Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

H.R.3552 through Congress

H.R.3552 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseJul 28, 2005IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.3552.

Related Senate bill: S.1869 Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 28, 2005

Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to report to Congress on the creation of digital maps of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units and other protected areas under the digital mapping pilot project. Requires the Secretary to carry out a project to create digital versions of all the remaining John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System maps and protected areas not included in the pilot project.

Establishes a program to provide grants to states to identify, assess, and recommend additional eligible coastal barriers along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts and shore areas of the Great Lakes for inclusion in the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System or for treatment as protected areas.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Gilchrest, Wayne T. [R-MD-1] · R–MD

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Leach, James A. [R-IA-2]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Nov 8, 2005
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Aug 8, 2005
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries and Oceans.
Jul 28, 2005
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Jul 28, 2005
Introduced in House
Jul 28, 2005
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jul 28, 2005 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

S 1869 · Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Source last updated: Aug 15, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3552 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3552, 109th Congress: Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3552

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2005-07-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hr3552/BILLS-109hr3552ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-15T17:58:39Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3552 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3552 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3552, 109th Congress: Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3552

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2005-07-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hr3552/BILLS-109hr3552ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-15T17:58:39Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3552 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3552 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3552, 109th Congress: Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3552

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2005-07-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hr3552/BILLS-109hr3552ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-15T17:58:39Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3552 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3552 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3552, 109th Congress: Coastal Barrier Resources Reauthorization Act of 2005

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3552

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2005-07-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hr3552/BILLS-109hr3552ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-15T17:58:39Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3552 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.