Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 203.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 16, 1993

Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act - Rescinds certain budget authority made to the following entities: (1) the Department of Agriculture; (2) the Department of Commerce; (3) the Department of State; (4) judicial defender services; (5) the Board for International Broadcasting; (6) the United States Information Agency; (7) the Civil Corps of Engineers; (8) the Department of the Interior; (9) the Department of Energy; (10) certain economic assistance funds and military assistance funds appropriated to the President; (11) the Department of the Treasury; (12) the Department of Labor; (13) the Department of Health and Human Services; (14) the Department of Education; (15) the House of Representatives and certain congressional agencies; (16) Department of Defense military construction; (17) the Department of Transportation; (18) the General Services Administration; (19) the Department of Veterans Affairs; (20) the Department of Housing and Urban Development; (21) the Environmental Protection Agency; (22) the Federal Emergency Management Agency; (23) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; (24) the National Science Foundation; and (25) the National Service Initiative.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Natcher, William H. [D-KY-2] · D–KY

Committees

Appropriations Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Nov 16, 1993
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 203.
Nov 16, 1993
Reported by the Committee on Appropriations. H. Rept. 103-368.
Nov 16, 1993
Reported by the Committee on Appropriations. H. Rept. 103-368.
Nov 16, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Nov 16, 1993
Introduced in House
Nov 16, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Nov 16, 1993 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in House · Nov 16, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3511 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3511, 103rd Congress: Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3511

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-11-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3511/BILLS-103hr3511rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:48:57Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3511 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3511 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3511, 103rd Congress: Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3511

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-11-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3511/BILLS-103hr3511rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:48:57Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3511 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3511 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3511, 103rd Congress: Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3511

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-11-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3511/BILLS-103hr3511rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:48:57Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3511 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3511 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3511, 103rd Congress: Fiscal Year 1994 Rescission Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/3511

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1993-11-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr3511/BILLS-103hr3511rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-26T13:48:57Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3511 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.