PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 3, 1993
Juvenile Firearm Regulation Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit the transfer of a firearm or ammunition to an individual under age 18, unless a parent or legal guardian has consented to the transfer. Prohibits a juvenile from possessing a firearm or ammunition, except with respect to a juvenile: (1) who is under the supervision of an adult who is not prohibited by Federal, State, or local law from possessing a firearm; or (2) while engaged in a course of instruction or in hunting, target shooting, or other sporting activities, or while transporting the firearm or ammunition to or from the site of such activities, to the extent that the possession is specifically authorized by or under State law. Sets penalties for violations of this Act. Limits to six months the maximum term of imprisonment that would be authorized if a juvenile had been tried and convicted as an adult where the juvenile was found to be delinquent by reason of a violation of the prohibition against the unsupervised and unauthorized possession of a firearm or ammunition.
People & committees
Rep. Skaggs, David E. [D-CO-2] · D–CO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
For Further Action See H.R.3098.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H8710, E2768-2769)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.3435 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.3435 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.3435 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.3435 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.