PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3519 / 113th Congress

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Accountability and Transparency Act of 2013

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 257.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 18, 2013

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Accountability and Transparency Act of 2013 - Amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to: (1) remove the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from the Federal Reserve System, and (2) repeal the authority of the CFPB Director to establish CFPB regional offices in cities in which are located either Federal Reserve Banks or their branches.

Repeals the mandatory annual transfer of funds to the CFPB from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Subjects the CFPB to the regular authorization, budget, and appropriations process of the Department of the Treasury.

Repeals establishment of the CFPB Fund.

Revises authorization of appropriations for FY2010-FY2014 with an authorization for each of FY2014 and FY2015.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Neugebauer, Randy [R-TX-19] · R–TX

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 257.

    2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 113-347.

    3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 113-347.

    4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 24.

    5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    6. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

    7. Introduced in House

    8. Introduced in House

    9. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises Prior to Introduction and Referral.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3519 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3519 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3519 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3519 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources