PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3469 / 116th Congress

Covert Testing and Risk Mitigation Improvement Act of 2019

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 9, 2019

Covert Testing and Risk Mitigation Improvement Act of 2019

This bill establishes standards for the covert testing process that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) uses to evaluate its aviation security operations.

Specifically, the TSA must

implement an internal, risk-informed covert testing process for aviation security operations that can yield statistically valid results;

execute at least three covert testing projects each year that are designed to identify systemic vulnerabilities in the transportation security system;

establish a system to address and mitigate the vulnerabilities identified and assessed pursuant to the testing process;

compile a list of the vulnerabilities, including a brief description of the nature of each vulnerability; and

report the status of the vulnerabilities to Congress as part of its annual budget submission.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Cummings, Elijah E. [D-MD-7] · D–MD

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Homeland Security Committee
24 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9366)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9366)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3469.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9366-9367)

  7. Ms. Clarke (NY) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 240.

  9. Reported by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 116-298.

  10. Reported by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 116-298.

  11. Ordered to be Reported.

  12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  13. Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security Discharged.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.

  15. Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

  16. Introduced in House

  17. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3469 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3469 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3469 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3469 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources