PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 1, 1998
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Amendments Act of 1998 - Modifies the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 to expand its purposes to include promotion of economic revitalization and community development through incentives to insured depository institutions that increase lending and other assistance and investment in both economically distressed communities and community development financial institutions. (Sec. 2) Places the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund in the Department of the Treasury, and all Fund functions under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury. (Sec. 3) Authorizes the Fund to offer community development finance activity training programs through grants or cooperative agreements with other organizations (as well as directly or through contracts). Authorizes an insured depository institution to apply for any community enterprise assessment credit for any semiannual period for the amount of new originations of qualified loans and other assistance provided to community development financial institutions in distressed communities. Allows application for credit for the amount of the increase (currently, the amount) of deposits accepted from persons domiciled in the distressed community. Allows credits for assistance other than financial. Revises the formula for determining the amount of an assessment credit for all such activities with respect to new lifeline accounts. Expands the scope of assistance that the Community Enterprise Assessment Credit Board may take into account for purposes of community enterprise assessment credits. Permits the Board to: (1) establish guidelines for analyzing other than technical assistance by an institution to residents of a qualified distressed community; and (2) employ alternative criteria for defining distressed communities. (Sec. 4) Amends the Act to extend the authorization of appropriations for the Act and for small business capital enhancement. (Sec. 5) Amends the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 to redefine a financial institution to include a community development financial institution. Repeals the prior appropriations prerequisite to State participation in the Small Business Capital Enhancement Program. Revises reimbursement guidelines to declare that participating States shall be reimbursed according to criteria established by the Fund, which may include: (1) whether a participating State is creating a new program, or is expanding in scope or scale an existing State program; (2) the need for Fund reimbursement; and (3) the availability of Fund resources.
People & committees
Rep. Vento, Bruce F. [D-MN-4] · D–MN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
Referred to the House Committee on Banking and Financial Services.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E541)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3617 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3617 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3617 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3617 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.