Reduce Exacerbated Inflation Negatively Impacting the Nation Act
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 23.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 53 · Passed House · Mar 1, 2023
Reduce Exacerbated Inflation Negatively Impacting the Nation Act
This bill requires the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers to provide an inflation estimate for each executive order that is projected to cause an annual gross budgetary or economic effect of at least $1 million.
The estimate must determine whether the executive order will have
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
no significant impact on inflation,
a quantifiable inflationary impact on the Consumer Price Index or the Producer Price Index, or
a significant impact on inflation that cannot be quantified at the time the estimate is prepared.
The estimate must also (1) incorporate the inflationary impact of the debt servicing costs associated with the executive order; and (2) take into account the spending patterns of military personnel and of residents of non-metropolitan areas, including rural areas and farm households.
The requirements do not apply to executive orders that (1) provide for emergency assistance or relief at the request of any state or local government or an official of the government, or (2) are necessary for national security or the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations.
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 347.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the question of agreeing to the amendments, which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Yakym amendment No. 15.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roy amendment No. 14, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 14.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 13.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 12.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Omar amendment No. 11.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H976-988)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 347 as unfinished business.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Langworthy moved that the Committee rise.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Langworthy amendment No. 10.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lee (NV) amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lee (NV) amendment No. 9.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 8.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 7.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 6.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cloud amendment No. 4.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Bobert amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Boebert demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Boebert amendment No. 3.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Comer amendment No. 2.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Bost amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 166, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bost amendment No. 1.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 347.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Carol D. Miller to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 166 and Rule XVIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 347 and H.J. Res. 30. Provides for consideration of H.R. 347 and H.J. Res. 30 and one hour of debate on each measure. The rule makes in order amendments to H.R. 347 printed in the report and provides for one motion to recommit on each measure.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 166. (consideration: CR H942-953)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 166 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 347 and H.J. Res. 30. Provides for consideration of H.R. 347 and H.J. Res. 30 and one hour of debate on each measure. The rule makes in order amendments to H.R. 347 printed in the report and provides for one motion to recommit on each measure.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.347 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.347 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.347 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.347 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.