PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3593 / 103rd Congress

Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Corridor Act of 1993

For Further Action See H.R.5044.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 20, 1993

Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Corridor Act of 1993 - Establishes the Ohio and Erie Canal National Heritage Corridor in Ohio. Establishes the Ohio and Erie Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission to assist Federal, State, and local authorities and the private sector in the development and implementation of an integrated management plan for the Corridor. Requires the Commission to submit a management plan for the Corridor to the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of Ohio for review and approval. Authorizes the Secretary, upon request of the Commission, to provide technical assistance to the Commission for the Corridor and to provide assistance through the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area. Authorizes the Secretary to accept transfers of real property from the Commission within the boundaries of the Corridor as established in the Corridor Management Plan. Requires property outside the legislated boundaries of the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area which is transferred to the National Park Service by the Commission to be added to and administered as part of the Area. Limits the Federal contribution to the Commission, to be provided on a matching basis, to not more than 50 percent of the total cost of the Commission's annual: (1) administrative expenditures; (2) development expenditures to implement the Corridor Management Plan; and (3) land acquisition expenditures. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Regula, Ralph [R-OH-16] · R–OH

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
18 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. For Further Action See H.R.5044.

  2. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  3. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  4. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

  5. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  6. Introduced in House

  7. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3593 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3593 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3593 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3593 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources