, activity, person, or service involving any such asset has a status or characterization under Federal or State securities or commodities law that is contrary to an express classification or treatment provided by this Act or an amendment made by this Act; (4) expand, contract, or otherwise alter the jurisdiction, exclusive or otherwise, of the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or any State regulator; (5) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the treatment of any asset, transaction, or interest as a covered security for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r); or (6) create any new private right of action under Federal or State law, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit, impair, or otherwise affect any private right of action preserved under subsection (a)(1), expressly provided in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or otherwise available under Federal law.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title II would apply tailored money-laundering controls, customer identification, records, suspicious-activity reporting and sanctions compliance to covered digital commodity brokers, dealers and exchanges. Treasury would establish risk-based examination standards. A voluntary public-private information-sharing pilot would last five years unless made permanent by rule, and a separate working group would research illicit finance and recommend responses.

Check the sources
201. Treatment under the Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions laws (a) Amendment Section 5312(c)(1)(A) of title 31, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting digital commodity broker, digital commodity dealer, after futures commission merchant,; and (2) by inserting before the period the following: and any digital commodity exchange registered, or required to register, under that Act that permits direct customer access. (b) Bank secrecy act requirements (1) Regulations The Secretary of the Treasury, acting through the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and in consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, shall issue requirements consistent with the requirements of futures commission merchants to apply the Bank Secrecy Act to digital commodity brokers, digital commodity dealers, and digital commodity exchanges that are tailored to the size and complexity of such entities, including by requiring each such entity to— (A) establish and maintain an anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism program, which shall include— (i) an appropriate risk assessment; (ii) the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls; (iii) the designation of a compliance officer; (iv) an ongoing employee training program; and (v) an independent audit function to test such program; (B) retain appropriate records of transactions; (C) monitor and report suspicious activity, which may include use of appropriate distributed ledger analytics; and (D) maintain an effective customer identification program to identify and verify account holders and carry out appropriate customer due diligence. (2) Compliance with sanctions A digital commodity broker, digital commodity dealer, or digital commodity exchange shall comply with all laws and regulations related to United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. (c) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that nothing in this section shall limit the applicability of any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions by the United States.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
202. Digital asset examination standards (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Federal functional regulator The term Federal functional regulator has the meaning given the term in section 509 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6809). (2) Financial institution The term financial institution has the meaning given the term in section 5312(a)(2) of title 31, United States Code. (b) Examination and review The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with Federal functional regulators, shall establish, coordinated to the extent feasible, risk-based examination standards to assess financial institutions involved in the digital asset sector for compliance with anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
203. Preventing Illicit Finance Through Partnership Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Preventing Illicit Finance Through Partnership Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Bank The term bank has the meaning given the term in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation). (2) Certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network The term certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network means a real-time, secure, public-private mechanism that— (A) facilitates the detection, interdiction, and prevention of illicit finance violations through rapid information exchange between government and regulated entities; and (B) is— (i) certified by the Secretary of the Treasury for the purpose of supporting interdiction and investigative actions consistent with law enforcement or regulatory authorities; or (ii) recognized by the Secretary of the Treasury as an existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act), effective public-private partnership network that meets standards for security, accountability, and participation that are equivalent to the standards that would be required by the Secretary of the Treasury for certification under clause (i). (3) Covered agency The term covered agency means— (A) the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration; (B) the Department of the Treasury, including the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and (C) the Department of Homeland Security. (4) Designated private sector entity The term designated private sector entity means a private sector entity designated under subsection (d). (5) Director The term Director means the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (6) Illicit finance violation The term illicit finance violation means the illicit use of digital assets. (7) Illicit use The term illicit use includes fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, the purchase and sale of illicit goods, trafficking of fentanyl (including fentanyl precursors and trade in other illicit drugs), sanctions evasion, theft of funds, funding of illegal activities, transactions relating to child sexual abuse material or elder fraud abuse, and any other financial transaction involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, as defined in section 1956(c) of title 18, United States Code. (8) Money services business The term money services business has the meaning given the term in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation). (c) Establishment of program The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish a pilot program under which covered agencies and designated private sector entities securely share information focused on potential illicit finance violations and threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations. (d) Designation of private sector entities (1) Required action (A) Initial companies Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director and the Secretary shall designate 10 private sector entities that are money services businesses, 10 private sector entities that are digital commodity brokers, digital commodity dealers, or digital commodity exchanges, and 10 private sector entities that are banks to participate in the pilot program established under subsection (c), if such entities agree and volunteer to participate in the program. (B) Biannual review Not less frequently than once every 6 months, the Director shall review and, as appropriate, replace the private sector entities designated under this paragraph. (C) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed as— (i) requiring an entity to participate in the pilot program established under this section; or (ii) enabling the Director to select an entity to participate in the pilot program without the consent of such entity. (2) Optional designation In addition to the 30 private sector entities designated under paragraph (1), the Director may designate— (A) 1 or more information sharing and analysis centers to participate in the pilot program; (B) 1 or more participants in a certified or recognized information sharing or interdiction network; or (C) 1 or more private sector entities, as appropriate, relating to a particular type of illicit activity. (e) Information sharing with private sector entities A covered agency that initiates an investigation into a potential illicit finance violation, or identifies a threat or emerging risk relating to an illicit finance violation, may share with any designated private sector entity such information about the investigation, threat, or emerging risk as the covered agency determines is appropriate. (f) Use of information by private sector entities Information received by a designated private sector entity under this section may not be used for any purpose other than identifying and reporting on activities that may involve illicit finance violations or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, unless otherwise prescribed by regulation or permitted by the covered agency sharing the information. (g) Means of sharing information The covered agencies and designated private sector entities may share information about potential illicit finance violations, or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, with each other— (1) through a portal established by the Secretary of the Treasury or a similar mechanism determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Treasury; (2) through secure email; (3) at monthly meetings, which shall be facilitated by the Secretary of the Treasury; or (4) through a certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network. (h) Limitation on liability A designated private sector entity that transmits, receives, or shares information for the purposes of identifying and reporting activities that may constitute illicit finance violations, or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, shall not be liable to any person for such disclosure or for any failure to provide notice of such disclosure to the person who is the subject of such disclosure or any other person identified in such disclosure. (i) Sunset The pilot program established under subsection (c) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, unless made permanent through notice and comment rulemaking by the Department of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
204. Financial Technology Protection Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Financial Technology Protection Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives. (2) Distributed ledger analytics company The term distributed ledger analytics company means any business providing software, research, or other services (such as tracing tools, geofencing, transaction screening, the collection of business data, and sanctions screening) that— (A) support private and public sector investigations and risk management activities; and (B) involve cryptographically secured distributed ledgers or any similar technology or implementation. (3) Emerging technologies The term emerging technologies means the critical and emerging technology areas listed in the Critical and Emerging Technologies List developed by the Fast Track Action Subcommittee on Critical and Emerging Technologies of the National Science and Technology Council, including any updates to such list. (4) Foreign terrorist organization The term foreign terrorist organization means an organization that is designated as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). (5) Illicit use The term illicit use includes fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, the purchase and sale of illicit goods, trafficking of fentanyl (including fentanyl precursors and trade in other illicit drugs), sanctions evasion, theft of funds, funding of illegal activities, transactions related to child sexual abuse material or elder fraud abuse, and any other financial transaction involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity (as defined in section 1956(c) of title 18, United States Code). (6) State sponsor of terrorism The term state sponsor of terrorism means a country determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism under section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780) or section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371). (7) Terrorist The term terrorist includes a person carrying out domestic terrorism or international terrorism (as such terms are defined, respectively, under section 2331 of title 18, United States Code). (8) Transnational organized crime The term transnational organized crime has the meaning given the term in section 284 of title 10, United States Code. (c) Independent financial technology working group to combat terrorism, narcotics trafficking, and illicit financing (1) Establishment There is established the Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism, Narcotics Trafficking, and Illicit Financing (in this section referred to as the Working Group ), which shall consist of the following: (A) The Secretary of the Treasury or their designee, who shall serve as the chair of the Working Group. (B) A senior-level representative from each of the following: (i) The Department of the Treasury. (ii) The Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. (iii) The Internal Revenue Service. (iv) The Department of Justice. (v) The Federal Bureau of Investigation. (vi) The Drug Enforcement Administration. (vii) The Department of Homeland Security. (viii) The United States Secret Service. (ix) The Department of State. (x) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (C) At least 5 individuals appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury to represent the following: (i) Digital asset companies. (ii) Distributed ledger analytics companies. (iii) Financial institutions. (iv) Institutions or organizations engaged in research. (v) Institutions or organizations focused on individual privacy and civil liberties. (D) Such additional individuals as the Secretary of the Treasury may appoint as necessary to accomplish the duties described in paragraph (2). (2) Duties The Working Group shall— (A) conduct research on the illicit use of digital assets and other related emerging technologies, including by terrorists, foreign terrorist organizations, state sponsors of terrorism, and transnational organized crime groups; and (B) develop legislative and regulatory proposals to improve anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist, and other counter-illicit financing efforts in the United States. (3) Reports (A) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually for the 3 years thereafter, the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of the Treasury, the heads of each agency represented in the Working Group pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), and the appropriate congressional committees a report containing the findings and determinations made by the Working Group in the previous year and any legislative and regulatory proposals developed by the Working Group. (B) Final report Before the date on which the Working Group terminates under paragraph (4)(A), the Working Group shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a final report detailing the findings, recommendations, and activities of the Working Group, including any final results from the research conducted by the Working Group. (4) Sunset (A) In general The Working Group shall terminate on the later of— (i) the date that is 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act; or (ii) the date on which the Working Group completes any wind-up activities described in subparagraph (B). (B) Authority to wind up activities If there are research, proposals, or other related activities of the Working Group ongoing as of the date that is 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Working Group may temporarily continue working in order to wind up such activities. (C) Return of appropriated funds On the date on which the Working Group terminates under subparagraph (A), any unobligated funds appropriated to carry out this subsection shall be transferred to the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Operators of kiosks that exchange cash for digital assets or digital assets for cash would register locations, provide scam warnings and receipts, maintain fraud controls and customer support, and screen wallet activity. During a customer's first 14 days, transactions sending digital assets to a specific wallet address would face a 72-hour wait. New customers would also face an interim $3,500 daily aggregate transaction limit; their transactions of at least $500 require additional confirmation. Qualifying fraud complaints would trigger transaction-fee refunds, not mandatory repayment of principal. States could enforce the rules and provide stronger protections. Treasury would set ongoing reporting and transaction-limit thresholds to deter fraud and illicit finance, with permitted exceptions and adjustments.

Check the sources
205. Digital asset kiosks (a) Registration Section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting , any person who owns, operates, or manages a digital asset kiosk in the United States or its territories, after similar instruments; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (3) Digital asset; digital asset address; digital asset kiosk; digital asset kiosk operator The terms digital asset, digital asset address, digital asset kiosk, and digital asset kiosk operator have the meanings given those terms, respectively, in section 5337. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (f) Registration of digital asset kiosk locations (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this subsection, and not less than once every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall require digital asset kiosk operators to submit an updated list containing the physical address of each digital asset kiosk owned or operated by the digital asset kiosk operator. (2) Form and manner of registration Each submission by a digital asset kiosk operator pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include— (A) the legal name of the digital asset kiosk operator; (B) any fictitious or trade name of the digital asset kiosk operator; (C) the physical address of each digital asset kiosk owned, operated, or managed by the digital asset kiosk operator that is located in the United States or the territories of the United States; (D) the start date of operation of each digital asset kiosk; (E) the end date of operation of each digital asset kiosk, if applicable; and (F) each digital asset address used by the digital asset kiosk operator. (3) False and incomplete information The filing of false or materially incomplete information in a submission required under paragraph (1) shall be deemed a failure to comply with the requirements of this subsection. . (b) Preventing fraudulent transactions at digital asset kiosks (1) In general Subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 5337. Digital asset kiosk fraud prevention (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Customer The term customer means any person that purchases or sells digital assets through a digital asset kiosk. (2) Distributed ledger analytics The term distributed ledger analytics means the analysis of data from public distributed ledgers, and associated transaction information, to provide risk-specific information about digital asset transactions and digital asset addresses. (3) Digital asset The term digital asset has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Digital asset address The term digital asset address means an alphanumeric identifier associated with a digital asset wallet identifying the location to which a digital asset purchased through a digital asset kiosk can be sent or from which a digital asset sold through a digital asset kiosk can be accessed. (5) Digital asset kiosk The term digital asset kiosk means a stand-alone machine that is capable of accepting or dispensing legal tender in exchange for digital assets. (6) Digital asset kiosk operator The term digital asset kiosk operator means a person who owns, operates, or manages a digital asset kiosk located in the United States or its territories. (7) Digital asset kiosk transaction The term digital asset kiosk transaction means the purchase or sale of digital assets via a digital asset kiosk. (8) Digital asset wallet The term digital asset wallet means a software application or other mechanism providing a means for holding, storing, and transferring digital assets. (9) FinCEN The term FinCEN means the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury. (10) New customer The term new customer, with respect to a digital asset kiosk operator, means a customer during the 14-day period beginning on the date of the first digital asset kiosk transaction of the customer with the digital asset kiosk operator. (11) Transaction hash The term transaction hash means a unique identifier made up of a string of characters that act as a record of and provide proof that a transaction was verified and added to the distributed ledger. (b) Disclosures (1) In general Before entering into a digital asset transaction with a customer, a digital asset kiosk operator shall disclose in a clear, conspicuous, and easily readable manner— (A) all relevant terms and conditions of the digital asset kiosk transaction, including— (i) the amount of the digital asset kiosk transaction; (ii) the type and nature of the digital asset kiosk transaction; (iii) a warning that the digital asset kiosk transaction is final, is not refundable, and may not be reversed; and (iv) the type and amount of any fees or other expenses paid by the customer; (B) a warning relating to consumer fraud including— (i) that consumer fraud often starts with contact from a stranger, and that the customer should never send money to someone the customer does not know; (ii) the most common types of fraudulent schemes involving digital asset kiosks, such as— (I) impersonation of a government official or a bank representative; (II) threats of jail time or financial penalties; (III) offers of a job or reward in exchange for payment, or offers of deals that seem too good to be true; (IV) claims of a frozen bank account or credit card; (V) requests for donations to charity or disaster relief; or (VI) payment to an individual the customer has never met; and (iii) a statement that the customer should contact law enforcement if they suspect fraudulent activity, such as scams, including contact information for a relevant law enforcement or government agency. (2) Additional disclosures FinCEN may adopt rules relating to additional disclosures required to be made to customers prior to engaging in a transaction. (c) Acknowledgment of disclosures Each time a customer uses a digital asset kiosk, the digital asset kiosk operator shall ensure acknowledgment of all disclosures required under subsection (b) via confirmation of consent of the customer at the digital asset kiosk. (d) Receipts Upon completion of each digital asset kiosk transaction, the digital asset kiosk operator shall provide the customer with a receipt, which shall include the following information: (1) The name and contact information of the digital asset kiosk operator, including a telephone number for a customer service helpline. (2) The name of the customer. (3) The type, value, date, and precise time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, transaction hash, and each applicable digital asset address. (4) The amount of the digital asset kiosk transaction expressed in United States dollars. (5) All fees charged. (6) A statement that the customer should contact law enforcement if they suspect fraudulent activity, such as scams, including contact information for a relevant law enforcement or government agency. (7) The exchange rate applied. (8) Any additional information the digital asset kiosk operator determines appropriate. (e) Physical receipts available A physical version of the receipt required under subsection (d) shall be issued to the customer at the time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, if the customer opts for such a physical version of the receipt. (f) Anti-Fraud policy
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) In general Each digital asset kiosk operator shall establish, maintain, and implement a written anti-fraud policy if required by, and consistent with, applicable State law in those States where the digital asset kiosk operator is licensed. (2) Federal standard A digital asset kiosk operator operating in any State that does not require an anti-fraud policy under paragraph (1) shall establish, maintain, and implement an anti-fraud policy that, at a minimum, includes— (A) the identification and assessment of fraud-related areas; (B) procedures and controls to protect against risks identified under subparagraph (A); (C) allocation of responsibility for monitoring the risks identified under subparagraph (A); and (D) procedures for the periodic evaluation and revision of the anti fraud procedures, controls, and monitoring mechanisms under subparagraphs (B) and (C). (g) Appointment of compliance officer Each digital asset kiosk operator shall designate and employ a compliance officer who— (1) is qualified to coordinate and monitor compliance with this section and all other applicable Federal and State laws, rules, and regulations; (2) is employed full-time by the digital asset kiosk operator; (3) is not the chief executive officer of the digital asset kiosk operator; and (4) does not own or control more than 10 percent of any interest in the digital asset kiosk operator. (h) Use of distributed ledger analytics and wallet pinning (1) In general Each digital asset kiosk operator shall use distributed ledger analytics to prevent sending a digital asset to a digital asset wallet known to be affiliated with fraudulent activity at the time of a digital asset kiosk transaction and to detect transaction patterns indicative of fraud or other illicit activities. (2) Wallet pinning Each digital asset kiosk operator shall maintain restrictions that prevent more than 1 customer of the digital asset kiosk operator from using the same digital wallet address. (3) Compliance The Director of FinCEN may request evidence from any digital asset kiosk operator to confirm compliance with this subsection. (i) Confirmation required before new customer transactions Before entering into a digital asset kiosk transaction valued at $500 or more with a new customer, the digital asset kiosk operator shall obtain confirmation from the new customer that— (1) the new customer wishes to proceed with the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (2) the new customer is not being fraudulently induced into engaging in the transaction. (j) Holding period No digital asset kiosk operator shall execute a transaction on behalf of a new customer that sends digital assets to a specific wallet address unless at least 72 hours have elapsed since the initiation of the transaction by the new customer. (k) Transaction limits with respect to new customers The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe by regulation the threshold amounts for reporting or limiting digital asset kiosk transactions, including aggregate or single-day deposit and withdrawal limits, as the Secretary determines are reasonably necessary to deter fraud and illicit finance. Such regulations shall consider the unique risks and functionalities of digital asset kiosks and may provide for exceptions, adjustments, or exclusions as deemed appropriate by the Secretary. (l) Interim transaction limits Until the effective date of regulations prescribed under subsection (k), a digital asset kiosk operator shall not permit a new customer to conduct transactions exceeding $3,500 in the aggregate within any 24-hour period. (m) Refunds A digital asset kiosk operator shall issue a refund for a customer’s transaction fees within 30 days if— (1) the customer was fraudulently induced into engaging in the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (2) the customer files a complaint to the digital asset kiosk operator, which includes— (A) the name, address, and phone number of the customer; (B) the transaction hash of the digital asset kiosk transaction or information sufficient to establish the type, value, date, and time of the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (C) a copy of a report to a State or local law enforcement or government agency made not later than 30 days after the digital asset kiosk transaction. (n) Customer service helpline Each digital asset kiosk operator shall provide live customer service during business hours, the phone number for which is regularly monitored and displayed in a clear, conspicuous, and easily readable manner upon each digital asset kiosk. During non-business hours, the digital asset kiosk operator shall maintain an alternative customer service system that may include an automated chatbot, an online complaint reporting portal, or other customer service mechanism. (o) Communications with law enforcement Each digital asset kiosk operator performing business in the United States shall have a dedicated method of contact, such as a phone number, email address, or other contact method, for law enforcement and regulatory agencies to contact the digital asset kiosk operator. This contact method shall be displayed and available on the digital asset kiosk operator’s website. (p) Civil penalties and state enforcement Any State regulator may bring a civil action or other appropriate proceeding to enforce the provisions of this section and may assess or collect civil penalties or other remedies for violations of this section, as provided under applicable State law. (q) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit a State from enacting a law, rule, or regulation that provides greater protection to customers. . (2) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 5337. Digital asset kiosk fraud prevention. .
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(k) Transaction limits with respect to new customers The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe by regulation the threshold amounts for reporting or limiting digital asset kiosk transactions, including aggregate or single-day deposit and withdrawal limits, as the Secretary determines are reasonably necessary to deter fraud and illicit finance. Such regulations shall consider the unique risks and functionalities of digital asset kiosks and may provide for exceptions, adjustments, or exclusions as deemed appropriate by the Secretary.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title III directs rules for people controlling certain trading protocols, but its scope is uncertain. Section 301 includes controlled systems in its protocol definition, while section 601 excludes them from its own definition; section 301 also requires consistency with section 601. This analysis cannot resolve which controllers would ultimately be covered. The text directs function-based securities and financial-crime rules and says software itself need not register. Separate Treasury guidance for U.S.-operated transaction interfaces would use existing authority. Qualifying narrowly limited cybersecurity emergency actions would not alone establish common control. Section 302’s construction clause states that the financial-institution definition shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers defined in section 604(b)(3); this specific protection does not exempt them from all financial-crime laws. Section 302(d)(2)(B) says the financial-institution definition shall not apply to the section 604(b)(3) non-controlling class, while section 604(e)(2) preserves possible financial-institution treatment for conduct outside section 604(c). Their interaction for outside-scope conduct is unresolved in the supplied text; this analysis does not treat either clause as settling that question.

Check the sources
301. Rulemaking on application of existing securities intermediary requirements and existing Bank Secrecy Act requirements to non-decentralized finance trading protocols (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Decentralized finance trading protocol The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (A) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (B) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of any digital assets subject to the financial transaction. (2) Non-decentralized finance trading protocol (A) In general The term non-decentralized finance trading protocol means a decentralized finance trading protocol that meets 1 or more of the following: (i) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the decentralized finance trading protocol. (ii) The decentralized finance trading protocol does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system. (iii) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, via operation of the decentralized finance trading protocol, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use of the decentralized finance trading protocol, including any applicable system-based user activity. (B) Special rule For purposes of subparagraph (A), a decentralized governance system, solely by virtue of the operation of the decentralized governance system, shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (C) Exclusions For purposes of this section, participation in an incident-response or security council, as described in subsection (f), shall not, by itself, be deemed to constitute control of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol. (D) Scoping In implementing this section, the Commission and the Department of the Treasury shall construe the term non-decentralized finance trading protocol in a manner consistent with section 15H of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by section 601. (b) Rules (1) In general The Commission, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after notice and comment, that clarify how a person, or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, that controls a non-decentralized finance trading protocol and is subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), as amended by this Act, shall comply with applicable requirements under that Act, including with respect to registration, conduct, disclosure, recordkeeping, supervision, and other requirements under the securities laws. (2) Requirements The rulemaking required under paragraph (1) shall— (A) ensure that the rules adopted pursuant to that rulemaking are consistent with the purposes of the securities laws, including the public interest, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets; (B) protect the rights of software developers, publishers, and users to create, publish, and use code and software in a manner consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (C) provide legal clarity for the development, publication, and operation of distributed ledger systems and the components therein in a manner consistent with the purposes of this section; and (D) result in, by operation of law, the application and enforcement by the Department of the Treasury, where applicable and pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal law with respect to any person or group of persons that the Commission determines, through that rulemaking, is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). (3) Application (A) In general Any person or group of persons determined under this subsection to be required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (referred to in this paragraph as the Exchange Act) shall be subject to that Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to the extent applicable under existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, consistent with the treatment of similarly situated participants under the Exchange Act. (B) Rulemaking The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commission, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after providing notice and the opportunity to comment, that define compliance with obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal laws relating to anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism with respect to any person, or group of persons under common control (or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert), that— (i) controls the operation of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol identified in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); (ii) is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Exchange Act, as determined in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); and (iii) is caused to be treated as a financial institution under the Bank Secrecy Act pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, as a result of registration or compliance described in clause (ii). (c) Activity-Based application Rules adopted under subsection (b)(1) shall require the Commission to determine the applicable requirements only with respect to securities-related activities, based on the functions performed by the controlling person or group of persons, including brokerage, dealing, trading, execution, clearing, or custody of securities, without regard to technological form, distributed architecture, or purportedly decentralized characterization. (d) Rules of construction (1) Registration not required Nothing in this section, nor any rule adopted under this section, may be construed to— (A) require a distributed ledger system or any software code to register with the Commission in its own capacity; or (B) prohibit the launch, deployment, or operation of a distributed ledger system. (2) No expansion of statutory authority Notwithstanding any rulemaking required under subsection (b), and notwithstanding any action the Commission or the Secretary of the Treasury may take under that subsection, nothing in this section, including any such rulemaking, may be construed to— (A) expand or contract the statutory authority of the Commission or the Department of the Treasury, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, under the Bank Secrecy Act; or
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) limit the use of the authority described in subparagraph (A) to determine, pursuant to that rulemaking, the applicability of existing statutory requirements, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, to persons or activities described in this section. (3) No presumption of applicability Nothing in this section may be construed to create a presumption that any person or activity described in this section is or is not subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the Bank Secrecy Act absent a determination made pursuant to a rulemaking required under this section. (e) Preservation of existing authorities Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) limit the authority of the Commission under the securities laws to investigate violations, bring actions, or issue subpoenas with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the securities laws under this section; or (2) limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act, including to investigate violations or bring actions with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the Bank Secrecy Act. (f) Non-Decentralized finance trading protocols (1) In general In adopting rules under subsection (b), the Commission shall treat a decentralized governance system and any person participating in the decentralized governance system as separate persons unless such persons are under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (2) Emergency measures (A) In general Pre-defined, temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures exercised by an incident-response or security council exclusively in response to a specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat and pursuant to publicly disclosed, on-chain authorization mechanisms, strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address such specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and without unilateral control by any single person, shall not, by themselves, constitute common control or an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, provided that such rules and authorities, including the procedures and operational limits governing such emergency measures, are disclosed in publicly available written documentation reasonably available to the applicable Federal regulator, by a decentralized governance system or similar legal entity sufficiently in advance of any exercise of such emergency powers. (B) Prohibition The emergency measures described in subparagraph (A) may not be used to implement protocol upgrades, governance decisions, or economic changes that are unrelated to the mitigation of the applicable cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, as described in that subparagraph. (3) Standards The standards criteria for temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures under paragraph (2) shall be established by rulemaking pursuant to subsection (b).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
302. Illicit finance obligations for distributed ledger messaging systems (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Distributed ledger messaging system The term distributed ledger messaging system— (A) means a web-hosted software application that provides a user with the ability to create or submit an instruction, communication, or message to a distributed ledger application or decentralized finance trading protocol for the purpose of executing a transaction by the user; and (B) does not include— (i) a distributed ledger application; (ii) a distributed ledger protocol; (iii) a distributed ledger system; (iv) a decentralized finance trading protocol; (v) any client, node, validator, or other form of computational infrastructure with respect to a distributed ledger system; or (vi) any software or hardware wallet that facilitates the custody of an individual of their digital assets. (2) United States sanction law The term United States sanction law means any Federal law imposing, or authorizing the imposition of, economic sanctions. (b) Guidance Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue guidance with respect to the economic sanctions and anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism obligations, risk management practices, or compliance considerations, applicable to a distributed ledger messaging system that is owned or operated by a United States person, as defined in any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions, which may include— (1) the use of commercially reasonable distributed ledger-analytics screening measures, through industry-standard distributed ledger-analytics tools, to identify wallet addresses that are owned by sanctioned persons, involve jurisdictions or financial institutions subject to United States sanctions, or activity prohibited by United States sanctions; (2) blocking, rejecting, preventing the routing of, or otherwise restricting attempted transactions prohibited by United States sanction laws; (3) blocking or restricting transactions that exhibit indicators of ransomware activity, illicit finance typologies, or any other pattern that presents a significant and identifiable illicit finance risk based on a commercially reasonable distributed ledger-analytics assessment to identify transactions that involve ransomware activity and other illicit finance activity; and (4) implementing and maintaining risk-based measures, consistent with applicable law, to identify, mitigate, and address anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism risks, including— (A) monitoring for risk indicators and limiting exposure to illicit-finance risks, which may include restricting, limiting, or otherwise mitigating exposure to high-risk transactions; and (B) complying, as applicable, with special measures implemented by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 5318A of title 31, United States Code. (c) Enforcement and penalties The Secretary of the Treasury and any other Federal agency with relevant jurisdiction have the authority, as applicable, to enforce this section using their existing authorities, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act, under applicable law. (d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) alter or amend any laws imposing or authorizing imposition of economic sanctions by the United States, including those that apply to United States persons that own or operate a distributed ledger messaging system; (2) expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act to any person, including any person that owns or operates a distributed ledger messaging system; or (B) the definition of a financial institution under applicable laws, which shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers as defined in section 604(b)(3); or (3) restrict the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement, administer, and enforce, including by imposing civil money penalties, any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions or any law to prevent money laundering or illicit finance otherwise provided by Federal law to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(2) Decentralized finance trading protocol (A) In general The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (i) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (ii) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of the digital assets subject to the financial transaction. (B) Exclusions (i) In general The term decentralized finance trading protocol does not include a distributed ledger system if— (I) a person or group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the distributed ledger system; (II) the distributed ledger system does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system; or (III) a person or group of persons under common control has the unilateral authority, via operation of the distributed ledger system, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use of the distributed ledger system, including any applicable system-based user activity. (ii) Special rule For purposes of clause (i), a decentralized governance system shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) alter or amend any laws imposing or authorizing imposition of economic sanctions by the United States, including those that apply to United States persons that own or operate a distributed ledger messaging system; (2) expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act to any person, including any person that owns or operates a distributed ledger messaging system; or (B) the definition of a financial institution under applicable laws, which shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers as defined in section 604(b)(3); or (3) restrict the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement, administer, and enforce, including by imposing civil money penalties, any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions or any law to prevent money laundering or illicit finance otherwise provided by Federal law to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c);
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Treasury could prohibit or condition specified transfers involving foreign digital-asset money-laundering concerns. Covered providers could receive protection from private lawsuits for qualifying good-faith transaction holds of up to 30 days, extendable another 150 days by a qualified agency request, with notice and recordkeeping conditions. Permitted stablecoin issuers must comply with qualifying federal court freezing orders; the section otherwise preserves existing blocking authority.

Check the sources
303. Special measure relating to certain transmittals of funds Section 5318A of title 31, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking subsection (b)(5) and inserting paragraph (5) or (6) of subsection (b) and (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following: (6) Special measure for certain transmittals of funds If the Secretary of the Treasury finds that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, 1 or more financial institutions operating outside of the United States, or 1 or more classes of transactions within, or involving, a jurisdiction outside of the United States is of primary money laundering concern in connection with illicit finance through the use of digital assets, as defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901), the Secretary may, by order, regulation, or otherwise as permitted by law, prohibit, or impose conditions upon, certain transmittals of funds (to be defined by the Secretary by regulation) by any domestic financial institution or domestic financial agency, if such transmittal of funds involves any such institution, class of transaction, or type of account. .
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
305. Temporary hold for certain digital asset transactions (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered agency The term covered agency means any State or Federal law enforcement agency, including the Department of the Treasury. (2) Covered person The term covered person means a person that is— (A) a permitted payment stablecoin issuer; (B) a foreign payment stablecoin issuer (as defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901)) registered with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to section 18(c) of that Act (12 U.S.C. 5916(c)); or (C) a digital asset service provider, as that term is defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (3) Payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms payment stablecoin and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Qualified written request The term qualified written request means a written communication issued by an authorized official of a covered agency that— (A) identifies a specific wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity; (B) requests a covered person initiate an action with respect to the specified wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity, including delaying the execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets; and (C) includes a designated agency contact. (5) Temporary hold The term temporary hold means a restriction applied by a covered person that delays execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 30 calendar days, which may be extended for an additional 150 calendar days pursuant to a qualified written request. (b) Protection from private causes of action (1) In general Any covered person that, in good faith and in compliance with this section, or any person complying with a temporary lawful order under subsection (c) that, voluntarily implements a temporary hold shall not be held liable pursuant to any Federal or State private right of action for implementing the temporary hold, provided that— (A) the covered person or other person, as applicable— (i) implements the temporary hold based on a reasonable belief the transaction, conversion, or withdrawal relates to a violation or attempted violation of State or Federal law; or (ii) implements the temporary hold after receiving a qualified written request from a covered agency; (B) the covered person— (i) makes reasonable efforts to notify the affected customer of the temporary hold; (ii) reasonably determines that notification would impede actual or potential law enforcement efforts; or (iii) receives a qualified written request from a covered agency that requests notification not be attempted; and (C) the covered person notifies as soon as reasonably practicable an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency or the Federal Trade Commission, provided that such notification is not required when the covered person has received a qualified written request from a covered agency. (2) Documentation A covered person shall— (A) maintain for the 3-year period following the implementation of a temporary hold documentation of the basis for applying a temporary hold; and (B) make available the documentation described in subparagraph (A) upon the request of a covered agency or the Federal Trade Commission. (c) Compliance with temporary lawful orders A permitted payment stablecoin issuer shall comply with any valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued or promulgated under Federal law by a court of competent jurisdiction that— (1) requires a person to freeze or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins; (2) specifies the payment stablecoins or accounts subject to blocking with reasonable particularity; and (3) is subject to judicial or administrative review or appeal, as provided by law. (d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) compel or require any covered person to take action to freeze, seize, or block digital assets that is not otherwise required under existing Federal or State law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act; (2) limit or alter the authority of any government agency, including with respect to authority to pursue enforcement actions; (3) limit or affect the application of— (A) section 5318(g)(3) of title 31, United States Code, and any regulation requiring any financial institution to report suspicious activity; or (B) any lawful authority to seize or freeze assets pursuant to a lawful order or sanctions designation; or (4) limit the ability of a covered person to apply a temporary hold to any wallet, address, account, or transaction located outside the United States. (e) Reporting The Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission may issue regulations or guidance relating to any notification by covered persons pursuant to this section to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, respectively.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Intermediaries would assess financial-crime, fraud, operational and cybersecurity risks before using decentralized trading protocols, explain risks to customers and maintain transaction controls. A voluntary federal cybersecurity program would supplement those duties. Required studies would examine offshore stablecoins, transaction-obscuring software, foreign intermediaries and adversaries, cybersecurity and borrowing-related financial risks; these research mandates do not establish findings of harm. Section 308 does not define the protocol term, and sections 301 and 601 supply differing definitions for their own contexts. This leaves the precise protocol coverage of these risk-control duties unresolved.

Check the sources
Before conducting trading activity (including routing orders and executing trades) through a decentralized finance trading protocol, a digital asset intermediary shall implement risk management standards
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Disclosing the risks identified under paragraph (1) using plain language to customers.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
establish a voluntary program for the adoption by persons developing decentralized finance trading protocols or engaging in covered activities of applicable cybersecurity standards published by NIST.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
conduct a separate study examining the risks to financial stability and orderly markets arising from the extension and maintenance of credit with respect to digital assets
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
304. Offshore stablecoin report (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Material volume of transactions The term material volume of transactions means a sustained level of transaction activity that is— (A) publicly observable; (B) exceeds de minimis usage over a 12-month period; and (C) is reasonably likely to affect the illicit finance or national security risk exposure of the United States. (2) Payment stablecoin The term payment stablecoin has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (3) United states-dependent offshore stablecoin The term United States-dependent offshore stablecoin means a payment stablecoin— (A) that is not issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer or any foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller (as those terms are defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901)); (B) that is issued by a person operating outside of the United States; and (C) the value of which is supported or backed by a reserve of assets that has a substantial nexus to the United States, which may include— (i) obligations of the United States, including United States Treasury securities and repurchase agreements backed by United States Treasury securities and funds held as deposits at any bank subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; (ii) deposits maintained at a banking entity or insured depository institution located in the United States, including correspondent or payable-through accounts; (iii) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof; or (iv) assets custodied, cleared, or settled through payment, clearing, or settlement systems located in the United States. (b) Report Not later than June 30 of the second calendar year that begins after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 4 years thereafter for not more than 3 reports, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, and make available on the website of the Department of the Treasury, a report assessing whether there is credible, articulable, and publicly supportable evidence of significant illicit finance threats or vulnerabilities associated with any United States-dependent offshore stablecoin employed in a material volume of transactions. (c) Contents Each report required under subsection (b) shall include— (1) an assessment of the illicit finance risk of each United States-dependent offshore stablecoin employed in a material volume of transactions; (2) an assessment of the controls employed by the issuers of United States-dependent offshore stablecoins to address the use of such stablecoins in illicit finance, as available; (3) data and information regarding the volume of United States-dependent offshore stablecoins assessed to be employed in connection with illicit finance, as available; (4) a general description of the relationships between United States-dependent offshore stablecoins and the financial system of the United States, including principal channels of interaction; and (5) such other information or analysis as the Secretary of the Treasury deems relevant to assessing the illicit finance risks of United States-dependent offshore stablecoins. (d) Classified annex Each report required under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. (e) National strategy The reporting requirement under subsection (b) may be met as part of the national strategy for combating terrorist and other illicit financing required under sections 261 and 262 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (Public Law 115–44; 131 Stat. 934) for the reporting years. (f) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize— (1) the disclosure of any information that is protected from disclosure under Federal law; and (2) the collection or use of any information other than publicly available data or information lawfully obtained by the Department of the Treasury under existing authorities, as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
309. Study on digital asset mixers and tumblers (a) Digital asset mixer and tumbler defined In this section, the term digital asset mixer and tumbler means a smart contract, or set of smart contracts, that obfuscate or eliminate the source or other forms of identification of the holder of a digital asset, including by pooling assets from different holders and redistributing those assets among holders. (b) Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that analyzes the following issues: (1) Current (as of the date on which the report is submitted) typologies of digital asset mixers and tumblers and historical transaction volume. (2) Estimates of the percentage of transactions relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers that are used by actors engaged in illicit finance. (3) Estimates of the reliance, and financial exposure, of centralized exchanges and traditional financial institutions to digital asset mixers and tumblers, and the extent to which centralized exchanges and traditional financial institutions are adequately implementing anti-money laundering and economic sanctions compliance with respect to digital asset mixers and tumblers. (4) An assessment of potential non-illicit uses of mixers and tumblers described in paragraph (1), including privacy benefits. (5) An analysis of regulatory approaches employed by other jurisdictions relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers. (6) Recommendations for legislation or regulation relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
310. GAO study on intermediaries in foreign jurisdictions (a) In general The Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall conduct a study to— (1) assess the risks posed by digital asset intermediaries that— (A) are primarily located in foreign jurisdictions that lack regulatory requirements that are substantially similar to the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; and (B) provide services to United States persons; and (2) provide any regulatory or legislative recommendations to address the risks described in paragraph (1). (b) Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under subsection (a).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
311. Studies on foreign adversary activities (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Foreign adversary The term foreign adversary means a foreign government or foreign non-government person determined by the Secretary of Commerce to be a foreign adversary under section 791.4(a) of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. (2) Relevant congressional committees The term relevant congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate; (C) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; (D) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; (E) the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives; and (F) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (b) Treasury report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Commission, shall conduct a study and submit a report to the relevant congressional committees, which may include a classified annex, that— (1) identifies any digital asset intermediary that is controlled by a government of a foreign adversary, or by individuals or entities acting at the direction of a foreign adversary; (2) determines whether any government of a foreign adversary is collecting trading data about United States persons in digital asset markets; and (3) evaluates whether any proprietary intellectual property of digital asset intermediaries is being misused or stolen by any government of a foreign adversary. (c) GAO study and report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study and submit a report to the relevant congressional committees, which may include a classified annex, that— (1) identifies any digital asset intermediary that is owned by a government of a foreign adversary, or by individuals or entities acting at the direction of a foreign adversary; (2) determines whether any government of a foreign adversary is collecting trading data about United States persons in digital asset markets; and (3) evaluates whether any proprietary intellectual property of digital asset intermediaries is being misused or stolen by any government of a foreign adversary.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
312. Treasury study on cybersecurity standards (a) Study The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall conduct a study on cybersecurity standards applicable to digital asset smart contracts, custody, key management, and smart contract deployment. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report containing— (A) the findings of the study under subsection (a); and (B) any legislative recommendations. (2) Classified annex The report under paragraph (1) may include a classified annex, as appropriate.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title IV would authorize listed digital-asset services for specified banks, financial holding companies and federal credit unions, including custody, payments, lending and customer-driven trading. Equivalent non-digital requirements and supervision for unsafe practices remain; some trading remains subject to existing banking restrictions. Additional advance approvals are limited to specified statutes and regulations. These authorities exclude nonfungible assets. Section 401(f) extends only section 401(e)(1)’s permission to use digital assets or ledger systems for otherwise lawful services to insured credit unions, subject to applicable state law. It does not expressly extend section 401(e)(2)’s separate authorization of the activities listed in subsection (g).

Check the sources
making loans collateralized by digital assets
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
underwriting, dealing in, or making a market in digital assets in customer-driven transactions
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a requirement that would apply if the activity were not performed, provided, or delivered using a digital asset or distributed ledger system.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be permissible for an insured credit union, subject to authorization by applicable State law.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The authorities described in this section shall not apply to nonfungible assets.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(h) Other requirements There shall be no other prior notice or approval requirements to engage in the activities described in subsections (b) through (g) of this section other than those required under title LXII of the Revised Statutes, the Act entitled An Act to place authority over the trust powers of national banks in the Comptroller of the Currency, approved September 28, 1962 (12 U.S.C. 92a et seq.), the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 221 et seq.), or the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated under those Acts. (i) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) exclude other possible permissible activities that are not activities described in subsection (g); (2) imply that inclusion of an activity described in subsection (g) means that the activity is otherwise impermissible; (3) limit the authority of an appropriate Federal banking agency to determine that activities other than those activities described in subsection (g) are permissible for a Federal credit union or authorized as part of the business of banking, or financial in nature, or incidental or complementary thereto, or other applicable law, as applicable, through interpretations, guidance, or rulemaking; or (4) limit the authority of an appropriate Federal banking agency, or a State bank supervisor, to supervise and take enforcement action with respect to an insured depository institution (or, to the extent applicable, a financial holding company) engaging in a digital asset activity authorized by this section that the appropriate Federal banking agency or State bank supervisor, as applicable, determines, pursuant to applicable law, to be an unsafe or unsound practice or a violation of a law, rule, or regulation, or any condition imposed in writing.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(e) Authorized activities for Federal credit unions (1) In general A Federal credit union may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the Federal credit union is otherwise authorized by law to perform, provide, or deliver. (2) Business of credit unions The activities described in subsection (g) are authorized as part of, or incidental to, the authority necessary or requisite to carry on effectively the business for which Federal credit unions are incorporated under paragraph (17) of section 107 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757(17)). (3) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to exempt the performance, provision, or delivery by a Federal credit union of an activity, function, product, or service from a requirement that would apply if the activity were not performed, provided, or delivered using a digital asset or distributed ledger system. (f) Insured credit unions The activities authorized for a Federal credit union under subsection (e)(1) shall be permissible for an insured credit union, subject to authorization by applicable State law.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Joint securities and commodities rules would permit collateral requirements based on combined portfolio risk across specified asset classes, with customer safeguards and insolvency disclosures. Banking regulators would develop related capital requirements. Expanded accounts could not operate before final rules. Digital commodities would be excluded from the Securities Investor Protection Act's security definition, and SIPC could not fund digital-commodity or swap claims in expanded accounts; bankruptcy customer-property treatment does not itself provide that coverage.

Check the sources
405. Expanded securities portfolio margin accounts under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (a) Amendments The Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.) is amended— (1) in section 9(a) (15 U.S.C. 78fff–3(a))— (A) in paragraph (4), by striking and at the end; (B) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (6) no advance shall be made by SIPC to the trustee to pay or otherwise satisfy any net equity claim of any customer with respect to any digital commodities or swaps held in an expanded securities portfolio margin account. ; (2) in section 10(g) (15 U.S.C. 78fff–4(g)), by striking 16(12) and inserting 16(13); and (3) in section 16 (15 U.S.C. 78lll)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (14) as paragraphs (8) through (15), respectively; (B) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following: (7) Expanded securities portfolio margin account The term expanded securities portfolio margin account means a customer account— (A) that is maintained by a broker or dealer registered with the Commission; (B) that includes positions in securities, security-based swaps, futures contracts, options on futures contracts, swaps, digital commodities, or other financial instruments, or any combination thereof, as permitted by rule jointly issued by the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; (C) that is subject to portfolio margining requirements approved pursuant to section 402 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; and (D) in which margin requirements are determined on a risk-based, portfolio-wide basis, rather than on an instrument-by-instrument basis. ; and (C) in paragraph (10), as so redesignated, in the matter following subparagraph (L), by striking a transaction in the portfolio margining account and inserting the portfolio margining account or expanded securities portfolio margin account. (b) Rules (1) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Expanded securities portfolio margin account The term expanded securities portfolio margin account has the meaning given the term in section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll), as amended by this section. (B) SIPC The term SIPC means the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. (2) Issuance of rules Notwithstanding any provision of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.), in jointly issuing rules under section 402, the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, in consultation with the SIPC and the Secretary of the Treasury, shall issue rules relating to the treatment under that Act of securities (including related extensions of credit), security-based swaps, contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery, options on contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery, swaps, digital commodities, cash, or other property (to the extent that such instruments, cash, or other property effectively hedge or collateralize a securities position) held in an account offering portfolio margining carried as a securities account by a registered broker or dealer pursuant to an expanded securities portfolio margin account to facilitate portfolio margining in a manner that protects customers, including portfolio margin customers, which shall include rules relating to— (A) the transfer of accounts; (B) the allocation of customer property among customers; (C) the eligibility of products and positions to be held in an expanded securities portfolio margin account, including any disclosures to and any elections that may need to be performed by customers; (D) the application of customer protection or segregation requirements as between securities customers who are and are not maintaining positions in an expanded securities portfolio margin account; (E) further defining the terms, solely as relating to an expanded securities portfolio margin account, customer, customer property, and net equity, as necessary or appropriate to address non-securities and non-cash positions and assets held in an expanded securities portfolio margin account, and in a manner consistent with subparagraphs (A) through (D); and (F) any interaction between a securities account and an expanded securities portfolio margin account, including any funding of debits in one type of account by credits in the other type of account. (3) Process for issuance of rules The requirements of section 402(b) shall apply with respect to the rules issued under this subsection. (c) Effect of rules An expanded securities portfolio margin account may not be offered, maintained, or utilized until the final rules required under subsection (b) are issued.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
402. Joint rules for portfolio margining determinations (a) In general The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Commission shall jointly issue rules to facilitate portfolio margining of securities (including related extensions of credit), security-based swaps, futures contracts for future delivery, options on futures contracts for future delivery, swaps, and digital commodities, or any subset thereof, for persons registered with either such Commission, in— (1) a securities account carried by a registered broker or dealer or a security-based swap account carried by a registered security-based swap dealer; (2) a futures or cleared swap account carried by a registered futures commission merchant; (3) a swap account carried by a swap dealer; or (4) a digital commodity account carried by a registered digital commodity broker or digital commodity dealer that is also registered in such other capacity as is necessary to also carry the other customer or counterparty positions being held in the account. (b) Process The rules required to be jointly issued under subsection (a) shall— (1) describe the treatment of any account to which the rules relate, and any assets that may be held therein, in a proceeding under title 11, United States Code, the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.), title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381 et seq.), or any other applicable insolvency law with respect to the person carrying the account; (2) be issued only if that issuance is in the public interest and provides for the appropriate protection of customers, including appropriate disclosures to each current and potential customer concerning the treatment of any account to which the rules relate, and any assets that may be held therein, in a proceeding under title 11, United States Code, the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.), title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381 et seq.), or any other applicable insolvency law with respect to the person carrying the account; (3) require the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to consider the public interest of, and the protection of investors by, those rules through the solicitation of public comments; and (4) require the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to— (A) consult with other relevant foreign or domestic regulators, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and State bank supervisors, as appropriate; and (B) if the rules pertain to a securities account carried by a registered broker or dealer that is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, consult with the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
403. Capital requirements to address netting agreements (a) Definitions In this section, the terms depository institution holding company and insured depository institution have the meanings given those terms in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (b) Capital requirements Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall develop risk-based and leverage capital requirements for insured depository institutions, depository institution holding companies, and nonbank financial companies supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System that address netting agreements that provide for termination and close-out netting across multiple types of financial transactions, consistent with section 402, in the event of the default of a counterparty.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
110. Securities Investor Protection Corporation applicability Section 16(14) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll(14)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the following: The term security does not include a digital commodity..
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Covered service providers and affiliates could not pay U.S. customers or users of a covered party interest-like returns solely for holding payment stablecoins or equivalent to bank-deposit interest. Genuine activity rewards remain permissible if they are not equivalent to deposit interest, even when calculated using balances or duration. Issuer-specific restrictions remain separate. Rules would require compensation disclosures and prohibit misleading insurance or government-guarantee claims; knowing and willful violations could draw penalties up to $5 million per violation.

Check the sources
solely in connection with the holding of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
rewards or incentives based on bona fide activities or bona fide transactions that are not economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may be calculated by reference to a balance, duration, tenure, or any combination of the foregoing.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty by the Department of the Treasury of not more than $5,000,000 for each such violation.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
modify, alter, or extend prohibitions on the payment of yield, interest, or consideration applicable to permitted payment stablecoin issuers or foreign payment stablecoin issuers
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(a) Definitions In this section: (1) Affiliate The term affiliate means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another entity. (2) Commissions The term Commissions means the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (3) Comptroller; foreign payment stablecoin issuer; payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms Comptroller, foreign payment stablecoin issuer, payment stablecoin, and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Covered party The term covered party means any digital asset service provider, together with all of its affiliates, but in each case excluding any permitted payment stablecoin issuer or foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller. (5) Deposit The term deposit has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (6) Restricted recipient The term restricted recipient means a United States person that is a customer or user of a covered party. (7) United States person The term United States person means a person that is a resident of the United States or is organized or incorporated under the laws of the United States.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) Prohibition on specified representations (1) Certain marketing practices No covered party shall represent that— (A) payment stablecoins are investment products, deposits, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, subject to deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration; or (B) any compensation (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid to a restricted recipient in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient is— (i) paid or generated by the payment stablecoin itself, a permitted payment stablecoin issuer, or a foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller; (ii) risk-free or comparable to interest paid on a deposit; or (iii) offered, administered, or paid by a person other than the covered party. (2) Misleading No covered party shall omit material information necessary to prevent any marketing, promotion, or description described in this subsection from being misleading. (e) Disclosures (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly promulgate rules requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure, in plain English, of any compensation (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid by a covered party in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of a restricted recipient in a manner that is consistent with subsection (d). (2) Requirements In promulgating rules under paragraph (1), the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall require that any required disclosure of compensation described in that paragraph, and any related term, representation, or description— (A) is presented in a clear, factual, nonpromotional, and non-misleading manner; (B) clearly identifies the circumstances under which such compensation can be paid; (C) clearly identifies the person or persons responsible for offering, administering, and paying such compensation, including whether such persons are affiliated with the issuer of associated payment stablecoins; (D) outlines all material terms with respect to such compensation; and (E) includes a statement that payment stablecoins are not investment products, deposits, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, subject to deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration. (3) Prohibition After the date on which the rules promulgated under paragraph (1) become effective, no covered party shall market the offering of compensation (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid by such covered party in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of a restricted recipient unless the covered party has provided the disclosures required under this subsection. (4) Satisfaction of requirement A covered party that provides the disclosures required under this subsection shall be deemed not to have made a representation that is prohibited under subsection (d), provided that— (A) any marketing, promotion, or description with respect to the applicable compensation does not contradict those disclosures; and (B) those disclosures are presented in plain English and in a clear and conspicuous manner.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title V's SEC–CFTC testing program would offer temporary, conditional regulatory relief to eligible U.S. firms with no more than 25 employees and $10 million in annual revenue. Each firm's program activities would face a $20 million ceiling on aggregate customer, investor, or counterparty funds; each agency could approve at most 20 projects annually. Participation normally lasts two years, with a conditional one-year extension. State registration requirements could be displaced for approved activities, but fraud and generally applicable laws remain.

Check the sources
employs not more than 25 employees; and (H) has annual gross revenues of not more than $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not raise or commit more than $20,000,000 in aggregate customer, investor, or counterparty funds in connection with Sandbox activities.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each of the Commissions may approve not more than 20 projects per year.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an eligible firm may participate in the Sandbox for a period of not more than 2 years
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not include any Federal or State anti-fraud law or any other law that is not specific to the regulation of securities or commodities
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(f) Duration of participation (1) Duration Except as provided in paragraph (2), an eligible firm may participate in the Sandbox for a period of not more than 2 years, provided that the eligible firm does not exceed the ceilings established under subsection (d)(2). (2) Extension (A) Sole jurisdiction If an eligible innovative activity is subject only to the jurisdiction of 1 Commission, that Commission may extend participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year, if that Commission determines that the eligible firm— (i) is actively pursuing the exit objective described in subsection (e)(1)(F) in good faith; (ii) is making demonstrable progress toward achieving such an exit; and (iii) establishes that such an extension is necessary to achieve such an exit. (B) Joint jurisdiction Where an eligible innovative activity is subject to the jurisdiction of both Commissions, an extension of participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year shall be by joint order of the Commissions after making the findings described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph (A).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(k) Relationship of sandbox participation to state law (1) Limited preemption for sandbox participants This section, including participation in the Sandbox, and any exemption or relief granted under this section, shall supersede any State securities or commodities law requiring registration, qualification, or licensing as a condition of engaging in an approved activity or otherwise regulating that activity as a security or commodity. (2) State enforcement preserved Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit or limit any State securities or commodities regulator, any State bank regulator, or any State law enforcement agency from conducting an investigation or bringing an administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement action under— (A) a State law prohibiting fraud or deceit, or fraudulent, deceptive, manipulative, unethical, dishonest, or other unlawful conduct or practices, in connection with securities or securities transactions; (B) the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) or State commodities laws; or (C) any State law of general applicability, including such a law relating to banking, consumer protection, contracts, property, or criminal conduct. (3) Notice filings A State may require notice of any document filed with either of the Commissions in connection with participation in the Sandbox, together with consent to service of process and reasonable fees, consistent with section 18(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(c)).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title V also directs international regulatory cooperation and an international illicit-finance strategy, studies automated compliance and tokenized securities, and promotes voluntary adoption of encryption standards addressing quantum-computing threats. Treasury would report on major foreign trading jurisdictions and remediation efforts. These study, coordination and voluntary-assistance provisions do not themselves establish market outcomes or replace existing compliance obligations.

Check the sources
shall consult and coordinate with foreign regulatory authorities or other relevant international organizations
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
carry out a study of distributed ledger-based compliance tools
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall promote the voluntary adoption and deployment of post-quantum cryptography standards
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a National Strategy to Combat International Digital Asset Illicit Finance
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
lists the top 20 foreign jurisdictions by volume of digital asset trading activity on foreign digital asset service providers
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
505. Tokenization of securities (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Tokenization The term tokenization means the process of creating a digital representation of all rights, obligations, or interests in a tangible or intangible asset on a distributed ledger or comparable technology. (2) Tokenized The term tokenized, with respect to an asset, means that the asset has undergone tokenization. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that States should promptly consider and adopt commercial law frameworks under the Uniform Commercial Code that provide clear and uniform rules for the ownership, control, and enforceability of rights relating to digital assets. (c) Study Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall conduct a comprehensive study of the regulatory treatment of tokenized securities, including custody standards, interagency coordination, cross-border coordination, and consumer protection. (d) Parity in regulatory treatment (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), a tokenized security shall be treated, for all regulatory purposes, as the security that the tokenized security represents, except as otherwise provided by— (A) section 106(a); or (B) a rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission. (2) Requirement A rule, regulation, or order described in paragraph (1)(B) may only be issued by the Commission to adapt the manner in which the applicable regulatory requirements are satisfied, to the extent necessary or appropriate— (A) in light of the unique technological or other characteristics of digital assets or substantially similar technology; and (B) consistent with— (i) what is necessary or appropriate in the public interest; and (ii) protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation. (e) Prohibition on misrepresentation Any statement or omission with respect to any material fact that is made by a person in connection with the offer, sale, or other representation regarding a tokenized security shall be subject to the securities laws, including applicable anti-fraud or anti-manipulation provisions under the securities laws. (f) Agency action for tokenized securities (1) In general The Commission may issue rules governing tokenized securities pursuant to the requirements of this section. (2) Requirements Rules issued under this subsection may address, consistent with sections 106 and 107, how requirements applicable to an underlying security apply to custody, books and records, reconciliation with transfer agents or other recordkeepers, auditability, settlement finality, treatment of chain reorganizations, and other operational risks arising from the use of distributed ledger technology or comparable technology. (g) Rule of construction regarding enforcement Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent the Commission from enforcing the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the securities laws, and the rules issued under the securities laws, with respect to tokenized securities, provided that the elements of those provisions are satisfied. (h) Savings clauses (1) Tokenized security Any asset that is a security under the securities laws shall not cease to be a security solely because the asset is issued, recorded, represented, or transferred using distributed ledger technology or comparable technology. (2) Effect on State law Nothing in this section may be construed, interpreted, or applied in a manner that preempts, supersedes, invalidates, or otherwise affects any State property transfer rules, laws, regulations, or common law principles relating to the transfer or recording of real tangible or intangible assets or interests therein. (3) Rulemakings, orders, and other actions Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, section 106 shall apply to any rulemaking, order, or other action of the Commission under this section. (4) No limit of ability to offer or sell Nothing in this section, or any rule, regulation, or order promulgated under this section, may be construed to limit the ability of any person to offer or sell any tokenized security, consistent with the securities laws.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Separate AI testing programs at six financial regulators would allow regulated firms to seek alternative ways to meet regulations, including for projects beyond digital assets. Applications begin one year after enactment. Agencies generally have 120 days plus a possible 120-day extension, after which unanswered applications become approved. Projects involving another agency's rules require joint approval. Fraud, manipulation and unsafe-practice enforcement remain; denied applicants receive a qualified 30-day enforcement delay. The text does not resolve how automatic approval interacts with that separate joint-approval requirement.

Check the sources
a financial product, service, or activity— (A) that makes substantial use of artificial intelligence
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
On and after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
After the expiration of the 120-day extension period, if the agency has not made a determination on the application, the application will automatically be deemed approved and effective.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not take an enforcement action related to the proposed AI test project against the applicant earlier than the date that is 30 days after
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
fraud or market manipulation or for engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice relating to an AI test project.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(5) Financial regulatory agency The term financial regulatory agency means— (A) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (B) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (C) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; (D) the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection; (E) the National Credit Union Administration; and (F) the Federal Housing Finance Agency. (6) Regulated entity The term regulated entity means an entity regulated by any financial regulatory agency.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(IV) Regulations of other agencies (aa) In general A regulated entity may submit an application under this subparagraph that includes an alternative compliance strategy for a regulation issued or enforced by a financial regulatory agency that is not the appropriate financial regulatory agency for the regulated entity. (bb) Requirements An application described in item (aa) shall be subject to the same requirements as an application described in subclause (II), except that— (AA) the regulated entity shall submit the application to the appropriate financial regulatory agency and the financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy; and (BB) the AI test project may not take effect unless the appropriate financial regulatory agency and any other financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy jointly approve the application using the process described in clause (ii).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title VI protects specified software development and network-support activities from securities requirements based solely on those activities, including certain state-law requirements. Ongoing interfaces, administration and liquidity-pool activities receive separate SEC clarification rather than an automatic blanket exclusion. Qualifying non-controlling developers or providers would be excluded from two specified federal money-transmitter classifications; a separate protection bars substantially similar registration requirements imposed solely for listed technical activities. Intentional transfers of known illicit funds and conduct outside the protected scope remain subject to the stated legal rules. Section 601 expressly reaches conduct before, on and after enactment.

Check the sources
Developing, publishing, or constituting— (A) a distributed ledger system
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission shall, pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking, clarify the circumstances
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall apply to conduct occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Application to software developers Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination, in relation to the operation of a distributed ledger system or any component thereof: (1) Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating, or acting in a similar capacity. (2) Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service, or procuring, offering, or utilizing network bandwidth, or providing other similar incidental services. .
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(g) Federal preemption (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no securities, commodities, or digital assets law of any State (or of any political subdivision of a State) shall apply to an activity described in subsection (b). (2) Rule of construction Nothing in paragraph (1) may be construed to apply to the anti-money laundering, anti-fraud, or anti-manipulation authorities of a State (or of any political subdivision of a State). .
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
604. Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Developer or provider The term developer or provider means any person or business that creates or publishes software to facilitate the creation of, or provide maintenance to, a distributed ledger, or a service associated with a distributed ledger. (2) Distributed ledger service The term distributed ledger service means any information, transaction, or computing service or system that provides or enables access to a distributed ledger system by multiple users, including a service or system that enables users to send, receive, exchange, or store digital assets described by distributed ledger systems. (3) Non-controlling developer or provider The term non-controlling developer or provider means a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service that, in the regular course of operations, does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets to which users are entitled, without the approval, consent, or direction of any third party. (c) Treatment Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a non-controlling developer or provider— (1) shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business, as defined in section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, and the regulations promulgated under that section; or (B) engaged in money transmitting, as defined in section 1960 of title 18, United States Code; and (2) on or after the date of enactment of this Act, shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar to a requirement (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) that applies to an entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), solely on the basis of— (A) creating or publishing software to facilitate the creation of, or providing maintenance services to, a distributed ledger or a service associated with a distributed ledger; (B) providing hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody or safekeeping of the digital assets of the customer; or (C) providing infrastructure support to maintain a distributed ledger service. (d) Clarification of treatment Subsection (c) shall not modify the application of section 1960(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States Code, to any person (referred to in this subsection as the initial person) that acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity. (e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (3) to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property; (4) to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section; or (5) to create a cause of action or impose liability under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Distinct collectible or access tokens would receive a securities safe harbor, subject to investment-contract treatment and exclusions for interchangeable mass-produced series, fractional interests and economic claims on tokens. A separate provision protects covered U.S. individuals' control of their own assets for lawful transactions while preserving illicit-finance enforcement and special measures. Those personal-use protections are not classified here as preferential benefits.

Check the sources
unless the transaction, in substance, involves all of the elements of an investment contract.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a mass-minted series of items with substantially similar or nearly identical traits that are marketed or sold interchangeably
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a fractionalized interest in a nonfungible token
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A Federal agency may not prohibit, restrict, or otherwise impair the ability of a covered user to self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted wallet or other means to conduct transactions for any lawful purpose.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any enforcement action or special measure authorized under applicable law
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
602. Safe harbor for nonfungible tokens (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Nonfungible token The term nonfungible token means a digital asset recorded on a distributed ledger that— (A) is individually identifiable and distinguishable from any other digital asset; (B) represents ownership of, or rights in, a work of authorship, art, a collectible, a membership, an access credential, a certificate of authenticity, an in-game or in-application item, or another similar specific item or discrete digital or physical good, service, or benefit; (C) is not interchangeable on a 1-to-1 basis with any other token or digital asset; and (D) may be bought, sold, or transferred for consideration. (2) Promoter The term promoter means a person or group that manages, controls, or operates an enterprise in which capital is invested, or any person or group acting on behalf of such a person or group with respect to such an enterprise, including an affiliate, agent, or coordinated actor that contributes to the capital raising efforts of the enterprise. (b) Safe harbor (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (3), the offer, sale, resale, transfer, or conveyance of a nonfungible token shall not be deemed to constitute an offer, sale, or distribution of a security or investment contract under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), or any equivalent State law, unless the transaction, in substance, involves all of the elements of an investment contract. (2) Rules of construction Neither of the following shall be considered to be a security under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.): (A) The resale or secondary market transfer of a nonfungible token, where the payment for that resale or transfer does not flow to a promoter or is not used to raise new capital for an enterprise. (B) A nonfungible token that serves as a collectible, membership right, event ticket, access credential, or other non-investment-based use case solely because the nonfungible token may appreciate in value or depend in part on the continued efforts or the reputation of the creator or issuer of the nonfungible token. (3) Exceptions The safe harbor under paragraph (1) shall not apply to— (A) a mass-minted series of items with substantially similar or nearly identical traits that are marketed or sold interchangeably; (B) a fractionalized interest in a nonfungible token; or (C) an interest representing a beneficial or economic claim on a nonfungible token or an asset that a nonfungible token represents. (4) Reliance; prospective effect (A) Reliance A person, other than an originator or related person, that reasonably and in good faith relies on the safe harbor under this subsection shall not be subject to any civil or administrative penalties. (B) Prospective effect Any determination by the Commission that the safe harbor under this subsection does not apply to a particular circumstance shall— (i) be prospective only; and (ii) take effect not earlier than 60 days after the date on which the Commission publicly posts that determination.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
605. Keep Your Coins Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Keep Your Coins Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered user The term covered user means a United States individual who obtains digital assets to purchase goods or services on behalf of that individual, without regard to the method in which that individual obtained those digital assets. (2) Self-hosted wallet The term self-hosted wallet means a digital interface— (A) that is used to secure and transfer digital assets; and (B) under which the owner of digital assets secured and transferred under subparagraph (A) retains independent control over those digital assets. (c) Self-Custody A Federal agency may not prohibit, restrict, or otherwise impair the ability of a covered user to self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted wallet or other means to conduct transactions for any lawful purpose. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the National Credit Union Administration to carry out any enforcement action or special measure authorized under applicable law, including— (1) the Bank Secrecy Act, section 9714 of the Combating Russian Money Laundering Act (31 U.S.C. 5318A note), and section 7213A of the Fentanyl Sanctions Act (21 U.S.C. 2313a); or (2) any other law relating to illicit finance, money laundering, terrorism financing, or United States sanctions.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title VII would bring customer-held ancillary assets and digital commodities into specified bankruptcy customer-property and claim rules. Broker-held securities and cash, bank deposits and commodity contracts retain their separately identified treatment. Digital-commodity transactions with listed financial intermediaries would also receive specified insolvency safe-harbor classifications; the full consequences depend on referenced laws not reproduced here.

Check the sources
701. Customer property protections for ancillary assets and digital commodities in bankruptcy (a) Definitions for stockbroker liquidation (1) In general Section 741 of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (9) as paragraphs (7) through (11), respectively; (B) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; (C) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following: (1) ancillary asset has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; ; (D) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated— (i) in subparagraph (A)(vi), by striking and at the end; (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: (B) entity with whom a person deals as principal or agent and that has a claim against such person on account of a digital commodity or an ancillary asset received, acquired, or held by such person from or for the securities account or accounts of such entity for 1 or more of the purposes identified in clauses (i) through (vi) of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph; and ; and (iv) in subparagraph (C), as so redesignated— (I) in clause (i)— (aa) by inserting , ancillary asset, or digital commodity after security; and (bb) by inserting or (B) after subparagraph (A); and (II) in clause (ii), by inserting an ancillary asset, a digital commodity, after a security,; (E) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ancillary asset, digital commodity, after cash, security, each place it appears; (F) by inserting after paragraph (5), as so redesignated, the following: (6) digital commodity has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; ; and (G) in paragraph (8), as so redesignated, in subparagraph (A)(i), by inserting , ancillary asset positions, and digital commodities positions after securities positions. (b) Extent of customer claims Section 746(b) of title 11, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking cash or a security and inserting cash, a security, an ancillary asset, or a digital commodity. (c) Technical and conforming amendments (1) Section 546(e) of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking section 741(7) and inserting section 741; and (B) by striking section 761(4) and inserting section 761. (2) Section 561(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking section 741(7) and inserting section 741; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking section 761(4) and inserting section 761. (3) Section 752(c) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking section 741(4)(B) and inserting section 741(5)(B). (d) Clarifications For the avoidance of doubt— (1) nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to securities or cash held by a broker-dealer and such assets and related claims shall be governed exclusively by the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.); (2) nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to deposits held by a bank or commodity contracts, which shall be governed by the relevant applicable law; and (3) in any liquidation proceeding under subchapter III or IV of chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, those provisions shall be construed to treat ancillary assets and digital commodities held for customers as customer property governed by title 11, United States Code, and required to be distributed according to such title.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
702. Insolvency safe harbor (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Commodity broker; financial institution; financial participant; securities clearing agency; stockbroker The terms commodity broker, financial institution, financial participant, securities clearing agency, and stockbroker have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 11, United States Code. (2) Commodity contract The term commodity contract means a commodity contract described in paragraph (4)(A) of section 761 of title 11, United States Code. (b) Safe harbor A purchase, sale, or loan of, a margin loan or other extension of credit on, or a repurchase, reverse repurchase, or other transaction involving, a unit of a digital commodity occurring with a commodity broker, stockbroker, financial institution, financial participant, or securities clearing agency shall be deemed to be— (1) a commodity contract for purposes of— (A) sections 362(b)(6), 362(o), 546(e), 553, 556, 561, and 562 of title 11, United States Code; (B) section 11 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1821); (C) section 210 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5390); and (D) section 5(b)(2)(C) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78eee(b)(2)(C)); and (2) a margin payment for purposes of section 548(d)(2)(B) of title 11, United States Code.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title VIII would require public risk education and broker-dealer disclosures explaining how specified digital assets would be treated if the firm failed. The SEC's insolvency-disclosure rules are due within 270 days after enactment. The title preserves specified Federal Trade Commission and consumer-financial authority and requires a study of financial literacy, including effectiveness in rural and majority-minority communities.

Check the sources
guidance on recognizing fraudulent schemes and instructions for reporting suspected fraud.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
written disclosures regarding the treatment of customer assets in the event of an insolvency, resolution, or liquidation proceeding
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed as limiting or abridging the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the efficacy of current financial literacy efforts with a focus on rural communities and communities with majority-minority populations
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
801. Educational materials The Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall require digital asset intermediaries to provide clear and accessible educational materials to the public, including— (1) an overview of how distributed ledger systems function; (2) a description of common risks associated with digital assets; (3) a description of the differences between digital asset markets and traditional financial markets; (4) information on reporting and disclosure requirements related to digital asset transactions and securities which may be accompanied by network tokens or ancillary assets; and (5) guidance on recognizing fraudulent schemes and instructions for reporting suspected fraud.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
802. Savings clauses (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Digital consumer token The term digital consumer token means a digital asset that is primarily acquired for a consumptive purpose, including redemption for a specified good or service at the time of sale or within a reasonable time after sale, as defined by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to rule. (2) Nonfungible token The term nonfungible token means a digital asset recorded on a distributed ledger that— (A) is individually identifiable and distinguishable from any other digital asset; (B) represents ownership of, or rights in, a work of authorship, art, a collectible, a membership, an access credential, a certificate of authenticity, an in-game or in-application item, or another similar specific item or discrete digital or physical good, service, or benefit; (C) is not interchangeable on a 1-to-1 basis with any other token or digital asset; and (D) may be bought, sold, or transferred for consideration. (b) Federal Trade Commission Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed as limiting or abridging the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission with respect to— (1) investigations or enforcement actions under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) relating to unfair or deceptive acts or practices by persons relating to commerce in nonfungible tokens or digital consumer tokens, including deceptive acts with respect to advertising and endorsements relating to nonfungible tokens and digital consumer tokens; (2) highlighting best practices relating to commerce in nonfungible tokens or digital consumer tokens; (3) promoting responsible innovation; (4) consumer education relating to fraudulent digital asset activity; or (5) investigating unlawful restraints of trade in the digital asset industry. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed to expand, contract, or otherwise affect the jurisdiction or authority with respect to the Federal consumer financial laws under the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, including with respect to subsection (i) or (j) of section 1027 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5517).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Title IX would create a joint SEC–CFTC advisory committee and require an agreement on coordinated supervision, enforcement and information sharing. Committee recommendations would be nonbinding, with agency responses due within 90 days. Its initial duration would be ten years, and its funding would depend on available funds.

Check the sources
shall not create any legal rights or obligations, and shall not limit or delay the independent authority of either of the Commissions.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provide the Committee with a formal written response not later than 90 days
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subject to the availability of funds, the Commissions shall jointly fund the Committee.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Committee shall remain in effect for 10 years
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
coordinated supervision and enforcement with respect to registrants
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(a) Establishment The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Commission (referred to collectively in this section as the Commissions) shall jointly establish the Joint Advisory Committee on Digital Assets (referred to in this section as the Committee). (b) Purpose (1) In general The Committee shall— (A) provide the Commissions with official findings and nonbinding recommendations on— (i) the rules, regulations, oversight, and other matters of the Commissions relating to digital assets, including with respect to regulatory harmonization between the Commissions; (ii) how to further the regulatory harmonization of digital asset policy between the Commissions or areas in which that harmonization should occur; and (iii) the implementation by the Commissions of this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, including with respect to regulatory harmonization between the Commissions, memoranda of understanding, and the CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox established pursuant to section 501; (B) develop and share objective methods and best practices for evaluating digital asset networks and activities, including, as appropriate, technical features, economic design, and implications for market integrity, investor protection, and operational resilience; and (C) issue nonbinding recommendations to assist in resolving disputes between the Commissions. (c) Review by the commissions Each of the Commissions shall— (1) review the findings and nonbinding recommendations provided under subsection (b)(1)(A); (2) promptly publish a public statement each time the Committee submits a finding or nonbinding recommendation to the applicable Commission under subsection (b)(1)(A) that— (A) assesses the finding or recommendation; and (B) if applicable, discloses the action or decision not to take action; and (3) provide the Committee with a formal written response not later than 90 days after the date of submission of a finding or nonbinding recommendation under subsection (b)(1)(A).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 903 authorizes $30 million for FinCEN in each fiscal year 2026–2030, each available through the following fiscal year, for digital-asset policy, technology, examination, information sharing and enforcement. This authorizes future appropriations; it does not itself appropriate those amounts or establish actual outlays. The director could also pay qualifying recruitment premiums up to 20% of basic pay. Section 904 reallocates grant funding rather than supplying a new appropriation.

Check the sources
there is authorized to be appropriated to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury the following
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until September 30, 2027. (2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2027, to remain available until September 30, 2028. (3) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2028, to remain available until September 30, 2029. (4) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2029, to remain available until September 30, 2030. (5) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2030, to remain available until September 30, 2031.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may pay an annual incentive premium of not more than 20 percent of the annual rate of basic pay
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the aggregate amount by which allocations to eligible recipients are decreased under subparagraph (B) for that fiscal year
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
903. FinCEN appropriations (a) Authorization of appropriations For the purposes of developing policy relating to digital assets, acquiring information technology resources, funding the operations described in sections 202 and 203 of this Act, and enforcement of the laws within its jurisdiction relating to digital assets, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury the following: (1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until September 30, 2027. (2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2027, to remain available until September 30, 2028. (3) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2028, to remain available until September 30, 2029. (4) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2029, to remain available until September 30, 2030. (5) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2030, to remain available until September 30, 2031. (b) Incentive premium for highly qualified individuals Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury may pay an annual incentive premium of not more than 20 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for a position if necessary to attract highly qualified individuals for positions that the Director has certified to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management reflect the needs of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The Build Now Act would adjust community development grants for eligible metropolitan cities and urban counties using improvement in housing growth across successive five-year periods. Below-median recipients face a 10% reduction; bonuses go to recipients at or above the comparison median or with current growth of at least 4%, funded from reductions and allocated by housing-unit counts. Exclusions cover specified lower-cost places, higher-vacancy places, recent disaster areas and recipients lacking zoning authority. Changes begin in the third full fiscal year after enactment, end after FY2043 and exclude pre-enactment appropriations. The interaction between high-growth bonuses and the reduction clause remains unclear.

Check the sources
the Secretary shall decrease the amount that would otherwise be allocated to the eligible recipient under section 106 for that fiscal year by 10 percent.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an eligible recipient for which the current annual growth rate is at or above 4 percent.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the covered recipient lacks the legal authority to enact or update zoning and permitting ordinances.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subsection (b) shall take effect beginning with the third full fiscal year after the date of enactment of this Act and remain in effect through fiscal year 2043.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
This section shall not apply to amounts appropriated before the date of enactment of this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) Eligible recipient The term eligible recipient means any covered recipient unless— (A) (i) the median Small Area Fair Market Rent in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is at or below the 60th percentile of median Small Area Fair Market Rents in the jurisdictions of all covered recipients; and (ii) the median home value in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is below the median home value for the United States; (B) the annual rental vacancy rate in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is greater than the national annual rental vacancy rate for the most recent year available, as published by the Bureau of the Census; (C) during the 1-year period preceding the date on which the Secretary allocates funds under section 106, the jurisdiction of the covered recipient has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration under section 401 or 501, respectively, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170, 5191); or (D) the covered recipient lacks the legal authority to enact or update zoning and permitting ordinances.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) Housing growth improvement rate at or above median; extremely high-growth recipients (i) In general If, with respect to a fiscal year for which the allocation under section 106 is being determined, the housing growth improvement rate for an eligible recipient is at or above the median housing growth improvement rate for all eligible recipients other than extremely high-growth recipients, or if an eligible recipient is an extremely high-growth recipient, the Secretary shall allocate to the eligible recipient for that fiscal year, in addition to the amount that would otherwise be allocated to the eligible recipient under section 106, a bonus amount, as determined under clause (ii) of this subparagraph. (ii) Bonus amount For purposes of clause (i), the bonus amount for an eligible recipient for a fiscal year shall be equal to the product of— (I) the aggregate amount by which allocations to eligible recipients are decreased under subparagraph (B) for that fiscal year; and (II) the quotient of— (aa) the number of housing units, as of the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year, in the jurisdiction of the eligible recipient, as calculated by the Secretary; and (bb) the number of housing units, as of the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year, in the jurisdictions of all eligible recipients that receive a bonus amount under this paragraph, as calculated by the Secretary.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered recipient The term covered recipient means a metropolitan city or urban county, as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302), that receives funds under section 106. (2) Current annual growth rate The term current annual growth rate, with respect to an eligible recipient and a fiscal year, means the average annual percentage increase in the number of housing units in the jurisdiction of the eligible recipient, as calculated by the Secretary, during the period— (A) beginning with the third quarter of the sixth preceding fiscal year; and (B) ending with the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year. (3) Eligible recipient The term eligible recipient means any covered recipient unless— (A) (i) the median Small Area Fair Market Rent in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is at or below the 60th percentile of median Small Area Fair Market Rents in the jurisdictions of all covered recipients; and (ii) the median home value in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is below the median home value for the United States; (B) the annual rental vacancy rate in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is greater than the national annual rental vacancy rate for the most recent year available, as published by the Bureau of the Census; (C) during the 1-year period preceding the date on which the Secretary allocates funds under section 106, the jurisdiction of the covered recipient has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration under section 401 or 501, respectively, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170, 5191); or (D) the covered recipient lacks the legal authority to enact or update zoning and permitting ordinances. (4) Extremely high-growth recipient The term extremely high-growth recipient means an eligible recipient for which the current annual growth rate is at or above 4 percent. (5) Housing growth improvement rate The term housing growth improvement rate, with respect to an eligible recipient and a fiscal year, means the quotient of— (A) (i) the current annual growth rate of the eligible recipient, minus (ii) the prior annual growth rate of the eligible recipient; and (B) the sum obtained by adding the absolute values of the current annual growth rate and the prior annual growth rate of the eligible recipient. (6) Prior annual growth rate The term prior annual growth rate, with respect to an eligible recipient and a fiscal year, means the average annual percentage increase in the number of housing units in the jurisdiction of the eligible recipient, as calculated by the Secretary, during the period— (A) beginning with the third quarter of the 11th preceding fiscal year; and (B) ending with the third quarter of the sixth preceding fiscal year. (7) Secretary The term Secretary means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (8) Section 106 The term section 106 means section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5306).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The general effective date is 360 days after enactment. A provision requiring rules instead takes effect on the later of that date or 60 days after its final rule is published. Implementing rules generally are due within one year unless another deadline applies. Separate enactment-based deadlines, retrospective provisions and the housing schedule require provision-specific reading; no calendar implementation date can be established without enactment.

Check the sources
shall take effect on the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
that provision shall take effect on the later of— (1) the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act; or (2) the date that is 60 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the final rule implementing the provision.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Except as otherwise provided, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, each applicable regulator shall adopt rules
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot records House passage by 294–134 on July 17, 2025, followed by Senate committee reporting of a substitute on June 1, 2026. On September 15, 2026, a 49–50 Senate vote failed to limit debate on the motion to take up the bill, and a reconsideration motion was entered. This was not final Senate passage. The September 17 snapshot does not establish enactment of the supplied substitute or later developments.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z.
Official legislative record · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2025-07-17: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 199).
Official legislative record · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-06-01: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Scott SC, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Official legislative record · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-09-15: Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 234. (CR S4706)
Official legislative record · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-09-15: Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 234) entered in Senate.
Official legislative record · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Findings to examine

The supplied version contains an apparent unrelated subject-matter provision and a broader-scope candidate. These classifications do not establish their individual attachment histories or motives.

Section 904's Build Now Act changes housing-based community development grant allocations, an apparent subject-matter rider unrelated to the principal digital-asset framework. It redistributes formula funding rather than naming a recipient for an earmark.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
904. Build Now Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Adjustments to community development block grant allocations
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the Secretary shall adjust the allocation based on the housing growth improvement rate of the eligible recipient
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 509 is a possible broader-scope rider candidate: its financial-sector AI testing program is not limited to digital assets. Its connection to the bill's regulatory-innovation title makes unrelatedness less clear than for the housing provision; it is not presented as a documented separately attached amendment.

Check the sources
The term AI test project means a financial product, service, or activity— (A) that makes substantial use of artificial intelligence
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an AI Innovation Lab to enable regulated entities to experiment with AI test projects
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No recipient- or place-specific congressionally directed spending outside competitive or formula allocation was identified in the complete supplied text version. General agency authorizations and statutory grant formulas are not automatically earmarks. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials, and formal earmark disclosures were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The text contains narrow grandfathering, liability protections and conditional regulatory exemptions. These findings identify special legal treatment for scrutiny, not improper motives or guaranteed economic gains.

Section 105 gives fixed-date favorable classification to tokens that were principal assets of qualifying exchange-traded products on January 1, 2026, and separately protects assets transferred in transactions covered by qualifying pre-enactment final federal judgments. The text does not identify the benefiting tokens.

Check the source
105. Characteristics of network tokens (a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall adopt rules that provide that— (1) a network token shall not be considered as providing a disqualifying financial right under section 4B(a)(7)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if the market value of the network token is primarily derived, or is reasonably expected to be primarily derived, from a distributed ledger system or from the broader adoption and use of such a system, including where— (A) the mechanisms of the distributed ledger system collect, receive, accrue, or distribute consideration from the functioning of the distributed ledger system; (B) the network token provides governance capabilities with respect to a distributed ledger system or a decentralized governance system; (C) the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the use of, or in response to the efforts, operations, or financial performance of, the distributed ledger system to which the network token relates or its decentralized governance system; or (D) for a network token that meets the definition of an ancillary asset, the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the efforts of the ancillary asset originator or related person; and (2) participants in offers or sales of network tokens providing financial interests described in paragraph (1) shall not be precluded from relying on the exemption from registration under section 4B(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act. (b) Effect of rulings and actions before date of enactment (1) In general If, before the date of enactment of this Act, a court of the United States, in a non-appealable final judgment, found that a digital asset transaction was not an offer, sale, or distribution of a security, a digital asset transferred pursuant to that offer, sale, or distribution shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act. (2) Network tokens A network token shall not be considered to be an ancillary asset, and shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if, on January 1, 2026, any units of that network token were the principal asset of an exchange-traded product— (A) not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); and (B) the shares of which are listed and traded on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102 would protect qualifying pre-effective-date ancillary-asset offers, sales or distributions from specified SEC and private registration-related actions, conditional on applicable transition compliance. The primary-transaction clause expressly preserves SEC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority. A separate savings clause preserves actions against originators or related persons for fraud or manipulation connected to their statements, disclosures or conduct, while prohibiting use of that particular preserved authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary-market trading. This is conditional relief for a defined earlier-transaction class, not blanket immunity.

Check the source
(k) Transactions before effective date (1) Primary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither the Commission nor any private plaintiff may initiate, pursue, or maintain any action, or an appeal of an action, for a violation of section 5 or 12(a)(1) of this Act arising from any offer, sale, or distribution of ancillary assets occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, provided that the ancillary asset originator or a certification covered party complies with any applicable requirements under subsection (c)(3). (2) Primary transactions related to fraud Nothing in paragraph (1) shall limit the ability of the Commission to bring an action based on the anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authorities of the Commission. (3) Secondary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section. (4) No inference of liability Nothing in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) may be construed as an admission, acknowledgment, or inference of liability for any act, transaction, or conduct occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. (5) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to— (A) impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; or (B) limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Sections 102–103 protect qualifying forward-looking disclosures by originators, and under section 102 intermediaries, from the specified misstatement liability when accompanied by meaningful warnings. Section 104 separately directs resale exemptions for genuine two-sided liquidity providers, qualifying exchange-traded products and passive pooled funds, including unregistered passive funds.

Check the sources
In any action against an ancillary asset originator or digital asset intermediary arising under this Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identified as forward-looking; and (2) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
104. Special disposition restrictions by related persons (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Certification covered party The term certification covered party means, with respect to an ancillary asset— (A) the ancillary asset originator; (B) a subsidiary of the ancillary asset originator; (C) a related person of the ancillary asset originator; or (D) any entity that directly or indirectly controls or is controlled by a common entity with an ancillary asset originator. (2) Covered token The term covered token means any unit of an ancillary asset that was acquired from the ancillary asset originator with respect to that ancillary asset or an agent or underwriter thereof. (3) Distributed ledger control person The term distributed ledger control person means, with respect to a distributed ledger system, any person or group of persons under common control, other than a decentralized governance system, that has the unilateral authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the distributed ledger system or a related ancillary asset. (b) Coordinated control (1) In general The Commission shall adopt rules, based on the criteria described in paragraph (2), to define the circumstances under which a distributed ledger system, together with a related ancillary asset, is considered to be under coordinated control. (2) Considerations In adopting rules under paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider the following criteria as indicia that a distributed ledger system described in that paragraph, together with the related ancillary asset, is considered to be under coordinated control: (A) Open digital system The extent to which the distributed ledger system is not— (i) a distributed ledger, the protocol of which is freely and publicly available; (ii) a distributed ledger application the source code of which is— (I) freely and publicly available via open-source code; and (II) recorded on a distributed ledger described in clause (i); or (iii) an analogue to a distributed ledger or distributed ledger application described in clause (i) or (ii), as determined by the Commission by rule or order. (B) Permissionless and credibly neutral digital system The extent to which a person or group of persons under common control has— (i) the unilateral authority, via operation of the distributed ledger system, to restrict, censor, or prohibit use of the distributed ledger system, including any applicable system-based user activity; or (ii) private permissions, hard-coded privileges, or similar capabilities granted by the source code of the distributed ledger system that provides preferential treatment compared to other similarly situated persons. (C) Distributed digital network The extent to which a person or group of persons under common control has beneficial ownership of, in the aggregate, more than 49 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of the ancillary asset or voting power with respect to any governance system that relates to the distributed ledger system. (D) Autonomous distributed ledger system The extent to which— (i) the distributed ledger system has not yet reached an autonomous state; and (ii) a person or group of persons under common control has the unilateral authority, directly or indirectly, to alter or change the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the distributed ledger system. (E) Economic independence The extent to which the primary programmatic mechanisms of the distributed ledger system that are intended to facilitate substantial value accrual to the ancillary asset through the functioning of the distributed ledger system are not yet functional. (3) Safe harbors (A) In general The Commission shall establish safe harbors under which a distributed ledger system, together with a related ancillary asset, will not be considered to be under coordinated control for the purposes of section 103(c)(2). (B) Decentralized governance systems (i) In general For the purposes of this section, a decentralized governance system shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control. (ii) Distributed ledger systems For the purposes of this section, a distributed ledger system, together with any related ancillary asset, shall not be precluded from being considered to not be under coordinated control solely based on a functional, administrative, clerical, or ministerial action of a decentralized governance system, including any such action taken by a person acting on behalf of and at the direction of that decentralized governance system, as determined by the Commission and consistent with the protection of investors, maintenance of fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and the facilitation of capital formation. (C) Emergency measures For the purposes of this section, a pre-defined, temporary, rules-based cybersecurity emergency measure that is exercised by an incident response or security council exclusively in response to a specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat pursuant to publicly disclosed, on-chain authorization mechanisms, that is strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address that cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and that is exercised without unilateral control by any single person, shall not alone constitute common control or an agreement to work in concert, if those rules and mechanisms, including the procedures and operational limits governing the emergency measure, are disclosed in publicly available written documentation reasonably available to the applicable Federal agency by a decentralized autonomous organization or similar legal entity sufficiently in advance of any exercise of the emergency measure. (D) Nonexclusive The safe harbors established under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) shall not be exclusive and the Commission shall consider such other circumstances as the Commission finds in the public interest or for the protection of investors. (4) Evidence The Commission may, in adopting rules under this subsection, require such certifications, third party verifications, or other evidence as the Commission determines necessary or appropriate to determine whether a distributed ledger system is under coordinated control for the purposes of section 103(c)(2). (5) Rule of construction For purposes of this subsection— (A) the existence or termination of coordinated control shall be determined independently of whether entrepreneurial or managerial efforts described in section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been completed; and (B) the elimination of coordinated control shall be a prerequisite to the completion of efforts described in subparagraph (A). (c) Special restrictions on disposition The Commission shall adopt rules that provide that, with respect to transactions involving an ancillary asset for which disclosures are required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, when a sale of that ancillary asset is made by a related person, the following restrictions on that sale shall apply:
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) Sales prior to certification If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system, the covered token may be sold by a related person before that distributed ledger system is certified as not subject to coordinated control, pursuant to subsection (d), if— (A) with respect to that distributed ledger system, the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; (B) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months; and (C) the amount of covered tokens sold in any 12-month period by the related person is— (i) not greater than an amount to be determined by the Commission pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, which rulemaking shall consider what is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, including, among other things, the protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation, and how to foster the development of distributed ledger systems that are not subject to coordinated control; and (ii) in no case equal to or greater than the amount determined by the Commission pursuant to the rulemaking described in paragraph (2)(C). (2) Sales after certification If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system that is certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d), the covered token may be sold by a related person, if— (A) with respect to that distributed ledger system, the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; (B) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months; and (C) the amount of covered tokens sold in any 12-month period by the related person is not greater than an amount to be determined by the Commission pursuant to rulemaking that shall not be less than 10 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of such ancillary assets. (3) Sales of pre-existing covered tokens If the covered token was acquired before the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system, the covered token may be sold by a related person if— (A) in the case that the distributed ledger system has not been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d)— (i) the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; and (ii) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months; and (B) in the case that the distributed ledger system has been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d), the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months. (4) Limitations on transactions by distributed ledger control persons If the holder of an ancillary asset that principally relies on a distributed ledger system that has been certified as not subject to coordinated control is a distributed ledger control person with respect to that distributed ledger system, that control person may resell that ancillary asset if— (A) that control person furnishes notice to the Commission, in a form and manner determined by the Commission, that the person has or intends to obtain an authority described in subparagraph (B) with respect to the distributed ledger system; (B) that distributed ledger control person furnishes disclosures to the Commission, in a form and manner determined by the Commission, describing the material activities, as determined by the Commission, of the control person; (C) with respect to that distributed ledger system, disclosures have been furnished pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act; and (D) that control person has satisfied such other requirements applicable to that control person that may be established by the Commission to prevent manipulation or distortion of the value of the ancillary asset, including resale restrictions consistent with those applied to related persons that are not control persons. (d) Certification of non-Control by related persons (1) Submission With respect to an ancillary asset, a certification covered party may furnish to the Commission a written certification, in such form and manner as the Commission may specify by rule consistent with subsection (b), stating that the distributed ledger system is not under coordinated control. (2) Automatic effectiveness A certification furnished under paragraph (1) shall become effective, and the distributed ledger system shall be deemed not to be under coordinated control, on the date that is the earlier of— (A) the date on which the Commission notifies the certification covered party in writing that the Commission does not object to the certification; or (B) if the Commission has not denied the certification under paragraph (3), the date that is 90 days after the date on which the certification is furnished, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine by rule. (3) Denial (A) In general The Commission may deny a certification furnished under paragraph (1)— (i) only during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the certification is furnished, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine by rule, or upon determining, based on reasonable evidence, that a material change in circumstances has occurred after the furnishing of the certification; and (ii) by providing to the certification covered party 10 days notice of the intent of the Commission to deny that certification. (B) Requirements after notice of intent After the 10-day period described in subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission shall— (i) conduct a hearing; and (ii) vote to deny the certification if there is a finding that the applicable ancillary asset does not meet the standard for certification that the operations of the distributed ledger system are not under such coordinated control. (C) Final agency action Denial under this paragraph constitutes final agency action reviewable under applicable law. (4) Verification The Commission may, by rule, require appropriate third-party verification of a certification furnished under paragraph (1). (e) Disgorgement (1) In general Any profit realized by a related person from the sale of an ancillary asset in violation of the restrictions under subsection (c) shall inure to, and be recoverable by, the holders of the ancillary asset, irrespective of any intention of holding the asset. (2) Enforcement An action to recover profit described in paragraph (1)— (A) may be instituted at law or in equity in any court of competent jurisdiction of the United States by— (i) the applicable ancillary asset originator; (ii) the owner of any units of the applicable ancillary asset; or (iii) the owner of any units of the applicable ancillary asset, in the name and on behalf of the ancillary asset originator, if the ancillary asset originator— (I) fails or refuses to bring the action within 60 days after a written request by any owner of not less than 5 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of that ancillary asset; or (II) fails to diligently prosecute the action; and (B) shall be brought not later than 2 years after the date that profit was realized.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(f) Exemption from disposition restrictions The Commission shall adopt rules that provide for the following exemptions from, or waivers to, disposition restrictions described in subsection (c): (1) Material hardship exemption (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (B), the Commission shall adopt rules and procedures to exempt parties from related person restrictions with respect to an ancillary asset where those restrictions conflict with an obligation or requirement arising from one of the following material hardships on a related person with respect to the ancillary asset or the ancillary asset originator: (i) The death of the related person. (ii) The bankruptcy or insolvency of the related person. (iii) The dissolution, merger, or acquisition of a corporate person. (iv) Tax liability relating to the receipt of the applicable ancillary asset. (v) Such other material hardships as may be designated by the Commission. (B) Requirements The rules and procedures adopted under subparagraph (A) shall be designed to mitigate the risk that parties may seek to structure holdings to evade resale restrictions and exempt or waive the application of resale restrictions only to the extent necessary to address the identified material hardship. (2) Liquidity provision exemption The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions parties buying or selling an ancillary asset through regular two-sided bidding and offering for the purposes of providing market liquidity, provided that such activities are not undertaken for the purpose of evading the requirements of this section. (3) Agency exemption The Commission shall adopt rules that exempt a party acting as a custodian, trading platform, broker, dealer or other agent from being treated as the owner of customer or client assets or from being restricted in facilitating sales on behalf of a customer or client if the agent is otherwise determined to be a related person. (4) Exchange-traded product and passive fund exemption The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions, as appropriate— (A) exchange-traded products, the shares of which are created and redeemed by authorized participants and registered with the Commission; and (B) passive pooled investment vehicles, whether or not the shares of which are registered with the Commission. (g) Related person disclosure requirements The Commission shall adopt rules that provide for reporting to the Commission certain information with respect to ancillary asset holdings or transactions relating to ancillary assets by related persons, subject to the disposition restrictions provided in subsection (c): (1) Disclosure reports (A) Disclosure of related person status Any person, or group of persons under common control, directly or indirectly, that acquire beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the total amount of outstanding units of any such ancillary asset, measured as of the end of any calendar quarter, shall furnish initial and continuing reports as determined by the Commission. (B) Sales of covered tokens by related person prior to certification of non-control Quarterly reports relating to the number of ancillary assets sold by a related person in a form as required by the Commission. (C) Sales of covered tokens by related person after certification of non-control Quarterly reports relating to the number of ancillary assets sold by a related person that holds, at any point during the applicable calendar quarter, in excess of 5 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of such ancillary asset in a form as required by the Commission. (D) Sales of pre-existing covered tokens by related person Quarterly reports relating to the number of ancillary assets sold by a related person that holds in excess of 5 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of such ancillary asset in a form as required by the Commission. (2) Confidential treatment The Commission may provide for confidential treatment of information provided under this subsection, or may exempt certain related persons from the requirement to furnish a report required under this subsection, pursuant to procedures the Commission shall establish and that are modeled on or identical to section 230.406 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. (3) Good-faith furnishing standard (A) In general Any obligation to furnish information under this section applies only to the furnisher acting on its own behalf and is limited to information that is material and known, or reasonably knowable after due inquiry, to that furnisher. (B) Reliance A furnisher described in subparagraph (A) may reasonably rely on public sources and third-party attestations where appropriate. (C) Liability Furnishing in good faith pursuant to this section shall not create liability for information outside the furnisher’s possession, custody, or control, or for omissions of information the furnisher could not reasonably obtain without breaching legal privilege, contractual confidentiality, or other applicable law. (D) Other persons Any person other than the furnisher may, in good faith and absent knowledge to the contrary, presume that a report required under paragraph (1) has been timely furnished. (4) Life cycle event considerations The Commission shall adopt rules establishing streamlined processes for the following life cycle events: (A) Successor disclosures in corporate transactions The transfer of disclosure obligations under this section to a successor entity in the event of a merger, acquisition, or sale of substantially all assets relating to the ancillary asset activities, including a notice of succession. (B) Cessation of work The cessation or suspension of ongoing disclosure obligations under this section where the ancillary asset originator or related person no longer engages, and does not reasonably expect to engage, in entrepreneurial or managerial efforts with respect to the ancillary asset or its associated distributed ledger system, including a notice of cessation of work. (C) Contractual termination The termination of disclosure obligations under this section that attach solely by virtue of a person’s status as a related person when a contractual arrangement with the ancillary asset originator or distributed ledger system has concluded, including a notice of cessation of contractual relationship. (h) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) limit or impair the anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authorities of the Commission; or (2) preclude reliance on Regulation Crypto, as adopted under section 103, or any other effective registration statement or exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), as amended by this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
103. Exemption and rulemaking for certain transactions involving ancillary assets (a) Adoption of Regulation Crypto The Commission shall adopt rules under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), which shall be referred to collectively as Regulation Crypto, to implement subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section. (b) Exemption for certain transactions involving ancillary assets (1) Exemption (A) In general Rules adopted by the Commission under this section shall provide that the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) shall not apply to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, if the offer, sale, or distribution does not exceed the greater of— (i) $50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding, as of the date of that offer, sale, or distribution. (B) Continued application of certain provisions Sections 12(a)(2) and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77l(a)(2), 77q) shall apply with respect to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset that is described in subparagraph (A). (2) Limitation An ancillary asset originator may not raise more than $200,000,000 in total gross proceeds in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a). (3) Review and adjustment for inflation (A) In general Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Commission shall— (i) review the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2); (ii) adjust the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) to account for inflation; and (iii) increase the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) as the Commission determines appropriate, if that action would be in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors. (B) Report If the Commission, after conducting a review under subparagraph (A), determines not to increase the amount described in paragraph (1)(A)(i) or (2) (other than to adjust that amount for inflation, as required under subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph), the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report detailing the reasons that the Commission did not increase that amount. (c) Conditions for exemption The following conditions shall apply to the exemption provided under subsection (b): (1) Initial disclosures Not later than 30 days before the date on which the applicable ancillary asset originator, any affiliate of the ancillary asset originator, or any underwriter of an investment contract, offers, sells, or distributes an ancillary asset in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a), the ancillary asset originator shall furnish to the Commission the disclosures required under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, subject to the periodic semiannual disclosure requirements of that section. (2) Coordinated control If the applicable ancillary asset is reliant on a distributed ledger system that, together with that ancillary asset, is subject to coordinated control, including by related persons, the restrictions on disposition under section 104 shall apply. (3) Criteria The applicable ancillary asset originator may not be— (A) a company that is not organized under, and subject to, the laws of a State or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia; (B) a development-stage company that either— (i) has no specific business plan or purpose; or (ii) has indicated that the business plan of the company is to merge with or acquire an unidentified company; (C) an investment company (as defined in section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a))) or a company (as defined in section 2 of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–2)) that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a)) but for the exclusions provided from that definition by section 3(c) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)), provided that, solely for the purposes of evaluating eligibility to rely on the exemption provided under subsection (b), an ancillary asset originator shall not be deemed to be an investment company solely by virtue of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading ancillary assets, including ancillary assets offered for sale by the ancillary asset originator; (D) a person issuing fractional undivided interests in other commodities; (E) a person that is or has been subject to any order of the Commission entered pursuant to section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(j)) after the date of enactment of this Act and during the 5-year period preceding the offer and sale; (F) a person that is or has been disqualified pursuant to section 230.506(d) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation, unless waived by order of the Commission; (G) a person that is or has been disqualified pursuant to section 230.251 through 230.263 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly referred to as Regulation A), or any successor regulations, unless waived by order of the Commission; or (H) a person convicted of a felony offense involving insider trading, embezzlement, cybercrime, money laundering, financing of terrorism, or financial fraud, within the last 10 years. (4) Furnishing notice of reliance The applicable ancillary asset originator shall electronically furnish to the Commission a notice of reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a) not fewer than 30 days before the date on which the ancillary asset originator first offers, sells, or distributes an ancillary asset in reliance on those rules, which shall contain the following information: (A) The name of the ancillary asset originator. (B) A statement by a person duly authorized by the ancillary asset originator that the conditions of those rules are satisfied. (C) The website where the summary documents of the ancillary asset originator, if any, may be found and made available for public consumption. (D) An email address at which the ancillary asset originator may be contacted. (5) Public availability The Commission shall require that the disclosures furnished to the Commission under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, be made publicly available in a manner that provides timely and continuing access. (6) Form and manner The disclosures furnished to the Commission under section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, shall be prepared, furnished, and made public in the form and manner prescribed by the Commission, including through the use of electronic furnishing, web posting, machine-readable formats, and plain-English legends, as the Commission determines necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. (d) Status under securities laws (1) In general A disclosure furnished under section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, including an initial or periodic disclosure furnished under subsection (d) of such section 4B, and any other document furnished under the rules adopted under subsection (a) of this section, shall be deemed to be—
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) a prospectus solely— (i) for purposes of section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77l(a)(2)); and (ii) with respect to the person that is the purchasing party in a transaction made in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a); and (B) a statement solely for purposes of— (i) section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77q(a)); (ii) section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)); and (iii) section 240.10b–5 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. (2) Registration statement (A) In general A disclosure furnished under section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, including an initial or periodic disclosure furnished under subsection (d) of such section 4B, or any other document furnished pursuant to the rules adopted under subsection (a), shall not be deemed to be a registration statement for purposes of section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77k) or to have been filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). (B) Civil liability Liability under section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77l(a)(2)) relating to a disclosure furnished under section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, including an initial or periodic disclosure furnished under subsection (d) of such section 4B, or any other document furnished pursuant to the rules adopted under subsection (a), shall only apply to the person making statements in that disclosure or other document, and only a person that purchased an ancillary asset in a transaction involving disclosures provided pursuant to the rules adopted under subsection (a) shall have a claim under such section 12(a)(2). (3) Forward-looking statements In any action against an ancillary asset originator under this title or the amendments made by this title that is based on an untrue statement of a material fact or omission of a material fact necessary to make the statement not misleading, no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement (including a statement of plans, objectives, projections, expectations, or assumptions concerning future performance, financial position, development milestones, digital asset utility, system adoption, or market conditions) made in a disclosure, statement, or other document furnished pursuant to section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, including an initial or periodic disclosure furnished under subsection (d) of such section 4B, or furnished under this section, if the statement is— (A) identified as forward-looking; and (B) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Designated private information-sharing participants receive immunity for qualifying disclosures and failure to notify affected people. Covered stablecoin issuers and service providers separately receive conditional protection from private lawsuits for good-faith temporary transaction holds. These protections support illicit-finance controls but limit remedies otherwise potentially available against participants.

Check the sources
203. Preventing Illicit Finance Through Partnership Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Preventing Illicit Finance Through Partnership Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Bank The term bank has the meaning given the term in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation). (2) Certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network The term certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network means a real-time, secure, public-private mechanism that— (A) facilitates the detection, interdiction, and prevention of illicit finance violations through rapid information exchange between government and regulated entities; and (B) is— (i) certified by the Secretary of the Treasury for the purpose of supporting interdiction and investigative actions consistent with law enforcement or regulatory authorities; or (ii) recognized by the Secretary of the Treasury as an existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act), effective public-private partnership network that meets standards for security, accountability, and participation that are equivalent to the standards that would be required by the Secretary of the Treasury for certification under clause (i). (3) Covered agency The term covered agency means— (A) the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration; (B) the Department of the Treasury, including the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and (C) the Department of Homeland Security. (4) Designated private sector entity The term designated private sector entity means a private sector entity designated under subsection (d). (5) Director The term Director means the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (6) Illicit finance violation The term illicit finance violation means the illicit use of digital assets. (7) Illicit use The term illicit use includes fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, the purchase and sale of illicit goods, trafficking of fentanyl (including fentanyl precursors and trade in other illicit drugs), sanctions evasion, theft of funds, funding of illegal activities, transactions relating to child sexual abuse material or elder fraud abuse, and any other financial transaction involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, as defined in section 1956(c) of title 18, United States Code. (8) Money services business The term money services business has the meaning given the term in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation). (c) Establishment of program The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish a pilot program under which covered agencies and designated private sector entities securely share information focused on potential illicit finance violations and threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations. (d) Designation of private sector entities (1) Required action (A) Initial companies Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director and the Secretary shall designate 10 private sector entities that are money services businesses, 10 private sector entities that are digital commodity brokers, digital commodity dealers, or digital commodity exchanges, and 10 private sector entities that are banks to participate in the pilot program established under subsection (c), if such entities agree and volunteer to participate in the program. (B) Biannual review Not less frequently than once every 6 months, the Director shall review and, as appropriate, replace the private sector entities designated under this paragraph. (C) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed as— (i) requiring an entity to participate in the pilot program established under this section; or (ii) enabling the Director to select an entity to participate in the pilot program without the consent of such entity. (2) Optional designation In addition to the 30 private sector entities designated under paragraph (1), the Director may designate— (A) 1 or more information sharing and analysis centers to participate in the pilot program; (B) 1 or more participants in a certified or recognized information sharing or interdiction network; or (C) 1 or more private sector entities, as appropriate, relating to a particular type of illicit activity. (e) Information sharing with private sector entities A covered agency that initiates an investigation into a potential illicit finance violation, or identifies a threat or emerging risk relating to an illicit finance violation, may share with any designated private sector entity such information about the investigation, threat, or emerging risk as the covered agency determines is appropriate. (f) Use of information by private sector entities Information received by a designated private sector entity under this section may not be used for any purpose other than identifying and reporting on activities that may involve illicit finance violations or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, unless otherwise prescribed by regulation or permitted by the covered agency sharing the information. (g) Means of sharing information The covered agencies and designated private sector entities may share information about potential illicit finance violations, or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, with each other— (1) through a portal established by the Secretary of the Treasury or a similar mechanism determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Treasury; (2) through secure email; (3) at monthly meetings, which shall be facilitated by the Secretary of the Treasury; or (4) through a certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network. (h) Limitation on liability A designated private sector entity that transmits, receives, or shares information for the purposes of identifying and reporting activities that may constitute illicit finance violations, or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, shall not be liable to any person for such disclosure or for any failure to provide notice of such disclosure to the person who is the subject of such disclosure or any other person identified in such disclosure. (i) Sunset The pilot program established under subsection (c) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, unless made permanent through notice and comment rulemaking by the Department of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
305. Temporary hold for certain digital asset transactions (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered agency The term covered agency means any State or Federal law enforcement agency, including the Department of the Treasury. (2) Covered person The term covered person means a person that is— (A) a permitted payment stablecoin issuer; (B) a foreign payment stablecoin issuer (as defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901)) registered with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to section 18(c) of that Act (12 U.S.C. 5916(c)); or (C) a digital asset service provider, as that term is defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (3) Payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms payment stablecoin and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Qualified written request The term qualified written request means a written communication issued by an authorized official of a covered agency that— (A) identifies a specific wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity; (B) requests a covered person initiate an action with respect to the specified wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity, including delaying the execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets; and (C) includes a designated agency contact. (5) Temporary hold The term temporary hold means a restriction applied by a covered person that delays execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 30 calendar days, which may be extended for an additional 150 calendar days pursuant to a qualified written request. (b) Protection from private causes of action (1) In general Any covered person that, in good faith and in compliance with this section, or any person complying with a temporary lawful order under subsection (c) that, voluntarily implements a temporary hold shall not be held liable pursuant to any Federal or State private right of action for implementing the temporary hold, provided that— (A) the covered person or other person, as applicable— (i) implements the temporary hold based on a reasonable belief the transaction, conversion, or withdrawal relates to a violation or attempted violation of State or Federal law; or (ii) implements the temporary hold after receiving a qualified written request from a covered agency; (B) the covered person— (i) makes reasonable efforts to notify the affected customer of the temporary hold; (ii) reasonably determines that notification would impede actual or potential law enforcement efforts; or (iii) receives a qualified written request from a covered agency that requests notification not be attempted; and (C) the covered person notifies as soon as reasonably practicable an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency or the Federal Trade Commission, provided that such notification is not required when the covered person has received a qualified written request from a covered agency. (2) Documentation A covered person shall— (A) maintain for the 3-year period following the implementation of a temporary hold documentation of the basis for applying a temporary hold; and (B) make available the documentation described in subparagraph (A) upon the request of a covered agency or the Federal Trade Commission. (c) Compliance with temporary lawful orders A permitted payment stablecoin issuer shall comply with any valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued or promulgated under Federal law by a court of competent jurisdiction that— (1) requires a person to freeze or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins; (2) specifies the payment stablecoins or accounts subject to blocking with reasonable particularity; and (3) is subject to judicial or administrative review or appeal, as provided by law. (d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) compel or require any covered person to take action to freeze, seize, or block digital assets that is not otherwise required under existing Federal or State law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act; (2) limit or alter the authority of any government agency, including with respect to authority to pursue enforcement actions; (3) limit or affect the application of— (A) section 5318(g)(3) of title 31, United States Code, and any regulation requiring any financial institution to report suspicious activity; or (B) any lawful authority to seize or freeze assets pursuant to a lawful order or sanctions designation; or (4) limit the ability of a covered person to apply a temporary hold to any wallet, address, account, or transaction located outside the United States. (e) Reporting The Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission may issue regulations or guidance relating to any notification by covered persons pursuant to this section to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, respectively.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Selected small U.S. sandbox firms receive temporary regulatory exemptions and state-registration relief for approved activities. Regulated AI-test participants receive project-specific alternative enforcement treatment, automatic approval after an unanswered extended deadline, and a qualified delay after denial. These conditional benefits go beyond ordinary access to a program, while fraud protections and other stated safeguards remain. AI projects involving another agency’s regulations separately require joint approval; the text does not explain how agency silence and that requirement interact.

Check the sources
501. CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Commission The term Commission means either of the Commissions, as the context requires. (2) Commissions The term Commissions means the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (3) Eligible firm The term eligible firm means a person that is eligible to participate in the Sandbox, in accordance with the requirements under this section. (4) Innovative The term innovative means new or emerging technology, or a novel application of technology, including artificial intelligence, that— (A) provides a financial product, service, business model, or delivery mechanism to the public; and (B) lacks— (i) a substantially comparable, widely available analogue in common use in the United States; and (ii) an analogous Federal regulatory regime. (5) Person The term person means a person, as defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)) or section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a). (6) Sandbox The term Sandbox means the CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox established under subsection (b). (7) Self-regulatory organization The term self-regulatory organization means a self-regulatory organization, as defined in— (A) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); or (B) section 1.52(a)(2) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation. (b) Establishment Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions shall, by joint notice and comment rulemaking, establish a CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox to enable eligible firms to test innovative activities within the United States, subject to— (1) applicable Federal and State securities and commodities laws; (2) other State laws that are not specific to the regulation of securities or commodities; and (3) the limitations of this section. (c) Eligible firm (1) In general A United States-based person shall be an eligible firm, and shall be eligible to participate in the Sandbox, if the person— (A) submits an application under subsection (e) that is approved under that subsection; (B) seeks to conduct an eligible and lawful innovative activity in the United States; (C) is not subject to— (i) a statutory disqualification, as defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (ii) a disqualification under section 8a(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 12a(2)); or (iii) a disqualification under State law; (D) does not have a criminal conviction for fraud; (E) agrees to submit to the jurisdiction and oversight of the Commissions, to the extent that the person is not subject to that jurisdiction or oversight, for purposes of, and while participating in, the Sandbox; (F) designates to the Commissions an individual as a point of contact with respect to activities that the person undertakes as an applicant and participant with respect to the Sandbox; (G) employs not more than 25 employees; and (H) has annual gross revenues of not more than $10,000,000 in any fiscal year. (2) Application of requirements The requirements under paragraph (1) shall be satisfied during the entire period in which an eligible firm participates in the Sandbox. (d) Eligible activities and activity ceilings (1) List of eligible activities (A) In general After providing notice and an opportunity for public comment, the Commissions shall maintain and publish a list of eligible innovative activities, which shall be— (i) updated once every 2 years after providing notice and an opportunity for public comment; (ii) reasonably tailored to include activities that— (I) further the purposes of this section; and (II) are consistent with the interests of the public and the protection of investors; (iii) sufficiently flexible to accommodate evolving technological developments, including distributed ledger-based products and services; and (iv) focused exclusively on activities for which specific provisions of the securities laws and commodities laws may create a material impediment to the proposed innovative activity. (B) Identification of requirements (i) In general For each eligible innovative activity, the Commissions shall, consistent with existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) statutory and regulatory precedent concerning the respective jurisdiction of each Commission, identify the requirements that each Commission will administer. (ii) Joint jurisdiction With respect to an eligible innovative activity that is subject to the jurisdiction of both Commissions, the rulemaking under subsection (b) shall specify which requirements each Commission will administer and any coordinated conditions needed to protect investors and market integrity. (2) Activity ceilings For each eligible innovative activity, the Commissions shall, after public input and consultation, establish individual customer and monetary ceilings, which shall provide that an eligible firm may not raise or commit more than $20,000,000 in aggregate customer, investor, or counterparty funds in connection with Sandbox activities. (3) Annual participation cap Each of the Commissions may approve not more than 20 projects per year. (e) Application (1) In general An eligible firm seeking to participate in the Sandbox shall submit to the Commission or Commissions, as applicable, an application that— (A) describes the proposed innovative activity and the desired outcomes; (B) subject to approval of the applicable Commission, identifies the provisions of the securities laws, or of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), from which the eligible firm proposes to be exempt during the period in which the eligible firm participates in the Sandbox, which— (i) shall not include any Federal or State anti-fraud law or any other law that is not specific to the regulation of securities or commodities; and (ii) shall be subject to the limitations of this section; (C) sets forth how relief from the provisions of law identified under subparagraph (B) is reasonably necessary to engage in the innovative activity; (D) identifies material risks to investors, customers, or market integrity and how the eligible firm will mitigate those risks; (E) certifies that the eligible firm will comply with applicable Federal and State anti-fraud laws; (F) states an exit objective of the eligible firm involving action from the applicable Commission, which may include registration, an exemptive order, interpretive guidance, a no-action letter, or a rulemaking petition, together with milestones and metrics the eligible firm will use to demonstrate readiness for that exit; (G) states the agreement of the eligible firm to submit to the jurisdiction and oversight of the Commissions, to the extent that the eligible firm is not otherwise subject to that jurisdiction and oversight, for purposes of, and while participating in, the Sandbox; (H) designates to the Commissions an individual as a point of contact with respect to activities that the eligible firm undertakes as an applicant and participant with respect to the Sandbox; and (I) states the agreement of the eligible firm to abide by any condition that either of the Commissions may impose for engaging in an eligible innovative activity in the Sandbox.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(2) Deadline for decision Not later than 180 business days after the date on which an eligible firm submits an application under this subsection, the Commission or Commissions, as applicable, shall make a decision with respect to the application, after which the eligible firm submitting the application may commence eligible innovative activities in the Sandbox unless the application is denied. (3) Updates and status reports Each eligible firm shall submit to the Commission or Commissions, as applicable, on a semi-annual basis while participating in the Sandbox, an updated application that— (A) describes any material changes to the information originally provided under paragraph (1); and (B) reports the progress of the eligible firm toward the stated exit objective described in paragraph (1)(F), including milestones achieved, remaining impediments, and any pending requests for official action before the applicable Commission or the Commissions. (4) Unredacted and redacted versions (A) In general An eligible firm that submits an initial or updated application under this subsection may submit to the applicable Commission or the Commissions an unredacted version, together with a request for confidential treatment, pursuant to procedures the applicable Commission shall establish that are modeled on the rules of that Commission relating to the confidential treatment of information, which shall include— (i) for the Securities and Exchange Commission, sections 200.83, 230.406, and 240.24b–2 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulations; and (ii) for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, section 145.9 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulations. (B) Omitted information An eligible firm may omit information granted confidential treatment under subparagraph (A) from any public posting under subsection (h) in accordance with the procedures established under subparagraph (A). (C) Indication of confidential information Any omission in a public posting under subsection (h) shall be clearly indicated by brackets with a prominent legend stating that— (i) confidential information has been omitted; and (ii) an unredacted version has been filed with the applicable Commission or the Commissions. (f) Duration of participation (1) Duration Except as provided in paragraph (2), an eligible firm may participate in the Sandbox for a period of not more than 2 years, provided that the eligible firm does not exceed the ceilings established under subsection (d)(2). (2) Extension (A) Sole jurisdiction If an eligible innovative activity is subject only to the jurisdiction of 1 Commission, that Commission may extend participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year, if that Commission determines that the eligible firm— (i) is actively pursuing the exit objective described in subsection (e)(1)(F) in good faith; (ii) is making demonstrable progress toward achieving such an exit; and (iii) establishes that such an extension is necessary to achieve such an exit. (B) Joint jurisdiction Where an eligible innovative activity is subject to the jurisdiction of both Commissions, an extension of participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year shall be by joint order of the Commissions after making the findings described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph (A). (g) Conditions and enforcement (1) Conditions An eligible firm shall comply with applicable regulatory conditions approved by the applicable Commission or the Commissions under subsection (e)(1)(B), which shall be consistent with applicable Federal and State anti-fraud laws. (2) Monitoring The Commissions shall monitor Sandbox activities and enforce compliance with applicable regulatory conditions and Federal anti-fraud laws. (3) Coordination (A) In general The Commissions shall coordinate supervision, information requests, and examinations to avoid duplication while each Commission retains full authority under the provisions of law that such Commission administers. (B) Cooperation with states The Commissions may cooperate with any State in enforcing compliance with applicable regulatory conditions and Federal and State anti-fraud laws with respect to the operation of the Sandbox. (4) Self-regulatory organizations Each self-regulatory organization shall recognize and respect Sandbox conditions that are applicable to a participant in the Sandbox. (5) Cessation of activities The Commissions may, at any time during the participation of an eligible firm in the Sandbox, disqualify the eligible firm from continued participation in the Sandbox, order the eligible firm to cease engaging in a permitted activity in the Sandbox, revoke a grant of exemptive relief, or impose additional or more stringent conditions on continuing participation or engagement in a permitted activity in the Sandbox, if the Commissions find that the eligible firm has failed to comply with— (A) the requirements of this section; (B) the terms or conditions of participation established by the Commissions; or (C) other applicable law. (h) Public disclosure (1) Initial posting Each eligible firm shall post, in a prominent location on a public website of the eligible firm, the information required under subsection (e)(1), subject to confidential treatment under subsection (e)(4), not later than the date on which the notice becomes effective under subsection (e)(3). (2) Updates Each eligible firm shall post, in the same manner as under paragraph (1), the information required under subsection (e)(3), subject to confidential treatment under subsection (e)(4), concurrently with submission to the applicable Commission or the Commissions. (3) Disclosure requirements Each post under this subsection shall satisfy the disclosure requirements of both Commissions where the jurisdictions of both Commissions are implicated. (i) Use of data by commissions Each Commission may collect and share data from Sandbox activities with the other Commission to inform permanent, principles-based regulatory frameworks that advance the missions of the Commissions. (j) Publication by commissions Not less frequently than annually, each Commission shall publish on the public website of the Commission a report summarizing the activities conducted under this section, including— (1) the number and general nature of eligible firms participating in the Sandbox; (2) the categories of innovative activities tested; (3) the impact of Sandbox participation on innovation, investor protection, market integrity, and the public interest; (4) the disclosures posted by eligible firms under subsection (h)(1); and (5) exit outcomes, including the types of relief requested and actions taken by the Commissions. (k) Relationship of sandbox participation to state law (1) Limited preemption for sandbox participants This section, including participation in the Sandbox, and any exemption or relief granted under this section, shall supersede any State securities or commodities law requiring registration, qualification, or licensing as a condition of engaging in an approved activity or otherwise regulating that activity as a security or commodity.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(2) State enforcement preserved Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit or limit any State securities or commodities regulator, any State bank regulator, or any State law enforcement agency from conducting an investigation or bringing an administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement action under— (A) a State law prohibiting fraud or deceit, or fraudulent, deceptive, manipulative, unethical, dishonest, or other unlawful conduct or practices, in connection with securities or securities transactions; (B) the anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) or State commodities laws; or (C) any State law of general applicability, including such a law relating to banking, consumer protection, contracts, property, or criminal conduct. (3) Notice filings A State may require notice of any document filed with either of the Commissions in connection with participation in the Sandbox, together with consent to service of process and reasonable fees, consistent with section 18(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(c)).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
509. AI innovation labs (a) Definitions (1) AI test project The term AI test project means a financial product, service, or activity— (A) that makes substantial use of artificial intelligence; (B) that is, or may be, subject to a Federal regulation or Federal statute; and (C) for which a regulated entity submits an application for the waiver or modification of an applicable regulation subject to an alternative compliance strategy. (2) Appropriate financial regulatory agency The term appropriate financial regulatory agency means— (A) the appropriate Federal banking agency, as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813), with respect to an institution described in subsection (q) of that section; (B) the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, with respect to a covered person, as defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481), that does not have an appropriate financial regulatory agency under subparagraph (A), (C), or (D) of this paragraph; (C) the National Credit Union Administration, with respect to an insured credit union, as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752); and (D) the Federal Housing Finance Agency, with respect to— (i) a Federal Home Loan Bank; (ii) the Federal Home Loan Bank System; (iii) the Federal National Mortgage Association; and (iv) the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. (3) Artificial intelligence; AI The terms artificial intelligence and AI have the meaning given the term artificial intelligence in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401). (4) Financial product or service The term financial product or service— (A) has the meaning given the term in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481); (B) includes— (i) activities that are financial in nature, as defined in section 4(k)(4) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1843(k)(4)); and (ii) any financial product or service provided by a person regulated by the Commission, as defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481); and (C) does not include the business of insurance. (5) Financial regulatory agency The term financial regulatory agency means— (A) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (B) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (C) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; (D) the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection; (E) the National Credit Union Administration; and (F) the Federal Housing Finance Agency. (6) Regulated entity The term regulated entity means an entity regulated by any financial regulatory agency. (b) Use of artificial intelligence by regulated financial entities (1) AI innovation labs (A) Establishment Each financial regulatory agency shall establish, or identify an office, division, or department of the agency that shall serve as, an AI Innovation Lab to enable regulated entities to experiment with AI test projects without unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation or expectation of enforcement actions, pursuant to the approval of an application under subparagraph (B). (B) Applications (i) Submission (I) In general On and after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, a regulated entity may submit to the appropriate financial regulatory agency an application, on a form determined by the appropriate financial regulatory agency, to engage in an AI test project through the AI Innovation Lab established or identified under subparagraph (A). (II) Contents An application submitted under subclause (I) shall include— (aa) a description of the AI test project proposed to be carried out by the regulated entity; (bb) an alternative compliance strategy that— (AA) identifies a regulation issued by the appropriate financial regulatory agency that the regulated entity requests be waived or modified; and (BB) proposes an alternative method for the regulated entity to comply with the regulation, including an explanation as to why the alternative method is essential to the operation of the entity and how the regulated entity would effectively manage risks associated with the AI test project; (cc) an explanation of how under the strategy described in item (aa), the AI test project— (AA) would serve the public interest, improve consumer or investor access to a financial product or service, or promote consumer or investor protection; (BB) would enhance efficiency or operations, foster innovation or competitiveness, improve risk management and security, or enhance regulatory compliance; (CC) would not present a systemic risk to the financial system of the United States; (DD) is consistent with the purposes of the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism obligations under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code; and (EE) would not present a national security risk to the United States; (dd) a proposed date on which the AI test project would terminate and an explanation as to why such termination date would be appropriate; (ee) proposed limitations on the size, scope, and growth of the AI test project; (ff) a detailed business plan; and (gg) an estimate of the economic impact of the AI test project if approved. (III) Joint applications Two or more regulated entities may submit a joint application to the same financial regulatory agency under subclause (I). (IV) Regulations of other agencies (aa) In general A regulated entity may submit an application under this subparagraph that includes an alternative compliance strategy for a regulation issued or enforced by a financial regulatory agency that is not the appropriate financial regulatory agency for the regulated entity. (bb) Requirements An application described in item (aa) shall be subject to the same requirements as an application described in subclause (II), except that— (AA) the regulated entity shall submit the application to the appropriate financial regulatory agency and the financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy; and (BB) the AI test project may not take effect unless the appropriate financial regulatory agency and any other financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy jointly approve the application using the process described in clause (ii). (V) Notice A regulated entity that is regulated or supervised by more than 1 financial regulatory agency shall provide notice of any application submitted to the appropriate financial regulatory agency under this section to each financial regulatory agency by which it is regulated or supervised not later than 5 business days after the entity submits the application to the appropriate financial regulatory agency. (ii) Agency review (I) In general Except as provided in subclause (IV), not later than 120 days after the date on which an application is submitted to the appropriate financial regulatory agency under clause (i), the appropriate financial regulatory agency shall— (aa) review the application; and (bb) submit to the applicant in writing a determination of the agency. (II) Approval
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(aa) In general If the applicant shows that it is more likely than not that the application meets the requirements for establishing an alternative compliance strategy and satisfies the standards described in items (bb) and (cc) of clause (i)(II), the agency shall approve the application and notify the applicant in writing of— (AA) the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy; (BB) the terms of the alternative compliance strategy for the AI test project; (CC) the date on which the AI test project will terminate; (DD) any limitations on the size, scope, or growth of the AI test project; and (EE) any additional limitations or conditions on the AI test project, as determined by the appropriate financial regulatory agency. (bb) Effect of approval With respect to an AI test project, except as provided in item (cc), beginning on the date on which an application submitted under clause (i) is approved and ending on the date described in item (aa)(CC)— (AA) the appropriate financial regulatory agency may enforce a regulation described in item (aa)(AA) only in the manner set out in the alternative compliance strategy described in item (aa)(BB); and (BB) except as provided in subclause (III), a financial regulatory agency that is not the appropriate financial regulatory agency may not enforce a regulation described in item (aa)(AA). (cc) Enforcement by another financial regulatory agency With respect to an AI test project, a financial regulatory agency other than the appropriate financial regulatory agency that approves an application under clause (i)(IV) may enforce a regulation described in item (aa)(AA) if the alternative compliance strategy described in item (aa)(BB) provides for enforcement by such financial regulatory agency. (dd) Rule of construction Nothing in this clause may be construed to limit the authority of a financial regulatory agency to take an enforcement action against a regulated entity with respect to fraud or market manipulation or for engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice relating to an AI test project. (III) Denial (aa) In general If an agency denies an application submitted under clause (i), the agency— (AA) shall submit to the applicant a written notice explaining the reason for denial; and (BB) may not take an enforcement action related to the proposed AI test project against the applicant earlier than the date that is 30 days after the date on which the agency submits the written notice described in subitem (AA). (bb) Resubmittals Each time an application submitted under clause (i) is denied, the regulated entity— (AA) may submit an amended application after receiving feedback from the agency making such denial; and (BB) may not resubmit more than 2 applications that are substantially similar to the denied application. (cc) Injunctive relief Notwithstanding item (aa)(BB), a financial regulatory agency, by and through its own attorneys, may file a civil action in an appropriate United States district court to enjoin an active AI test project if the agency determines that the AI test project presents an immediate danger to consumers or investors or presents a risk— (AA) to financial markets; (BB) in the case of an AI test project engaged in by an insured depository institution or an insured credit union, of loss to a Federal deposit or share insurance fund; (CC) of a violation of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism obligations under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code; or (DD) to the national security of the United States. (IV) Extension If the financial regulatory agency needs additional time, the agency may extend the approval deadline by 120 days. After the expiration of the 120-day extension period, if the agency has not made a determination on the application, the application will automatically be deemed approved and effective. (V) Additional information Not later than the initial or extended approval deadline, as applicable, a financial regulatory agency may request additional information from the applicant. (iii) Data security All data supplied by sponsors of AI test projects to a financial regulatory agency submitted under this section shall be stored and maintained in a secure manner by the financial regulatory agency, consistent with applicable data security standards. (iv) Regulations Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each financial regulatory agency shall promulgate regulations that— (I) shall be published in the Federal Register and provide a 60-day period for public notice and comment; (II) include— (aa) procedures for modifying the AI test projects that are approved by the agency; (bb) consequences for failure to comply with the terms of an alternative compliance strategy; (cc) a requirement that an AI test project will terminate not earlier than 1 year after the AI test project is approved; (dd) procedures to extend the termination date described in item (cc); (ee) procedures for confidentiality; and (ff) procedures for coordinating decisions relating to applications submitted jointly by multiple regulated entities or applications submitted to more than one financial regulatory agency. (2) Report Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and each year for 7 years thereafter, each financial regulatory agency shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives an annual report on the outcomes of AI test projects. A report under this subsection may not include the names of participating entities or any proprietary or confidential business information. A report under this subsection shall include aggregated findings, trends, and lessons learned from the AI test projects. (3) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of a financial regulatory agency to take an enforcement action against a regulated entity with respect to fraud or market manipulation relating to an AI test project.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Specified developers and network-service providers receive activity-based securities exclusions, including retrospective application and displacement of certain state requirements. Qualifying non-controlling developers or providers receive exclusion from two specified federal money-transmitter classifications, plus a separate bar on substantially similar registration requirements imposed solely for listed technical activities. These sector-specific protections turn on conduct and control, with retained fraud authorities and exceptions for intentional illicit transfers; they are not blanket immunity for software businesses. Section 302 also expressly excludes the section 604(b)(3) non-controlling developer/provider class from the financial-institution definition, while preserving the stated financial-crime authorities. Section 302(d)(2)(B) says the financial-institution definition shall not apply to the section 604(b)(3) non-controlling class, while section 604(e)(2) preserves possible financial-institution treatment for conduct outside section 604(c). Their interaction for outside-scope conduct is unresolved in the supplied text; this analysis does not treat either clause as settling that question.

Check the sources
601. Protecting software developers (a) Amendment to the securities act of 1933 The Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 27B (15 U.S.C. 77z–2a) the following: 27C. Application to software developers (a) Distributed ledger system defined In this section, the term distributed ledger system has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. (b) Application to software developers Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination, in relation to the operation of a distributed ledger system or any component thereof: (1) Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating, or acting in a similar capacity. (2) Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service, or procuring, offering, or utilizing network bandwidth, or providing other similar incidental services. . (b) Amendment to the securities exchange act of 1934 The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 15G (15 U.S.C. 78o–11) the following: 15H. Application to software developers (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Constitute The term constitute means to compile, assemble, integrate, or otherwise combine software components into a complete software system. (2) Decentralized finance trading protocol (A) In general The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (i) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (ii) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of the digital assets subject to the financial transaction. (B) Exclusions (i) In general The term decentralized finance trading protocol does not include a distributed ledger system if— (I) a person or group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the distributed ledger system; (II) the distributed ledger system does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system; or (III) a person or group of persons under common control has the unilateral authority, via operation of the distributed ledger system, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use of the distributed ledger system, including any applicable system-based user activity. (ii) Special rule For purposes of clause (i), a decentralized governance system shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert. (3) Deploy The term deploy means to bring software or hardware onto a distributed ledger system for active use. (4) Digital asset; distributed ledger application; distributed ledger system; distributed ledger protocol; decentralized governance system; smart contract The terms digital asset, distributed ledger application, distributed ledger system, distributed ledger protocol, decentralized governance system, and smart contract have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. (5) Decentralized finance messaging system (A) In general The term decentralized finance messaging system means a software application that provides a user with the ability to create or submit an instruction, communication, or message to a decentralized finance trading protocol. (B) Additional requirements The term decentralized finance messaging system does not include any system that provides any person other than the user with— (i) control over the funds of the user; or (ii) the authority to execute any of the transaction of the user. (b) Application to software developers Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination, in relation to the operation of a distributed ledger system or any component thereof: (1) Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating, or acting in a similar capacity. (2) Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service, or procuring, offering, or utilizing network bandwidth, or providing other similar incidental services. (3) Developing, publishing, or constituting— (A) a distributed ledger system; or (B) software or systems that create or utilize hardware or software, including wallets or other systems, that facilitate the ability of a user to keep, safeguard, or have custody of the digital assets or private keys of the user. (c) Rule of construction Subsection (b)(3) does not extend to any activity covered in any of the activities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (d)(1), including activity taken following deployment of such software or hardware. (d) Clarification (1) In general The Commission shall, pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking, clarify the circumstances under which a person shall not be subject to this Act by reason of engaging solely in 1 or more of the following activities in relation to the operation of a decentralized finance trading protocol or any component thereof: (A) Providing a user interface that enables a user to read and access data. (B) Administering, maintaining, or otherwise distributing a decentralized governance system relating to a decentralized finance trading protocol, or a decentralized finance trading protocol. (C) Administering, maintaining, or otherwise distributing a decentralized finance messaging system or operating or participating in a smart contract-based liquidity pool in a decentralized finance trading protocol. (D) Administering, maintaining, or otherwise distributing software or systems that create or deploy hardware or software, including wallets or other systems, that facilitate the ability of a user to keep, safeguard, or maintain custody of the digital assets or related private keys of the user. (2) Considerations In providing the clarification under paragraph (1) the Commission shall— (A) ensure that the rules are consistent with the purposes of the securities laws, including the public interest, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets; (B) provide that section 108(a) of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026 shall apply to such rules; (C) protect the rights of software developers, publishers, and users to create, publish, and use code and software in a manner consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and (D) provide legal clarity for the development, publication, and operation of distributed ledger systems and the components therein in a manner consistent with the purposes of this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to grant the Commission authority over persons, systems, software, or activities that do not otherwise fall within the jurisdiction of the Commission under this Act, or to create a presumption that any such activity is subject to this Act. (e) Anti-Fraud, anti-Manipulation, and false reporting The determination that a person is not subject to this Act under subsections (b) and (d) shall not apply to the anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, or false reporting enforcement authorities of the Commission. (f) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act or the rules and regulations promulgated under this Act may be construed to apply any requirement of the securities laws to a digital commodity, as defined in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or expand the authority of the Commission beyond that which the Commission had before the date of enactment of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act to regulate the activities described in subsection (d)(1). (g) Federal preemption (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no securities, commodities, or digital assets law of any State (or of any political subdivision of a State) shall apply to an activity described in subsection (b). (2) Rule of construction Nothing in paragraph (1) may be construed to apply to the anti-money laundering, anti-fraud, or anti-manipulation authorities of a State (or of any political subdivision of a State). . (c) Applicability This section, and the amendments made by this section, shall apply to conduct occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
604. Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Developer or provider The term developer or provider means any person or business that creates or publishes software to facilitate the creation of, or provide maintenance to, a distributed ledger, or a service associated with a distributed ledger. (2) Distributed ledger service The term distributed ledger service means any information, transaction, or computing service or system that provides or enables access to a distributed ledger system by multiple users, including a service or system that enables users to send, receive, exchange, or store digital assets described by distributed ledger systems. (3) Non-controlling developer or provider The term non-controlling developer or provider means a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service that, in the regular course of operations, does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets to which users are entitled, without the approval, consent, or direction of any third party. (c) Treatment Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a non-controlling developer or provider— (1) shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business, as defined in section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, and the regulations promulgated under that section; or (B) engaged in money transmitting, as defined in section 1960 of title 18, United States Code; and (2) on or after the date of enactment of this Act, shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar to a requirement (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) that applies to an entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), solely on the basis of— (A) creating or publishing software to facilitate the creation of, or providing maintenance services to, a distributed ledger or a service associated with a distributed ledger; (B) providing hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody or safekeeping of the digital assets of the customer; or (C) providing infrastructure support to maintain a distributed ledger service. (d) Clarification of treatment Subsection (c) shall not modify the application of section 1960(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States Code, to any person (referred to in this subsection as the initial person) that acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity. (e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (3) to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property; (4) to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section; or (5) to create a cause of action or impose liability under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) alter or amend any laws imposing or authorizing imposition of economic sanctions by the United States, including those that apply to United States persons that own or operate a distributed ledger messaging system; (2) expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act to any person, including any person that owns or operates a distributed ledger messaging system; or (B) the definition of a financial institution under applicable laws, which shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers as defined in section 604(b)(3); or (3) restrict the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement, administer, and enforce, including by imposing civil money penalties, any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions or any law to prevent money laundering or illicit finance otherwise provided by Federal law to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c);
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Two narrower reliance protections favor qualifying participants: stablecoin reward providers can avoid penalties for programs later found impermissible if they structured them in good-faith reliance on the activity-reward and calculation rules, comply within 90 days and have no substantially similar past violation; non-originators and unrelated persons reasonably relying on the NFT safe harbor in good faith avoid civil or administrative penalties, with adverse SEC determinations prospective after at least 60 days.

Check the sources
404. Prohibiting interest and yield on payment stablecoins (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Affiliate The term affiliate means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another entity. (2) Commissions The term Commissions means the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (3) Comptroller; foreign payment stablecoin issuer; payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms Comptroller, foreign payment stablecoin issuer, payment stablecoin, and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Covered party The term covered party means any digital asset service provider, together with all of its affiliates, but in each case excluding any permitted payment stablecoin issuer or foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller. (5) Deposit The term deposit has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (6) Restricted recipient The term restricted recipient means a United States person that is a customer or user of a covered party. (7) United States person The term United States person means a person that is a resident of the United States or is organized or incorporated under the laws of the United States. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) depository institutions provide financial services that are integral to the strength of the economy of the United States and that the payment of consideration by digital asset service providers to United States customers or users based on their payment stablecoin balances in a manner that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit may inhibit the key functions of depository institutions in the economy of the United States; and (2) payment stablecoins represent a significant innovation in financial infrastructure that can strengthen the United States payments system and the primacy of the United States dollar and that activity-based rewards and incentives tied to the use of payment stablecoins and participation in distributed ledger systems are critical to enabling innovation, competition, and consumer adoption. (c) Prohibition on interest and yield (1) In general No covered party shall, directly or indirectly, pay any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) to a restricted recipient— (A) solely in connection with the holding of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient; or (B) on a payment stablecoin balance in a manner that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit. (2) Activity-based or transaction-based rewards and incentives permitted (A) In general The prohibition under paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to rewards or incentives based on bona fide activities or bona fide transactions that are not economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit pursuant to the regulations promulgated under paragraph (3). (B) Equivalence to bank deposits Except as permitted under subparagraph (A), the prohibition under paragraph (1) shall apply to the payment of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) by a covered party to a restricted recipient in connection with a loyalty, promotional, subscription, or incentive program that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit. (3) Rulemaking (A) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly promulgate regulations through notice and comment rulemaking to clarify the circumstances under which the prohibition and permissible rewards and incentives in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall apply. Such rulemaking shall include a non-exhaustive list of permissible activity-based or transaction-based rewards or incentives, including payments to restricted recipients in connection with or in compensation for any of the following, provided such payments are not economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit: (i) A transaction, payment, transfer, conversion, remittance, or settlement activity, including a rebate or incentive provided in connection with the acceptance or use of a payment stablecoin. (ii) Providing liquidity for market-marking activity, posting of collateral in connection with trading, or otherwise putting assets at credit or investment risk. (iii) The use of any product or service, including participation in governance, validation, staking, or a loyalty, promotional, subscription, or incentive program. (B) Calculation by reference Payments to restricted recipients of consideration, rewards, or benefits that are permissible pursuant to paragraph (2) and subparagraph (A) of this paragraph may be calculated by reference to a balance, duration, tenure, or any combination of the foregoing. (4) Evasion It shall be unlawful for a covered party to violate the prohibition under paragraph (1) or rules promulgated pursuant to paragraph (3). A covered party may not circumvent or evade such prohibition or rules. The Commissions and the Secretary may jointly issue such rules as may be necessary or appropriate to prevent circumvention or evasion of the prohibition under paragraph (1) or the rules promulgated pursuant to paragraph (3). (5) Good faith reliance A covered party that structures a program in good faith reliance on paragraphs (2) and (3) shall not be subject to penalties if a subsequent rulemaking or adjudication determines the program falls outside paragraphs (2) and (3), provided— (A) the covered party comes into compliance within 90 days of such determination; and (B) the violation is not substantially similar to a past violation by the covered party. (d) Prohibition on specified representations (1) Certain marketing practices No covered party shall represent that— (A) payment stablecoins are investment products, deposits, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, subject to deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration; or (B) any compensation (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid to a restricted recipient in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient is— (i) paid or generated by the payment stablecoin itself, a permitted payment stablecoin issuer, or a foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller; (ii) risk-free or comparable to interest paid on a deposit; or (iii) offered, administered, or paid by a person other than the covered party. (2) Misleading No covered party shall omit material information necessary to prevent any marketing, promotion, or description described in this subsection from being misleading. (e) Disclosures (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly promulgate rules requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure, in plain English, of any compensation
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid by a covered party in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of a restricted recipient in a manner that is consistent with subsection (d). (2) Requirements In promulgating rules under paragraph (1), the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall require that any required disclosure of compensation described in that paragraph, and any related term, representation, or description— (A) is presented in a clear, factual, nonpromotional, and non-misleading manner; (B) clearly identifies the circumstances under which such compensation can be paid; (C) clearly identifies the person or persons responsible for offering, administering, and paying such compensation, including whether such persons are affiliated with the issuer of associated payment stablecoins; (D) outlines all material terms with respect to such compensation; and (E) includes a statement that payment stablecoins are not investment products, deposits, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, subject to deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration. (3) Prohibition After the date on which the rules promulgated under paragraph (1) become effective, no covered party shall market the offering of compensation (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) paid by such covered party in connection with the holding, use, or retention of the payment stablecoins of a restricted recipient unless the covered party has provided the disclosures required under this subsection. (4) Satisfaction of requirement A covered party that provides the disclosures required under this subsection shall be deemed not to have made a representation that is prohibited under subsection (d), provided that— (A) any marketing, promotion, or description with respect to the applicable compensation does not contradict those disclosures; and (B) those disclosures are presented in plain English and in a clear and conspicuous manner. (f) Penalty (1) Civil monetary penalty Whoever knowingly and willfully participates in a violation of subsection (c)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2), or (e)(3), or rules issued under subsection (c)(4), shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty by the Department of the Treasury of not more than $5,000,000 for each such violation. (2) Determination of the number of violations For purposes of determining the number of violations for this subsection, separate acts of noncompliance are a single violation when the acts are a result of— (A) a common or substantially overlapping originating cause; or (B) the same statement or publication. (g) Referral to Secretary of the Treasury If the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has reason to believe that any covered party has knowingly and willfully violated subsection (c)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2), or (e)(3), or rules issued under subsection (c)(4), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, as applicable, shall refer the matter to the Secretary of the Treasury. (h) Report to Congress Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on payment stablecoin activity that— (1) analyzes and quantifies— (A) the adoption of United States dollar-denominated payment stablecoins and of other payment stablecoins issued by permitted payment stablecoin issuers and foreign payment stablecoin issuers registered with the Comptroller; (B) the effect of United States dollar-denominated payment stablecoins on the average yields of, and demand for, United States Treasury securities of various durations; (C) the effect of United States dollar-denominated payment stablecoins on the use of the dollar in global foreign exchange transactions, global foreign exchange reserves, and global trade; (D) the effect of United States dollar-denominated payment stablecoins on increasing access to financial services for unbanked and underbanked persons, both domestically and globally; (E) the effect of United States dollar-denominated payment stablecoins on payment costs of consumers and merchants; and (F) the adoption of non-United States dollar-denominated stablecoins, including foreign central bank digital currencies, and their effect on the use of the dollar in global foreign exchange transactions, global foreign exchange reserves, and global trade; (2) describes how compensation, if any, is paid by covered parties to restricted recipients with respect to the payment stablecoins of restricted recipients, including through rewards, incentives, or similar programs; and (3) analyzes and quantifies the effect of any compensation described in paragraph (2) and the effect of prohibitions on the payment of interest or yield by covered parties under this Act and by issuers of payment stablecoins under section 4(a)(11) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11)) on— (A) the volume, stickiness, composition, and concentration of deposits at depository institutions, including any deposit outflows from depository institutions and the extent to which community banks and credit unions are disproportionately affected thereby; (B) net interest margin accrued to depository institutions; (C) the average rate of interest paid to depositors at depository institutions; (D) consumer and business access to credit; (E) financial arrangements between depository institutions and digital asset service providers and issuers of payment stablecoins; and (F) the items described in paragraph (1). (i) No deeming of payment of interest or yield For purposes of this section, a covered party shall not be deemed to violate the prohibition in subsection (c) solely because an unaffiliated third party independently makes a payment with respect to a payment stablecoin, unless the covered party directs or maintains significant influence over the offering of such consideration and the offering of such consideration would otherwise violate the prohibition in subsection (c). (j) Clarification of scope and regulatory authority (1) Compensation The prohibitions under subsections (c), (d), and (e) shall only apply to compensation paid in connection with a payment stablecoin or payment stablecoin balance. (2) Other assets Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the Commissions or the Secretary of the Treasury to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the payment of any compensation paid in connection with any asset other than a payment stablecoin. (k) Non-applicability Nothing in this section shall— (1) modify, alter, or extend prohibitions on the payment of yield, interest, or consideration applicable to permitted payment stablecoin issuers or foreign payment stablecoin issuers, including under section 4(a)(11) of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5903(a)(11)); or (2) prohibit the disclosure by covered parties of truthful, non-misleading factual information or any information otherwise required by Federal law or regulation.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
602. Safe harbor for nonfungible tokens (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Nonfungible token The term nonfungible token means a digital asset recorded on a distributed ledger that— (A) is individually identifiable and distinguishable from any other digital asset; (B) represents ownership of, or rights in, a work of authorship, art, a collectible, a membership, an access credential, a certificate of authenticity, an in-game or in-application item, or another similar specific item or discrete digital or physical good, service, or benefit; (C) is not interchangeable on a 1-to-1 basis with any other token or digital asset; and (D) may be bought, sold, or transferred for consideration. (2) Promoter The term promoter means a person or group that manages, controls, or operates an enterprise in which capital is invested, or any person or group acting on behalf of such a person or group with respect to such an enterprise, including an affiliate, agent, or coordinated actor that contributes to the capital raising efforts of the enterprise. (b) Safe harbor (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (3), the offer, sale, resale, transfer, or conveyance of a nonfungible token shall not be deemed to constitute an offer, sale, or distribution of a security or investment contract under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), or any equivalent State law, unless the transaction, in substance, involves all of the elements of an investment contract. (2) Rules of construction Neither of the following shall be considered to be a security under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.): (A) The resale or secondary market transfer of a nonfungible token, where the payment for that resale or transfer does not flow to a promoter or is not used to raise new capital for an enterprise. (B) A nonfungible token that serves as a collectible, membership right, event ticket, access credential, or other non-investment-based use case solely because the nonfungible token may appreciate in value or depend in part on the continued efforts or the reputation of the creator or issuer of the nonfungible token. (3) Exceptions The safe harbor under paragraph (1) shall not apply to— (A) a mass-minted series of items with substantially similar or nearly identical traits that are marketed or sold interchangeably; (B) a fractionalized interest in a nonfungible token; or (C) an interest representing a beneficial or economic claim on a nonfungible token or an asset that a nonfungible token represents. (4) Reliance; prospective effect (A) Reliance A person, other than an originator or related person, that reasonably and in good faith relies on the safe harbor under this subsection shall not be subject to any civil or administrative penalties. (B) Prospective effect Any determination by the Commission that the safe harbor under this subsection does not apply to a particular circumstance shall— (i) be prospective only; and (ii) take effect not earlier than 60 days after the date on which the Commission publicly posts that determination.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 903 would let FinCEN’s director pay a discretionary annual incentive premium of up to 20% of basic pay when necessary to attract highly qualified individuals to positions certified to the Office of Personnel Management as reflecting FinCEN’s needs. This agency-specific compensation authority appears alongside funding for digital-asset work, but the premium clause itself is not expressly limited to digital-asset positions. It does not guarantee payment to any person or identify individual recipients.

Check the sources
(b) Incentive premium for highly qualified individuals Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury may pay an annual incentive premium of not more than 20 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for a position if necessary to attract highly qualified individuals for positions that the Director has certified to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management reflect the needs of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
For the purposes of developing policy relating to digital assets, acquiring information technology resources, funding the operations described in sections 202 and 203 of this Act, and enforcement of the laws within its jurisdiction relating to digital assets, there is authorized to be appropriated
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 103 would disregard ancillary-asset holdings alone when deciding whether an originator is an ineligible investment company for Regulation Crypto. This is a specific eligibility exception, not a general exemption from investment-company law.

Check the source
solely for the purposes of evaluating eligibility to rely on the exemption provided under subsection (b), an ancillary asset originator shall not be deemed to be an investment company solely by virtue of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading ancillary assets, including ancillary assets offered for sale by the ancillary asset originator
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 301 would give qualifying incident-response and security councils a narrow exception from treating their emergency activity alone as control. It is tied to limited cybersecurity responses, advance public documentation, and absence of unilateral control, and excludes unrelated changes.

Check the sources
301. Rulemaking on application of existing securities intermediary requirements and existing Bank Secrecy Act requirements to non-decentralized finance trading protocols (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Decentralized finance trading protocol The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (A) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (B) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of any digital assets subject to the financial transaction. (2) Non-decentralized finance trading protocol (A) In general The term non-decentralized finance trading protocol means a decentralized finance trading protocol that meets 1 or more of the following: (i) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the decentralized finance trading protocol. (ii) The decentralized finance trading protocol does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system. (iii) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, via operation of the decentralized finance trading protocol, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use of the decentralized finance trading protocol, including any applicable system-based user activity. (B) Special rule For purposes of subparagraph (A), a decentralized governance system, solely by virtue of the operation of the decentralized governance system, shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (C) Exclusions For purposes of this section, participation in an incident-response or security council, as described in subsection (f), shall not, by itself, be deemed to constitute control of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol. (D) Scoping In implementing this section, the Commission and the Department of the Treasury shall construe the term non-decentralized finance trading protocol in a manner consistent with section 15H of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by section 601. (b) Rules (1) In general The Commission, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after notice and comment, that clarify how a person, or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, that controls a non-decentralized finance trading protocol and is subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), as amended by this Act, shall comply with applicable requirements under that Act, including with respect to registration, conduct, disclosure, recordkeeping, supervision, and other requirements under the securities laws. (2) Requirements The rulemaking required under paragraph (1) shall— (A) ensure that the rules adopted pursuant to that rulemaking are consistent with the purposes of the securities laws, including the public interest, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets; (B) protect the rights of software developers, publishers, and users to create, publish, and use code and software in a manner consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (C) provide legal clarity for the development, publication, and operation of distributed ledger systems and the components therein in a manner consistent with the purposes of this section; and (D) result in, by operation of law, the application and enforcement by the Department of the Treasury, where applicable and pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal law with respect to any person or group of persons that the Commission determines, through that rulemaking, is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). (3) Application (A) In general Any person or group of persons determined under this subsection to be required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (referred to in this paragraph as the Exchange Act) shall be subject to that Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to the extent applicable under existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, consistent with the treatment of similarly situated participants under the Exchange Act. (B) Rulemaking The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commission, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after providing notice and the opportunity to comment, that define compliance with obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal laws relating to anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism with respect to any person, or group of persons under common control (or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert), that— (i) controls the operation of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol identified in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); (ii) is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Exchange Act, as determined in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); and (iii) is caused to be treated as a financial institution under the Bank Secrecy Act pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, as a result of registration or compliance described in clause (ii). (c) Activity-Based application Rules adopted under subsection (b)(1) shall require the Commission to determine the applicable requirements only with respect to securities-related activities, based on the functions performed by the controlling person or group of persons, including brokerage, dealing, trading, execution, clearing, or custody of securities, without regard to technological form, distributed architecture, or purportedly decentralized characterization. (d) Rules of construction (1) Registration not required Nothing in this section, nor any rule adopted under this section, may be construed to— (A) require a distributed ledger system or any software code to register with the Commission in its own capacity; or (B) prohibit the launch, deployment, or operation of a distributed ledger system. (2) No expansion of statutory authority Notwithstanding any rulemaking required under subsection (b), and notwithstanding any action the Commission or the Secretary of the Treasury may take under that subsection, nothing in this section, including any such rulemaking, may be construed to— (A) expand or contract the statutory authority of the Commission or the Department of the Treasury, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, under the Bank Secrecy Act; or
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) limit the use of the authority described in subparagraph (A) to determine, pursuant to that rulemaking, the applicability of existing statutory requirements, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, to persons or activities described in this section. (3) No presumption of applicability Nothing in this section may be construed to create a presumption that any person or activity described in this section is or is not subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the Bank Secrecy Act absent a determination made pursuant to a rulemaking required under this section. (e) Preservation of existing authorities Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) limit the authority of the Commission under the securities laws to investigate violations, bring actions, or issue subpoenas with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the securities laws under this section; or (2) limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act, including to investigate violations or bring actions with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the Bank Secrecy Act. (f) Non-Decentralized finance trading protocols (1) In general In adopting rules under subsection (b), the Commission shall treat a decentralized governance system and any person participating in the decentralized governance system as separate persons unless such persons are under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (2) Emergency measures (A) In general Pre-defined, temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures exercised by an incident-response or security council exclusively in response to a specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat and pursuant to publicly disclosed, on-chain authorization mechanisms, strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address such specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and without unilateral control by any single person, shall not, by themselves, constitute common control or an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, provided that such rules and authorities, including the procedures and operational limits governing such emergency measures, are disclosed in publicly available written documentation reasonably available to the applicable Federal regulator, by a decentralized governance system or similar legal entity sufficiently in advance of any exercise of such emergency powers. (B) Prohibition The emergency measures described in subparagraph (A) may not be used to implement protocol upgrades, governance decisions, or economic changes that are unrelated to the mitigation of the applicable cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, as described in that subparagraph. (3) Standards The standards criteria for temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures under paragraph (2) shall be established by rulemaking pursuant to subsection (b).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102(k)(3) separately gives specified non-security treatment to offers, sales or distributions of network tokens by a person occurring before the Act’s effective date. This is date-limited treatment for earlier network-token transactions. Its operative wording is broader than the “Secondary transactions” heading, so this analysis does not infer a secondary-only restriction or blanket immunity for unrelated misconduct.

Check the sources
(3) Secondary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(5) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to— (A) impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; or (B) limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Explore the provisions

The overview above brings the bill together. Open a subject below for the detailed explanation, findings, and source quotations. Groups may repeat shared definitions or context.

All extracted text blocks, including headings and unnumbered appropriations, are assigned to a reviewed group. Shared context can appear in multiple groups. Coverage is not a guarantee of error-free interpretation.

Token classification, disclosures and financial-crime controls

This supplied portion of the proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act would change how certain digital tokens are regulated. It would generally treat qualifying network tokens as non-securities while requiring disclosures from some token originators and restricting certain insider sales. Qualifying originators could also sell tokens under a capped exemption from securities registration, subject to eligibility conditions and disclosures. It would also require digital commodity businesses to maintain controls against money laundering and comply with sanctions. Token creators, trading businesses, investors, and financial institutions would be affected, with important exceptions and protections described below.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Except as provided in this section, and subject to paragraph (3), a network token shall be treated as a non-security, to the extent materially consistent with the requirements and conditions of this section
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
when a sale of that ancillary asset is made by a related person, the following restrictions on that sale shall apply
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
establish and maintain an anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism program
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A digital commodity broker, digital commodity dealer, or digital commodity exchange shall comply with all laws and regulations related to United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with Federal functional regulators, shall establish, coordinated to the extent feasible, risk-based examination standards to assess financial institutions involved in the digital asset sector for compliance with anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be referred to collectively as Regulation Crypto
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not exceed the greater of— (i) $50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding, as of the date of that offer, sale, or distribution.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 2 defines a distributed ledger as a shared public digital record secured by cryptography. A smart contract is software that automatically carries out transactions when coded conditions occur, without intervention by an entity or individual people except to supply data. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the default meaning of “Commission.” Title I would be called the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026.

Check the sources
Except where otherwise expressly provided, the term Commission means the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
through which data is shared across a network that creates a public digital ledger of verified transactions or information among network participants
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
in which cryptography is used to link the data
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
automatically executes or enforces digital asset transactions upon the occurrence of explicit, pre-determined conditions encoded in the contract or program, without intervention, other than to provide data, by any entity or natural person.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
This title may be cited as the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The proposal distinguishes decentralized governance from common control. A qualifying governance system must be transparent and rules-based, with participation not limited to or controlled by a person or commonly controlled group. Participants generally remain separate persons; an entity formed under state law can qualify without centralized management. These governance systems would be excluded from the definition of a related person.

Check the sources
any transparent, rules-based system permitting persons to form consensus or reach agreement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
participation is not limited to, or under the control of, any person or group of persons under common control.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be treated as separate persons unless those persons are under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall include a legal entity, including a decentralized unincorporated nonprofit association or other entity created pursuant to State law, used to implement the rules-based system described in subparagraph (A), provided that the legal entity does not operate pursuant to centralized management.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) does not include a decentralized governance system.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Related-person restrictions would reach founders who meet a 4% token-ownership test within the preceding 36 months; specified executives, directors and other insiders within 12 months; holders of at least 10% of all tokens within six months; and holders of covered tokens equal to at least 2% of all tokens within six months. Covered tokens are units acquired from the originator or its agent or underwriter.

Check the sources
any person that is, or within the preceding 36-month period was— (I) a founder or person serving in a similar capacity with respect to the ancillary asset originator; and (II) a beneficial owner of not less than 4 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of an ancillary asset associated with the ancillary asset originator
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any person that is, or in the preceding 12-month period was, an executive officer, director, trustee, general partner, owner of more than 10 percent of any class of equity shares of the ancillary asset originator, or person serving in a similar capacity
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any person, or group of persons under common control, that beneficially owns, or in the preceding 6-month period owned, 10 percent or more of the total amount of outstanding units of the ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
covered tokens (as that term is defined in section 104(a)) that equal not less than 2 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of the ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any unit of an ancillary asset that was acquired from the ancillary asset originator with respect to that ancillary asset or an agent or underwriter thereof.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102 would create a network-token category for digital commodities linked to the use of a distributed ledger system. An ancillary asset would be a network token whose value depends on its originator's or a related person's business or management efforts. Network-token status would exclude specified securities; investment contracts or profit-sharing interests conveying, or substantially equivalent to, listed debt, equity, liquidation, payment or other financial interests; and specified interests in investment companies or other asset-holding entities. The payment and financial-interest exclusions except decentralized governance systems. Economic or voting rights relating to the network or its decentralized governance alone would not disqualify a token. Originator distributions would generally be treated as investment-contract transactions, while qualifying secondary transactions would generally not be securities transactions; the latter treatment would not cover a securities offering by an originator or underwriter.

Check the sources
a digital commodity that is intrinsically linked to a distributed ledger system and that derives, or is reasonably expected to derive, its value from the use of such distributed ledger system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a network token, the value of which is dependent upon the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of an ancillary asset originator or a related person
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(I) A debt or equity interest, or an option on a debt or equity interest, in a person. (II) Liquidation rights with respect to a person. (III) An entitlement to, or a reasonable expectation of, an interest, dividend, or other payment, or direct or indirect transfer of value, from a person (other than a decentralized governance system).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The offer, sale, or distribution of an ancillary asset by, or caused by, an ancillary asset originator, including through an underwriter, shall be considered to be an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, except with respect to a gratuitous distribution.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the applicable network token is offered, sold, or distributed pursuant to the offer, sale, or distribution of a security by an ancillary asset originator or underwriter.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) Disqualifying financial rights The term network token does not include any of the following: (i) Any security, consistent with the categories of disqualifying financial rights described in clause (ii). (ii) An investment contract or a certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement that represents, gives the holder, or is substantially economically or functionally equivalent to, any of the following, as the Commission shall establish by rule: (I) A debt or equity interest, or an option on a debt or equity interest, in a person. (II) Liquidation rights with respect to a person. (III) An entitlement to, or a reasonable expectation of, an interest, dividend, or other payment, or direct or indirect transfer of value, from a person (other than a decentralized governance system). (IV) An express or implied financial interest in (including a limited partnership interest or interest in intellectual property of), or provided by, a person (other than a decentralized governance system). (iii) Any interest that is, represents, or is functionally equivalent to an interest in an investment company or a company (as defined in section 2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2)) that would be an investment company under section 3(a) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a)) but for the exclusions provided from that definition by section 3(c) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)). (iv) Any interest that is, represents, or is functionally equivalent to an interest in any entity or person that is not an investment company but holds or will hold assets other than securities.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be disqualified from being deemed a network token due to the granting of economic interests or voting capabilities with respect to a distributed ledger system or its decentralized governance system, as further clarified by the Commission through the final rules adopted under section 105 of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The originator would include the initial distributor and anyone controlling or causing the initial distribution during its first 12 months. If the initial distributor did not receive the largest amount during that period, disclosure responsibility could also extend jointly to the largest recipient, with exclusions for intermediaries, qualifying gratuitous distributions, registered public offerings and certain other broad public distributions. The SEC would have 360 days after enactment of the new section to issue responsibility-allocation rules.

Check the sources
(i) initially offers, sells, or distributes the ancillary asset; or (ii) during the 12-month period beginning on the date on which the ancillary asset is initially offered, sold, or distributed, controls or causes the initial offer, sale, or distribution of that ancillary asset.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
solely for purposes of subsection (c), shall be jointly and severally considered to be an ancillary asset originator
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
along with the person (including a person under direct or indirect control of that person) that received the largest amount of those ancillary assets in that period, other than ancillary assets received— (i) in an intermediary capacity; (ii) solely through a gratuitous distribution; (iii) through an offer, sale, or distribution of a security to the public registered under section 5; or (iv) otherwise in a broad and public manner that the Commission determines, pursuant to regulation, should not subject the person to disclosure requirements under subsection (d).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Commission shall, after providing notice and the opportunity for comment, issue rules
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
if the person that initially offered, sold, or distributed an ancillary asset (or otherwise sold, distributed, controlled, or caused the initial offer, sale, or distribution of the ancillary asset) did not receive the largest amount of those ancillary assets distributed in the 12-month period following the commencement of that offer, sale, or distribution
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Qualifying gratuitous distributions—broad, equitable token distributions for no more than nominal value—would be presumed, by themselves, not to be securities offerings. The definition includes specified staking arrangements, in which tokens support network validation, and automated distributions. Liquid-staking receipts must not grant discretionary management authority; custodial staking services must be exclusively administrative or ministerial under SEC rules. Fraud and manipulation authority would remain.

Check the sources
in exchange for not more than a nominal value of cash, property, services, or other assets in a broad, equitable, and non-discretionary manner
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
as a programmatic result of validating or staking activity for a distributed ledger system’s consensus mechanism
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provided that such tokens are issued as administrative or ministerial receipts and are not providing discretionary management authority.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission shall issue rules defining the custodial and ancillary staking services described in subclause (I) that are exclusively administrative or ministerial in nature
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The automated, programmatic, protocol-defined, or rules-based distribution of network tokens achieved through the transparent functioning of a distributed ledger system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A gratuitous distribution, by itself, shall be presumed to not constitute an offer, sale, or distribution of a security
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit, impair, or otherwise affect the anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authorities of the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or a State regulator.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Network tokens would initially be presumed to be ancillary assets unless an originator or eligible intermediary supplies an evidence-backed certification. That certification would take effect on SEC non-objection or after 60 days without rebuttal. Denial normally requires notice within 20 business days, a 10-day comment opportunity and an SEC vote; a later material change could also support denial. During the first three years after the Act's effective date, response failures could pause deadlines for periods of up to 60 days.

Check the sources
there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a network token, including a network token distributed in the manner described in paragraph (4), is an ancillary asset unless the originator of that network token, or a digital asset intermediary (as provided under subsection (c)(4)), submits to the Commission a completed written certification, supported by reasonable evidence
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) the date on which the Commission notifies the originator or digital asset intermediary in writing that the Commission does not object to the certification; or (ii) if the Commission has not issued a rebuttal to the originator or digital asset intermediary in accordance with subparagraph (C), 60 days after the date on which the originator or digital asset intermediary submits the certification.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
either not later than 20 business days after the date on which the certification is submitted, or promptly after determining that a material change in circumstances has occurred
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a 10-day period following the provision of notice
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
have a vote of the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any applicable period specified in this paragraph may be tolled, for periods of not longer than 60 days, during the 3-year period following the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, upon a showing in writing that the originator or digital asset intermediary has not substantially responded to a request for information from the Commission within a reasonable time.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

An intermediary seeking that certification would have to investigate publicly available information about the originator's entrepreneurial and managerial efforts over the preceding 180 days and likely future efforts, and conclude that those efforts have not occurred or are not reasonably likely to occur. Ordinarily the originator must also certify that it and related parties have no relevant material nonpublic information, including during those 180 days. This originator-certification requirement would not apply if the intermediary, after reasonable inquiry appropriate to the circumstances, determines that the originator or jointly responsible person cannot certify. Material certification misstatements or omissions could support revocation and enforcement.

Check the sources
conducted a reasonable inquiry of publicly available information, appropriate under the circumstances, regarding whether the applicable originator has engaged in entrepreneurial and managerial efforts with respect to the applicable network token during the most recent 180-day period, or is likely to engage in those efforts in the future
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the applicable originator has certified that there is not (and, during the most recent 180-day period, there has not been) material, non-public information regarding entrepreneurial or managerial efforts with respect to the applicable network token in the possession of the originator or a related party.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Clause (i)(II) shall not be required if the applicable digital asset intermediary, after a reasonable inquiry, appropriate under the circumstances, determines that the applicable originator, or any person jointly and severally liable pursuant to subsection (a)(2)(B), is not capable of submitting the applicable certification.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any material misstatement or omission to state a material fact, including with respect to continuing compliance, in a certification that has become effective under this paragraph shall constitute grounds for the Commission, consistent with the securities laws, to issue an order denying, suspending, or revoking the effectiveness of the certification and to pursue any appropriate enforcement action.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
concluded that the efforts described in item (aa) have not occurred or are not reasonably likely to occur
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Disclosure duties would begin with specified post-effective-date offerings or the first U.S. secondary-market public offering, whichever occurs first. Disclosures generally would be due before the transaction and every six months afterward. An exclusion would apply if first-year gross proceeds were no more than $5 million, or if average daily public U.S. spot-market trading met a separate $5 million test, both inflation-adjusted. The trading test includes due-inquiry and reasonable-expectation conditions.

Check the sources
upon the occurrence of the earlier of the following
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Regulation Crypto
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The first secondary market offer, sale, or distribution of an ancillary asset in the United States after the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act that constitutes a public offering
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) before— (I) any initial offer, sale, or distribution described in paragraph (1)(A)(i); or (II) a secondary market offer, sale, or distribution described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii); and (ii) semiannually thereafter.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the aggregate gross proceeds from the offer, sale, or distribution of the applicable ancillary asset (together with any related assets sold in those offers, sales, or distributions) were $5,000,000 or less (adjusted for inflation) during the 12-month period immediately following the date of the first such offer, sale, or distribution
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the average daily aggregate value of trading in the applicable ancillary asset in all spot markets open to the public in the United States for which trading volume is generally available is $5,000,000 or less (adjusted for inflation) during the 12-month period (or such shorter period as the Commission may determine) immediately following the commencement of compliance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
based on the knowledge of the ancillary asset originator after due inquiry (or, if the ancillary asset has not yet traded on spot markets open to the public in the United States, the trading volume is reasonably expected to be $5,000,000 or less (adjusted for inflation) during the 12-month period immediately following the reporting date specified by paragraph (2))
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Originators of pre-effective-date securities transactions involving ancillary assets would begin applicable periodic disclosures one year after the effective date, covering the preceding three years. They could instead use the specified certification route. Intermediaries could sometimes supply disclosures for originators, but not for qualifying U.S.-organized originators conducting the specified post-effective-date offerings. The SEC could require originator filings after notice, comment, a hearing opportunity and a transition period, including for foreign originators.

Check the sources
shall comply with the periodic disclosure requirements under subsection (d), if applicable, beginning on the date that is 1 year after that effective date.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The disclosures required under subparagraph (A) shall apply with respect to the 3-year period preceding the effective date described in that subparagraph.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may furnish a certification as provided in that subsection without complying with the periodic disclosure requirements under subsection (d), if the Commission has not denied that certification within a 60-day period after the completion of the process under that subsection.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
that digital asset intermediary may, in lieu of the applicable ancillary asset originator, satisfy the requirements of subsection (d)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A digital asset intermediary may not satisfy the requirements of subsection (d) in lieu of the applicable ancillary asset originator, if— (I) the ancillary asset originator is incorporated, organized, or otherwise registered under the laws of the United States or of any State
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If, after notice, comment, and the opportunity for a hearing, the Commission determines that it is in the public interest or necessary for the protection of investors, including with respect to an ancillary asset originator incorporated or organized in a foreign jurisdiction, the Commission may require an ancillary asset originator, after a transition period, to file the disclosures required under subsection (d).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Required disclosures would cover material information known or reasonably knowable about the originator and token. SEC rules would tailor their scope and could require management, finances, risks, ownership, transactions, token supply, network operation, development plans and technical information. If SEC rules require the listed financial statements, they would receive independent accountant review at gross public proceeds of $25 million or less and an independent audit above that amount. Additional material information would be required to avoid misleading readers.

Check the sources
to the extent that the information is material and known, or reasonably knowable, to the ancillary asset originator or digital asset intermediary.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be reasonably tailored, including by adjusting the scope, form, and content of required disclosures
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Basic corporate information regarding the ancillary asset originator and the ancillary asset activities of the ancillary asset originator, which may include the following items, as the Commission shall determine by rule
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
if the aggregate amount of such ancillary assets offered, sold, or distributed to the public does not exceed $25,000,000 in gross proceeds, reviewed by a public accountant that is independent of the ancillary asset originator; or (II) if the aggregate amount of such ancillary assets offered, sold, or distributed to the public exceeds $25,000,000 in gross proceeds, audited by a public accountant that is independent of the ancillary asset originator.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Economic and technical information relating to the ancillary asset, which may include the following items, as the Commission shall determine by rule
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the total supply of the ancillary asset or the manner and rate of the ongoing production or creation of the ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall provide such further material information, if any, as may be necessary to ensure that the statements made in the disclosure are not, in light of the circumstances under which the statements are made, materially misleading.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Basic corporate information regarding the ancillary asset originator and the ancillary asset activities of the ancillary asset originator, which may include the following items, as the Commission shall determine by rule:
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Disclosure duties could end through certification that covered parties had undertaken no more than nominal business or management efforts during the preceding 180 days and at submission, those efforts were not a primary value driver, a section 104 non-control certification was effective, future disqualifying efforts were not reasonably expected, and substantially all material value-related information was public and expected to remain so. This certification would be deemed approved after 90 days without written objection or non-objection. Renewed disqualifying efforts would restart disclosures.

Check the sources
during the 180-day period preceding the date on which the certification covered party submits the certification, and as of the date of submission, no certification covered party has engaged in more than a nominal level of entrepreneurial or managerial efforts
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any efforts described in item (aa) were not a primary factor in determining the value of the related ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a certification is effective under section 104(d)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not reasonably expect there to be any efforts that would render the certification covered party unable to provide a new certification
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
substantially all material information that is reasonably expected to contribute to the value of the ancillary assets offered, sold, or distributed to the public by the ancillary asset originator is, and is reasonably expected to remain, available to the public.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If the Commission fails to issue a written notice of objection or non-objection within 90 days after submission of a certification under clause (i), the certification shall be deemed approved by the Commission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the certification covered party undertaking efforts described in that subclause shall be responsible for furnishing to the Commission the disclosures required under paragraph (1), including a description of the change in circumstances.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Material disclosure failures could prevent intermediary listing after a joint SEC–Commodity Futures Trading Commission finding and a reasonable opportunity to fix the failure, for the specified post-effective-date originators or substitute filers. Failure alone would not turn the asset into a security. False or misleading originator filings would be unlawful; an intermediary would have a reasonable-care defense. The SEC could grant conditional disclosure exemptions and allow requests for confidential treatment.

Check the sources
an ancillary asset shall not be listed for trading on a digital asset intermediary if the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly find
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
initially offered, sold, or distributed the ancillary asset after the effective date
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
has materially failed to furnish the required disclosures under this subsection after a reasonable opportunity to cure
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not, by itself, cause an ancillary asset offered, sold, or distributed by that ancillary asset originator (or that the ancillary asset originator caused to be offered, sold, or distributed) to be a security under any applicable law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
It shall be unlawful for an ancillary asset originator, in any initial and periodic disclosure, certification, or other document furnished under this section, to make an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
unless that digital asset intermediary did not know (and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known) of that misstatement or omission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission may, by order, exempt an ancillary asset originator or digital asset intermediary, or any class of ancillary asset originators or digital asset intermediaries, from specified requirements under subsection (d)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may submit a request for confidential treatment of information included in such disclosures
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102 would bar SEC and private actions or appeals under Securities Act sections 5 and 12(a)(1) for pre-effective-date ancillary-asset offers, sales or distributions if applicable transition requirements are met. Its separate paragraph headed “Secondary transactions” states that pre-effective-date offers, sales or distributions of network tokens “by a person” receive specified non-security treatment. That operative wording is broader than the heading, so this analysis does not infer a secondary-only limit from the heading. The primary-transaction clause expressly retains SEC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority. A separate savings clause preserves vested rights and lawful contracts, and SEC actions against originators or related persons for fraud or manipulation connected to their statements, disclosures or conduct; that particular preserved authority cannot be used to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary-market trading.

Check the sources
neither the Commission nor any private plaintiff may initiate, pursue, or maintain any action, or an appeal of an action, for a violation of section 5 or 12(a)(1) of this Act arising from any offer, sale, or distribution of ancillary assets occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, provided that the ancillary asset originator or a certification covered party complies with any applicable requirements under subsection (c)(3).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(k) Transactions before effective date (1) Primary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither the Commission nor any private plaintiff may initiate, pursue, or maintain any action, or an appeal of an action, for a violation of section 5 or 12(a)(1) of this Act arising from any offer, sale, or distribution of ancillary assets occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, provided that the ancillary asset originator or a certification covered party complies with any applicable requirements under subsection (c)(3). (2) Primary transactions related to fraud Nothing in paragraph (1) shall limit the ability of the Commission to bring an action based on the anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authorities of the Commission. (3) Secondary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section. (4) No inference of liability Nothing in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) may be construed as an admission, acknowledgment, or inference of liability for any act, transaction, or conduct occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. (5) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to— (A) impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; or (B) limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Sections 102 and 103 would protect specified forward-looking statements—such as projections and development plans—from the described misstatement liability if clearly identified and accompanied by meaningful risk warnings. Section 102 would preserve fiduciary duties, allow rules against deliberate evasion, and protect arrangements with a legitimate business purpose that are not principally structured to evade requirements. Its implementing rulemaking would be due within 360 days after enactment.

Check the sources
no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) identified as forward-looking; and (2) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) identified as forward-looking; and (B) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any fiduciary duty that any person owes to a customer, client, or shareholder under any other provision of Federal or State law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
evasion shall not have occurred if an agreement, contract, or transaction is entered into for a legitimate business purpose and is not structured with a principal purpose of willfully circumventing the requirements of this section.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall conduct a notice and comment rulemaking as necessary or appropriate to carry out section 4B
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 103 would require “Regulation Crypto,” a registration exemption for investment contracts involving ancillary assets. Its transaction ceiling would be the greater of $50 million in annual gross proceeds for no more than four years, or 10% of the outstanding assets' total dollar value, with a separate $200 million total cap per originator. The SEC would review and inflation-adjust the dollar caps within two years and every two years thereafter, and could increase them further under the stated public-interest and investor-protection standard.

Check the sources
shall be referred to collectively as Regulation Crypto
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not exceed the greater of— (i) $50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding, as of the date of that offer, sale, or distribution.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
An ancillary asset originator may not raise more than $200,000,000 in total gross proceeds
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
adjust the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) to account for inflation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
increase the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) as the Commission determines appropriate, if that action would be in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Regulation Crypto would require initial disclosures and an electronic reliance notice at least 30 days before use, followed by semiannual reporting and continuing public access. Eligibility would exclude non-U.S.-organized companies, specified companies without concrete business plans, investment companies subject to a token-holding exception, issuers of fractional commodity interests, specified regulatory disqualifications and listed financial-crime felonies within ten years. Certain regulatory disqualifications could be waived by the SEC.

Check the sources
Not later than 30 days before the date
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
subject to the periodic semiannual disclosure requirements of that section.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall electronically furnish to the Commission a notice of reliance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
not fewer than 30 days before the date
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a company that is not organized under, and subject to, the laws of a State or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a development-stage company that either— (i) has no specific business plan or purpose; or (ii) has indicated that the business plan of the company is to merge with or acquire an unidentified company
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an ancillary asset originator shall not be deemed to be an investment company solely by virtue of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading ancillary assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a person issuing fractional undivided interests in other commodities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
unless waived by order of the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a person convicted of a felony offense involving insider trading, embezzlement, cybercrime, money laundering, financing of terrorism, or financial fraud, within the last 10 years.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
made publicly available in a manner that provides timely and continuing access.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Regulation Crypto documents would count as offering documents and statements only for specified liability provisions. They would not be registration statements for Securities Act section 11 or filings under the Securities Exchange Act. Section 12(a)(2) liability would reach only the person making the statements, and claims under that provision would be limited to purchasers in transactions involving Regulation Crypto disclosures.

Check the sources
a prospectus solely— (i) for purposes of section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a statement solely for purposes of— (i) section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77q(a)); (ii) section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78j(b)); and (iii) section 240.10b–5 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be deemed to be a registration statement for purposes of section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77k) or to have been filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall only apply to the person making statements in that disclosure or other document, and only a person that purchased an ancillary asset in a transaction involving disclosures provided pursuant to the rules adopted under subsection (a) shall have a claim under such section 12(a)(2).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 104 would direct the SEC to define coordinated control using factors such as closed code, unilateral censorship or privileges, ownership or voting power above 49%, unilateral power to change operations, and unfinished mechanisms for generating network value. No single listed factor is stated as an automatic test. Limited decentralized administrative actions and qualifying temporary cybersecurity emergency measures would receive protections against control classification.

Check the sources
shall consider the following criteria as indicia
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
freely and publicly available via open-source code
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the unilateral authority, via operation of the distributed ledger system, to restrict, censor, or prohibit use
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
more than 49 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of the ancillary asset or voting power
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the unilateral authority, directly or indirectly, to alter or change the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the primary programmatic mechanisms of the distributed ledger system that are intended to facilitate substantial value accrual to the ancillary asset through the functioning of the distributed ledger system are not yet functional.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be precluded from being considered to not be under coordinated control solely based on a functional, administrative, clerical, or ministerial action of a decentralized governance system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address that cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and that is exercised without unilateral control by any single person, shall not alone constitute common control or an agreement to work in concert
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

For disclosure-covered assets whose covered tokens principally rely on a distributed ledger system, related persons selling covered tokens acquired after the effective date would generally need 12 months of ownership before non-control certification, or six months afterward, plus required disclosures. The SEC would set annual quantity limits; the pre-certification limit must be lower, while the post-certification limit could not be set below 10% of outstanding units. For pre-existing covered tokens that also principally rely on a distributed ledger system, the text instead specifies 12 months and disclosures before certification, or six months after certification.

Check the sources
with respect to transactions involving an ancillary asset for which disclosures are required pursuant to section 4B(d)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
in no case equal to or greater than the amount determined by the Commission pursuant to the rulemaking described in paragraph (2)(C).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months; and (C) the amount of covered tokens sold in any 12-month period by the related person is not greater than an amount to be determined by the Commission pursuant to rulemaking that shall not be less than 10 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of such ancillary assets.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If the covered token was acquired before the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system, the covered token may be sold by a related person if— (A) in the case that the distributed ledger system has not been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d)— (i) the disclosures required pursuant to section 4B(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, have been furnished; and (ii) the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 12 months; and (B) in the case that the distributed ledger system has been certified as not subject to coordinated control pursuant to subsection (d), the holder of the covered token has held the units for not less than 6 months.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If the covered token was acquired after the effective date of this Act and principally relies on a distributed ledger system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Non-control certification would take effect upon SEC non-objection or after 90 days without denial, unless the SEC sets a shorter period. Denial would require ten days' notice, a hearing and a vote, and could also follow a material change supported by reasonable evidence. The SEC could require third-party verification. A person retaining unilateral control over a certified network would face notice, disclosure and other SEC resale conditions.

Check the sources
the date on which the Commission notifies the certification covered party in writing that the Commission does not object to the certification
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
90 days after the date on which the certification is furnished, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine by rule.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
upon determining, based on reasonable evidence, that a material change in circumstances has occurred
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
10 days notice of the intent of the Commission to deny that certification.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) conduct a hearing; and (ii) vote to deny the certification
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission may, by rule, require appropriate third-party verification
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
that control person has satisfied such other requirements applicable to that control person that may be established by the Commission to prevent manipulation or distortion of the value of the ancillary asset, including resale restrictions consistent with those applied to related persons that are not control persons.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Profits from sales violating section 104 restrictions would be recoverable for token holders. The originator or a token owner could sue within two years after the profit was realized. An owner could also sue on the originator's behalf if it failed to act within 60 days after a written request from an owner of at least 5% of outstanding units, or failed to pursue the case diligently.

Check the sources
Any profit realized by a related person from the sale of an ancillary asset in violation of the restrictions under subsection (c) shall inure to, and be recoverable by, the holders of the ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) the applicable ancillary asset originator; (ii) the owner of any units of the applicable ancillary asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
in the name and on behalf of the ancillary asset originator, if the ancillary asset originator— (I) fails or refuses to bring the action within 60 days after a written request by any owner of not less than 5 percent of the total amount of outstanding units of that ancillary asset; or (II) fails to diligently prosecute the action
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be brought not later than 2 years after the date that profit was realized.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The SEC would have to create resale exemptions for specified hardships, genuine two-sided liquidity trading, agents handling customer assets, qualifying exchange-traded products and passive pooled funds. Hardship relief would cover death, insolvency, corporate transactions, token-related tax liabilities and other designated hardships, but only as necessary and with safeguards against evasion.

Check the sources
(i) The death of the related person. (ii) The bankruptcy or insolvency of the related person. (iii) The dissolution, merger, or acquisition of a corporate person. (iv) Tax liability relating to the receipt of the applicable ancillary asset. (v) Such other material hardships as may be designated by the Commission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
exempt or waive the application of resale restrictions only to the extent necessary to address the identified material hardship.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
parties buying or selling an ancillary asset through regular two-sided bidding and offering for the purposes of providing market liquidity, provided that such activities are not undertaken for the purpose of evading the requirements of this section.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
exempt a party acting as a custodian, trading platform, broker, dealer or other agent from being treated as the owner of customer or client assets or from being restricted in facilitating sales on behalf of a customer or client if the agent is otherwise determined to be a related person.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
exempt from disposition restrictions, as appropriate— (A) exchange-traded products, the shares of which are created and redeemed by authorized participants and registered with the Commission; and (B) passive pooled investment vehicles, whether or not the shares of which are registered with the Commission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 104 would require ownership reports at the 10% quarter-end threshold and quarterly related-person sales reports, with over-5% holdings tests for specified post-certification and pre-existing-token sales. Reports would be limited to material information known or reasonably knowable after inquiry, with good-faith protections and possible confidentiality or exemptions. SEC rules would streamline transfers or endings of reporting obligations after corporate succession, cessation of work or the end of a relevant contract.

Check the sources
acquire beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the total amount of outstanding units of any such ancillary asset, measured as of the end of any calendar quarter, shall furnish initial and continuing reports
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Quarterly reports relating to the number of ancillary assets sold by a related person
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
holds, at any point during the applicable calendar quarter, in excess of 5 percent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Sales of pre-existing covered tokens by related person Quarterly reports relating to the number of ancillary assets sold by a related person that holds in excess of 5 percent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
limited to information that is material and known, or reasonably knowable after due inquiry
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may provide for confidential treatment of information provided under this subsection, or may exempt certain related persons
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Furnishing in good faith pursuant to this section shall not create liability for information outside the furnisher’s possession, custody, or control
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The transfer of disclosure obligations under this section to a successor entity
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The cessation or suspension of ongoing disclosure obligations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
when a contractual arrangement with the ancillary asset originator or distributed ledger system has concluded
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 105 would require SEC rules within one year protecting network-token status where value primarily comes, or is reasonably expected to come, from a ledger system or its adoption and use. Listed examples include network-generated value and governance rights. Separate protections would cover assets transferred in transactions conclusively found by a federal court before enactment not to be securities offerings, and tokens that were principal assets of qualifying exchange-traded products on January 1, 2026. Participants in offers or sales of tokens with the financial interests described in section 105(a)(1) would not be precluded from relying on the cited registration exemption; this does not automatically establish that a particular offering meets all exemption conditions. Section 105(a)(2) calls section 4B(b) a registration exemption, but the supplied section 4B(b), added by section 102, describes token and transaction treatment. The Regulation Crypto registration exemption appears in section 103(b). This cross-reference leaves the intended exemption uncertain; the analysis does not substitute a corrected reference or establish eligibility.

Check the sources
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the market value of the network token is primarily derived, or is reasonably expected to be primarily derived, from a distributed ledger system or from the broader adoption and use of such a system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the mechanisms of the distributed ledger system collect, receive, accrue, or distribute consideration from the functioning of the distributed ledger system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the network token provides governance capabilities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If, before the date of enactment of this Act, a court of the United States, in a non-appealable final judgment, found that a digital asset transaction was not an offer, sale, or distribution of a security, a digital asset transferred pursuant to that offer, sale, or distribution shall not be considered to be a security
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A network token shall not be considered to be an ancillary asset, and shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if, on January 1, 2026, any units of that network token were the principal asset of an exchange-traded product— (A) not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); and (B) the shares of which are listed and traded on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(2) participants in offers or sales of network tokens providing financial interests described in paragraph (1) shall not be precluded from relying on the exemption from registration under section 4B(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Treatment of network tokens and transactions (1) In general The offer, sale, or distribution of an ancillary asset by, or caused by, an ancillary asset originator, including through an underwriter, shall be considered to be an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, except with respect to a gratuitous distribution. (2) Treatment as non-security Except as provided in this section, and subject to paragraph (3), a network token shall be treated as a non-security, to the extent materially consistent with the requirements and conditions of this section, for purposes of — (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Exemption for certain transactions involving ancillary assets (1) Exemption (A) In general Rules adopted by the Commission under this section shall provide that the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) shall not apply to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset, if the offer, sale, or distribution does not exceed the greater of— (i) $50,000,000 in gross proceeds per calendar year for a period of not longer than 4 years; or (ii) 10 percent of the total dollar value of those ancillary assets that are outstanding, as of the date of that offer, sale, or distribution. (B) Continued application of certain provisions Sections 12(a)(2) and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77l(a)(2), 77q) shall apply with respect to an offer, sale, or distribution of an investment contract involving an ancillary asset that is described in subparagraph (A). (2) Limitation An ancillary asset originator may not raise more than $200,000,000 in total gross proceeds in reliance on the rules adopted under subsection (a). (3) Review and adjustment for inflation (A) In general Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Commission shall— (i) review the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2); (ii) adjust the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) to account for inflation; and (iii) increase the amounts described in paragraphs (1)(A)(i) and (2) as the Commission determines appropriate, if that action would be in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors. (B) Report If the Commission, after conducting a review under subparagraph (A), determines not to increase the amount described in paragraph (1)(A)(i) or (2) (other than to adjust that amount for inflation, as required under subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph), the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report detailing the reasons that the Commission did not increase that amount.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 106 would preserve existing SEC exemption powers and add authority to issue Securities Act section 28 exemptions by order, with procedures set by rule and discretion to decline applications. Section 107 would require updated securities recordkeeping rules to facilitate distributed-ledger records.

Check the sources
Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed to amend, limit, impair, or otherwise affect the authority of the Commission to grant an exemption
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
by striking by rule or regulation and inserting by rule, regulation, or order
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall, by rule or regulation, determine the procedures under which an exemptive order under this section shall be granted and may, in the sole discretion of the Commission, decline to entertain any application
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission shall adopt rules to modernize the recordkeeping requirements
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
including to facilitate the utilization of distributed ledger records.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 108 would require the SEC to revise digital-asset requirements that are outdated, unnecessary or unduly burdensome because of the technology's characteristics, including custody, trading, settlement and reporting rules. Changes must follow applicable law. It would retain fraud enforcement and, except for express overrides elsewhere in the proposal, state consumer-protection laws.

Check the sources
amend, rescind, replace, or supplement by rule, order, guidance, exemptive relief, or any other appropriate action
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provided such action is consistent with chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, and other applicable law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome in light of the unique technological characteristics of digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) customer protection, including custody of digital assets or substantially similar technology; (B) transfer agent rules; (C) books and records, or recordkeeping requirements; (D) clearance and settlement rules; (E) broker-dealer, alternative trading system, and exchange rules; (F) issuer disclosure and ongoing reporting requirements
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission to pursue fraud, manipulation, or deceptive practices
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Except as expressly provided by this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, nothing in this Act (or in any such amendment) shall preempt any State consumer protection law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 108 would amend federal provisions that limit state securities regulation, adding “qualified transactions” and certain future SEC section 28 exemptions. Network tokens and ancillary assets distributed under Regulation Crypto would receive “covered security” treatment under section 18. The section preserves specified state authority and investment-adviser duties. Its preservation of broker-dealer obligations, including Regulation Best Interest, expressly does not apply to persons registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Check the sources
by striking term qualified purchaser and inserting terms qualified transaction and qualified purchaser
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Commission rules or regulations issued under section 28, except that this subparagraph does not apply to rules or regulations adopted before the date of enactment of this subparagraph.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A network token, as defined in section 4B(a), shall be treated as a covered security.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
An ancillary asset offered, sold, or distributed in reliance on Regulation Crypto, as adopted under section 103 of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026, shall be treated as a covered security.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
limit the authority (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) described in section 18(c)(1)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any person registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any rule issued under this Act or pursuant to any such amendment may be construed to limit, preempt, or otherwise affect the obligations of a broker or dealer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the fiduciary duty that an investment adviser
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 109 would apply existing rules against trading or communicating important nonpublic information to securities transactions involving ancillary assets, including Regulation Crypto offerings. SEC rules must provide a defense for qualifying written trading plans adopted before awareness of that information and remain consistent with the specified existing legal principles. Violations would face securities-law penalties, but this section would not extend securities law to secondary token trades that are not otherwise securities or specified swap transactions.

Check the sources
while in possession of material nonpublic information, or communicates such information in connection with or in the transaction
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall apply to any offer, sale, or purchase of a security, security-based swap, or security-based swap agreement in which an ancillary asset is offered, sold, or purchased
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an affirmative defense for an offer, sale, or purchase of an ancillary asset made pursuant to a written plan adopted before the applicable person became aware of material nonpublic information
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not be construed to expand or contract, the principles of, and judicial precedent interpreting (by the Supreme Court of the United States), the securities laws
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
subject to the penalties under sections 21A and 32
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section may be construed to apply the securities laws, or any regulation issued under the securities laws (including any rule adopted under subsection (c)), to any secondary market transaction in an ancillary asset that is not otherwise a transaction in a security, security-based swap, or security-based swap agreement.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 110 would exclude digital commodities from the Securities Investor Protection Act's definition of a security. The supplied amendment alone does not establish the full consequences for customer protection in an intermediary failure.

Check the source
Section 16(14) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll(14)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the following: The term security does not include a digital commodity.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 111 would preserve specified fraud remedies, regulatory enforcement, generally applicable state laws, adviser duties and federal consumer-financial protections, subject to express limits. It would not override the bill's asset classifications or restore preempted registration requirements. Section 111 does not create a new general private right of action. Subsection (b)(6) expressly preserves actions covered by (a)(1), expressly provided by the bill, or otherwise available under federal law. Subsection (b)(2) separately says (a) cannot create, preserve or authorize private rights; the analysis reports both clauses without resolving every possible interaction.

Check the sources
Subject to subsection (b)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any person from bringing a civil action to enforce any private right of action for fraud, deceit, manipulation, or deceptive practices, to the extent that such private right of action is expressly provided for in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or is otherwise available under Federal law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any generally applicable State law, including a law relating to fraud, deceit, unfair or deceptive acts or practices, consumer protection, banking, payments, property, contracts, criminal law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the fiduciary obligations of an investment adviser
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any right or remedy under Federal consumer financial law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
to the extent that such requirement is preempted or otherwise limited by this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
create, preserve, or authorize any private right of action under Federal or State law with respect to an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or transaction involving any such asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a status or characterization under Federal or State securities or commodities law that is contrary to an express classification or treatment provided by this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Limitations and rules of construction Nothing in subsection (a) may be construed to— (1) preserve, create, or authorize any Federal or State registration, licensing, qualification, or merit-review requirement under State law with respect to an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, transaction, person, or activity, to the extent that such requirement is preempted or otherwise limited by this Act or an amendment made by this Act; (2) create, preserve, or authorize any private right of action under Federal or State law with respect to an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or transaction involving any such asset; (3) permit any claim, action, proceeding, requirement, liability, obligation, or remedy to be brought, maintained, imposed, or enforced under Federal or State securities or commodities law to the extent that such claim, action, proceeding, requirement, liability, obligation, or remedy depends upon, is predicated on, or would require a determination that an ancillary asset, network token, digital commodity, or any transaction, activity, person, or service involving any such asset has a status or characterization under Federal or State securities or commodities law that is contrary to an express classification or treatment provided by this Act or an amendment made by this Act; (4) expand, contract, or otherwise alter the jurisdiction, exclusive or otherwise, of the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or any State regulator; (5) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the treatment of any asset, transaction, or interest as a covered security for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r); or (6) create any new private right of action under Federal or State law, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit, impair, or otherwise affect any private right of action preserved under subsection (a)(1), expressly provided in this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or otherwise available under Federal law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 201 would add digital commodity brokers, dealers and specified direct-access exchanges to the referenced Bank Secrecy Act provision. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, consulting the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, would issue size- and complexity-tailored requirements for risk assessments, internal controls, compliance officers, training, independent audits, transaction records, suspicious-activity reports and customer identification. These businesses would also have to follow U.S. sanctions rules.

Check the sources
by inserting digital commodity broker, digital commodity dealer, after futures commission merchant
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any digital commodity exchange registered, or required to register, under that Act that permits direct customer access.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Secretary of the Treasury, acting through the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and in consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, shall issue requirements
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
tailored to the size and complexity of such entities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) an appropriate risk assessment; (ii) the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls; (iii) the designation of a compliance officer; (iv) an ongoing employee training program; and (v) an independent audit function to test such program
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) retain appropriate records of transactions; (C) monitor and report suspicious activity, which may include use of appropriate distributed ledger analytics; and (D) maintain an effective customer identification program to identify and verify account holders and carry out appropriate customer due diligence.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall comply with all laws and regulations related to United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 202 would require Treasury, consulting federal financial regulators, to establish risk-based examination standards for financial institutions in the digital-asset sector. The standards would assess compliance with anti-money-laundering and terrorist-financing requirements and be coordinated where feasible.

Check the source
The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with Federal functional regulators, shall establish, coordinated to the extent feasible, risk-based examination standards to assess financial institutions involved in the digital asset sector for compliance with anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 203 would create a voluntary Treasury pilot for secure information sharing about illicit digital-asset finance. Within 90 days after enactment, officials would designate ten consenting money-services businesses, ten digital commodity businesses and ten banks, review participants at least every six months, and could add other specified participants. Shared information would ordinarily be usable only to identify and report illicit-finance activity or risks, unless regulations or the sharing agency allow another use.

Check the sources
shall establish a pilot program under which covered agencies and designated private sector entities securely share information
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director and the Secretary shall designate 10 private sector entities that are money services businesses, 10 private sector entities that are digital commodity brokers, digital commodity dealers, or digital commodity exchanges, and 10 private sector entities that are banks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
if such entities agree and volunteer to participate
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not less frequently than once every 6 months
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
In addition to the 30 private sector entities designated under paragraph (1), the Director may designate
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not be used for any purpose other than identifying and reporting on activities that may involve illicit finance violations or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, unless otherwise prescribed by regulation or permitted by the covered agency sharing the information.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Designated pilot participants would receive liability protection for qualifying information disclosures and failure to notify the people identified. Information could be exchanged through secure portals, email, monthly meetings or certified networks. The pilot would end five years after enactment unless Treasury made it permanent through notice-and-comment rulemaking.

Check the sources
shall not be liable to any person for such disclosure or for any failure to provide notice of such disclosure to the person who is the subject of such disclosure or any other person identified in such disclosure.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) through a portal established by the Secretary of the Treasury or a similar mechanism determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Treasury; (2) through secure email; (3) at monthly meetings, which shall be facilitated by the Secretary of the Treasury; or (4) through a certified or recognized information-sharing or interdiction network.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, unless made permanent through notice and comment rulemaking by the Department of the Treasury.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 204 would establish a Treasury-chaired working group with federal agencies and at least five representatives covering digital-asset businesses, analytics, financial institutions, research, and privacy and civil liberties. It would study illicit uses of digital assets and related emerging technologies and propose legislation and regulation. Annual reports would begin within one year and continue for three more years, followed by a final report. The group would end after four years or completion of temporary wind-up work, returning unobligated appropriated funds to Treasury.

Check the sources
The Secretary of the Treasury or their designee, who shall serve as the chair
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
At least 5 individuals appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury to represent the following: (i) Digital asset companies. (ii) Distributed ledger analytics companies. (iii) Financial institutions. (iv) Institutions or organizations engaged in research. (v) Institutions or organizations focused on individual privacy and civil liberties.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
conduct research on the illicit use of digital assets and other related emerging technologies
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
develop legislative and regulatory proposals
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually for the 3 years thereafter
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a final report detailing the findings, recommendations, and activities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall terminate on the later of— (i) the date that is 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act; or (ii) the date on which the Working Group completes any wind-up activities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any unobligated funds appropriated to carry out this subsection shall be transferred to the Treasury.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The supplied action snapshot, updated September 17, 2026, records House passage on July 17, 2025, by 294–134, followed by Senate committee reporting of a substitute on June 1, 2026, without a written report. The replacement instruction calls for replacing everything after the enacting clause. These records do not establish that the supplied substitute became law.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z.
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2025-07-17: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 294 - 134 (Roll no. 199).
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-06-01: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Scott SC, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic
Official source · Reported amendment instruction · 2026-06-01

In the supplied September 17, 2026 snapshot, the latest recorded actions are a September 15 failed cloture vote, 49–50, on the motion to proceed and entry of a motion to reconsider that vote. This was a vote on advancing consideration, not a recorded final Senate passage vote.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z.
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-09-15: Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 234) entered in Senate.
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z
2026-09-15: Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 234. (CR S4706)
Official source · 2026-09-17T17:09:18Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) · Token classification, disclosures and financial-crime controls (partial bill review). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Evidence is limited

No unrelated rider is identified in this supplied group. Because the bill text is partial, the review cannot establish absence elsewhere in this version or in accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

Evidence is limited

No congressionally directed spending for a particular recipient or place is identified in this group. The partial text and missing spending disclosures do not support a whole-bill or formal earmark conclusion.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The supplied group contains narrow grandfathering rules, liability protections and exceptions to regulatory restrictions. These classifications identify special treatment for scrutiny, not improper motive or an assessment of its merits; omitted portions remain unassessed.

Section 105(b)(2) would give special non-ancillary-asset and non-security treatment to tokens that were principal assets of qualifying exchange-traded products on January 1, 2026. This fixed-date exception favors an existing token class within the broader classification regime; the text does not name the qualifying tokens.

Check the source
A network token shall not be considered to be an ancillary asset, and shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if, on January 1, 2026, any units of that network token were the principal asset of an exchange-traded product— (A) not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); and (B) the shares of which are listed and traded on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 105(b)(1) would give protected classification to assets transferred in transactions covered by a pre-enactment, non-appealable federal judgment finding no securities offering. The treatment is limited to a class defined by prior litigation outcomes.

Check the source
If, before the date of enactment of this Act, a court of the United States, in a non-appealable final judgment, found that a digital asset transaction was not an offer, sale, or distribution of a security, a digital asset transferred pursuant to that offer, sale, or distribution shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102 would protect qualifying pre-effective-date ancillary-asset offers, sales or distributions from specified SEC and private registration-related actions, conditional on applicable transition compliance. The primary-transaction clause expressly preserves SEC anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority. A separate savings clause preserves actions against originators or related persons for fraud or manipulation connected to their statements, disclosures or conduct, while prohibiting use of that particular preserved authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary-market trading. This is conditional relief for a defined earlier-transaction class, not blanket immunity.

Check the source
(k) Transactions before effective date (1) Primary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, neither the Commission nor any private plaintiff may initiate, pursue, or maintain any action, or an appeal of an action, for a violation of section 5 or 12(a)(1) of this Act arising from any offer, sale, or distribution of ancillary assets occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, provided that the ancillary asset originator or a certification covered party complies with any applicable requirements under subsection (c)(3). (2) Primary transactions related to fraud Nothing in paragraph (1) shall limit the ability of the Commission to bring an action based on the anti-fraud or anti-manipulation authorities of the Commission. (3) Secondary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section. (4) No inference of liability Nothing in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) may be construed as an admission, acknowledgment, or inference of liability for any act, transaction, or conduct occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. (5) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to— (A) impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; or (B) limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Sections 102 and 103 would provide special protection against the described misstatement liability for originators' qualifying projections; section 102 also covers intermediaries. Statements must be identified as forward-looking and include meaningful cautionary language. Section 102 limits this protection to the cited actions against an originator or intermediary “arising under this Act” and based on a material misstatement or omission in covered filings.

Check the sources
In any action against an ancillary asset originator or digital asset intermediary arising under this Act that is based on an untrue statement of a material fact or omission of a material fact necessary to make the statement not misleading, no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) identified as forward-looking; and (2) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
In any action against an ancillary asset originator under this title or the amendments made by this title
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) identified as forward-looking; and (B) accompanied by meaningful cautionary language that identifies important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
In any action against an ancillary asset originator or digital asset intermediary arising under this Act that is based on an untrue statement of a material fact or omission of a material fact necessary to make the statement not misleading, no liability shall arise with respect to any forward-looking statement
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 103 would disregard ancillary-asset holdings alone when deciding whether an originator is an ineligible investment company for Regulation Crypto. This is a specific eligibility exception, not a general exemption from investment-company law.

Check the source
solely for the purposes of evaluating eligibility to rely on the exemption provided under subsection (b), an ancillary asset originator shall not be deemed to be an investment company solely by virtue of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading ancillary assets, including ancillary assets offered for sale by the ancillary asset originator
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 104 would exempt qualifying exchange-traded products and passive pooled investment vehicles from insider disposition restrictions, as appropriate under SEC rules. Passive vehicles could qualify even if their shares were not SEC-registered.

Check the source
The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions, as appropriate— (A) exchange-traded products, the shares of which are created and redeemed by authorized participants and registered with the Commission; and (B) passive pooled investment vehicles, whether or not the shares of which are registered with the Commission.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 104 would provide a resale-restriction exemption for businesses supplying liquidity through regular two-sided buying and selling, conditioned on not using that activity to evade the section.

Check the source
The Commission shall adopt rules to exempt from disposition restrictions parties buying or selling an ancillary asset through regular two-sided bidding and offering for the purposes of providing market liquidity, provided that such activities are not undertaken for the purpose of evading the requirements of this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 203 would give designated private participants liability immunity for qualifying illicit-finance information disclosures and failure to notify affected people. This finding concerns the special liability protection, not participation in the pilot alone.

Check the source
A designated private sector entity that transmits, receives, or shares information for the purposes of identifying and reporting activities that may constitute illicit finance violations, or threats and emerging risks relating to illicit finance violations, shall not be liable to any person for such disclosure or for any failure to provide notice of such disclosure to the person who is the subject of such disclosure or any other person identified in such disclosure.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 102(k)(3) separately gives specified non-security treatment to offers, sales or distributions of network tokens by a person occurring before the Act’s effective date. This is date-limited treatment for earlier network-token transactions. Its operative wording is broader than the “Secondary transactions” heading, so this analysis does not infer a secondary-only restriction or blanket immunity for unrelated misconduct.

Check the sources
(3) Secondary transactions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the offer, sale, or distribution of a network token by a person occurring before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act shall be treated as not involving the offer, sale, or distribution of a security under— (A) section 2(a)(1); (B) section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (C) section 2(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)); (D) section 202(a) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)); (E) section 16 of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll); or (F) any applicable requirement of State law that is functionally equivalent to the provisions described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including any provision of State law that directly or indirectly prohibits, limits, or imposes any conditions on the use, offer, sale, transfer, or disposition of a network token in a manner that is— (i) not substantially similar to prohibitions, limitations, or conditions imposed by that State relating to assets that are commodities under the laws of that State; and (ii) inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(5) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to— (A) impair vested rights or contractual obligations lawfully established before the effective date of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act; or (B) limit the authority of the Commission to bring an action against an ancillary asset originator or a related person for securities fraud or manipulation in connection with a statement, a disclosure, or conduct by that ancillary asset originator or related person, except that the Commission may not exercise that authority to treat a network token as a security or regulate secondary market trading.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Limits of this section review

  • This detail review covers only the sections supplied in its excerpt and shared context; it does not independently verify other groups or whole-bill completeness. “Outside this group” describes the excerpt boundary, not absence from the bill. For cross-group navigation, consult the overview’s reading guide.
  • The analyzed language is the supplied June 1, 2026 proposed Senate committee substitute, with deleted text excluded. House passage does not establish passage of this later text. The action snapshot ends September 17, 2026; later advancement or enactment is unestablished.
  • Section 906 is outside this group’s source excerpt; its content and effective-date interactions are not established by this detail review. Deadlines tied to enactment or effectiveness cannot be converted into calendar dates here.
  • Several definitions and legal consequences depend on material not reproduced here, including the digital-commodity definition, the GENIUS Act, the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act and existing securities, banking and consumer-financial statutes. The analysis does not reconstruct that missing context.
  • Many thresholds, exemptions, disclosure details and control standards require future agency rules. The text does not establish their final design or practical market effects.
  • Section 102 contains distinct certification routes and timing language: 60-day prior-certification provisions, a 90-day deemed-approval rule for ending disclosures, and separate transition exclusions referring to 60 days after completion of a process. Their interaction is not fully resolved by this analysis.
  • Section 111 does not create a new general private right of action. Subsection (b)(6) expressly preserves actions covered by (a)(1), expressly provided by the bill, or otherwise available under federal law. Subsection (b)(2) separately says (a) cannot create, preserve or authorize private rights; the analysis reports both clauses without resolving every possible interaction.
  • Section 110 supplies a definition change. The customer-property provisions are outside this group’s excerpt, and the underlying investor-protection statutes are not fully reproduced. This detail review cannot establish the complete treatment of customer losses or intermediary insolvency.
  • The source set lacks earmark disclosures, member requests and relevant accompanying committee or conference materials. It cannot establish formal earmark status or the origins of particular exceptions.
  • Section 105(a)(2) calls section 4B(b) a registration exemption, but the supplied section 4B(b), added by section 102, describes token and transaction treatment. The Regulation Crypto registration exemption appears in section 103(b). This cross-reference leaves the intended exemption uncertain; the analysis does not substitute a corrected reference or establish eligibility.
Kiosk safeguards and decentralized-finance oversight

These proposed sections would add scam protections for digital-asset kiosk customers, direct rules and risk checks for certain trading protocols and transaction interfaces, and expand tools against illicit finance. They would also require studies of financial-crime risks and offshore businesses. The precise protocol coverage cannot be established from this excerpt alone because referenced definitions are outside it. These are proposed rules, not findings that the studied harms have occurred.

Check the sources
a stand-alone machine that is capable of accepting or dispensing legal tender in exchange for digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Before entering into a digital asset transaction with a customer, a digital asset kiosk operator shall disclose in a clear, conspicuous, and easily readable manner
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(iii) a warning that the digital asset kiosk transaction is final, is not refundable, and may not be reversed; and (iv) the type and amount of any fees or other expenses paid by the customer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the most common types of fraudulent schemes involving digital asset kiosks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each time a customer uses a digital asset kiosk, the digital asset kiosk operator shall ensure acknowledgment of all disclosures required under subsection (b) via confirmation of consent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) The type, value, date, and precise time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, transaction hash, and each applicable digital asset address. (4) The amount of the digital asset kiosk transaction expressed in United States dollars. (5) All fees charged. (6) A statement that the customer should contact law enforcement if they suspect fraudulent activity, such as scams, including contact information for a relevant law enforcement or government agency. (7) The exchange rate applied.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A physical version of the receipt required under subsection (d) shall be issued to the customer at the time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, if the customer opts for such a physical version
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
has the authority, via operation of the decentralized finance trading protocol, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
determine the applicable requirements only with respect to securities-related activities, based on the functions performed by the controlling person or group of persons
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be subject to that Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to the extent applicable under existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a web-hosted software application that provides a user with the ability to create or submit an instruction, communication, or message to a distributed ledger application or decentralized finance trading protocol for the purpose of executing a transaction by the user
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not include— (i) a distributed ledger application; (ii) a distributed ledger protocol; (iii) a distributed ledger system; (iv) a decentralized finance trading protocol; (v) any client, node, validator, or other form of computational infrastructure with respect to a distributed ledger system; or (vi) any software or hardware wallet that facilitates the custody of an individual of their digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue guidance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Before conducting trading activity (including routing orders and executing trades) through a decentralized finance trading protocol, a digital asset intermediary shall implement risk management standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall conduct a comprehensive review of how foreign terrorist organizations and transnational organized criminals utilize digital assets in connection with illicit activities.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall conduct a study
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 205 would add U.S. and territorial digital-asset kiosk owners, operators, and managers to the cited registration provision. Treasury would require location updates within 90 days after the new subsection's effective date and at least every 90 days afterward. Submissions would include operator names, kiosk addresses and operating dates, and digital asset addresses; false or materially incomplete submissions would count as noncompliance.

Check the sources
any person who owns, operates, or manages a digital asset kiosk in the United States or its territories
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 90 days after the effective date of this subsection, and not less than once every 90 days thereafter
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) the legal name of the digital asset kiosk operator; (B) any fictitious or trade name of the digital asset kiosk operator; (C) the physical address of each digital asset kiosk owned, operated, or managed by the digital asset kiosk operator that is located in the United States or the territories of the United States; (D) the start date of operation of each digital asset kiosk; (E) the end date of operation of each digital asset kiosk, if applicable; and (F) each digital asset address used by the digital asset kiosk operator
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The filing of false or materially incomplete information in a submission required under paragraph (1) shall be deemed a failure to comply
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Kiosks—stand-alone machines exchanging cash for digital assets or digital assets for cash—would have to disclose transaction terms, fees, finality warnings, common scam warnings, and law-enforcement contact information before transactions. Customers would acknowledge disclosures each time. Operators would provide detailed receipts, including fees, exchange rates, and transaction identifiers, with a physical receipt available on request.

Check the sources
a stand-alone machine that is capable of accepting or dispensing legal tender in exchange for digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Before entering into a digital asset transaction with a customer, a digital asset kiosk operator shall disclose in a clear, conspicuous, and easily readable manner
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(iii) a warning that the digital asset kiosk transaction is final, is not refundable, and may not be reversed; and (iv) the type and amount of any fees or other expenses paid by the customer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the most common types of fraudulent schemes involving digital asset kiosks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each time a customer uses a digital asset kiosk, the digital asset kiosk operator shall ensure acknowledgment of all disclosures required under subsection (b) via confirmation of consent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(3) The type, value, date, and precise time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, transaction hash, and each applicable digital asset address. (4) The amount of the digital asset kiosk transaction expressed in United States dollars. (5) All fees charged. (6) A statement that the customer should contact law enforcement if they suspect fraudulent activity, such as scams, including contact information for a relevant law enforcement or government agency. (7) The exchange rate applied.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A physical version of the receipt required under subsection (d) shall be issued to the customer at the time of the digital asset kiosk transaction, if the customer opts for such a physical version
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(iii) a statement that the customer should contact law enforcement if they suspect fraudulent activity, such as scams, including contact information for a relevant law enforcement or government agency.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Kiosk operators would need anti-fraud policies under applicable state requirements or a federal minimum where the state has none. They would employ a qualified full-time compliance officer who is not the chief executive and does not own or control more than 10% of the operator. They would use ledger analysis to detect fraud and prevent transfers to wallets known to be fraudulent, and prevent different customers from using the same wallet address.

Check the sources
shall establish, maintain, and implement a written anti-fraud policy if required by, and consistent with, applicable State law in those States where the digital asset kiosk operator is licensed
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
operating in any State that does not require an anti-fraud policy under paragraph (1) shall establish, maintain, and implement an anti-fraud policy
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) is qualified to coordinate and monitor compliance with this section and all other applicable Federal and State laws, rules, and regulations; (2) is employed full-time by the digital asset kiosk operator; (3) is not the chief executive officer of the digital asset kiosk operator; and (4) does not own or control more than 10 percent of any interest in the digital asset kiosk operator
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall use distributed ledger analytics to prevent sending a digital asset to a digital asset wallet known to be affiliated with fraudulent activity at the time of a digital asset kiosk transaction and to detect transaction patterns indicative of fraud or other illicit activities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall maintain restrictions that prevent more than 1 customer of the digital asset kiosk operator from using the same digital wallet address
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

For a customer's first 14 days with a kiosk operator, transactions of $500 or more would require confirmation of intent and absence of fraudulent inducement. Transfers on behalf of a new customer to a specified wallet would have a minimum 72-hour wait. Until Treasury's transaction-limit regulations took effect, new customers could not transact more than $3,500 in any 24 hours. Treasury would have to set reporting or transaction-limit thresholds by regulation, including aggregate or single-day deposit and withdrawal limits reasonably necessary to deter fraud and illicit finance. The rules must consider kiosks’ particular risks and functions and may include exceptions, adjustments, or exclusions.

Check the sources
The term new customer, with respect to a digital asset kiosk operator, means a customer during the 14-day period beginning on the date of the first digital asset kiosk transaction of the customer with the digital asset kiosk operator.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Before entering into a digital asset kiosk transaction valued at $500 or more with a new customer, the digital asset kiosk operator shall obtain confirmation from the new customer that— (1) the new customer wishes to proceed with the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (2) the new customer is not being fraudulently induced into engaging in the transaction.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
unless at least 72 hours have elapsed since the initiation of the transaction by the new customer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Until the effective date of regulations prescribed under subsection (k), a digital asset kiosk operator shall not permit a new customer to conduct transactions exceeding $3,500 in the aggregate within any 24-hour period.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may provide for exceptions, adjustments, or exclusions as deemed appropriate by the Secretary
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(k) Transaction limits with respect to new customers The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe by regulation the threshold amounts for reporting or limiting digital asset kiosk transactions, including aggregate or single-day deposit and withdrawal limits, as the Secretary determines are reasonably necessary to deter fraud and illicit finance. Such regulations shall consider the unique risks and functionalities of digital asset kiosks and may provide for exceptions, adjustments, or exclusions as deemed appropriate by the Secretary.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Kiosk fraud victims meeting the complaint requirements would receive refunds of transaction fees within 30 days; the text does not require repayment of the transferred principal. Their complaint must include identifying and transaction information and a copy of a report to a state or local law-enforcement or government agency made within 30 days after the transaction. Operators would provide live help during business hours, an alternative after-hours system, and a dedicated official contact channel. State regulators could enforce the section, and states could adopt stronger customer protections.

Check the sources
shall issue a refund for a customer’s transaction fees within 30 days if— (1) the customer was fraudulently induced into engaging in the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (2) the customer files a complaint
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) the name, address, and phone number of the customer; (B) the transaction hash of the digital asset kiosk transaction or information sufficient to establish the type, value, date, and time of the digital asset kiosk transaction; and (C) a copy of a report to a State or local law enforcement or government agency made not later than 30 days after the digital asset kiosk transaction
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall provide live customer service during business hours
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
During non-business hours, the digital asset kiosk operator shall maintain an alternative customer service system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall have a dedicated method of contact, such as a phone number, email address, or other contact method, for law enforcement and regulatory agencies
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any State regulator may bring a civil action or other appropriate proceeding to enforce the provisions of this section and may assess or collect civil penalties or other remedies for violations of this section, as provided under applicable State law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit a State from enacting a law, rule, or regulation that provides greater protection to customers.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 206 would require Treasury, consulting the Attorney General, to review foreign terrorist organizations' and transnational organized criminals' illicit digital-asset use within one year after enactment. A congressional report would follow within 180 days after completion, with findings and recommendations for stronger compliance and enforcement. Treasury could seek other regulators' input and include a classified annex.

Check the sources
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall conduct a comprehensive review of how foreign terrorist organizations and transnational organized criminals utilize digital assets in connection with illicit activities.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 180 days after completing the review under subsection (b)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
recommendations to assist the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in strengthening compliance and enforcement of digital assets-related entities registered with their respective agencies
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may, in the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury, solicit input
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may include a classified annex, as appropriate
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 301 directs tailored securities and financial-crime rules for persons controlling covered trading protocols, but the exact scope is unresolved here. The threshold definition requires multiple participants to transact through automated, predetermined, non-discretionary rules, without relying on someone other than the user to maintain custody or control of the assets in the transaction. Its additional control tests include authority to materially change a protocol, operations not based solely on transparent pre-set code, or authority to restrict use. It also requires consistency with section 601, which is outside this group’s excerpt, so these tests alone do not establish which controllers would be covered. The directed securities rules depend on securities-related functions; Bank Secrecy Act duties depend on existing law and rulemaking. Software itself would not have to register, and the section would not prohibit a network's launch or operation.

Check the sources
has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
has the authority, via operation of the decentralized finance trading protocol, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
determine the applicable requirements only with respect to securities-related activities, based on the functions performed by the controlling person or group of persons
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be subject to that Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to the extent applicable under existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section, nor any rule adopted under this section, may be construed to— (A) require a distributed ledger system or any software code to register with the Commission in its own capacity; or (B) prohibit the launch, deployment, or operation of a distributed ledger system.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
In implementing this section, the Commission and the Department of the Treasury shall construe the term non-decentralized finance trading protocol in a manner consistent with section 15H of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by section 601.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) Decentralized finance trading protocol The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (A) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (B) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of any digital assets subject to the financial transaction.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 301 would not treat decentralized governance alone, or qualifying security-council participation alone, as common control. Temporary cybersecurity emergency powers would have to be pre-defined, narrowly limited, publicly authorized and documented in advance, and free of unilateral control. They could not be used for unrelated upgrades, governance decisions, or economic changes. The section preserves investigation and enforcement powers and creates no automatic presumption that particular people or activities are covered.

Check the sources
a decentralized governance system, solely by virtue of the operation of the decentralized governance system, shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
participation in an incident-response or security council, as described in subsection (f), shall not, by itself, be deemed to constitute control
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Pre-defined, temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures exercised by an incident-response or security council exclusively in response to a specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat and pursuant to publicly disclosed, on-chain authorization mechanisms, strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address such specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and without unilateral control by any single person
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
disclosed in publicly available written documentation reasonably available to the applicable Federal regulator, by a decentralized governance system or similar legal entity sufficiently in advance of any exercise of such emergency powers
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not be used to implement protocol upgrades, governance decisions, or economic changes that are unrelated to the mitigation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to create a presumption that any person or activity described in this section is or is not subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the Bank Secrecy Act absent a determination made pursuant to a rulemaking required under this section.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(e) Preservation of existing authorities Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) limit the authority of the Commission under the securities laws to investigate violations, bring actions, or issue subpoenas with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the securities laws under this section; or (2) limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act, including to investigate violations or bring actions with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the Bank Secrecy Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 302 would require Treasury guidance within 360 days after enactment for U.S.-owned or operated web applications that send users' transaction instructions to blockchain applications or trading protocols. The definition excludes underlying networks, protocols, computing infrastructure, and individual custody wallets. Guidance could address screening, restricted transactions, and financial-crime risk controls. Enforcement would use existing authority; the section says it does not expand or contract existing financial-crime laws. Its construction clause also says the financial-institution definition shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers defined in section 604(b)(3). That definition is outside this excerpt, so this group does not determine exactly who qualifies for that protection. Section 604 is outside this excerpt, so this detail review cannot resolve how that protection interacts with other provisions or establish financial-institution treatment for conduct outside the protected scope; see the overview’s cross-section limitation.

Check the sources
a web-hosted software application that provides a user with the ability to create or submit an instruction, communication, or message to a distributed ledger application or decentralized finance trading protocol for the purpose of executing a transaction by the user
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not include— (i) a distributed ledger application; (ii) a distributed ledger protocol; (iii) a distributed ledger system; (iv) a decentralized finance trading protocol; (v) any client, node, validator, or other form of computational infrastructure with respect to a distributed ledger system; or (vi) any software or hardware wallet that facilitates the custody of an individual of their digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue guidance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
applicable to a distributed ledger messaging system that is owned or operated by a United States person
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
have the authority, as applicable, to enforce this section using their existing authorities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Guidance Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue guidance with respect to the economic sanctions and anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism obligations, risk management practices, or compliance considerations, applicable to a distributed ledger messaging system that is owned or operated by a United States person, as defined in any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions, which may include— (1) the use of commercially reasonable distributed ledger-analytics screening measures, through industry-standard distributed ledger-analytics tools, to identify wallet addresses that are owned by sanctioned persons, involve jurisdictions or financial institutions subject to United States sanctions, or activity prohibited by United States sanctions; (2) blocking, rejecting, preventing the routing of, or otherwise restricting attempted transactions prohibited by United States sanction laws; (3) blocking or restricting transactions that exhibit indicators of ransomware activity, illicit finance typologies, or any other pattern that presents a significant and identifiable illicit finance risk based on a commercially reasonable distributed ledger-analytics assessment to identify transactions that involve ransomware activity and other illicit finance activity; and (4) implementing and maintaining risk-based measures, consistent with applicable law, to identify, mitigate, and address anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism risks, including— (A) monitoring for risk indicators and limiting exposure to illicit-finance risks, which may include restricting, limiting, or otherwise mitigating exposure to high-risk transactions; and (B) complying, as applicable, with special measures implemented by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 5318A of title 31, United States Code.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) alter or amend any laws imposing or authorizing imposition of economic sanctions by the United States, including those that apply to United States persons that own or operate a distributed ledger messaging system; (2) expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act to any person, including any person that owns or operates a distributed ledger messaging system; or (B) the definition of a financial institution under applicable laws, which shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers as defined in section 604(b)(3); or (3) restrict the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement, administer, and enforce, including by imposing civil money penalties, any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions or any law to prevent money laundering or illicit finance otherwise provided by Federal law to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 303 would authorize Treasury to prohibit or condition certain domestic financial institutions' or agencies' fund transfers when it finds a foreign jurisdiction, foreign financial institution, or specified foreign-linked transaction class to be a primary money-laundering concern involving digital assets. Treasury would define the covered transfers by regulation. The full existing statutory procedure is not reproduced.

Check the sources
If the Secretary of the Treasury finds that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, 1 or more financial institutions operating outside of the United States, or 1 or more classes of transactions within, or involving, a jurisdiction outside of the United States is of primary money laundering concern in connection with illicit finance through the use of digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the Secretary may, by order, regulation, or otherwise as permitted by law, prohibit, or impose conditions upon, certain transmittals of funds (to be defined by the Secretary by regulation) by any domestic financial institution or domestic financial agency, if such transmittal of funds involves any such institution, class of transaction, or type of account
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 304 would require public Treasury reports assessing whether credible, articulable and publicly supportable evidence of significant illicit-finance threats or vulnerabilities exists for certain offshore payment stablecoins backed by assets substantially connected to the United States. It covers issuers outside the permitted or registered categories and tokens with sustained, publicly observable, more-than-minimal activity over 12 months that is reasonably likely to affect U.S. illicit-finance or national-security risk exposure. The first report would be due June 30 of the second calendar year beginning after enactment, with reports every four years and no more than three reports. Reports could include classified annexes and use only public or otherwise lawfully obtained information.

Check the sources
not issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer or any foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
issued by a person operating outside of the United States; and (C) the value of which is supported or backed by a reserve of assets that has a substantial nexus to the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a sustained level of transaction activity that is— (A) publicly observable; (B) exceeds de minimis usage over a 12-month period; and (C) is reasonably likely to affect the illicit finance or national security risk exposure of the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than June 30 of the second calendar year that begins after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 4 years thereafter for not more than 3 reports
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
make available on the website of the Department of the Treasury, a report assessing whether there is credible, articulable, and publicly supportable evidence of significant illicit finance threats or vulnerabilities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize— (1) the disclosure of any information that is protected from disclosure under Federal law; and (2) the collection or use of any information other than publicly available data or information lawfully obtained by the Department of the Treasury under existing authorities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 305 would protect covered stablecoin issuers and digital asset service providers from private federal or state lawsuits for qualifying good-faith temporary holds. Holds could last a reasonable period up to 30 calendar days and be extended another 150 days by a qualified agency request. Protection would require a reasonable belief that the transaction, conversion, or withdrawal relates to a violation or attempted violation of state or federal law, or a qualified written agency request, customer-notification efforts or a specified exception, and prompt official notification unless the hold followed an agency request. Covered persons would retain supporting records for three years.

Check the sources
a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 30 calendar days, which may be extended for an additional 150 calendar days pursuant to a qualified written request
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Any covered person that, in good faith and in compliance with this section, or any person complying with a temporary lawful order under subsection (c) that, voluntarily implements a temporary hold shall not be held liable pursuant to any Federal or State private right of action
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) implements the temporary hold based on a reasonable belief the transaction, conversion, or withdrawal relates to a violation or attempted violation of State or Federal law; or (ii) implements the temporary hold after receiving a qualified written request from a covered agency
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) makes reasonable efforts to notify the affected customer of the temporary hold; (ii) reasonably determines that notification would impede actual or potential law enforcement efforts; or (iii) receives a qualified written request from a covered agency that requests notification not be attempted
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
notifies as soon as reasonably practicable an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency or the Federal Trade Commission, provided that such notification is not required when the covered person has received a qualified written request
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
maintain for the 3-year period following the implementation of a temporary hold documentation of the basis
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Permitted payment stablecoin issuers would have to comply with valid federal court requirements to freeze or prevent transfers when the affected coins or accounts are reasonably specified and review or appeal is available. Section 305 would otherwise preserve existing freezing and enforcement authority rather than independently compel additional asset blocking. Covered persons could also apply temporary holds to foreign accounts or transactions.

Check the sources
A permitted payment stablecoin issuer shall comply with any valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued or promulgated under Federal law by a court of competent jurisdiction
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) requires a person to freeze or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins; (2) specifies the payment stablecoins or accounts subject to blocking with reasonable particularity; and (3) is subject to judicial or administrative review or appeal, as provided by law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) compel or require any covered person to take action to freeze, seize, or block digital assets that is not otherwise required under existing Federal or State law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
limit the ability of a covered person to apply a temporary hold to any wallet, address, account, or transaction located outside the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 306 would require the National Institute of Standards and Technology to establish a voluntary cybersecurity program for decentralized trading developers and other referenced activities. Public input would inform criteria, reports, revisions, and updates. Applicants would receive a compliance determination; successful applicants could display an official identifier. Federal agencies issuing related rules or guidance would consider adoption evidence of good-faith legal compliance. State law would remain applicable.

Check the sources
establish a voluntary program for the adoption by persons developing decentralized finance trading protocols or engaging in covered activities of applicable cybersecurity standards published by NIST
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall issue a request for information in the Federal Register to gather input from experts and industry stakeholders
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The public may petition the Director to reevaluate certain aspects of the program criteria
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall determine whether the protocol or activity is in compliance with existing applicable standards, frameworks, and guidelines
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may publicly display a designation, seal, or other identifier issued by the Director
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a Federal agency shall consider adoption of cybersecurity standards under the program required by subsection (b) as evidence of good faith compliance with the law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to preempt any otherwise applicable provision of law of a State.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 307 would add digital assets, 'as may be applicable,' to part of the monetary-instrument definition. Treasury's national illicit-finance strategy would consider both risks and stated potential benefits of wallets that owners control themselves. Optional guidance could not require personal identifying information about a wallet controller who is not both the institution's customer and a party to the transaction, except where federal law or lawful process requires it. Investigative authority would remain.

Check the sources
Section 5312(a)(3)(D) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting , including digital assets (as defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901)), as may be applicable, after value.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the owner of digital assets secured and transferred under subparagraph (A) retains independent control over those digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the benefits of the use of self-hosted wallets to— (A) enhance user privacy and civil liberties through direct asset custody; and (B) expand financial inclusion and access for communities underserved by traditional financial institutions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
end user and counterparty risks associated with self-hosted wallets, including consumer fraud, cybersecurity, and identity verification
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not— (1) require a regulated entity to collect, with respect to any transaction, personally identifiable information about the controller of a self-hosted wallet when the controller is not both the customer of the regulated entity and a party to such transaction, except as required by Federal law, including United States sanctions laws and regulations or lawful process
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
hinder, restrict, or otherwise impair the authority of any Federal agency to investigate, detect, counteract, or prevent illegal activity
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 308 would require intermediaries to assess and manage financial-crime, fraud, manipulation, operational, and cybersecurity risks before trading through decentralized protocols. They would explain risks in plain language, maintain detection capabilities, and decide when to execute, reject, or suspend transactions. Regular examinations would verify compliance. Treasury would write money-laundering and sanctions rules; securities and commodities regulators would write the other rules, tailored to size and reasonably knowable risks. Section 308 does not define “decentralized finance trading protocol.” This excerpt does not establish which definition governs that section, so the precise protocol coverage remains unresolved.

Check the sources
Before conducting trading activity (including routing orders and executing trades) through a decentralized finance trading protocol, a digital asset intermediary shall implement risk management standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) money laundering and sanctions evasion risks, including whether trading will involve activity relating to a primary money laundering concern; (B) fraud and market manipulation; (C) operational and cybersecurity risk, including settlement; and (D) implementing robust policies and procedures to mitigate the risks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Disclosing the risks identified under paragraph (1) using plain language to customers.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Implementing an effective risk-based procedure for determining whether to execute, reject, or suspend an incoming or outgoing transaction
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall verify compliance with the requirements of this section as part of a regular examination
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, shall adopt rules to implement the money laundering and sanctions evasion risk analysis standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall adopt rules to implement this section other than the provisions described in paragraph (1).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
reasonably tailored to the size of the applicable digital asset intermediary and risks of the digital asset intermediary that are reasonably knowable
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 309 would require a Treasury report within one year after enactment on mixers and tumblers—software contracts that obscure asset sources or holders, including through pooling and redistribution. It would examine transaction volumes, illicit-use estimates, financial-sector exposure and compliance, potential lawful privacy uses, foreign regulation, and policy recommendations.

Check the sources
a smart contract, or set of smart contracts, that obfuscate or eliminate the source or other forms of identification of the holder of a digital asset, including by pooling assets from different holders and redistributing those assets among holders
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Estimates of the percentage of transactions relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers that are used by actors engaged in illicit finance.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Estimates of the reliance, and financial exposure, of centralized exchanges and traditional financial institutions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(4) An assessment of potential non-illicit uses of mixers and tumblers described in paragraph (1), including privacy benefits. (5) An analysis of regulatory approaches employed by other jurisdictions relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers. (6) Recommendations for legislation or regulation relating to digital asset mixers and tumblers.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) Current (as of the date on which the report is submitted) typologies of digital asset mixers and tumblers and historical transaction volume.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 310 would require the Government Accountability Office's Comptroller General, consulting Treasury, to study intermediaries serving U.S. persons from foreign jurisdictions lacking substantially similar Bank Secrecy Act requirements. The study would assess risks and possible legislative or regulatory responses, with a report to Congress within one year after enactment.

Check the sources
The Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall conduct a study
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
are primarily located in foreign jurisdictions that lack regulatory requirements that are substantially similar to the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; and (B) provide services to United States persons
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provide any regulatory or legislative recommendations to address the risks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report containing all findings and determinations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) · Kiosk safeguards and decentralized-finance oversight (partial bill review). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The supplied group contains specific liability protections and regulatory exceptions tied to digital-asset activities. These are related to the proposal's main policy; identifying them does not establish improper favoritism or their practical effects.

Section 301 would give qualifying incident-response and security councils a narrow exception from treating their emergency activity alone as control. It is tied to limited cybersecurity responses, advance public documentation, and absence of unilateral control, and excludes unrelated changes.

Check the sources
301. Rulemaking on application of existing securities intermediary requirements and existing Bank Secrecy Act requirements to non-decentralized finance trading protocols (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Decentralized finance trading protocol The term decentralized finance trading protocol means a distributed ledger system through which multiple participants can execute a financial transaction— (A) in accordance with an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary; and (B) without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control of any digital assets subject to the financial transaction. (2) Non-decentralized finance trading protocol (A) In general The term non-decentralized finance trading protocol means a decentralized finance trading protocol that meets 1 or more of the following: (i) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise, to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement of the decentralized finance trading protocol. (ii) The decentralized finance trading protocol does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system. (iii) A person or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, has the authority, via operation of the decentralized finance trading protocol, to restrict, censor, or prohibit the use of the decentralized finance trading protocol, including any applicable system-based user activity. (B) Special rule For purposes of subparagraph (A), a decentralized governance system, solely by virtue of the operation of the decentralized governance system, shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (C) Exclusions For purposes of this section, participation in an incident-response or security council, as described in subsection (f), shall not, by itself, be deemed to constitute control of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol. (D) Scoping In implementing this section, the Commission and the Department of the Treasury shall construe the term non-decentralized finance trading protocol in a manner consistent with section 15H of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by section 601. (b) Rules (1) In general The Commission, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after notice and comment, that clarify how a person, or group of persons under common control, or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, that controls a non-decentralized finance trading protocol and is subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), as amended by this Act, shall comply with applicable requirements under that Act, including with respect to registration, conduct, disclosure, recordkeeping, supervision, and other requirements under the securities laws. (2) Requirements The rulemaking required under paragraph (1) shall— (A) ensure that the rules adopted pursuant to that rulemaking are consistent with the purposes of the securities laws, including the public interest, the protection of investors, and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets; (B) protect the rights of software developers, publishers, and users to create, publish, and use code and software in a manner consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; (C) provide legal clarity for the development, publication, and operation of distributed ledger systems and the components therein in a manner consistent with the purposes of this section; and (D) result in, by operation of law, the application and enforcement by the Department of the Treasury, where applicable and pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal law with respect to any person or group of persons that the Commission determines, through that rulemaking, is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). (3) Application (A) In general Any person or group of persons determined under this subsection to be required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (referred to in this paragraph as the Exchange Act) shall be subject to that Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to the extent applicable under existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, consistent with the treatment of similarly situated participants under the Exchange Act. (B) Rulemaking The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commission, shall adopt tailored, clear, and specific rules, after providing notice and the opportunity to comment, that define compliance with obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act and other Federal laws relating to anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism with respect to any person, or group of persons under common control (or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert), that— (i) controls the operation of a non-decentralized finance trading protocol identified in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); (ii) is required to register, or comply as a registrant, under the Exchange Act, as determined in the rulemaking conducted under paragraph (1); and (iii) is caused to be treated as a financial institution under the Bank Secrecy Act pursuant to existing law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, as a result of registration or compliance described in clause (ii). (c) Activity-Based application Rules adopted under subsection (b)(1) shall require the Commission to determine the applicable requirements only with respect to securities-related activities, based on the functions performed by the controlling person or group of persons, including brokerage, dealing, trading, execution, clearing, or custody of securities, without regard to technological form, distributed architecture, or purportedly decentralized characterization. (d) Rules of construction (1) Registration not required Nothing in this section, nor any rule adopted under this section, may be construed to— (A) require a distributed ledger system or any software code to register with the Commission in its own capacity; or (B) prohibit the launch, deployment, or operation of a distributed ledger system. (2) No expansion of statutory authority Notwithstanding any rulemaking required under subsection (b), and notwithstanding any action the Commission or the Secretary of the Treasury may take under that subsection, nothing in this section, including any such rulemaking, may be construed to— (A) expand or contract the statutory authority of the Commission or the Department of the Treasury, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, under the Bank Secrecy Act; or
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) limit the use of the authority described in subparagraph (A) to determine, pursuant to that rulemaking, the applicability of existing statutory requirements, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, to persons or activities described in this section. (3) No presumption of applicability Nothing in this section may be construed to create a presumption that any person or activity described in this section is or is not subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the Bank Secrecy Act absent a determination made pursuant to a rulemaking required under this section. (e) Preservation of existing authorities Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) limit the authority of the Commission under the securities laws to investigate violations, bring actions, or issue subpoenas with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the securities laws under this section; or (2) limit the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury under the Bank Secrecy Act, including to investigate violations or bring actions with respect to persons determined, pursuant to rulemaking, to be subject to the Bank Secrecy Act. (f) Non-Decentralized finance trading protocols (1) In general In adopting rules under subsection (b), the Commission shall treat a decentralized governance system and any person participating in the decentralized governance system as separate persons unless such persons are under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert. (2) Emergency measures (A) In general Pre-defined, temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures exercised by an incident-response or security council exclusively in response to a specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat and pursuant to publicly disclosed, on-chain authorization mechanisms, strictly limited in scope and duration solely to address such specific and documented cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, and without unilateral control by any single person, shall not, by themselves, constitute common control or an agreement, arrangement, or understanding to act in concert, provided that such rules and authorities, including the procedures and operational limits governing such emergency measures, are disclosed in publicly available written documentation reasonably available to the applicable Federal regulator, by a decentralized governance system or similar legal entity sufficiently in advance of any exercise of such emergency powers. (B) Prohibition The emergency measures described in subparagraph (A) may not be used to implement protocol upgrades, governance decisions, or economic changes that are unrelated to the mitigation of the applicable cybersecurity incident or imminent threat, as described in that subparagraph. (3) Standards The standards criteria for temporary rules-based cybersecurity emergency measures under paragraph (2) shall be established by rulemaking pursuant to subsection (b).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 305 would protect specified stablecoin issuers, digital asset service providers, and qualifying persons complying with temporary lawful orders against private lawsuits for covered holds. The protection is conditioned on good faith, a reasonable legal basis or agency request, and applicable notice requirements; it does not remove government enforcement authority.

Check the source
305. Temporary hold for certain digital asset transactions (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered agency The term covered agency means any State or Federal law enforcement agency, including the Department of the Treasury. (2) Covered person The term covered person means a person that is— (A) a permitted payment stablecoin issuer; (B) a foreign payment stablecoin issuer (as defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901)) registered with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to section 18(c) of that Act (12 U.S.C. 5916(c)); or (C) a digital asset service provider, as that term is defined in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (3) Payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms payment stablecoin and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Qualified written request The term qualified written request means a written communication issued by an authorized official of a covered agency that— (A) identifies a specific wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity; (B) requests a covered person initiate an action with respect to the specified wallet, address, account, or transaction reasonably suspected of being linked to illicit activity, including delaying the execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets; and (C) includes a designated agency contact. (5) Temporary hold The term temporary hold means a restriction applied by a covered person that delays execution of a transaction, conversion, or withdrawal involving digital assets for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 30 calendar days, which may be extended for an additional 150 calendar days pursuant to a qualified written request. (b) Protection from private causes of action (1) In general Any covered person that, in good faith and in compliance with this section, or any person complying with a temporary lawful order under subsection (c) that, voluntarily implements a temporary hold shall not be held liable pursuant to any Federal or State private right of action for implementing the temporary hold, provided that— (A) the covered person or other person, as applicable— (i) implements the temporary hold based on a reasonable belief the transaction, conversion, or withdrawal relates to a violation or attempted violation of State or Federal law; or (ii) implements the temporary hold after receiving a qualified written request from a covered agency; (B) the covered person— (i) makes reasonable efforts to notify the affected customer of the temporary hold; (ii) reasonably determines that notification would impede actual or potential law enforcement efforts; or (iii) receives a qualified written request from a covered agency that requests notification not be attempted; and (C) the covered person notifies as soon as reasonably practicable an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency or the Federal Trade Commission, provided that such notification is not required when the covered person has received a qualified written request from a covered agency. (2) Documentation A covered person shall— (A) maintain for the 3-year period following the implementation of a temporary hold documentation of the basis for applying a temporary hold; and (B) make available the documentation described in subparagraph (A) upon the request of a covered agency or the Federal Trade Commission. (c) Compliance with temporary lawful orders A permitted payment stablecoin issuer shall comply with any valid writ, process, order, rule, decree, command, or other requirement issued or promulgated under Federal law by a court of competent jurisdiction that— (1) requires a person to freeze or prevent the transfer of payment stablecoins; (2) specifies the payment stablecoins or accounts subject to blocking with reasonable particularity; and (3) is subject to judicial or administrative review or appeal, as provided by law. (d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) compel or require any covered person to take action to freeze, seize, or block digital assets that is not otherwise required under existing Federal or State law, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act; (2) limit or alter the authority of any government agency, including with respect to authority to pursue enforcement actions; (3) limit or affect the application of— (A) section 5318(g)(3) of title 31, United States Code, and any regulation requiring any financial institution to report suspicious activity; or (B) any lawful authority to seize or freeze assets pursuant to a lawful order or sanctions designation; or (4) limit the ability of a covered person to apply a temporary hold to any wallet, address, account, or transaction located outside the United States. (e) Reporting The Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission may issue regulations or guidance relating to any notification by covered persons pursuant to this section to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, respectively.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 302’s construction clause preserves existing financial-crime law while stating that the financial-institution definition shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers defined in section 604(b)(3). This identifies a specific regulatory protection for that referenced class. Section 604(b)(3) is outside this excerpt; the finding does not determine eligibility or imply exemption from all sanctions or financial-crime laws. Section 604 is outside this excerpt, so this detail review cannot resolve how that protection interacts with other provisions or establish financial-institution treatment for conduct outside the protected scope; see the overview’s cross-section limitation.

Check the source
(d) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) alter or amend any laws imposing or authorizing imposition of economic sanctions by the United States, including those that apply to United States persons that own or operate a distributed ledger messaging system; (2) expand or contract the applicability of— (A) economic sanctions, anti-money laundering, or any other illicit finance laws in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act to any person, including any person that owns or operates a distributed ledger messaging system; or (B) the definition of a financial institution under applicable laws, which shall not apply to non-controlling developers or providers as defined in section 604(b)(3); or (3) restrict the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to implement, administer, and enforce, including by imposing civil money penalties, any law imposing or authorizing the imposition of economic sanctions or any law to prevent money laundering or illicit finance otherwise provided by Federal law to the Secretary of the Treasury.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Limits of this section review

  • This detail group explains its assigned primary sections. Shared context was read for interpretation; its standalone analysis belongs to the owning group listed in the overview’s reading guide. “Outside this group” describes the supplied excerpt boundary, not absence from the bill. This group alone cannot establish whole-bill completeness.
  • Sections 103–105, 108, 601, 604 and 906 are outside this group’s excerpt. Their offering exemptions, control standards, developer protections and effective-date interactions cannot be established by this detail review alone; consult the overview’s reading guide for cross-group navigation.
  • Existing statutes and regulations incorporated by reference are not fully reproduced, including the GENIUS Act definitions and the provisions amended in sections 201, 205, 303, and 307. The analysis describes supported amendments without assuming the omitted statutory context.
  • The supplied text is a proposed Senate committee substitute. The dated actions snapshot does not establish enactment or events after September 17, 2026; missing later history does not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
  • Many operative standards depend on future agency rules. Enactment-relative and effective-date-relative deadlines cannot be converted to calendar dates from this evidence.
  • The kiosk fee-refund clause says refunds are due within 30 days but does not expressly identify the starting event for that deadline. It separately requires the customer's government or law-enforcement report within 30 days after the transaction.
  • Required studies and risk assessments are proposed research tasks, not findings that the risks, benefits, or effects they would study have been established.
  • This detail review cannot establish whole-bill rider, earmark or targeted-benefit coverage. Earmark disclosures, member requests and accompanying reports are not supplied to this review; findings do not establish absence elsewhere or in other versions.
  • Section 306’s voluntary cybersecurity program and its recognition and good-faith-compliance benefits are described in the provisions. They were considered for targeted-benefit classification, but the supplied text does not establish a materially narrow preferential carve-out beyond the program’s generally available eligibility conditions. The analysis therefore retains those facts without a targeted-benefit label.
  • Section 604 is outside this excerpt, so this detail review cannot resolve how that protection interacts with other provisions or establish financial-institution treatment for conduct outside the protected scope; see the overview’s cross-section limitation.
Banking, stablecoin rewards and regulatory testing

These proposed sections would authorize specified digital-asset services for banks and credit unions, restrict interest-like payments on payment stablecoins, and set rules for accounts that calculate collateral using combined investment risks. They would also create a limited financial-technology testing program and require research on foreign adversaries, cybersecurity, financial stability and automated compliance.

Check the sources
A financial holding company or financial subsidiary may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the financial holding company is otherwise authorized by law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A national bank may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the national bank is otherwise authorized by law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The activities authorized for a Federal credit union under subsection (e)(1) shall be permissible for an insured credit union, subject to authorization by applicable State law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A Federal credit union may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the Federal credit union is otherwise authorized by law to perform, provide, or deliver.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
No covered party shall, directly or indirectly, pay any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) to a restricted recipient— (A) solely in connection with the holding of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient; or (B) on a payment stablecoin balance in a manner that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall jointly issue rules to facilitate portfolio margining of securities (including related extensions of credit), security-based swaps, futures contracts for future delivery, options on futures contracts for future delivery, swaps, and digital commodities, or any subset thereof
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
margin requirements are determined on a risk-based, portfolio-wide basis, rather than on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a customer account— (A) that is maintained by a broker or dealer registered with the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions shall, by joint notice and comment rulemaking, establish a CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Commission, shall conduct a study and submit a report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study and submit a report to the relevant congressional committees, which may include a classified annex
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a study on cybersecurity standards applicable to digital asset smart contracts, custody, key management, and smart contract deployment.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 4 years thereafter until 4 consecutive reports have been issued, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the feasibility, benefits, and risks of allowing regulated entities to satisfy applicable regulatory obligations through on-chain, code-based, or other automated mechanisms
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 311 would require separate Treasury and GAO reports within one year after enactment concerning foreign adversaries designated under the referenced Commerce regulation. Treasury would examine adversary control of intermediaries; GAO would examine ownership. Both would investigate collection of U.S. persons’ trading data and misuse or theft of intermediaries’ intellectual property. Classified annexes would be allowed.

Check the sources
determined by the Secretary of Commerce to be a foreign adversary under section 791.4(a) of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Commission, shall conduct a study and submit a report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identifies any digital asset intermediary that is controlled by a government of a foreign adversary, or by individuals or entities acting at the direction of a foreign adversary
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study and submit a report to the relevant congressional committees, which may include a classified annex
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identifies any digital asset intermediary that is owned by a government of a foreign adversary
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
determines whether any government of a foreign adversary is collecting trading data about United States persons in digital asset markets; and (3) evaluates whether any proprietary intellectual property of digital asset intermediaries is being misused or stolen
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 312 would require Treasury, consulting federal cybersecurity and standards agencies, to study cybersecurity for automated digital contracts, custody, key management and contract deployment. A report with findings and any legislative recommendations would be due within 365 days after enactment and could include a classified annex.

Check the sources
in consultation with the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a study on cybersecurity standards applicable to digital asset smart contracts, custody, key management, and smart contract deployment.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) the findings of the study under subsection (a); and (B) any legislative recommendations. (2) Classified annex The report under paragraph (1) may include a classified annex, as appropriate.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 313 would require Treasury, the Federal Reserve, SEC and CFTC to study decentralized finance and separately study credit in digital-asset markets. Topics would include borrowing, links to traditional finance, stability risks, safeguards and regulatory gaps. Reports would start within one year after enactment and repeat every four years until four consecutive reports have been issued.

Check the sources
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 4 years thereafter until 4 consecutive reports have been issued, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the use of such protocols to obtain leverage or financing
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the risks of decentralized finance protocols to financial stability, fair and orderly markets, and otherwise to the financial system of the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
conduct a separate study examining the risks to financial stability and orderly markets arising from the extension and maintenance of credit with respect to digital assets by digital asset service providers
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(C) the strategies and guardrails regulators and market participants have used and are using to mitigate risks arising from the use of decentralized finance protocols; and (D) an assessment of whether the regulatory framework adequately controls any risk with respect to decentralized finance protocols; (2) conduct a separate study examining the risks to financial stability and orderly markets arising from the extension and maintenance of credit with respect to digital assets by digital asset service providers, including— (A) the effect of gaps in the regulatory framework for credit extended on digital assets, such as risks arising from the extension and maintenance of credit on digital assets; and (B) the interconnections between leverage in the market for digital assets and the financial system; and
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 401 would authorize specified banking entities to use digital assets and shared-ledger systems for otherwise lawful services. Listed activities include custody, related staking and lending services, digital-asset-backed loans, payments, network operation, wallet software, brokerage and qualifying trading. It also addresses foreign-bank branches and state banks; Federal credit unions could use digital assets and shared-ledger systems for services they are otherwise authorized by law to provide. Section 401(f) extends only section 401(e)(1)’s permission to use digital assets or ledger systems for otherwise lawful services to insured credit unions, subject to applicable state law. It does not expressly extend section 401(e)(2)’s separate authorization of the activities listed in subsection (g). These authorities would not apply to nonfungible assets.

Check the sources
A financial holding company or financial subsidiary may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the financial holding company is otherwise authorized by law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A national bank may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the national bank is otherwise authorized by law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
providing custodial, fiduciary, or safekeeping services for digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
making loans collateralized by digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
operating a node on a distributed ledger; (6) providing self-custodial wallet software
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The activities authorized for a Federal credit union under subsection (e)(1) shall be permissible for an insured credit union, subject to authorization by applicable State law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The authorities described in this section shall not apply to nonfungible assets.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A Federal credit union may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the Federal credit union is otherwise authorized by law to perform, provide, or deliver.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(B) Branches of foreign banks (i) Federal branches Consistent with section 4(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3102(b)), the activities authorized for a national bank under subparagraph (A) and paragraph (2) shall be permissible for a Federal branch, subject to any limitations that would apply to those activities pursuant to the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.) if the activity were not performed, provided, or delivered using a digital asset or distributed ledger system. (ii) Rule of construction for State branches For the purposes of activities engaged in by a State branch as principal under section 7(h) of the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3105(h)), the activities authorized under clause (i) are permissible activities of a Federal branch.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) State banks The activities authorized under subsection (c) are permissible activities— (1) of a national bank for purposes of activities of an insured State bank and any subsidiary of an insured State bank to engage in as principal under subsections (a) and (d) of section 24 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831a); and (2) of a State member bank, and any subsidiary of a State member bank, to engage in as principal.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(g) Activities described The activities described in this subsection are— (1) providing custodial, fiduciary, or safekeeping services for digital assets; (2) providing services related to custodial services for digital assets, including staking, facilitating digital asset lending, distributed ledger governance services, and advancing funds for the purchase of digital assets or in respect of distributions on digital assets; (3) making loans collateralized by digital assets; (4) engaging in payment activities involving digital assets, including facilitating customer or principal payments in connection with otherwise permissible activities; (5) operating a node on a distributed ledger; (6) providing self-custodial wallet software; (7) engaging in derivatives transactions, including related hedging activities, in a manner consistent with section 7.1030 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act; (8) providing brokerage services with respect to any digital asset, including clearing and execution services, whether alone or in combination with other permissible activities; (9) facilitating transactions in the secondary market for all types of digital assets on the order of customers as a riskless principal to the extent of engaging in a transaction in which a company, after receiving an order to buy or sell a digital asset from a customer, purchases or sells the digital asset for its own account to offset a contemporaneous sale to or purchase from the customer; (10) holding as principal digital assets for which the banking entity anticipates a reasonably foreseeable need to the extent incidental to an otherwise permissible activity, which shall include holding digital assets as principal in order to pay fees arising from interactions with a distributed ledger system or for the purposes of risk management, treasury services, liquidity management or trade or margin settlement or similar purposes, subject to the otherwise applicable limitations on the activities of a banking entity pursuant to section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) and only to the extent that the terms and prohibitions of that section apply to a transaction; and (11) underwriting, dealing in, or making a market in digital assets in customer-driven transactions, including related hedging activities in connection with those customer-driven transactions, subject to the otherwise applicable limitations on the activities of a banking entity pursuant to section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) and only to the extent that the terms and prohibitions of that section apply to a transaction.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(e) Authorized activities for Federal credit unions (1) In general A Federal credit union may use a digital asset or distributed ledger system to perform, provide, or deliver any activity, function, product, or service that the Federal credit union is otherwise authorized by law to perform, provide, or deliver. (2) Business of credit unions The activities described in subsection (g) are authorized as part of, or incidental to, the authority necessary or requisite to carry on effectively the business for which Federal credit unions are incorporated under paragraph (17) of section 107 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757(17)). (3) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection may be construed to exempt the performance, provision, or delivery by a Federal credit union of an activity, function, product, or service from a requirement that would apply if the activity were not performed, provided, or delivered using a digital asset or distributed ledger system. (f) Insured credit unions The activities authorized for a Federal credit union under subsection (e)(1) shall be permissible for an insured credit union, subject to authorization by applicable State law.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 401 would retain requirements that apply to equivalent activities without digital technology and preserve supervision for unsafe practices and legal violations. Certain holdings and customer-driven dealing would remain subject to applicable Bank Holding Company Act section 13 restrictions. Customer-driven transactions must serve an independent customer business purpose, rather than deliver otherwise impermissible investments to the institution. Additional prior notice or approval requirements would be limited to the listed banking statutes and their regulations.

Check the sources
from a prohibition, restriction, registration, limitation, or other requirement that would apply if the activity were not performed, provided, or delivered using a digital asset or distributed ledger system
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
subject to the otherwise applicable limitations on the activities of a banking entity pursuant to section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851) and only to the extent that the terms and prohibitions of that section apply to a transaction.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
means a transaction that is entered into for a valid and independent business purpose of a customer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not include a transaction, the principal purpose of which is to deliver to a financial holding company, insured State bank, national bank, or Federal credit union assets that the financial holding company, insured State bank, national bank, or Federal credit union, respectively, could not invest in directly.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
There shall be no other prior notice or approval requirements to engage in the activities described in subsections (b) through (g) of this section other than those required under title LXII of the Revised Statutes, the Act entitled An Act to place authority over the trust powers of national banks in the Comptroller of the Currency, approved September 28, 1962 (12 U.S.C. 92a et seq.), the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 221 et seq.), or the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated under those Acts.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
supervise and take enforcement action
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 402 would require joint SEC-CFTC rules for portfolio margining—setting collateral requirements using combined portfolio risks—across securities, derivatives and digital commodities in specified registered accounts. Rules could issue only if in the public interest and protective of customers. They must explain insolvency treatment, require related customer disclosures, solicit public comment and include consultation with relevant regulators and, where applicable, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC).

Check the sources
shall jointly issue rules to facilitate portfolio margining of securities (including related extensions of credit), security-based swaps, futures contracts for future delivery, options on futures contracts for future delivery, swaps, and digital commodities, or any subset thereof
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
margin requirements are determined on a risk-based, portfolio-wide basis, rather than on an instrument-by-instrument basis.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
be issued only if that issuance is in the public interest and provides for the appropriate protection of customers, including appropriate disclosures to each current and potential customer concerning the treatment of any account
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
through the solicitation of public comments
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
if the rules pertain to a securities account carried by a registered broker or dealer that is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, consult with the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Process The rules required to be jointly issued under subsection (a) shall— (1) describe the treatment of any account to which the rules relate, and any assets that may be held therein, in a proceeding under title 11, United States Code, the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.), title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381 et seq.), or any other applicable insolvency law with respect to the person carrying the account; (2) be issued only if that issuance is in the public interest and provides for the appropriate protection of customers, including appropriate disclosures to each current and potential customer concerning the treatment of any account to which the rules relate, and any assets that may be held therein, in a proceeding under title 11, United States Code, the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78aaa et seq.), title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5381 et seq.), or any other applicable insolvency law with respect to the person carrying the account; (3) require the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to consider the public interest of, and the protection of investors by, those rules through the solicitation of public comments; and (4) require the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to— (A) consult with other relevant foreign or domestic regulators, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and State bank supervisors, as appropriate; and (B) if the rules pertain to a securities account carried by a registered broker or dealer that is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, consult with the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 403 would require federal banking regulators, within 360 days after enactment, to develop capital requirements addressing agreements that terminate and offset obligations across different financial transactions when a counterparty defaults. The requirements would cover insured depository institutions, their holding companies and Federal Reserve-supervised nonbank financial companies.

Check the sources
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall develop risk-based and leverage capital requirements for insured depository institutions, depository institution holding companies, and nonbank financial companies supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
netting agreements that provide for termination and close-out netting across multiple types of financial transactions, consistent with section 402, in the event of the default of a counterparty.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 404 would prohibit digital-asset service providers and their affiliates from paying U.S. customers or users of a covered party interest or yield solely for holding payment stablecoins, or payments economically or functionally equivalent to interest on bank deposits. Permitted issuers and registered foreign issuers are excluded from this section’s covered-party definition; the section would leave their existing issuer-specific restrictions unchanged.

Check the sources
any digital asset service provider, together with all of its affiliates, but in each case excluding any permitted payment stablecoin issuer or foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The term restricted recipient means a United States person that is a customer or user of a covered party.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
No covered party shall, directly or indirectly, pay any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) to a restricted recipient— (A) solely in connection with the holding of the payment stablecoins of that restricted recipient; or (B) on a payment stablecoin balance in a manner that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section shall— (1) modify, alter, or extend prohibitions on the payment of yield, interest, or consideration applicable to permitted payment stablecoin issuers or foreign payment stablecoin issuers
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(a) Definitions In this section: (1) Affiliate The term affiliate means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another entity. (2) Commissions The term Commissions means the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (3) Comptroller; foreign payment stablecoin issuer; payment stablecoin; permitted payment stablecoin issuer The terms Comptroller, foreign payment stablecoin issuer, payment stablecoin, and permitted payment stablecoin issuer have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the GENIUS Act (12 U.S.C. 5901). (4) Covered party The term covered party means any digital asset service provider, together with all of its affiliates, but in each case excluding any permitted payment stablecoin issuer or foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller. (5) Deposit The term deposit has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). (6) Restricted recipient The term restricted recipient means a United States person that is a customer or user of a covered party. (7) United States person The term United States person means a person that is a resident of the United States or is organized or incorporated under the laws of the United States.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Genuine activity- or transaction-based stablecoin rewards would be permitted under the proposed prohibition if not equivalent to bank-deposit interest. Joint rules due within one year would clarify permissible rewards, including rewards for providing liquidity, posting collateral, or otherwise putting assets at credit or investment risk. Permissible rewards could be calculated using balances or duration. Good-faith programs later found outside the rules would avoid penalties if brought into compliance within 90 days and not substantially similar to a past violation.

Check the sources
rewards or incentives based on bona fide activities or bona fide transactions that are not economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly promulgate regulations through notice and comment rulemaking
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Providing liquidity for market-marking activity, posting of collateral in connection with trading, or otherwise putting assets at credit or investment risk.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may be calculated by reference to a balance, duration, tenure, or any combination of the foregoing.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be subject to penalties if a subsequent rulemaking or adjudication determines the program falls outside paragraphs (2) and (3), provided— (A) the covered party comes into compliance within 90 days of such determination; and (B) the violation is not substantially similar to a past violation by the covered party.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Providers could not market payment stablecoins as deposits, investments, government-guaranteed or federally insured, or describe related compensation as risk-free or comparable to deposit interest. Rules due within one year would require clear compensation disclosures, including the responsible payer and material terms. Once effective, those disclosures would be required before marketing compensation. Knowing and willful violations of specified provisions could draw Treasury civil penalties up to $5 million per violation, with related acts grouped as one violation.

Check the sources
No covered party shall represent that— (A) payment stablecoins are investment products, deposits, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, guaranteed by the United States Government, subject to deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
risk-free or comparable to interest paid on a deposit
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly promulgate rules requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure, in plain English, of any compensation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
clearly identifies the person or persons responsible for offering, administering, and paying such compensation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
After the date on which the rules promulgated under paragraph (1) become effective, no covered party shall market the offering of compensation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Whoever knowingly and willfully participates in a violation of subsection (c)(1), (d)(1), (d)(2), or (e)(3), or rules issued under subsection (c)(4), shall be subject to a civil monetary penalty by the Department of the Treasury of not more than $5,000,000 for each such violation.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
separate acts of noncompliance are a single violation when the acts are a result of— (A) a common or substantially overlapping originating cause; or (B) the same statement or publication.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 404 would apply only to compensation connected with payment stablecoins, not authorize compensation restrictions for other assets. Independent third-party payments would not alone create a violation unless the provider directs or significantly influences an otherwise prohibited payment. Banking regulators and Treasury would report within two years on stablecoin adoption, payments, dollar use, financial access, rewards and effects on bank deposits and credit. Congress’s statements about possible economic effects are policy views, not study findings.

Check the sources
The prohibitions under subsections (c), (d), and (e) shall only apply to compensation paid in connection with a payment stablecoin or payment stablecoin balance.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
unless the covered party directs or maintains significant influence over the offering of such consideration and the offering of such consideration would otherwise violate the prohibition
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly submit
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
analyzes and quantifies the effect of any compensation described in paragraph (2) and the effect of prohibitions on the payment of interest or yield
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
It is the sense of Congress that
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(i) No deeming of payment of interest or yield For purposes of this section, a covered party shall not be deemed to violate the prohibition in subsection (c) solely because an unaffiliated third party independently makes a payment with respect to a payment stablecoin, unless the covered party directs or maintains significant influence over the offering of such consideration and the offering of such consideration would otherwise violate the prohibition in subsection (c). (j) Clarification of scope and regulatory authority (1) Compensation The prohibitions under subsections (c), (d), and (e) shall only apply to compensation paid in connection with a payment stablecoin or payment stablecoin balance. (2) Other assets Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the Commissions or the Secretary of the Treasury to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the payment of any compensation paid in connection with any asset other than a payment stablecoin.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 405 would establish expanded securities portfolio margin accounts at registered brokers or dealers, subject to joint rules on eligible positions, customer property, transfers, disclosures and protections in insolvency. SIPC could not advance money to satisfy customer claims for digital commodities or swaps held in these accounts. Accounts could not be offered, maintained or used until the final implementing rules are issued.

Check the sources
no advance shall be made by SIPC to the trustee to pay or otherwise satisfy any net equity claim of any customer with respect to any digital commodities or swaps held in an expanded securities portfolio margin account.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a customer account— (A) that is maintained by a broker or dealer registered with the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(A) the transfer of accounts; (B) the allocation of customer property among customers; (C) the eligibility of products and positions to be held in an expanded securities portfolio margin account, including any disclosures to and any elections that may need to be performed by customers
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
An expanded securities portfolio margin account may not be offered, maintained, or utilized until the final rules required under subsection (b) are issued.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 501 would require an SEC-CFTC testing program within 360 days after enactment for innovative financial activities lacking a widely available U.S. counterpart and an analogous federal regulatory regime. U.S.-based applicants must have no more than 25 employees and $10 million in annual gross revenue, satisfy eligibility requirements throughout participation, and lack specified disqualifications or fraud convictions. Each agency could approve at most 20 projects annually, with a $20 million aggregate limit on customer, investor or counterparty funds per firm’s program activities.

Check the sources
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissions shall, by joint notice and comment rulemaking, establish a CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
lacks— (i) a substantially comparable, widely available analogue in common use in the United States; and (ii) an analogous Federal regulatory regime.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A United States-based person shall be an eligible firm
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
employs not more than 25 employees; and (H) has annual gross revenues of not more than $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The requirements under paragraph (1) shall be satisfied during the entire period
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an eligible firm may not raise or commit more than $20,000,000 in aggregate customer, investor, or counterparty funds in connection with Sandbox activities.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each of the Commissions may approve not more than 20 projects per year.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(C) is not subject to— (i) a statutory disqualification, as defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)); (ii) a disqualification under section 8a(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 12a(2)); or (iii) a disqualification under State law; (D) does not have a criminal conviction for fraud;
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Applicants would identify necessary regulatory exemptions, risks, safeguards and an exit objective. Agencies must decide applications within 180 business days. Eligibility requires an approved application, while the decision provision says activities may commence “after which” unless denied. The interaction if an agency misses the deadline is not resolved here. Firms would update applications every six months and normally participate for no more than two years; a one-year extension would require demonstrated progress and necessity. Agencies could impose stricter conditions, revoke relief or stop participation for noncompliance.

Check the sources
sets forth how relief from the provisions of law identified under subparagraph (B) is reasonably necessary to engage in the innovative activity
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
states an exit objective of the eligible firm involving action from the applicable Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 180 business days after the date on which an eligible firm submits an application under this subsection, the Commission or Commissions, as applicable, shall make a decision with respect to the application, after which the eligible firm submitting the application may commence eligible innovative activities in the Sandbox unless the application is denied.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
on a semi-annual basis while participating in the Sandbox, an updated application
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may participate in the Sandbox for a period of not more than 2 years
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may extend participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
disqualify the eligible firm from continued participation in the Sandbox, order the eligible firm to cease engaging in a permitted activity in the Sandbox, revoke a grant of exemptive relief, or impose additional or more stringent conditions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A United States-based person shall be an eligible firm, and shall be eligible to participate in the Sandbox, if the person— (A) submits an application under subsection (e) that is approved under that subsection;
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(2) Extension (A) Sole jurisdiction If an eligible innovative activity is subject only to the jurisdiction of 1 Commission, that Commission may extend participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year, if that Commission determines that the eligible firm— (i) is actively pursuing the exit objective described in subsection (e)(1)(F) in good faith; (ii) is making demonstrable progress toward achieving such an exit; and (iii) establishes that such an extension is necessary to achieve such an exit. (B) Joint jurisdiction Where an eligible innovative activity is subject to the jurisdiction of both Commissions, an extension of participation by an eligible firm in the Sandbox by not more than 1 additional year shall be by joint order of the Commissions after making the findings described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph (A).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The testing program could provide securities or commodities exemptions and override state registration, qualification or licensing laws for approved activities. Federal and state anti-fraud laws and generally applicable state laws would remain enforceable; states could require notice filings and reasonable fees. Firms would publish application information and updates, subject to confidential treatment, and each agency would publish at least annual program reports.

Check the sources
identifies the provisions of the securities laws, or of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), from which the eligible firm proposes to be exempt
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall supersede any State securities or commodities law requiring registration, qualification, or licensing as a condition of engaging in an approved activity or otherwise regulating that activity as a security or commodity.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not include any Federal or State anti-fraud law or any other law that is not specific to the regulation of securities or commodities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any State law of general applicability, including such a law relating to banking, consumer protection, contracts, property, or criminal conduct.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A State may require notice of any document filed with either of the Commissions in connection with participation in the Sandbox, together with consent to service of process and reasonable fees
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each eligible firm shall post, in a prominent location on a public website of the eligible firm, the information required under subsection (e)(1), subject to confidential treatment
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not less frequently than annually, each Commission shall publish on the public website of the Commission a report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 502 would direct the SEC and CFTC, as appropriate, to coordinate international digital-asset standards, pursue reciprocal treatment for U.S. firms and advocate open standards, lawful public-network access, dollar-denominated assets, self-custody and privacy. Information sharing, cooperative enforcement and cross-border testing programs would be permitted rather than required.

Check the sources
the Commissions, as appropriate— (1) shall consult and coordinate with foreign regulatory authorities or other relevant international organizations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall pursue reciprocal arrangements with foreign regulatory authorities that ensure United States-based digital asset firms, exchanges, and infrastructure providers receive treatment equivalent to that granted to foreign counterparts operating within the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall advocate in international fora for the development and adoption of technology-neutral, open standards that preserve lawful access to public distributed ledger infrastructure, support dollar-denominated digital asset usage, and safeguard individual rights, including self-custody and privacy
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may enter into such information sharing arrangements
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may, as appropriate, engage in, at the least, cooperative enforcement, supervisory coordination, and joint technical assistance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
to establish or participate in cross-border regulatory sandboxes
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 503 would require a GAO study, consulting financial regulators, on using shared-ledger technology to automate disclosures, reporting and compliance checks. It would assess feasibility, risks, interoperability, costs for different-sized entities, international approaches and accountability safeguards, and recommend possible pilots or legal changes. A public report would be due within one year after enactment; the study itself would not authorize automated compliance to replace existing obligations.

Check the sources
the feasibility, benefits, and risks of allowing regulated entities to satisfy applicable regulatory obligations through on-chain, code-based, or other automated mechanisms
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
recommends pilot programs, guidance, rule changes, or amendments to statutes that would be needed to implement effective automated regulatory compliance approaches
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identifies the costs and benefits to issuers of different sizes, secondary market intermediaries, regulators, investors, and other applicable parties, including differential impacts on smaller entities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
evaluates whether existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) oversight, enforcement, and liability frameworks are sufficient
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall make publicly available a report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
503. Automated regulatory compliance study (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Automated regulatory compliance The term automated regulatory compliance means the use of technology, including data standards, automation, and distributed ledger or smart contract functionality, to automate, tag, or otherwise streamline regulatory reporting, disclosure, supervisory, or other compliance obligations. (2) Innovative The term innovative has the meaning given the term in section 501(a). (b) Study required The Comptroller General of the United States shall, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury (including the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Office of Foreign Assets Control, and the Office of Financial Research), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, carry out a study of distributed ledger-based compliance tools that— (1) to the extent feasible, identifies and evaluates— (A) the landscape of existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) distributed ledger-based compliance tools for— (i) statutory and regulatory disclosures; (ii) real-time reporting and audit-trail logging; and (iii) anti-money-laundering practices, sanctions screening, and customer-identification checks; (B) the feasibility, benefits, and risks of allowing regulated entities to satisfy applicable regulatory obligations through on-chain, code-based, or other automated mechanisms; (C) the potential for interoperability with automated regulatory compliance mechanisms across and among each of those agencies; (D) the data collection systems of each of those agencies; and (E) standards or taxonomies, or other common data elements, if any, that those agencies could publish or adopt to support the interoperability described in subparagraph (C) in order to ensure consistency and regulatory access; (2) recommends pilot programs, guidance, rule changes, or amendments to statutes that would be needed to implement effective automated regulatory compliance approaches and any other related approaches addressed in the study; (3) identifies the costs and benefits to issuers of different sizes, secondary market intermediaries, regulators, investors, and other applicable parties, including differential impacts on smaller entities and options to reduce those burdens; (4) benchmarks international efforts with respect to automated regulatory compliance mechanisms and consults with any appropriate State, Federal, or foreign regulators; and (5) evaluates whether existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) oversight, enforcement, and liability frameworks are sufficient to— (A) ensure accountability, transparency, fairness, and consumer protection; and (B) prevent misuse of distributed ledger-based compliance tools. (c) Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall make publicly available a report that includes the results of the study conducted under subsection (b).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) · Banking, stablecoin rewards and regulatory testing (partial bill review). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The assigned sections provide conditional penalty protection and limited regulatory relief for specified participants. These findings do not establish improper motives or measured economic benefits.

Stablecoin service providers would receive a conditional penalty safe harbor for reward programs structured in good faith that a later rulemaking or adjudication finds impermissible. They must comply within 90 days, and the violation cannot substantially resemble a past violation.

Check the sources
A covered party that structures a program in good faith reliance on paragraphs (2) and (3) shall not be subject to penalties if a subsequent rulemaking or adjudication determines the program falls outside paragraphs (2) and (3), provided— (A) the covered party comes into compliance within 90 days of such determination; and (B) the violation is not substantially similar to a past violation by the covered party.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(4) Covered party The term covered party means any digital asset service provider, together with all of its affiliates, but in each case excluding any permitted payment stablecoin issuer or foreign payment stablecoin issuer registered with the Comptroller.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Selected small U.S.-based firms in the testing program could obtain temporary securities or commodities exemptions and relief from state registration and licensing requirements for approved activities. The benefit is restricted by firm-size requirements, annual project caps, agency conditions and continuing anti-fraud protections.

Check the sources
A United States-based person shall be an eligible firm
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
employs not more than 25 employees; and (H) has annual gross revenues of not more than $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each of the Commissions may approve not more than 20 projects per year.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identifies the provisions of the securities laws, or of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), from which the eligible firm proposes to be exempt
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall supersede any State securities or commodities law requiring registration, qualification, or licensing as a condition of engaging in an approved activity or otherwise regulating that activity as a security or commodity.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not include any Federal or State anti-fraud law or any other law that is not specific to the regulation of securities or commodities
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
subject to approval of the applicable Commission, identifies the provisions of the securities laws, or of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), from which the eligible firm proposes to be exempt during the period in which the eligible firm participates in the Sandbox
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Except as provided in paragraph (2), an eligible firm may participate in the Sandbox for a period of not more than 2 years, provided that the eligible firm does not exceed the ceilings established under subsection (d)(2).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(g) Conditions and enforcement (1) Conditions An eligible firm shall comply with applicable regulatory conditions approved by the applicable Commission or the Commissions under subsection (e)(1)(B), which shall be consistent with applicable Federal and State anti-fraud laws.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Limits of this section review

  • This detail group explains its assigned primary sections. Shared context was read for interpretation; its standalone analysis belongs to the owning group listed in the overview’s reading guide. “Outside this group” describes the supplied excerpt boundary, not absence from the bill. This group alone cannot establish whole-bill completeness.
  • Sections 103–105, including section 104’s covered-token definition, control rules and certification requirements, and section 906 are outside this group’s excerpt. The referenced digital-commodity definition and external statutes such as GENIUS Act definitions are not reproduced here. Their contents and treatment elsewhere cannot be established by this detail review; consult the overview’s reading guide.
  • Several provisions amend existing laws without reproducing their full context, including the monetary-instrument definition and Securities Investor Protection Act provisions. The analysis describes supported changes without assuming the missing law's complete effect.
  • Section 501(h)(1) ties initial public posting to a notice becoming effective under subsection (e)(3), but that subsection describes application updates rather than an effective notice. The initial posting deadline is therefore unclear in the supplied text.
  • Many requirements depend on future agency rules, including token classification, disclosure content, permissible stablecoin rewards and portfolio margin protections. The source does not establish the final rules or their practical effects.
  • The actions snapshot ends September 17, 2026. It does not establish later advancement, enactment or rejection, and House passage does not establish approval of the supplied Senate substitute.
  • Riders and targeted-benefit findings here concern only this detail group. Earmark disclosures, member requests and conference materials are not supplied; no whole-bill absence conclusion follows.
Regulatory innovation, software protections and self-custody

These proposed sections would create supervised tests of artificial intelligence at financial regulators and protect specified software development and personal control of digital assets. They would also set special securities treatment for distinct collectible or access tokens, address tokenized securities, and require international coordination, reporting and work on cryptographic security.

Check the sources
(A) Establishment Each financial regulatory agency shall establish, or identify an office, division, or department of the agency that shall serve as, an AI Innovation Lab to enable regulated entities to experiment with AI test projects without unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation or expectation of enforcement actions, pursuant to the approval of an application under subparagraph (B).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Application to software developers Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination, in relation to the operation of a distributed ledger system or any component thereof: (1) Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating, or acting in a similar capacity. (2) Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service, or procuring, offering, or utilizing network bandwidth, or providing other similar incidental services. .
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A Federal agency may not prohibit, restrict, or otherwise impair the ability of a covered user to self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted wallet or other means to conduct transactions for any lawful purpose.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Safe harbor (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (3), the offer, sale, resale, transfer, or conveyance of a nonfungible token shall not be deemed to constitute an offer, sale, or distribution of a security or investment contract under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), or any equivalent State law, unless the transaction, in substance, involves all of the elements of an investment contract.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a tokenized security shall be treated, for all regulatory purposes, as the security that the tokenized security represents, except as otherwise provided by— (A) section 106(a); or (B) a rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall lead an interagency initiative to strengthen international cooperation to prevent the misuse of digital assets for illicit finance, sanctions evasion, terrorist financing, or other national-security threats
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall promote the voluntary adoption and deployment of post-quantum cryptography standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 3 years thereafter for a total of not fewer than 12 years after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 504 would require each listed federal financial regulator to report to the designated congressional committees on implementation and further legislative recommendations. Reports would begin within one year after enactment and recur every three years for a reporting period lasting at least 12 years after enactment.

Check the sources
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 3 years thereafter for a total of not fewer than 12 years after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a description of the implementation of this Act and the amendments made by this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any legislative recommendations for the further effective implementation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 505 would generally regulate a tokenized security—a digital representation of an existing asset's rights—as the security it represents. SEC adjustments could adapt how requirements are met for the technology, subject to stated protections and section 106, which is outside this group’s excerpt. Securities would not lose that status solely by using ledger technology. Fraud rules and state property-transfer law would remain applicable. The SEC must study tokenized securities within 360 days; Congress would encourage, rather than require, states to adopt uniform commercial rules.

Check the sources
creating a digital representation of all rights, obligations, or interests in a tangible or intangible asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a tokenized security shall be treated, for all regulatory purposes, as the security that the tokenized security represents, except as otherwise provided by— (A) section 106(a); or (B) a rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may only be issued by the Commission to adapt the manner in which the applicable regulatory requirements are satisfied
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not cease to be a security solely because the asset is issued, recorded, represented, or transferred using distributed ledger technology
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
including applicable anti-fraud or anti-manipulation provisions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any State property transfer rules, laws, regulations, or common law principles
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
It is the sense of Congress that States should promptly consider and adopt commercial law frameworks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 506 would promote voluntary adoption of post-quantum cryptography standards—security methods addressing quantum-computing threats—through public guidance, practicable technical assistance for high-risk entities, and industry consultation. Congressional reports would begin within two years and recur every two years until 2035. A public report on stakeholder engagement and lessons learned would be due within five years. The section presents quantum threats as a congressional finding.

Check the sources
Congress finds the following
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Advances in quantum computing threaten existing (as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act) cryptographic standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall promote the voluntary adoption and deployment of post-quantum cryptography standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
providing technical assistance, as practicable, to entities that are at high risk
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter until 2035
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, make available to the public a report on stakeholder engagement and lessons learned
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 507 would put Treasury in charge of an interagency effort against international misuse of digital assets for illicit finance, sanctions evasion, and terrorism. It would require foreign engagement, assistance to partner jurisdictions, attention to high-risk jurisdictions, and annual progress reports. A national strategy due within 270 days would assess vulnerabilities, set measurable goals, recommend staffing and resources, and identify standards informed by U.S. law and supervision.

Check the sources
shall lead an interagency initiative to strengthen international cooperation to prevent the misuse of digital assets for illicit finance, sanctions evasion, terrorist financing, or other national-security threats
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identify and prioritize jurisdictions of concern
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
support technical assistance and capacity-building programs for partner jurisdictions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
report annually to Congress
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
set measurable goals and timelines
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
recommend resource and staffing requirements
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall be informed by United States law, regulation, and supervisory standards
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 508 would require Treasury reports within one year and annually thereafter for four years on the 20 foreign jurisdictions with the most digital-asset trading through foreign providers in the preceding calendar year. Reports would assess how closely each jurisdiction’s applicable laws and standards align with the standards and framework identified in the section 507 strategy and identify jurisdictions combining material deficiencies with trading volumes posing systemic illicit-finance risks to the United States. For those jurisdictions, Treasury must report remediation efforts, commitments, and progress. Reports would be unclassified but could include classified annexes.

Check the sources
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a period of 4 years
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
lists the top 20 foreign jurisdictions by volume of digital asset trading activity on foreign digital asset service providers during the calendar year immediately preceding the year of the report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
material deficiencies in the implementation or enforcement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
trading volumes that present systemic illicit finance risk to the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any commitments obtained from the foreign jurisdiction to address identified deficiencies, including timeliness and benchmarks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 509 would establish artificial-intelligence testing offices at the six listed banking, consumer-finance, credit-union, and housing regulators. Starting one year after enactment, regulated entities could seek regulatory waivers or modifications using alternative compliance plans. Applications must explain a public-interest, access, or consumer-protection benefit and an efficiency/operations, innovation/competitiveness, risk-management/security, or regulatory-compliance benefit. They must also address consistency with anti-money-laundering obligations and absence of systemic and national-security risk. These are alternatives within the listed benefit tests, not a requirement to demonstrate every listed benefit. Insurance is excluded from the financial-product definition.

Check the sources
The term financial regulatory agency means— (A) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (B) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (C) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; (D) the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection; (E) the National Credit Union Administration; and (F) the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
On and after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
identifies a regulation issued by the appropriate financial regulatory agency that the regulated entity requests be waived or modified
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
would serve the public interest, improve consumer or investor access to a financial product or service, or promote consumer or investor protection
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
would not present a systemic risk to the financial system of the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
would not present a national security risk to the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
does not include the business of insurance
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
would serve the public interest, improve consumer or investor access to a financial product or service, or promote consumer or investor protection; (BB) would enhance efficiency or operations, foster innovation or competitiveness, improve risk management and security, or enhance regulatory compliance; (CC) would not present a systemic risk to the financial system of the United States; (DD) is consistent with the purposes of the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism obligations under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code; and (EE) would not present a national security risk to the United States;
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Agencies would generally have 120 days to decide AI applications, with one 120-day extension and automatic approval after that extension expires without a decision. Approval would be mandatory if the applicant meets the specified more-likely-than-not standard. Relief involving another agency's regulation separately requires joint approval. The text does not resolve how that requirement interacts with automatic approval when the extended deadline expires; this analysis does not assume agency silence supplies the required joint approval. During an approved test, enforcement of the affected regulation would follow the alternative compliance plan, while fraud, manipulation, and unsafe-or-unsound-practice powers remain.

Check the sources
not later than 120 days after the date on which an application is submitted
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the agency may extend the approval deadline by 120 days. After the expiration of the 120-day extension period, if the agency has not made a determination on the application, the application will automatically be deemed approved and effective.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
If the applicant shows that it is more likely than not
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the agency shall approve the application
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not take effect unless the appropriate financial regulatory agency and any other financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy jointly approve
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may enforce a regulation described in item (aa)(AA) only in the manner set out in the alternative compliance strategy
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
fraud or market manipulation or for engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

After denying an AI application, an agency generally could not take project-related enforcement action for 30 days, but could seek a court order to stop an active project presenting the listed urgent dangers or risks. After each denial, an applicant could submit no more than two applications substantially similar to the denied application. Rules due within 180 days must provide a 60-day comment period and require tests to terminate no earlier than one year after approval, with extension procedures. Outcome reports would begin within two years and recur annually for seven more years, excluding participant names and confidential business information.

Check the sources
may not take an enforcement action related to the proposed AI test project against the applicant earlier than the date that is 30 days
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may file a civil action in an appropriate United States district court to enjoin an active AI test project
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not resubmit more than 2 applications that are substantially similar
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provide a 60-day period for public notice and comment
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an AI test project will terminate not earlier than 1 year after the AI test project is approved
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and each year for 7 years thereafter
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not include the names of participating entities or any proprietary or confidential business information
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 601 would exclude people from the two specified securities statutes solely for transaction-processing and incidental network-support activities. The Exchange Act exclusion also covers developing, publishing, or assembling ledger systems and personal-custody software. It does not automatically cover the separately listed ongoing interface, governance, messaging, liquidity-pool, and wallet-administration activities; the SEC must clarify their treatment by rule. The Exchange Act amendment preserves SEC fraud, manipulation, and false-reporting enforcement. Its rule of construction also says the Act and its rules cannot apply securities-law requirements to a digital commodity or expand the SEC’s pre-enactment authority to regulate the listed decentralized-finance activities. The referenced digital-commodity definition is not reproduced in this excerpt.

Check the sources
solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Developing, publishing, or constituting
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subsection (b)(3) does not extend to any activity covered in any of the activities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (d)(1)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall, pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking, clarify the circumstances
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not apply to the anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, or false reporting enforcement authorities of the Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(f) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act or the rules and regulations promulgated under this Act may be construed to apply any requirement of the securities laws to a digital commodity, as defined in section 2 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or expand the authority of the Commission beyond that which the Commission had before the date of enactment of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act to regulate the activities described in subsection (d)(1).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

For these developer provisions, a decentralized trading protocol must operate through predetermined rules without another person holding users' assets, and is excluded if specified persons can control its operation or unilaterally censor its use. A system is also excluded if it does not operate, execute and enforce its operations and transactions solely through pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly in its source code. Decentralized governance receives a special exception from the common-control test. State securities, commodities, and digital-asset laws would not apply to the Exchange Act amendment's listed subsection (b) activities, while state money-laundering, fraud, and manipulation powers remain. Section 601 would apply to conduct before, on, and after enactment.

Check the sources
an automated rule or algorithm that is predetermined and non-discretionary
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
without reliance on a person other than the user to maintain custody or control
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
to control or materially alter the functionality, operation, or rules of consensus or agreement
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the unilateral authority, via operation of the distributed ledger system, to restrict, censor, or prohibit
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a decentralized governance system shall not be considered to be a person or a group of persons under common control or acting pursuant to an agreement to act in concert
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
no securities, commodities, or digital assets law of any State (or of any political subdivision of a State) shall apply to an activity described in subsection (b)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in paragraph (1) may be construed to apply to the anti-money laundering, anti-fraud, or anti-manipulation authorities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall apply to conduct occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(II) the distributed ledger system does not operate, execute, and enforce its operations and transactions based solely on pre-established, transparent rules encoded directly within the source code of the distributed ledger system; or
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 602 would create a securities-law safe harbor for nonfungible tokens: individually distinguishable tokens representing particular items or rights and not interchangeable one-for-one. Transactions would remain outside securities treatment unless they substantively contain every element of an investment contract, subject to exceptions. The safe harbor excludes interchangeable mass-produced series, fractional interests, and beneficial or economic claims on tokens or their underlying assets. Appreciation or reliance in part on a creator's reputation would not alone make a specified non-investment-use token a security.

Check the sources
is individually identifiable and distinguishable from any other digital asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
is not interchangeable on a 1-to-1 basis
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
unless the transaction, in substance, involves all of the elements of an investment contract
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a mass-minted series of items with substantially similar or nearly identical traits that are marketed or sold interchangeably; (B) a fractionalized interest in a nonfungible token; or (C) an interest representing a beneficial or economic claim on a nonfungible token or an asset that a nonfungible token represents
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
solely because the nonfungible token may appreciate in value or depend in part on the continued efforts or the reputation of the creator or issuer
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 602 would also exclude a token's resale or secondary transfer from the specified federal securities definitions where payment does not flow to a promoter or is not used to raise new enterprise capital. People other than originators or related persons who reasonably rely on the safe harbor in good faith would avoid civil or administrative penalties. An SEC determination that the harbor does not apply would operate only prospectively, no sooner than 60 days after public posting.

Check the sources
where the payment for that resale or transfer does not flow to a promoter or is not used to raise new capital for an enterprise
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A person, other than an originator or related person, that reasonably and in good faith relies on the safe harbor under this subsection shall not be subject to any civil or administrative penalties.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
be prospective only; and (ii) take effect not earlier than 60 days after the date on which the Commission publicly posts that determination
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 603 would require the Comptroller General to study nonfungible-token markets, issuance, storage, interoperability, scalability, possible benefits, intellectual-property and cybersecurity risks, traditional-market integration, and illicit activity. A public report would be due within one year after enactment. These are study topics, not established findings of benefit or harm.

Check the sources
shall carry out a study of nonfungible tokens
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the benefits of nonfungible tokens, including verifiable digital ownership
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the risks of nonfungible tokens, including— (A) the infringement of intellectual property rights; (B) cybersecurity risks; and (C) market risks
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the levels and types of illicit activity in nonfungible token markets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 604 would exclude qualifying non-controlling developers or providers from the two specified federal money-transmitter classifications. Separately, from enactment onward, it would bar substantially similar registration requirements imposed solely for the listed software, personal-custody tools or infrastructure activities. Eligibility requires lacking, in regular operations, the specified legal right or unilateral and independent ability to control or move users’ assets without third-party approval, consent or direction. The section preserves the specified treatment of intentional transfers of known criminal proceeds or funds intended for unlawful activity; its rules of construction preserve the stated treatment of conduct outside subsection (c). Section 604(e)(2) states that financial-institution treatment for conduct outside subsection (c) is unaffected. Interactions with provisions outside this excerpt cannot be verified here, so this detail review does not establish the ultimate financial-institution treatment of outside-scope conduct.

Check the sources
does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets to which users are entitled, without the approval, consent, or direction of any third party
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
on or after the date of enactment of this Act, shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
providing hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody or safekeeping
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
providing infrastructure support to maintain a distributed ledger service
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c)
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 605 would prohibit federal agencies from impairing covered U.S. individuals' ability to hold their own digital assets and use them for lawful transactions. Covered users are individuals obtaining assets to buy goods or services for themselves; a self-hosted wallet leaves independent control with its owner. Existing enforcement and special-measure powers concerning illicit finance, money laundering, terrorism financing, and sanctions would remain.

Check the sources
a United States individual who obtains digital assets to purchase goods or services on behalf of that individual
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
retains independent control over those digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
A Federal agency may not prohibit, restrict, or otherwise impair the ability of a covered user to self-custody digital assets using a self-hosted wallet or other means to conduct transactions for any lawful purpose.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any enforcement action or special measure authorized under applicable law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
any other law relating to illicit finance, money laundering, terrorism financing, or United States sanctions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) · Regulatory innovation, software protections and self-custody (partial bill review). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Evidence is limited

The partial source supports the tentative scope-related candidate below, but does not establish its amendment attachment history or settle whether it is unrelated to the bill as a whole. No complete inventory is claimed.

Possible unrelated-provision candidate: section 509 creates AI testing arrangements for regulated financial entities, defining covered projects as financial products, services, or activities making substantial use of AI. That definition is not limited to digital assets. Its reach may therefore extend beyond the bill’s digital-asset framework; the partial source does not establish that it is a documented rider or explain why it was included.

Check the sources
The term AI test project means a financial product, service, or activity— (A) that makes substantial use of artificial intelligence; (B) that is, or may be, subject to a Federal regulation or Federal statute; and (C) for which a regulated entity submits an application for the waiver or modification of an applicable regulation subject to an alternative compliance strategy.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each financial regulatory agency shall establish, or identify an office, division, or department of the agency that shall serve as, an AI Innovation Lab to enable regulated entities to experiment with AI test projects without unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulation or expectation of enforcement actions, pursuant to the approval of an application under subparagraph (B).
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The supplied text contains defined liability protections and regulatory carve-outs that warrant scrutiny as targeted benefits. They relate to the proposal's central policy; this classification does not establish improper purpose or extend to omitted text.

Regulated financial entities in approved AI tests would receive project-specific alternative enforcement treatment. Applicants would also receive automatic approval after an unanswered extended deadline and a qualified 30-day enforcement delay after denial. Fraud, manipulation, unsafe-practice enforcement, and specified court interventions limit these protections. Projects involving another agency’s regulations separately require joint approval; the interaction with automatic approval remains unresolved, as described in the provisions.

Check the sources
may enforce a regulation described in item (aa)(AA) only in the manner set out in the alternative compliance strategy
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
After the expiration of the 120-day extension period, if the agency has not made a determination on the application, the application will automatically be deemed approved and effective.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may not take an enforcement action related to the proposed AI test project against the applicant earlier than the date that is 30 days
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
fraud or market manipulation or for engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may file a civil action in an appropriate United States district court to enjoin an active AI test project
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the AI test project may not take effect unless the appropriate financial regulatory agency and any other financial regulatory agency that issued or enforces the regulation that is the subject of the alternative compliance strategy jointly approve the application using the process described in clause
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Specified ledger developers and network-service providers would receive activity-based exclusions from securities regulation, including state-law displacement for the listed Exchange Act subsection (b) activities. The protection applies to past as well as future conduct, with stated enforcement exceptions.

Check the sources
a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
no securities, commodities, or digital assets law of any State (or of any political subdivision of a State) shall apply to an activity described in subsection (b)
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not apply to the anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, or false reporting enforcement authorities
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall apply to conduct occurring before, on, or after the date of enactment
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Application to software developers Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a person shall not be subject to this Act and the regulations promulgated under this Act solely based on the person engaging in any of the following activities, whether singly or in combination, in relation to the operation of a distributed ledger system or any component thereof: (1) Compiling network transactions or relaying, searching, sequencing, validating, or acting in a similar capacity. (2) Providing computational work, operating a node or oracle service, or procuring, offering, or utilizing network bandwidth, or providing other similar incidental services. (3) Developing, publishing, or constituting— (A) a distributed ledger system; or (B) software or systems that create or utilize hardware or software, including wallets or other systems, that facilitate the ability of a user to keep, safeguard, or have custody of the digital assets or private keys of the user.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Non-originators and unrelated persons reasonably relying in good faith on the nonfungible-token safe harbor would receive civil and administrative penalty protection. An SEC determination that the safe harbor does not apply to a particular circumstance would take effect prospectively, no earlier than 60 days after public posting.

Check the sources
A person, other than an originator or related person, that reasonably and in good faith relies on the safe harbor under this subsection shall not be subject to any civil or administrative penalties.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
be prospective only; and (ii) take effect not earlier than 60 days after the date on which the Commission publicly posts that determination
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 604 would exclude qualifying non-controlling developers or providers from the two specified federal money-transmitter classifications. Separately, from enactment onward, it would bar substantially similar registration requirements imposed solely for the listed software, personal-custody tools or infrastructure activities. Eligibility requires lacking, in regular operations, the specified legal right or unilateral and independent ability to control or move users’ assets without third-party approval, consent or direction. The section preserves the specified treatment of intentional transfers of known criminal proceeds or funds intended for unlawful activity; its rules of construction preserve the stated treatment of conduct outside subsection (c). Section 604(e)(2) states that financial-institution treatment for conduct outside subsection (c) is unaffected. Interactions with provisions outside this excerpt cannot be verified here, so this detail review does not establish the ultimate financial-institution treatment of outside-scope conduct. These protections identify a defined class without implying blanket immunity for software businesses.

Check the sources
a non-controlling developer or provider— (1) shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c)
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
604. Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Developer or provider The term developer or provider means any person or business that creates or publishes software to facilitate the creation of, or provide maintenance to, a distributed ledger, or a service associated with a distributed ledger. (2) Distributed ledger service The term distributed ledger service means any information, transaction, or computing service or system that provides or enables access to a distributed ledger system by multiple users, including a service or system that enables users to send, receive, exchange, or store digital assets described by distributed ledger systems. (3) Non-controlling developer or provider The term non-controlling developer or provider means a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service that, in the regular course of operations, does not have the legal right or the unilateral and independent ability to control, initiate upon demand, or effectuate transactions involving digital assets to which users are entitled, without the approval, consent, or direction of any third party. (c) Treatment Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a non-controlling developer or provider— (1) shall not be treated as— (A) a money transmitting business, as defined in section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, and the regulations promulgated under that section; or (B) engaged in money transmitting, as defined in section 1960 of title 18, United States Code; and (2) on or after the date of enactment of this Act, shall not be otherwise subject to any registration requirement that is substantially similar to a requirement (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) that applies to an entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), solely on the basis of— (A) creating or publishing software to facilitate the creation of, or providing maintenance services to, a distributed ledger or a service associated with a distributed ledger; (B) providing hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody or safekeeping of the digital assets of the customer; or (C) providing infrastructure support to maintain a distributed ledger service. (d) Clarification of treatment Subsection (c) shall not modify the application of section 1960(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States Code, to any person (referred to in this subsection as the initial person) that acts with the specific intent to transfer, on behalf of another person, funds that are known by the initial person to be— (1) derived from a criminal offense; or (2) intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity. (e) Rules of construction Nothing in this section may be construed— (1) to affect whether a developer or provider of a distributed ledger service is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a money transmitter, or as engaged in money transmitting, under applicable Federal or State law, including laws relating to anti-money laundering or countering the financing of terrorism, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (2) to affect whether a developer or provider is otherwise subject to classification or treatment as a financial institution under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, this Act, any amendment made by this Act, or any Act enacted after the date of enactment of this Act, based on conduct outside the scope of subsection (c); (3) to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property; (4) to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section; or (5) to create a cause of action or impose liability under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Limits of this section review

  • This detail group explains its assigned primary sections. Shared context was read for interpretation; its standalone analysis belongs to the owning group listed in the overview’s reading guide. “Outside this group” describes the supplied excerpt boundary, not absence from the bill. This group alone cannot establish whole-bill completeness.
  • Section 906 is outside this group’s excerpt. Its general effective-date rule is not established by this detail review, and enactment-relative deadlines cannot be converted into calendar dates here.
  • Sections 103–110, including section 104’s covered-token definition and certification rules, are outside this group’s excerpt. The referenced digital-commodity definition and external statutory context are not reproduced here. Their contents and treatment elsewhere cannot be verified by this detail review; consult the overview’s reading guide.
  • Section 501(h)(1) ties initial public posting to a notice becoming effective under subsection (e)(3), but the supplied subsection (e)(3) addresses updated applications and status reports rather than a notice-effective date. The initial posting deadline is therefore unclear.
  • Section 509 provides automatic approval after an extended review deadline while separately requiring joint approval for projects involving another agency's regulations. Their interaction is not fully specified. The section requires a minimum project duration and extension procedures but states no general maximum duration.
  • Many substantive details depend on future agency rules, including disclosure tailoring, staking-service eligibility, certification evidence, sandbox conditions, and treatment of ongoing decentralized-finance software activities.
  • The actions record is a dated September 17, 2026 snapshot. It does not establish events after that date, and the absence of a later action in this bundle does not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
  • No earmark requests, disclosures, accompanying committee analysis, or complete amendment history are supplied. The category review cannot establish the absence of riders, earmarks, or targeted benefits elsewhere in the bill or other versions.
  • Section 602’s general NFT transaction safe harbor and resale rules were considered for targeted-benefit classification. They describe the proposal’s central securities treatment of a broad asset class; that policy scope alone does not establish a materially narrow preferential beneficiary. They remain in the provisions, while the separately conditioned good-faith penalty protection for non-originators and unrelated persons remains a targeted-benefit finding.
  • Section 604(e)(2) states that financial-institution treatment for conduct outside subsection (c) is unaffected. Interactions with provisions outside this excerpt cannot be verified here, so this detail review does not establish the ultimate financial-institution treatment of outside-scope conduct.
Customer protections, agency coordination, funding, housing and implementation

These proposed sections would change how certain digital assets are handled when a financial firm fails, require customer risk education and disclosures, and coordinate federal oversight. They would authorize funding for financial-crime enforcement. A separate housing provision would redistribute community development grants according to housing growth. This group also explains the proposed deadlines and effective-date rules.

Check the sources
Section 741 of title 11, United States Code, is amended
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Section 746(b) of title 11, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking cash or a security and inserting cash, a security, an ancillary asset, or a digital commodity.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
in any liquidation proceeding under subchapter III or IV of chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, those provisions shall be construed to treat ancillary assets and digital commodities held for customers as customer property governed by title 11, United States Code, and required to be distributed according to such title
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to securities or cash held by a broker-dealer and such assets and related claims shall be governed exclusively by the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to deposits held by a bank or commodity contracts, which shall be governed by the relevant applicable law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall require digital asset intermediaries to provide clear and accessible educational materials to the public, including— (1) an overview of how distributed ledger systems function; (2) a description of common risks associated with digital assets; (3) a description of the differences between digital asset markets and traditional financial markets; (4) information on reporting and disclosure requirements related to digital asset transactions and securities which may be accompanied by network tokens or ancillary assets; and (5) guidance on recognizing fraudulent schemes and instructions for reporting suspected fraud.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission, after consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, shall issue rules requiring written disclosures regarding the treatment of customer assets in the event of an insolvency, resolution, or liquidation proceeding
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
before a digital commodity, a payment stablecoin, or a security involving a unit of a digital commodity is received, acquired, or held by the broker or dealer for the account of the investor
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall jointly establish the Joint Advisory Committee on Digital Assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Commission shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
coordinated supervision and enforcement with respect to registrants
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
For the purposes of developing policy relating to digital assets, acquiring information technology resources, funding the operations described in sections 202 and 203 of this Act, and enforcement of the laws within its jurisdiction relating to digital assets, there is authorized to be appropriated
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until September 30, 2027. (2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2027, to remain available until September 30, 2028. (3) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2028, to remain available until September 30, 2029. (4) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2029, to remain available until September 30, 2030. (5) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2030, to remain available until September 30, 2031.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
at or above the median housing growth improvement rate for all eligible recipients other than extremely high-growth recipients, or if an eligible recipient is an extremely high-growth recipient
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
below the median housing growth improvement rate for all eligible recipients other than extremely high-growth recipients, the Secretary shall decrease the amount that would otherwise be allocated to the eligible recipient under section 106 for that fiscal year by 10 percent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Except as otherwise provided, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, each applicable regulator shall adopt rules to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, through appropriate notice and comment rulemaking.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall take effect on the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, except that, if a provision of this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, requires a rulemaking, that provision shall take effect on the later of— (1) the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act; or (2) the date that is 60 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the final rule implementing the provision
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 701 would add ancillary assets and digital commodities to specified stockbroker-bankruptcy definitions and customer-claim provisions, with conforming cross-reference changes. In the specified Chapter 7 liquidations, these assets held for customers would be customer property distributed under bankruptcy law. The changes would not apply to broker-dealer securities or cash, bank deposits or commodity contracts, which would remain under the laws identified in the text.

Check the sources
Section 741 of title 11, United States Code, is amended
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Section 746(b) of title 11, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking cash or a security and inserting cash, a security, an ancillary asset, or a digital commodity.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
in any liquidation proceeding under subchapter III or IV of chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, those provisions shall be construed to treat ancillary assets and digital commodities held for customers as customer property governed by title 11, United States Code, and required to be distributed according to such title
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to securities or cash held by a broker-dealer and such assets and related claims shall be governed exclusively by the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section may be construed to apply to deposits held by a bank or commodity contracts, which shall be governed by the relevant applicable law
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 702 would treat digital-commodity purchases, sales, loans, credit and other transactions with the listed financial intermediaries as commodity contracts for specified bankruptcy and financial-resolution provisions, and as margin payments for one additional bankruptcy provision. This is a proposed insolvency safe harbor, but the referenced laws are not reproduced, so the supplied text alone does not establish all resulting protections or creditor consequences.

Check the sources
A purchase, sale, or loan of, a margin loan or other extension of credit on, or a repurchase, reverse repurchase, or other transaction involving, a unit of a digital commodity occurring with a commodity broker, stockbroker, financial institution, financial participant, or securities clearing agency shall be deemed to be
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a commodity contract for purposes of— (A) sections 362(b)(6), 362(o), 546(e), 553, 556, 561, and 562 of title 11, United States Code; (B) section 11 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1821); (C) section 210 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5390); and (D) section 5(b)(2)(C) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78eee(b)(2)(C)); and (2) a margin payment for purposes of section 548(d)(2)(B) of title 11, United States Code
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 801 would require the SEC and CFTC to make intermediaries provide accessible public education about distributed ledgers, digital-asset risks, differences from traditional markets, reporting and disclosure requirements, and recognizing and reporting fraud.

Check the source
The Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall require digital asset intermediaries to provide clear and accessible educational materials to the public, including— (1) an overview of how distributed ledger systems function; (2) a description of common risks associated with digital assets; (3) a description of the differences between digital asset markets and traditional financial markets; (4) information on reporting and disclosure requirements related to digital asset transactions and securities which may be accompanied by network tokens or ancillary assets; and (5) guidance on recognizing fraudulent schemes and instructions for reporting suspected fraud.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 802 would preserve Federal Trade Commission authority over specified token commerce, including deceptive advertising, consumer education and unlawful restraints of trade. For this section, consumer tokens are primarily obtained for use or redemption, and nonfungible tokens are distinct, noninterchangeable tokens representing specified items or rights. Existing authority under federal consumer financial laws would neither expand nor contract.

Check the sources
primarily acquired for a consumptive purpose, including redemption for a specified good or service at the time of sale or within a reasonable time after sale, as defined by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to rule
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
is individually identifiable and distinguishable from any other digital asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
is not interchangeable on a 1-to-1 basis with any other token or digital asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed as limiting or abridging the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
including deceptive acts with respect to advertising and endorsements relating to nonfungible tokens and digital consumer tokens
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
consumer education relating to fraudulent digital asset activity; or (5) investigating unlawful restraints of trade in the digital asset industry
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may be construed to expand, contract, or otherwise affect the jurisdiction or authority with respect to the Federal consumer financial laws under the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
represents ownership of, or rights in, a work of authorship, art, a collectible, a membership, an access credential, a certificate of authenticity, an in-game or in-application item, or another similar specific item or discrete digital or physical good, service, or benefit;
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 803 would require a joint SEC–CFTC study of retail customers' digital-asset financial literacy, useful disclosures, educational methods, coordination, partnerships and measures of improvement. It would specifically examine current efforts in rural and majority-minority communities and develop a strategy with measurable goals where practicable. A report to the specified Senate and House committees would be due within one year of enactment.

Check the sources
The Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall jointly conduct a study
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the efficacy of current financial literacy efforts with a focus on rural communities and communities with majority-minority populations
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the most useful and understandable relevant information, including clear disclosures, that retail digital asset customers need to make informed financial decisions before engaging with or purchasing a digital asset
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
a strategy (including, to the extent practicable, measurable goals and objectives) to increase financial literacy of investors regarding digital assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall jointly submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives a written report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 804 would require SEC rules within 270 days of enactment, after consultation with the CFTC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Brokers and dealers would have to give written explanations of insolvency treatment before receiving, acquiring or holding specified digital commodities, payment stablecoins or securities involving digital commodities for an investor, and afterward at an SEC-set frequency. The rules would address how that treatment differs from securities and cash.

Check the sources
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission, after consultation with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, shall issue rules requiring written disclosures regarding the treatment of customer assets in the event of an insolvency, resolution, or liquidation proceeding
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
before a digital commodity, a payment stablecoin, or a security involving a unit of a digital commodity is received, acquired, or held by the broker or dealer for the account of the investor
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
after the provision of the disclosures under paragraph (1), at such frequency as the Commission may prescribe
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
how the treatment described in paragraph (1) differs from the treatment of securities and cash
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 901 would establish a joint SEC–CFTC digital-assets advisory committee to advise on regulation, coordination and implementation, share evaluation methods and recommend ways to resolve agency disputes. Its recommendations would not bind either agency or create legal rights. Agencies would have to publish assessments of covered findings and recommendations and respond formally within 90 days.

Check the sources
shall jointly establish the Joint Advisory Committee on Digital Assets
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
develop and share objective methods and best practices for evaluating digital asset networks and activities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
issue nonbinding recommendations to assist in resolving disputes between the Commissions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
promptly publish a public statement each time the Committee submits a finding or nonbinding recommendation
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
provide the Committee with a formal written response not later than 90 days after the date of submission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall not create any legal rights or obligations, and shall not limit or delay the independent authority of either of the Commissions
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(b) Purpose (1) In general The Committee shall— (A) provide the Commissions with official findings and nonbinding recommendations on— (i) the rules, regulations, oversight, and other matters of the Commissions relating to digital assets, including with respect to regulatory harmonization between the Commissions; (ii) how to further the regulatory harmonization of digital asset policy between the Commissions or areas in which that harmonization should occur; and (iii) the implementation by the Commissions of this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, including with respect to regulatory harmonization between the Commissions, memoranda of understanding, and the CFTC-SEC Micro-Innovation Sandbox established pursuant to section 501;
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The committee would have four-year non-federal member terms, meet at least twice annually and ordinarily reimburse travel without paying members compensation. Its charter, appointments and first meeting would be due within 90, 120 and 180 days of enactment. Funding would depend on available funds. It would initially last ten years, with possible successive two-year renewals. The text caps nongovernmental voting members at 14 but requires eight listed appointments per agency, including a state securities regulator for each. It does not explain how the cap, appointment list and nongovernmental label fit together; this analysis does not assume that the state-regulator positions resolve the apparent inconsistency.

Check the sources
not more than 14 nongovernmental voting members
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
For each of the Commissions, the appointees under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall include— (i) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(A); (ii) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(B); (iii) 1 individual described in paragraph (2)(C); (iv) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(D); and (v) 1 individual described in paragraph (2)(E).
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Each non-Federal member of the Committee shall be appointed for a term of 4 years.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
serve without compensation; and (B) while away from the home or regular place of business of the member in the performance of services for the Committee, be allowed travel expenses
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
not less frequently than twice annually
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, adopt a joint charter for the Committee; (2) not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, make the appointments required under subsection (d)(1); and (3) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, hold the initial meeting
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subject to the availability of funds, the Commissions shall jointly fund the Committee.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Committee shall remain in effect for 10 years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may renew the Committee for successive 2-year periods by publishing a notice in the Federal Register
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(E) a State securities regulator.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(d) Membership and leadership (1) Non-federal members; size and composition (A) In general The Commissions shall appoint to the Committee not more than 14 nongovernmental voting members who— (i) represent a broad spectrum of interests, equally divided between the Commissions; and (ii) serve at the pleasure of the appointing Commission. (B) Specific members For each of the Commissions, the appointees under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall include— (i) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(A); (ii) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(B); (iii) 1 individual described in paragraph (2)(C); (iv) 2 individuals described in paragraph (2)(D); and (v) 1 individual described in paragraph (2)(E). (2) Members described A member described in this paragraph is— (A) an individual who is employed by, or is a related person with respect to, a digital asset market participant; (B) a person registered with either of the Commissions and that is engaged in activities relating to digital assets; (C) an individual engaged in academic research relating to digital assets; (D) a retail user of digital assets; and (E) a State securities regulator. (3) NIST The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or the designee of the Director, shall serve in an advisory capacity as a nonvoting, ex officio member of the Committee, and shall not be excluded from any proceedings, meetings, discussions, or deliberations of the Committee, except that the chair of the Committee, upon an affirmative vote of the Committee, may exclude the Director or the designee from any proceedings, meetings, discussions, or deliberations of the Committee when necessary to safeguard and promote the free exchange of confidential information. (4) Co-designated Federal officers; commissioner support (A) Co-designated Federal officers (i) In general Each Commission shall designate 1 Federal officer to serve as a co-designated Federal officer of the Committee. (ii) Shared duties The duties required by section 1009(e) of title 5, United States Code, to be carried out by a designated officer or employee of the Federal Government with respect to the Committee shall be shared by the Federal officers of the Committee who are co-designated under clause (i). (B) Commissioner support (i) In general Commissioners of the Commissions may be supported by officers or employees of the respective Commission who may prepare or transmit materials, coordinate with agency staff, liaise with Committee leadership, propose agenda items, gather information, and otherwise support the participation of that commissioner in Committee business, in an ex officio, nonvoting capacity. (ii) Rule of construction An officer or employee described in clause (i) shall not be considered to be a member of the Committee for purposes of chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code. (C) Information sharing The co-designated Federal officers under subparagraph (A) and the officers or employees of the respective Commissions providing support under subparagraph (B) shall share information about digital asset activities under this Act, in accordance with section 902, including with regard to preventing insider trading. (5) Committee leadership The members of the Committee shall elect, from among the membership of the Committee, a secretary and an assistant secretary. (6) Rotating chair The chair and vice chair of the Committee shall rotate annually between the Commissions, with the Commission designating the chair in even-numbered calendar years, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission designating the chair in odd-numbered calendar years, the Commission designating the vice chair in odd-numbered calendar years, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission designating the vice chair in even-numbered calendar years. (7) Terms; vacancies; holdover (A) In general Each non-Federal member of the Committee shall be appointed for a term of 4 years. (B) Service until new appointment A member of the Committee may continue to serve after the expiration of the term of the member until a successor is appointed. (C) Vacancies A vacancy with respect to membership in the Committee shall be filled only for the remainder of the applicable term. (D) Reappointment A member of the Committee may be reappointed. (8) Status of members A member of the Committee appointed under paragraph (1) shall not be deemed to be an employee or agent of either of the Commissions solely by reason of membership on the Committee.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 902 would require an SEC–CFTC agreement coordinating supervision, enforcement and information sharing. It would preserve CFTC fraud, manipulation and false-reporting authority over commodity sales, and preserve applicable securities insider-trading law, including for digital-asset securities.

Check the sources
The Commission shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
coordinated supervision and enforcement with respect to registrants
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
appropriate information sharing between the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, or false reporting enforcement authorities of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, may be construed to limit or prevent the continued application of applicable law regarding the insider trading of securities, including digital asset securities
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 903 would authorize, rather than directly appropriate, $30 million annually for fiscal years 2026–2030 for the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Each year's funds would remain available through September 30 of the following fiscal year. The stated purposes include digital-asset policy, information technology, enforcement and operations under sections 202 and 203, outside this group’s excerpt. The director could also pay an annual incentive premium up to 20% of basic pay when necessary to attract highly qualified people for certified agency needs.

Check the sources
For the purposes of developing policy relating to digital assets, acquiring information technology resources, funding the operations described in sections 202 and 203 of this Act, and enforcement of the laws within its jurisdiction relating to digital assets, there is authorized to be appropriated
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
(1) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until September 30, 2027. (2) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2027, to remain available until September 30, 2028. (3) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2028, to remain available until September 30, 2029. (4) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2029, to remain available until September 30, 2030. (5) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2030, to remain available until September 30, 2031.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
may pay an annual incentive premium of not more than 20 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for a position if necessary to attract highly qualified individuals for positions that the Director has certified to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management reflect the needs of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 904 would change community development block grant allocations for qualifying metropolitan cities and urban counties. Exclusions cover places meeting both specified lower-rent and below-national-median home-value tests; places with rental vacancy above the national rate; places with a major disaster or emergency declaration during the preceding year; and recipients without legal authority over zoning and permitting ordinances.

Check the sources
a metropolitan city or urban county, as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302), that receives funds under section 106
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the median Small Area Fair Market Rent in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is at or below the 60th percentile of median Small Area Fair Market Rents in the jurisdictions of all covered recipients; and (ii) the median home value in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is below the median home value for the United States
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the annual rental vacancy rate in the jurisdiction of the covered recipient is greater than the national annual rental vacancy rate for the most recent year available
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
during the 1-year period preceding the date on which the Secretary allocates funds under section 106, the jurisdiction of the covered recipient has been the subject of a major disaster or emergency declaration
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the covered recipient lacks the legal authority to enact or update zoning and permitting ordinances
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

The housing formula would compare average annual growth in housing units over two successive five-year windows, using third-quarter endpoints. Its improvement rate would equal current growth minus prior growth, divided by the sum of their absolute values. Recipients below the comparison median would lose 10% of their otherwise applicable allocation. Those at or above the median, or with current growth of at least 4%, would qualify for bonuses funded by the reductions and divided in proportion to their housing-unit counts. The comparison median excludes the at-least-4% group.

Check the sources
beginning with the third quarter of the sixth preceding fiscal year; and (B) ending with the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
beginning with the third quarter of the 11th preceding fiscal year; and (B) ending with the third quarter of the sixth preceding fiscal year
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the quotient of— (A) (i) the current annual growth rate of the eligible recipient, minus (ii) the prior annual growth rate of the eligible recipient; and (B) the sum obtained by adding the absolute values of the current annual growth rate and the prior annual growth rate
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
an eligible recipient for which the current annual growth rate is at or above 4 percent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
at or above the median housing growth improvement rate for all eligible recipients other than extremely high-growth recipients, or if an eligible recipient is an extremely high-growth recipient
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the aggregate amount by which allocations to eligible recipients are decreased under subparagraph (B) for that fiscal year
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the quotient of— (aa) the number of housing units, as of the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year, in the jurisdiction of the eligible recipient, as calculated by the Secretary; and (bb) the number of housing units, as of the third quarter of the preceding fiscal year, in the jurisdictions of all eligible recipients that receive a bonus amount
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
below the median housing growth improvement rate for all eligible recipients other than extremely high-growth recipients, the Secretary shall decrease the amount that would otherwise be allocated to the eligible recipient under section 106 for that fiscal year by 10 percent
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Housing and Urban Development would use Census address data and current block boundaries, with Census and Postal Service assistance, and could shift calculation periods by up to two months to align data. It would publish annual results before allocations and notify eligible recipients within 60 days of enactment, including guidance on reducing housing barriers. Allocation changes would run from the third full fiscal year after enactment through fiscal year 2043 and would not affect amounts appropriated before enactment.

Check the sources
use the Current Address Count Listing Files and other data products, as needed, of the Bureau of the Census tabulated from the Master Address File; and (B) make calculations at the block level, using boundaries that reflect the most current boundaries
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
The Bureau of the Census and the United States Postal Service shall provide any relevant data to the Secretary upon request
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
by not more than 2 months to achieve alignment with the data provided by the Bureau of the Census
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Before allocating funds under section 106 for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall publish a report
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall notify each eligible recipient of the recipient’s housing growth improvement rate
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
best practices and recommendations for policies to reduce regulatory barriers to housing and increase housing supply
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Subsection (b) shall take effect beginning with the third full fiscal year after the date of enactment of this Act and remain in effect through fiscal year 2043.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
This section shall not apply to amounts appropriated before the date of enactment of this Act.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Section 905 would generally require implementing rules within one year of enactment unless another deadline is specified. Section 906 sets a general effective date 360 days after enactment. A provision requiring rulemaking would instead take effect on the later of that date or 60 days after publication of its final implementing rule. These are relative deadlines, not established calendar dates.

Check the sources
Except as otherwise provided, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, each applicable regulator shall adopt rules to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, through appropriate notice and comment rulemaking.
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
shall take effect on the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act, except that, if a provision of this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, requires a rulemaking, that provision shall take effect on the later of— (1) the date that is 360 days after the date of enactment of this Act; or (2) the date that is 60 days after the publication in the Federal Register of the final rule implementing the provision
Official source · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded) · Customer protections, agency coordination, funding, housing and implementation (partial bill review). These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

Findings to examine

The supplied text contains an apparent subject-matter rider. This classification concerns its relationship to the bill's main subject, not an inferred attachment history.

Section 904's Build Now Act would adjust community development block grants according to housing growth. That housing-allocation policy appears unrelated to the digital-asset regulation that forms the bill's main subject. The supplied evidence does not establish when or why it was attached.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
904. Build Now Act
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
Adjustments to community development block grant allocations
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
the Secretary shall adjust the allocation based on the housing growth improvement rate of the eligible recipient
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

Evidence is limited

No finding is asserted for this category in the assigned sections. This is a partial-text detail review and cannot establish whole-bill absence.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The assigned sections include conditional compensation authority for a narrow class of agency positions. This partial review does not establish the absence of other benefits elsewhere.

Section 903 would let FinCEN’s director pay a discretionary annual incentive premium of up to 20% of basic pay when necessary to attract highly qualified individuals to positions certified to the Office of Personnel Management as reflecting FinCEN’s needs. This agency-specific compensation authority appears alongside funding for digital-asset work, but the premium clause itself is not expressly limited to digital-asset positions. It does not guarantee payment to any person or identify individual recipients.

Check the sources
(b) Incentive premium for highly qualified individuals Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury may pay an annual incentive premium of not more than 20 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for a position if necessary to attract highly qualified individuals for positions that the Director has certified to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management reflect the needs of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)
For the purposes of developing policy relating to digital assets, acquiring information technology resources, funding the operations described in sections 202 and 203 of this Act, and enforcement of the laws within its jurisdiction relating to digital assets, there is authorized to be appropriated
Official bill text · Reported to Senate · 2026-06-01 · proposed committee substitute (deleted text excluded)

Limits of this section review

  • This detail group explains its assigned primary sections. Shared context was read for interpretation; its standalone analysis belongs to the owning group listed in the overview’s reading guide. “Outside this group” describes the supplied excerpt boundary, not absence from the bill. This group alone cannot establish whole-bill completeness.
  • The supplied text is a proposed Senate committee substitute. The September 17, 2026 actions snapshot does not establish enactment, the outcome of reconsideration, or developments after that date. House passage does not establish approval of this later substitute.
  • Sections 103–105, 108, 202–203 and 602 are outside this group’s excerpt. The referenced digital-commodity definition and much of the external GENIUS Act, securities and bankruptcy law are not reproduced here. Their contents and treatment elsewhere cannot be verified by this detail review; consult the overview’s reading guide.
  • Section 901 caps nongovernmental voting members at 14 while listing eight appointments per agency, including a state securities regulator for each. All are listed under the capped provision. The text does not explain how the figures and membership labels fit together; the apparent inconsistency remains unresolved.
  • Section 904 does not specify how to calculate its improvement ratio when both growth rates are zero. Its bonus rule includes extremely high-growth recipients, while the reduction rule does not expressly exclude such a recipient whose improvement rate is below the comparison median.
  • Several provisions set deadlines or treatment beginning at enactment, while section 906 supplies a general delayed effective date. The interaction is not expressly resolved for every provision.
  • The bundle lacks complete accompanying earmark disclosures, member requests and committee or conference materials. Findings about riders and targeted benefits are limited to the supplied provisions and do not establish their absence elsewhere.
  • Section 702’s digital-commodity transaction classifications were considered for targeted-benefit classification. The listed financial-counterparty condition identifies the proposed regulatory scope, but the supplied text does not establish that these broad counterparty classes are a materially narrow preferential exception. The provision remains in the substantive analysis; no targeted-benefit finding or creditor consequence is inferred from the absent underlying insolvency laws.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • Reading guide: “Token classification, disclosures and financial-crime controls” covers sections 1–2, 101–111 and 201–204. “Kiosk safeguards and decentralized-finance oversight” covers sections 205–206 and 301–310. “Banking, stablecoin rewards and regulatory testing” covers sections 311–313, 401–405 and 501–503. “Regulatory innovation, software protections and self-custody” covers sections 504–509 and 601–605. “Customer protections, agency coordination, funding, housing and implementation” covers sections 701–702, 801–804 and 901–906. Shared context supports interpretation without repeating its standalone explanation in every group. The overview and final cross-group review use the complete selected Senate replacement text.
  • The complete supplied selected-text document was reviewed as the June 1, 2026 proposed Senate substitute, with deleted text excluded. Partial-source limitations in individual drafts were reassessed against that complete document. House passage does not establish approval of this later text.
  • The supplied Senate substitute does not contain the digital-commodity definition it says the Act adds and does not include the referenced Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act framework. Consequently, the exact asset and entity coverage of central token, intermediary, banking and insolvency provisions cannot be established from this source. This analysis explains the text’s stated directions and conditions only; it does not determine that a specific asset, person or transaction qualifies, reconstruct an absent CFTC registration regime, or infer enactment of the referenced framework. External statutes, including GENIUS Act definitions, are not fully reproduced.
  • Many substantive rules remain for agencies to determine. Section 102 contains distinct 60-day classification and 90-day disclosure-termination certification clocks, plus separate 60-day reporting-exclusion language; their interaction is not fully resolved.
  • Drafting uncertainties include the sandbox's approval and initial-publication provisions, AI automatic approval alongside joint-approval requirements, and the advisory committee's membership categories and cap. Enactment-specific provisions also must be reconciled with section 906's general delay.
  • The housing formula does not specify the result when both growth rates are zero. Its reduction clause does not expressly exempt every extremely high-growth recipient that qualifies for a bonus; no allocation totals or jurisdictional effects are calculated.
  • The official action record ends September 17, 2026. No later status, complete historical research, actual spending, market effects or human review is claimed.
  • Member earmark requests, disclosures and accompanying committee or conference analysis are not supplied. Text-based classifications do not establish formal earmark status, attachment motives or absence in other versions.
  • Sections 301 and 601 differ in whether controlled systems are included in their decentralized-finance trading-protocol definitions, while section 301 requires consistency with section 601. The analysis identifies this unresolved scope issue rather than selecting an interpretation.
  • Section 602’s general NFT transaction safe harbor and resale rules were considered for targeted-benefit classification. They describe the proposal’s central securities treatment of a broad asset class; that policy scope alone does not establish a materially narrow preferential beneficiary. They remain in the provisions, while the separately conditioned good-faith penalty protection for non-originators and unrelated persons remains a targeted-benefit finding.
  • Section 702’s digital-commodity transaction classifications were considered for targeted-benefit classification. The listed financial-counterparty condition identifies the proposed regulatory scope, but the supplied text does not establish that these broad counterparty classes are a materially narrow preferential exception. The provision remains in the substantive analysis; no targeted-benefit finding or creditor consequence is inferred from the absent underlying insolvency laws.
  • Section 306’s voluntary cybersecurity program and its recognition and good-faith-compliance benefits are described in the provisions. They were considered for targeted-benefit classification, but the supplied text does not establish a materially narrow preferential carve-out beyond the program’s generally available eligibility conditions. The analysis therefore retains those facts without a targeted-benefit label.
  • Section 105(a)(2) calls section 4B(b) a registration exemption, but the supplied section 4B(b), added by section 102, describes token and transaction treatment. The Regulation Crypto registration exemption appears in section 103(b). This cross-reference leaves the intended exemption uncertain; the analysis does not substitute a corrected reference or establish eligibility.
  • Section 302(d)(2)(B) says the financial-institution definition shall not apply to the section 604(b)(3) non-controlling class, while section 604(e)(2) preserves possible financial-institution treatment for conduct outside section 604(c). Their interaction for outside-scope conduct is unresolved in the supplied text; this analysis does not treat either clause as settling that question.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 17, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI