PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3499 / 103rd Congress

To amend the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act.

Became Public Law No: 103-425.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 13, 1994

Amends the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act to require the Director of Dependents' Education to establish for teachers a voluntary leave transfer program. Authorizes the Director to establish a voluntary leave bank program for such teachers.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McCloskey, Frank [D-IN-8] · D–IN

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Post Office and Civil Service Committee
  • Education and Workforce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 103-425.

    2. Became Public Law No: 103-425.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H11423)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H11423)

    10. Mr. McCloskey asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.

    11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

    13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

    14. Amendment SP 2650 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

    15. Amendment SP 2650 proposed by Senator Breaux for Senator Levin.

    16. Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S14681)

    17. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 709.

    18. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Glenn without amendment. With written report No. 103-396.

    19. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Glenn without amendment. With written report No. 103-396.

    20. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    21. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    22. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    23. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    24. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

    25. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    26. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5788-5789)

    27. Ms. Norton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 103-598, Part I.

    29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 103-598, Part I.

    30. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute.

    31. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits.

    33. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).

    34. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    35. Referred to the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education.

    36. Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    37. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

    38. Introduced in House

    39. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.3499 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.3499 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.3499 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.3499 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources