Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 19, 1998
Fair and Open Elections Act of 1998 - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) to prohibit candidates from accepting contributions from persons other than residents of the State involved in excess of the total contributions accepted from such residents. Increases individual contribution limits with respect to contributions to candidates and their authorized committees and to political committees of national political parties (political party committees). Raises the overall annual limit on individual contributions to $50,000. Provides for indexing of limits on individual contributions. Prohibits contributions through an intermediary or conduit (bundling), but allows a person to facilitate a contribution by providing: (1) advice to another as to how to make a contribution; and (2) addressed mailing material or similar items to another person for use in making a contribution. (Current law requires contributions made through intermediaries to be treated as contributions from the original source.) Bars individuals who are not eligible to vote in Federal elections from making contributions to candidates or political committees. (Sec. 3) Prohibits political party committees from soliciting, expending, or transferring funds which are not subject to FECA requirements. Repeals certain limitations on expenditures by: (1) political party committees in presidential election campaigns; and (2) national or State political party committees in Federal office election campaigns. Requires political party committees to report to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) any transfer of funds made to State political committees or local political parties. (Sec. 4) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow an individual to take a tax credit for up to $100 ($200 for a joint return) of Federal campaign contributions, subject to verification procedures. (Sec. 5) Requires persons who make payments for public communications which mention a political party or clearly identified candidate for Federal office during the 60-day period ending on the date of a general election to report such payments and the source of funds to the FEC. Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to require broadcasting stations that broadcast such communications for which any valuable consideration is accepted to make certain sponsorship information regarding such communications available to the public. (Sec. 6) Entitles eligible House of Representatives candidates to reduced postage rates. Limits such candidates to election expenditures of $700,000. Increases such amount to $1.4 million for candidates against whom independent expenditures are made. Provides for indexing of such limits. (Sec. 7) Requires reports filed with the FEC to be in electronic format. Prohibits a reduction in annual appropriations for the FEC. Lengthens the term of FEC members from six to ten years. (Sec. 8) Increases the contribution amount which triggers a requirement for reporting contributor information to the treasurer of a political committee. (Sec. 9) Requires persons conducting telephone polls relating to Federal elections (other than presidential elections) in which the number of households exceeds a specified threshold to disclose the identity of the poll sponsor to respondents.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.
Referred to House Government Reform
Referred to House Commerce
Referred to House Ways and Means
Referred to the Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Commerce, and Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to House Oversight
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3516 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3516 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3516 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3516 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.