To protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land, and for other purposes.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 439.

H.R.3476 through Congress

H.R.3476 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseDec 13, 2001IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.3476.

Related Senate bill: S.2989 A bill to protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · Oct 1, 2002

Prohibits transferring or otherwise making available for condemnation specified land located in Riverside County, California, that is held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians until: (1) the Secretary of the Interior renders a final decision on the pending fee to trust application concerning such land; and (2) final decisions have been rendered regarding all appeals relating to that application decision; or (3) such fee to trust application is withdrawn.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Issa, Darrell E. [R-CA-48] · R–CA

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 1, 2002
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 439.
Oct 1, 2002
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-708.
Oct 1, 2002
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-708.
Jul 10, 2002
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Jul 10, 2002
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Jun 19, 2002
Executive Comment Received from Interior.
Apr 24, 2002
Executive Comment Received from Interior.
Apr 17, 2002
Committee Hearings Held.
Dec 19, 2001
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Dec 13, 2001
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Dec 13, 2001
Introduced in House
Dec 13, 2001
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Oct 1, 2002 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in House · Dec 13, 2001 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

S 2989 · A bill to protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3476 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3476, 107th Congress: To protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/3476

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2002-10-01.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hr3476/BILLS-107hr3476rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:39:44Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.3476 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3476 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3476, 107th Congress: To protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/3476

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2002-10-01.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hr3476/BILLS-107hr3476rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:39:44Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3476 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3476 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3476, 107th Congress: To protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/3476

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2002-10-01.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hr3476/BILLS-107hr3476rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:39:44Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3476 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3476 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.3476, 107th Congress: To protect certain lands held in fee by the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians from condemnation until a final decision is made by the Secretary of the Interior regarding a pending fee to trust application for that land, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/3476

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2002-10-01.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hr3476/BILLS-107hr3476rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:39:44Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.3476 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.