Cloture motion on the measure withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate. (consideration: CR S3064)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Mar 11, 2014
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here, with an updated short title.)
Hire More Heroes Act of 2014 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to permit an employer, for purposes of determining whether such employer is an applicable large employer and thus required to provide health care coverage to its employees under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, to exclude employees who have coverage under a health care program administered by the Department of Defense (DOD), including TRICARE, or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Cloture motion on the measure withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate. (consideration: CR S3064)
Cloture motion on the measure presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S3019; text: CR S3019)
Motion by Senator Reid to commit to Senate Committee on Finance with instructions to report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 3093) made in Senate. (consideration: CR S3018-3019; text: CR S3018)
Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S3018-3019)
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3018)
Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (consideration: CR S2984-2993, S3018)
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 96 - 3. Record Vote Number: 143. (consideration: CR S2930; text: CR S2930)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 406 - 1 (Roll no. 115).(text: CR H2276)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2284-2285)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3474.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2276-2278)
Mr. Brady (TX) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. (consideration: CR H2276)
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.3474 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.3474 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.3474 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.3474 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.