PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Department Operations and Nutrition.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 3, 1993
Amends the Internal Revenue Code (as amended by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) to repeal: (1) the increase in the earned income tax credit; and (2) the increase in the presidential election campaign fund checkoff. Amends the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to repeal the moratorium on the collection of disallowances under the child welfare services provisions of the Social Security Act. Amends the Food Stamp Act (as amended by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) to repeal and reverse certain provisions which would increase the costs of the food stamp program.
People & committees
Rep. Schiff, Steven [R-NM-1] · R–NM
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Department Operations and Nutrition.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Elections.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H8712)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3442 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3442 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3442 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3442 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.