PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3520 / 105th Congress

To adjust the boundaries of the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area and the adjacent Wenatchee National Forest in the State of Washington.

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 408.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 19, 1998

Adjusts the boundary of: (1) the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, Washington, to exclude a certain parcel of land and waters; and (2) the Wenatchee National Forest, to include such parcel. Transfers administrative jurisdiction over Federal land and waters in the parcel from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of Agriculture. Considers the boundaries of the Forest to be those as of January 1, 1965, for purposes of Federal provisions concerning allocation of Land and Water Conservation Fund monies for Federal purposes.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hastings, Doc [R-WA-4] · R–WA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 408.

    2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4259-4260)

    7. Mrs. Chenoweth moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    8. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-560.

    9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 316.

    10. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-560.

    11. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    13. Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands Discharged.

    14. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

    15. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    16. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    17. Executive Comment Requested from USDA, Interior.

    18. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

    19. Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.

    20. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    21. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E429)

    22. Introduced in House

    23. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3520 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3520 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3520 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3520 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources