PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3615 / 106th Congress

Rural Local Broadcast Signal Act

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 525.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 2000

Rural Local Broadcast Signal Act - Amends the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to authorize the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service to make loan guarantees (through a specified date) to providers of multichannel video services, including direct broadcast satellite licensees, to improve access to local television broadcasting to all households desiring such service in unserved and underserved rural areas.Requires loan guarantee approval by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.Sets forth satellite carrier loan guarantee qualifications.Authorizes appropriations.Sets forth conditions under which a borrower shall be obliged to carry local broadcast signals without charge.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6] · R–VA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
123 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 525.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 37 (Roll no. 128). (text: CR H2292-2296)

    House roll call 128 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 375 - 37 (Roll no. 128).(text: CR H2292-2296)

    House roll call 128 · Individual votes
  5. The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.

  6. DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3615.

  7. Considered by previous order of the House. (consideration: CR H2283-2302; text of measure as reported in House: CR H2283-2285)

  8. Consideration initiated by previous order of the House.

  9. ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Dreier asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill H.R. 3615; that the bill be considered as read for amendment; that, in lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committees on Agriculture and Commerce now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute which is at the desk be considered as read and adopted; that the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions; and (3) that H. Res. 475 be laid upon the table. Agreed to without objection.

  10. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 475 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3615 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committees on Agriculture and Commerce now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.

  11. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 309.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-508, Part II.

  13. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 106-508, Part II.

  14. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than April 6, 2000.

  15. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than April 5, 2000.

  16. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than April 4, 2000.

  17. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  18. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  19. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  21. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  22. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  23. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  24. House Committee on Judiciary Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than March 31, 2000.

  25. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than March 31, 2000.

  26. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 106-508, Part I.

  27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 106-508, Part I.

  28. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.

  29. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  30. Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property.

  31. Referred to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection.

  32. Executive Comment Requested from USDA.

  33. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  34. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  35. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  36. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  37. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E109)

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3615 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3615 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3615 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3615 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources