PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.3465 / 103rd Congress

Wetlands Protection and Management Act

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 8, 1993

Wetlands Protection and Management Act - Prohibits the revision of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual before the Committee on Wetlands Characterization of the National Research Council publishes a specified report. Permits revisions afterward if the revisions: (1) take into account the findings and recommendations of the report; and (2) are made after field testing and public notice and comment. Requires wetlands identification and delineation to be carried out through the Manual until revised in accordance with this Act. Directs the Chief of the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Secretaries of the Army and the Interior to issue a memorandum of agreement which sets forth procedures for identifying and delineating wetlands on agricultural lands. Requires the SCS Chief, after the issuance of the memorandum, to carry out such activities on agricultural lands and on non-agricultural lands which are contiguous to, or contained within, agricultural lands. Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize grants to States for wetlands conservation planning. Requires the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to ensure, in issuing permits for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters, that there is no net loss of wetland acreage, functions, and values. Establishes procedures for the issuance of permits for minor discharges into wetlands. Creates a Small Landowners Assistance Account to provide technical assistance to private landowners to aid in compliance with permit requirements. Authorizes the issuance of general permits on a State or nationwide basis for any category of activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material if the activities are similar in nature and will cause only minimal adverse environmental effects when performed separately and cumulatively. Exempts prior converted cropland (unless abandoned) and certain waters and activities from regulation under dredged and fill permit provisions. Establishes administrative appeal procedures for determinations of regulatory jurisdiction over property, permit issuance or denial, and imposition of administrative penalties. Requires the Administrator to establish compensatory wetlands mitigation guidelines. Provides for mitigation banks (wetlands restoration projects that provide advance mitigation to offset foreseeable wetlands losses from future discharges of dredged or fill material). Establishes wetlands delineator training and certification programs and wetlands education and outreach programs. Includes "wetlands" in the definition of navigable waters. Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Wetlands Reserve Program is an effective program and should be fully funded.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Studds, Gerry E. [D-MA-10] · D–MA

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
  • Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  2. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

  4. Executive Comment Requested from Army.

  5. Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Natural Resources.

  6. Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Credit and Rural Development.

  7. Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  8. Referred to the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.

  9. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

  10. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2809-2810)

  11. Introduced in House

  12. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.3465 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.3465 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.3465 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.3465 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources